Ok well it's been cool. If anyone is alive out there follow me on Instagram! @ _therealfake

No title available

Discoholic đȘ©
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
Three Goblin Art
todays bird
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Andulka
NASA
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Claire Keane

if i look back, i am lost
taylor price
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Janaina Medeiros
đȘŒ
Cosmic Funnies
Cosimo Galluzzi
ojovivo
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Australia

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bosnia & Herzegovina
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Brazil
seen from Netherlands
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@vivelerose
Ok well it's been cool. If anyone is alive out there follow me on Instagram! @ _therealfake
thatâs enough emotions for a whole year. ciao
The earlier in the year you reblog this the better it gets
HOLY SHIT, IT WAS THE ORIGINAL ONE
MAKE A WISH
the first post ever on tumblr
I WAS EXPECTING IT TO BE A REMAKE OF SOME SORT HOLY FUCK
WHO THE FUCK KEEPS BRINGING THIS BACK
reblog this because it shows up every blue moon
Marie Antoinette
directed by Sofia Coppola, 2006
Period dramas + Art (parallels)
Help me lol $nq01
đâ€
French rococo masterpost
Marie Antoinette (2006) dir. Sofia Coppola
WATCHED IN 2020:
[4/?] films directed by women » Marie Antoinette (2006) dir. Sofia Coppola
Oh, you were not what was desired, but that makes you no less dear to me. A boy would have been the Son of France, but you, Marie ThérÚse, shall be mine.
Marie Antoinette (2006) // Jean-Honoré Fragonard (1732-1806)
Marie Antoinette (2006)
Marie AntionetteÂ
Costume Tests
When Milena Canonero, the storied costume designer for âMarie Antoinetteâ, spoke about the pre-production process for the film to London Times Magazine in 2006, she offered a revealing piece of information: âWe thought that maybe we could have gone more crazy, but there was just not time.â
The behind-the-scenes photographs here show Kirsten Dunst and Jason Schwartzman in costume, as well as scans from a 2006 issue of V Magazine showing a few other photographs from the film production.
What is interesting about these is that the costumes, hair and make-up on our Queen and company are very noticeably different from the look and tone of the completed film. Kirsten Dunst wears heavier rouge and powder, her coiffure is a bit more complicated in some of the shots and it is decorated with shocking pink feathers. Jason Schwartzman, as well, is wearing a bit of powder, rouge, and eye-liner â much different from his appearance in the film.
In the scans from V Magazine, the upper left hand and lower right hand corner snaps show Kirsten Dunst and Jason Schwartzman (possibly at this same shoot), in even heavier, more elaborate hair and makeâup. Both are extremely powdered and rouged â Kirsten seemingly with hot pink on her cheeks and around her eyes. The costume she wears in the solo shot matches the hot pink of her make-up design, which, even for a film that features daring colors for the 18th century, is quite a shocking tone.
While itâs possible that these were taken in post-production for promotional photographs that were never used, it seems more plausible that these shots are actually from pre-production and are examples of the âmore crazyâ appearances that Milena Canonero spoke of. For one, many of the costumes that Kirsten Dunst wears are not from the film, and arenât even necessarily appropriate to 1770s Versailles, meaning that perhaps they were just available costumes that the actress threw on so that the crew could do these hair and make-up tests. Jason Schwartzman is also slimmer than he is in the film, which he gained weight for, so the shots couldnât be from the shooting period.
Itâs fun to speculate about what âMarie Antoinetteâ would have looked like if Milena Canonero and Sofia Coppola had gone with a heavier, rouged appearance for the characters, which ultimately would have been more appropriate for the era but is a bit excessive for the tone of the finished film. The one shot of Kirsten Dunst and Jason Schwartzman together, she in hot pink and he in navy silk, both extremely powdered, is especially captivating since it juxtaposes so much with the scenes of them together in the film.
Also of note â in the V Magazine scans one can see Asia Argento (Madame du Barry) being fitted by Milena Canonero in a chemise Ă la reine ensemble, which also never appears on film.
Marie Antoinette begins and ends with âGoodbyeâ, in sequences that almost disturbingly juxtapose with one another.
The audience is introduced to a fourteen-year-old Marie Antoinette as she prepares to leave behind a halcyon Viennese childhood. It is the spring of 1770, and the once Hapsburg archduchess, now Bourbon dauphine, will journey across the Austrian Empire to the Kingdom of France to wed her betrothed, Louis Auguste. Clutching her tawny pug, Mops, the young Antoinette bids farewell to Austria and her mother, the Empress Maria Theresa, then climbs into the beautifully outfitted carriage commissioned by her grandfather-in-law, King Louis XV, to escort her to Versailles. Staring out of the windows of the royal coach, she admires the Germanic forests while Mops makes himself comfortable on her lap. Antoinette turns her attention to a miniature of her future husband, the only image that she has of the dauphin and whom she will meet for the first time once she has crossed the border from Austria into France. The days of the journey drag on before she finally reaches the tiny island on the Rhine where she will be conducted through her remise ceremony to emerge thoroughly French.
The film closes nearly two decades later, in October of 1789. Marie Antoinette, Queen of France for 15 years, is escorted from Versailles by the mob that has stormed the palace in the early days of the Revolution. She now clutches her four-year-old son, the dauphin Louis Charles, as she enters the coach that will carry the royal family from the aureate chùteau. Inside of the carriage, which bears no resemblance to the grandeur of the one that brought Antoinette there for the first time as an adolescent, Louis Charles, and her daughter, Marie-ThérÚse, sleep on her lap. Rather than the portrait of her betrothed that she pondered curiously in the first carriage scene, she is comforted now by the presence of Louis XVI, her husband of so many years.
âAre you admiring your lime avenue?â, he earnestly asks of his wife (fun fact: Louis XVI did in fact pose this question, but it was to his younger sister, the princesse Ălisabeth, who is not depicted in this scene of the film). âIâm saying goodbyeâ, Marie Antoinette responds. Just as she said her farewells to Vienna when she was fourteen, never to see her homeland again, the thirty-three-year old Queen now says goodbye to Versailles, her home of 19 years, never to see it again. The blues and bright tones, sunlight, and vividness of the initial scenes have been washed over in muted hues, greys, and a burning, foreboding sunrise that does not suggest a hopeful end to this story.
Beginning with the image of a teenage girl comfortably in her bed in Vienna, the film ends with an image of her bedchamber at Versailles, in the aftermath of the rioting of the Parisian market women within the palace. Marie Antoinette has been pulled from her bed and forced to Paris. The bed has been bayoneted, in the vain hope of murdering her. The mirrors which once reflected her beautiful image are now destroyed. The chandelier has fallen from the ceiling, an alarming suggestion of her fate. Beginning with a goodbye that might lead her to a glittering, auspicious and uncertain future, Marie Antoinette ends with a goodbye that signifies an uncertain future of unspeakable terror.
Marie-Antoinette (2006) dir. Sofia Coppola