
Discoholic 🪩
taylor price

Kiana Khansmith

No title available
ojovivo
No title available
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Claire Keane
NASA
Jules of Nature
Misplaced Lens Cap
todays bird

titsay
h
we're not kids anymore.
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
One Nice Bug Per Day

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Serbia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia
@unhingedxylophone
Drawing the requests that talk give me part 1 - ?? 😋
Permayandereloli
Identifying as being permanently a yandere loli
Ids: mentality, age, body
No wrong way to identify with this
f2u misc proship stamps. credit not needed!
Stop saying pedophile when you mean sex offender.
Stop saying zoophile when you mean sex offender.
Stop saying necrophile when you mean sex offender.
Stop saying paraphile when you mean sex offender.
Learning to be okay with harmless weirdos will help you overcome a lot of unnecessary discomfort in your life, go outside and have fun :3
people be reposting this but then be against radqueers
so like apparently. bluesky is doing more or less the exact same shit as every other site, when it comes to nsfw. It's really unfortunate bc they drew in many people by being an actually functional and safe place for people to post nsfw and for other users to not have to see it bc of content labels. Now you can just arbitrarily decide that the porn someone drew looks "nonconsentual" and get their shit taken down. This will benefit precisely 0 people. fictional characters can't "consent" or "not consent" bc they're fucking fictional. But people can and HAVE had their whole accounts sniped for drawing porn that could be interpreted as being of a nonconsentual situation. This will likely result in people avoiding using the content warning system to avoid getting sniped. This will benefit precisely 0 people.
so do antis ever have an actual argument for why writing noncon, incest, abuse, etc. is bad and condoning those behaviors IRL, but media glorifying graphic violence is fine? bc all the antis I’ve asked tend to deflect or treat it like a bad faith question.
Because that would then force them to acknowledge that they don't actually care about mainstream media and simply find it easier to target and harass individual people with moral flag waving and threats over massive corporations who would either outright ignore them or smash them with the legal hammer.
What's easier; hounding a teenager online with death threats because they write incest fanfic or forcing international censorship of Game of Thrones and prosecuting George R. R. Martin as an incestuous murdering rapist who creates child pornography?
What's easier; needing no argument other than; "I think its gross and immoral" as defence for your virtue signalling or needing very extensive knowledge of the law, sociology and psychology in order to accurately formulate and prove that creating and/or consuming content relative to specific subjects is more harmful than beneficial and has direct action consequences?
And thus, the answer. Option A is indefinitely easier and more manageable, and more outcome-effective. Antis then real like they're "empowering real change" because if they successfully bully someone off of a platform, they were Right All Along and their activism is Working.
(Whereas if they went after Universal Studios, for example, they would probably be sued into oblivion and laughed at for generations to come. Not very empowering or uplifting.)
I hate the argument of "it would be illegal irl tho!!" Not just cause, that obviously doesn't make it illegal in fiction, and so it half the stuff in fiction.
But because it's so infuriating how many people see "illegal" and "morally bad" as the same thing. And never unpack why those things are bad.
CSEM and real life child abuse is bad. Not just cause it's illegal, but because it hurts a child. In some countries, there's less or no protections put in place legally to protect kids. That doesn't mean it's okay.
Being lgbtq, most people in these conversations can agree, is completely fine and doesn't hurt anyone. Yet it is still illegal in many places. Does that mean actually it's morally bad? NO.
And when you start thinking "oh this thing is icky, must be illegal", you're letting yourself completely ignore the actual damage things do or placing the blame in the wrong place.
Furthermore, I had someone turn to me and say that since I like adult x minor, I'd probably have "cp" if it was legal. And no I wouldn't, not just cause I'm simply not attracted to children, but because regardless of what the law says, I'd still think it was morally wrong, harmful and disgusting to own or support in any manner.
I don't like adult x minor just cause its the legal option. I like adult x minor ships and ALSO understand that it is not morally bad and doesn't do harm. That is why it's okay, not just cause it happens to be legal to ship it. Because I do not base my morality solely off the law, but my own understanding of the world and what causes harm.
"xyz DNI" blocking people is YOUR job, sorry. You cannot ask the world to simply move around you, you have to take control of your online experience or you will be fucking miserable forever. Most people don't read your bio/pinned/carrd before touching the posts that cross their dash anyways.
Also maybe worry less about if someone who likes something you hate clicks on your tumblr post. I promise it is not that fucking serious.
Also-also if you have this DNI because your friends/moots said or implied you have to otherwise you're somehow Bad and/or will be punished by them if you don't, that's kind of fucked and maybe you need less controlling friends.
I know you feel ethically helpless on this bitch of an earth but I promise you, telling people with certain fetishes or god forbid media interests not to interact with your posts is doing less than nothing to make the world any different, but it IS stressing you the fuck out to be worried about if the clicks you get on the internet are coming from someone who likes to imagine The Wrong Fictional Characters kissing.
For the love of god, shipping is not that fucking important. I promise you, whatever the fuck you think you know about someone based on what they ship can be determined by the shit they actually do in the real world about real things that actually happen.
Media consumption is not activism and fandom is not the battleground upon which Ethics And Morals will live or die. It is playing pretend. Please please please get some perspective
This generation has never lived through 'if it exists, there's porn of it,' and that sucks! Yes, there is porn of EVERYTHING! Even if you can't find it, it's out there, and that's WONDERFUL AND GOOD! There's an attraction to literally EVERYTHING, and I love that.
"Is someone really into this?"
YES. THERE ARE BILLIONS OF US, AND NO NEW EXPERIENCES, NOTHING IS ORIGINAL. IF YOU CAN THINK OF IT, SOMEONE IS GETTING OFF TO IT, AND I LOVE THAT.
Don't like, don't watch. Not everything is for you. Don't harass others over your pearl clutching, no one cares that this offended you. Is anyone hurt (besides your sensitivities)? Did anyone die? Is anyone getting their rights and life taken from them? No? Then, fuck off.
you shouldnt be allowed to talk about "weird fetishes" on youtube unless you also have a weird fetish
Yeah....
Three of my favorite! :D
Hey vincent....whatcha doin...?
I TRIED YOOO