★
sheepfilms
taylor price
#extradirty
occasionally subtle
No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
todays bird
art blog(derogatory)
titsay
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Kiana Khansmith
Mike Driver
Today's Document
tannertan36
macklin celebrini has autism
pixel skylines
wallacepolsom
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
cherry valley forever
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from Tunisia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from Spain
seen from Tunisia
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@very-martyrdumb
Welcome to my blog!! Vmdb (vermdub) for short, i like drawing stuff :P
This is just a way to look at art that i make cuz it’s hard to find it through all the reblogs -_-
🔪 oc art
🌷fanart🌷
🎬 gachiakuta
🎼 creepypasta
🎧 scott pilgrim
🎹 hetalia
🎤 other
Other stuff ^_^
📰 stamps
Divider credz:
lobster-graphics sperocorodolium
happy alfred day… had to quickly make this one
3DS found with erosion and barnacles found while diving
some octopus had 900 hours in Pokemon Alpha Sapphire and you just fuckin stole his 3DS
I spent the afternoon arranging our books by size and color (and it’s so satisfying and looks amazing) and my partner came home and stared in shock at the bookcase and then said “i’m a librarian, you can’t do this.”
him: you split up all the song of ice and fire books
me: yeah i know, they’re all primary colors, it’s perfect
him: [self-destructs]
You’re a monster
As a former bookstore employee, this hurts my soul. I mean, sure it looks nice, but how do you find anything?
it has occurred me during this process that apparently not everyone thinks about books by what color they are? like, literally when i’m looking for a book, i picture it in my mind. i have a very…tactile experience with the books i read and idk! i thought everyone did that lol.
my partner was like “how will i find [this book] for instance” and i replied “easy, it’s purple” and he looked at me like i was a witch.
OP your brain is neat and I love you for it you funky little color-coded cupcake. But you’re still a monster.
This actually is interesting in terms of information-seeking behavior, which is a thing librarians think about a lot and often actually study (some library jobs require you to publish, and academic librarians, for instance, will often use the students at the college they work at to study how they search for information in order to figure out how to best provide them services).
When you go for an MLS (Master’s of Library Science, which is a thing, and which is usually required for “professional-level” library work [which is also a weird and contentious concept that I won’t go into here]), one of the things you study is the organization of information. This deals with how to determine what a book or other material is “about"—a concept we tongue-in-cheek call “aboutness"—and how to convey that to a potential user of the item and make it easy for them to find. Things like keywords and subject headings, do I put this book about how often wild birds attack aerial drones in with books about birds or with books about technology, if its a fictional novel do I put fantasy in it’s own section or mix it in with all of the other fiction, so on and so on.
OP is organizing books by how they would look for them. OP’s partner is thinking in terms of aboutness. This is a system that works for OP because it’s their personal library: they know basically what books they own and they only own books that are relevant to them, and if they know what the book looks like, that can be a quick way to find it.
In a library that assumes the public (or people who do not own that particular collection of books) are using the collection, that doesn’t work. Books are often re-issued in multiple covers, or re-bound in new covers when they get worn out, and if the user doesn’t know what the book looks like or is expecting a different cover, they’re lost. That’s why non-personal libraries used standardized cataloging systems like the Dewey Decimal System or Library of Congress System to organize a book by what it’s “about”, and then put books about the same or similar topics together, marked with labels and signage so a person unfamiliar with the book or collection can find their way to it.
Basically, OP’s system works for their own personal library, because it’s best suited to how the primary user—OP themselves—looks for books. OP’s librarian partner is coming from a background of thinking in terms of a public-facing collection, where aboutness is the key criteria and communicating it to a user unfamiliar with the collection is the priority.
And also, OP is a monster.
old tjamt charlie study that I never posted here
The third movie is out in Japan. I am patiently waiting until I can watch it. This new medicine seller is growing on me
Happy pride month to the bisexuals
Today in obscure Doctor Who jokes:
Somebody on Twitter pointed out that the Big Finish companion Hex is canonically from the year 2021, so when he occasionally abbreviates the word "suspicious" to "sus," it's probably an Among Us reference.
The punchline is that this character was actually introduced back in 2004. It was made-up future slang that they happened to get right.
“British writer invents time travel and uses it on One Joke”
mononoke
Hi🍒😊🍒
when me and my colleague stand really close 😌
Divine Ritual
watching twilight and I keep making myself laugh imagining if it was just alucard or any other vampire instead of Edward. POV nausferatu goes to ur school
2x09 — Charlie Goes America All Over Everybody's Ass
obligatory cold war chibis
