"if thoughtcrimes aren't real then why are they called thoughtcrimes" are we actually being serious right now
we should arrest people with ocd for their horrible thoughts /j

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
todays bird
★

bliss lane
Show & Tell
Misplaced Lens Cap

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

roma★
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
Noah Kahan
tumblr dot com

gracie abrams
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
𓃗

pixel skylines

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Not today Justin

Origami Around

tannertan36
Sweet Seals For You, Always

seen from Finland
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Algeria

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
@vincentrabbitt
"if thoughtcrimes aren't real then why are they called thoughtcrimes" are we actually being serious right now
we should arrest people with ocd for their horrible thoughts /j
If you see me like your vent post that is me giving u a lil hug, I do not enjoy your suffering
Being transmasculine is odd cus on one end of the spectrum everyone is telling you that you're privileged and evil and basically just a cis man (even if you're nonpassing), and on the other end you're watching your brothers being raped and murdered and buried under their dead names while being falsely listed as a femicide. (this faulty documention will be wielded as proof of your privilege)
“Trans men don’t expirience transphobia for being a man”
the average threads comment section under a post about Elliot page:
Artfight attack
as a teen, i was constantly harassed by adults enforcing ''dress codes'' on me. I very much experienced this as sexual harassment. I think this is one of many cases where people would more easily understand this as sexual harassment if I described it as if it happened to an adult.
imagine being on your lunch break, and your supervisor comes over to your table, tells you to stand up in front of everyone. they draw everyone's attention to your thighs. they tell you that you have broken the dress code because of the length of your shorts. they tell you to go change (so you do not get the rest of your lunch break). they do this every single day at lunch. every day. so you read the whole dress code front and back, and you choose your clothing carefully to not break it. you bring a cloth tape measure with you to work because they will not believe you. this time when your supervisor tells you that you're breaking dress code, you pull out your tape measure and show that you are within the limit. your supervisor says "I bet you wouldn't want me to bring you to the boss and let him measure it, would you?" it's clearly a threat: if you don't obey then you will be put alone in a room with your boss and he will touch your thighs. you don't know how to respond. you're taken out of lunch again.
this was my experience at school. replace supervisor with "teacher" and boss with "principal." this was sexual harassment. fuck dress codes.
“darkshipping is bad and evil bc fiction effects reality 😡”
okay! so i’ll assume you don’t consume any media that contains murder, r4pe, etc!
“no!! the medias i consume don’t fetishize it like yours do 😡”
okay. first, let’s get the definition of fetishize.
“to treat an object, idea, or person with an irrational, obsessive, or unnatural degree of devotion, desire, or reverence”
most people, even darkshippers, are not treating any of the dark topics with unnatural devotion, desire or reverence, but let’s discuss those who do.
some people definitely treat dark topics with a certain desire. in that case, it is most likely a paraphilia.
68% of adults suffer from a paraphilia. around 5% of that 68% act on them. (i am in no way defending that 5%)
that is not a lot of people, is it? i think it would be obvious to conclude that there is no correlation between ‘dark desires’ and acting on them. therefore, no harm.
“but! so many people do terrible things like that! there’s no way they all fit into the 5%”
OBVIOUSLY. most who act on it, do not suffer from the paraphilia. they simply enjoy holding that level of power over someone.
secondly, let’s discuss the first statement- that fiction effects reality.
fiction definitely effects reality, but it only effects how we feel- not how we act. antis love to use a purposefully vague term. they never give the whole truth.
saying fiction effects how we ACT destroys accountability on individuals who do act on it. it throws the accountability onto the person who made the media they consumed.
anyways, i’m tired and i think i covered all the main points. tell me if there’s anything else i need to cover.
Ciel sleeping between R!Ciel and Sebastian. Inside they are both seething like he will choose me to cuddle in his sleep. Instead, Ciel just cuddles his Bitter Rabbit, blissfully unaware.
HE WILL SO DO THAT. fuck those arguing idiots he has his cute little rabbit :3
but we must also consider the possibility of ciel being cuddled by both. might be a bit too warm and suffocating but hey they love him so much!! he should endure.
Personally I believe R! Ciel would crawl into bed and cuddle with O! Ciel and Sebastian would just sulk and seethe in the corner in his shadow form.
So I just fetched myself some cookies from the kitchen (my cookies/I bought them) there were only three left in the container so I was taking the entire thing upstairs. I decided to give my sister one because she hasn't really had any, and I prefer to consume in twos (ocd) so if I gave her one I would have two left >w<) But then my father asks if he can have one, which I didn't want to share because for one he has been eating most of them anyways– so I tell him no and immediately get hit with crippling anxiety that if I don't share with him something bad will happen. So I give him a cookie and then force him to listen to me (badly) retell a fairytale.
Once upon a time there lived a couple in the woods who had three sons, the youngest of which was called Boots. Every day the father would go into the forest to chop firewood but one day he blew out his back and could no longer do the job, so the couple sent their oldest son into the woods. He was chopping for a little while when he got hungry and decided to sit down and eat the lunch his mother packed him, a loaf of bread some meat and cheese and a flask of wine. As he was eating an old man appears and asks if the oldest son could spare some food.
'I cannot! For if I did I would no longer have enough for myself. Away with you old man before I tear out your beard!' the older brother says and the old man turns him into a rock and then disappears.
