itshe

you're tellong me a girl this bug big mouth on my rod

[spamtonhater1997]

DOWNLOADING WET SPIDER

[hamsterscooter]

some things never change

[wolvvve]

what a lunatic

[hallowshumour]

Flora and fauna // @deenquality 🦋🪷

[heavymetalhazard]

oh my god

[suigintou]

deliriously ripping open the sexy fishnet tights of a beautiful woman named bag of mandarins

[hallowshumour]

⚡️⚡️⚡️

[donitkitt]

Flash comm for hallowshumour

[rainbowgaez]

bro hop on ranked spiders

[charlesoberonn]

Conspiracy theorist discovers basic geometry

[professionalanagram]

citing wikipedia is harsh but citing khan academy is going for the fucking jugular

[deadallover]

Doodles from magma tonight, ft my friends :]

[crazysodomite]

Gives you the potion that turns you into a buge

[fivetrench]

[nartothelar]

I love how you draw Joltiks. You are absolutely correct.

electric cotton ball

[hallowshumour]

Gnarping off 👽🐆

[hallowshumour]

👽✌️

[jester-nonconforming]

People still tend to lump JK Rowling in with the category of ~problematic artists~ and I need everyone to understand that is not the problem with her. She is not comparable to anyone who wrote a piece of fiction you hate, or someone who made rude comments in 2015 and has since learned better.

She is far more like Elon Musk. She is a radicalized person with an extreme amount of social and financial power, and for YEARS she has been using that power to try to influence her government into hurting vulnerable people, on purpose. And she has succeeded. THAT is the problem with her, and THAT is why spending money on her books is so dangerous, not because her books aged badly.

Critiquing her work is fine, of course (I personally was never a fan so I really don’t care) but you NEED to understand that fiction is not the main issue here. And I truly think acting like she’s the same as the rest of any giant list of ~problematic creators of the week~ waters down how dangerous she is.

[decadent-trans-girl]

[hallowshumour]

Yeah yeah