The following day the oldest brother had not returned so the couple sent the middle brother out into the woods to chop wood. He was out there for a time before he also got hungry, and the middle brother sat down and laid out the lunch his mother had packed for him, which was equally as rich as his brothers before him. As he was eating the old man appears and asks if he might share with him because he is so hungry.
The middle brother laughs and says 'I cannot! For if I did, what would I have left for myself? Away with you old man, before I poke out your eyes!' the old man harumphs and turns the middle brother into a stump and then vanishes.
The next day the couple sent the youngest brother Boots off into the forest to chop wood, as both his brothers had disappeared and he was the only one for it. So Boots walks into the forest and starts to chop wood for quite a while until eventually he gets hungry. He sits down on a stump to eat the lunch that his mother had packed him– which was much sparser than his brothers. Half a loaf of stale bread, the burnt meat pickings and a flask of wine had the youngest to eat, but just as he was about to the old man appears. Once again he asks, could you please share with him a morsel?
Boots says 'Of course, the food will taste twice as fine when eaten in good company!' and shares it with the old man. Once they finish the old man thanks him and to reward Boots for his charity he turns his axe into pure gold and transforms the chopped wood into chests filled with treasure. Boots is overjoyed and takes his bounty home where he finds his brothers already waiting there for him.
And they live Happily Ever After, The End.
And I tell you this so that I could tell you that ocd is a little bitch that makes me think of this story whenever I don't share my food with others, regardless of circumstances :D
Ooh here’s something that might be interesting abt me!
I have this really weird urge to collect (hoard) everything and anything I see that is shaped like a baby bottle but isn’t a real baby bottle. Like those serum bottles, or this keychain of mine
And I really really really like pressing (regular, not the type on clothing) buttons. Everyday I long to have one of those toy buttons that I just keep pressing as a fidget toy and doesn’t actually do anything.
And I also really like cardboard boxes & the shape of paper bags.
Very good shape. I like shape
i Need more People to Be lolicons And woke. Im tired Of seeing The same Guy whose A lolicon But also Spews the Most racist, Homophobic, transphobic, Misogynistic, xenophobic, Ableist, Every kind Of phobic BS on Twitter and Claims yuri Lovers ruin Everything.
Hashtag we Need more Woke lolicons PRONTO that Also love Yuri
People: Why are you like that?
Me who was sexually and physically abused as a kid, severely emotionally neglected, has not socialized/been completely isolated since 2015/2016, and is also autistic: Yea so I'm stupid :)
*deep long sigh.*
people will just... write this shit and call themselves leftists. They will... absolutely call themselves leftists and not see anything wrong with that.
They'll claim to be "anti art" (whatever that means) and "anti kink" and just... ignore that's something nazi's would wholeheartedly agree with. God, ignorance really is bliss.
And something else too: yeah, it will always be just fiction. Fiction can affect reality if you let it affect it. You have the right to make that kind of movie if you want and people have the responsability to inform themselves on why you would be completely wrong. And that's what proship people are for. Knowledge is everything. People who listen to these kind of stories and agree were not "influenced" or "controlled" by them. They were always bigotted assholes and needed an excuse.
Reality will always influence fiction more, WAY MORE than the opposite.
The reason people will listen is because fascists like you already exist and already believe in this because of REAL LIFE politicians who convince them there's something like "degenerate art" in the first place.
Check-mate.
(same person who says that "hays code was self imposed". yeah because there was no other alternative for american movie directors. It's either that or the fucking church whines and the government applies censorship laws to your art. And to prevent that, the movie industry decided to apply the Hays Code instead. They knew what would have came for them if they decided to do whatever they wanted. So they decided to do what the law would have done anyway.
oh and anyway, Pre-Code era, the government already hated "nasty" movies anyway. Do you remember that they banned Freaks, right? It was banned immediately upon release in multiple states of the US.)
It's interesting how no one bats an eye when characters are murderers, cannibals, violent criminals, and horrible people. Graphic self harm, suicide, mutilation, gore, genocide, and slurs are all A-Okay. Yet the second someone draws two fictional brothers kissing each other, they deserve to be called out and burned at the stake.
Genuinely, why is the standard for ~morality~ so different for what is arguably the most "tame" taboo topic somebody could explore?
I see a new call out every day over some bullshit. "This guy draws incest" who fucking cares. They're not real people. "They're glorifying/romanticizing/fetishizing it!!" One of my main OCs is a violent sociopath and a serial killer. He's a fan favorite. Never once have I depicted him negatively or put out some disclaimer saying "THESE THINGS ARE BAD".
Generally, it's an unspoken understanding that artists and writers who depict things like murder are NOT okay with them IRL. So why exactly do people who draw incest automatically also get labeled as incestuous and condoning it??
"Well everyone knows murder is bad, they're influencing people who don't know better about incest!" If you don't know incest is bad, you're either living in the deep south bumfuck nowhere, or you're a fucking kid and too young to be on the internet anyways.
TLDR; I don't give a shit about some random stranger drawing fictional dudes kissing. If that's all it takes to be considered a proshipper, then so be it. Nobody's saying you have to like it; just block them and move on. Y'all have way too much time on your hands. Some of us have REAL problems in the REAL world.
GRABS you by the THROAT. stop using "narcissistic", "slow", "depressed", "bipolar", "schizophrenic" and the literal R slur (i'm not saying it.) etc etc etc as insults. I don't care if you're neurodivergent and doing this you're still an ableist prick
I'm going to add in 'pedophile' 'Epstein' and 'Diddy' because this shit is way too normalized :D
Someone needs to tell parents everywhere that a child never complaining is NOT a sign of a mentally healthy child, and it is, in fact, the complete opposite of that.
A child that doesn't complain is a child that is afraid of complaining...
Art for Artfight