i've been wanting to paint a portrait of whoopi for so long; she's one of my fav actresses, so really wanted to get her right for this ☺
AnasAbdin
No title available
$LAYYYTER

Janaina Medeiros

roma★

#extradirty
Xuebing Du
Peter Solarz
i don't do bad sauce passes
Jules of Nature
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
h
YOU ARE THE REASON

izzy's playlists!

No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic 🪩
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
we're not kids anymore.
Game of Thrones Daily
seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Lithuania

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Russia
@warp8
i've been wanting to paint a portrait of whoopi for so long; she's one of my fav actresses, so really wanted to get her right for this ☺
Incomparable Kate
HOSHI SATO and T'POL in STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE — 1.22 "VOX SOLA"
enterprise is peak trek to me and i'm not sorry to say it
April 5, 2063
Ohhhh, Equinox made you think Janeway was questionable as a captain and morally unhinged?
Weak.
Equinox made Janeway hotter and more correct. God forbid a woman find something worth going Captain Ahab over.
Over 3 minutes of Patrick Stewart’s bloopers from Star Trek: The Next Generation:
Compiled from several sources I can’t remember any of them I found this at the bottom of my editing folder.
yay painting :)
janeway not quite done but very nearly, she has the most work to her, aside from i think neelix, as i need to draw the patterning somehow on his jacket
I'm curious about the generational divide when it comes to Starfleet Academy. Which means it's poll time! If you're on the cusp of a generation, just pick the one you vibe with more. And yes, I know that enjoyment is relative, but tumblr only allows 12 poll options so nuance is limited. This is just about your overall feeling regarding the whole show. Don't vote if you haven't seen at least the first three eps. The show changes and deepens greatly but in a way that feels realistic(to me), and I don't want people who only watched the first ep and threw it away to skew the poll. I might make a different poll asking about people who stopped after or during ep 1 later.
Do you enjoy Starfleet Academy? What generation are you in?
Boomer-I enjoy it
Boomer-I don't enjoy it
Gen X-I enjoy it
Gen X-I don't enjoy it
Millennial-I enjoy it
Millennial-I don't enjoy it
Gen Z-I enjoy it
Gen Z-I don't enjoy it
Gen Alpha-I enjoy it
Gen Alpha-I don't enjoy it
Results
Please reblog so I can get everyone's opinions!
The Ultimate Star Trek Voyager Tournament
Round 2 - Match 21
The Gift (S4E2) vs Dark Frontier (S5E15)
Seven of Nine has recently been disconnected from the Borg, and she’s not embracing her humanity. Kes’s psychic powers are developing at such a rapid rate that she starts bending the walls of Voyager. When Seven contacts the Borg, Voyager must leave Borg space as quickly as possible. Kes decides to leave Voyager to save the ship and its crew, and she helps Voyager with one final gift.
Seven of Nine’s parents were… unconventional. They followed the Borg to learn about them, and brought their six year old child with them… Anyway, Janeway’s new plan is to steal a transwarp coil from the Borg. It should be easy with the help of all the research that Seven’s parents did on the Borg! Seven is tasked with going through her parents’ research, which brings up lots of fun childhood memories… And then her other mother appears…
Which episode is your favourite?
The Gift
Dark Frontier
To see an overview of the tournament, click here.
Pumbaa-like Neelix 😁 That really makes sense! 100% natural silliness 🙃
🌟 2025 carrd | ☕️ Ko-fi 🌟
The thing I like about Starfleet Academey is that's it actually demonstrates Federation ideals that were directly contradicted by the worldbuilding in the 90s shows and even TOS to a certain extent.
You don't get a meeting with Captian Ake because you knew someone who served under her 20 years ago or have a recognisable surname or bribed her with a bottle of Chateu Picard. You get a meeting with her because her door is equally open to everyone.
The writers seem to get that if you want a truly currency free society you have to be careful not to replace material currency with social currency.
I’m sorry, but this is an inaccurate interpretation of the old shows. When did we see people being turned away from meetings with officers because they weren’t important enough? Kirk, Picard, Sisko, Janeway, and their respective senior officers, were all openly accessible to their crews. They regularly intermingled with civilians and lower ranking officers on a regular basis. Even children. I cannot think of a single time when we saw any of these characters snub someone because they weren’t important enough. Teamwork, equality, and cooperation are the main themes of the show. Command hierarchies exist in this particular universe as a piece of fundamental, logical world building. How else are you going to run a starship with over 1000 people on board? Or a space station? Sticker charts?
While rank as currency is often a trope in other shows, Star Trek meticulously worked hard to show the opposite: that rank was functional, not financial. They even had the mirror universe episodes to show a world where people rose through the ranks for greedy reasons. And why that was bad.
The writers of old were thoughtful and meticulous when it came to this kind of world building. They were not accidentally contradicting themselves.
*this meeting could have been an email voice* this cgi could have been a puppet
or a suit actor
or a scale model
or a matte painting
was watching a video essay on how grim star trek is nowadays and saw some great comments.
I know we beat the "seasons are only 10 episodes now and it sucks" dead horse on the daily but another thing we lost when we stopped making the 24 episode 1 hour drama was the freedom to be narratively risky.
Star Trek, The X Files, and Doctor Who are great examples of this since they had the sandbox of Sci-Fi to play with. There are so many amazing, mind bending, soul stretching episodes that were teetering on the edge of flop or flying and through bold writing they didn't just fly but catapulted into the stratosphere of iconic. These episodes changed expectations and genre boundaries of what Sci-Fi could be for years to come.
We don't get episodes like this anymore because these new shows cannot afford the risk of a flop. The weekly episodic story structure that was once the foundation of television has been abandoned by Hollywood. The beautiful thing about this "simplistic" structure is that it provides a narrative safety net. You can take a risk and afford the miss because you can have a clean slate next week. You can't do that with continual narrative structures where only one story is being told over ten episodes (note to add: both structures are valuable, but total abandonment of one in favor of the other is detrimental).
These production companies gleefully hold the metaphorical gun of cancellation to the writer's heads and this actively ensures that stories are as safe as possible. This is creatively devastating, and ironically, guarantees catastrophic failure of shows. Safety is a bland cage.
Of course, the production think-tanks can't possibly take responsibility for their suffocating creative control so they blame the audiences for *checks notes* being on their phones too much, not subscribing enough, paying too little for ads, being too vocal online, not being vocal enough, being too demanding, being too liberal, being too conservative, whatever it takes to say "these failures are not our fault, you're just bad audiences".
Now, there are the episodes that did flop, but they flopped so spectacularly that we have entire days celebrating them decades later. These episodes took massive risks and instead of trying to back away from that creative intensity, these writers-of-old stepped up to bat, acknowledged they probably didn't have the screen-time to truly flesh out these concepts but by God they were going to try, and then hit so hard they shattered the bat. Sure they lost the game, but wow, what a thing to witness.
When I invariably get asked what my least favorite episodes of Star Trek are, I can't even remember because a "bad" episode to me is one that's simply forgettable.
There is no greater crime in the realm of artistic creation than being aesthetically beige and mind numbingly forgettable and yet for the past 15 years 8 out of 10 productions seem to be repeat offenders of exactly this.
Spin the wheel twice (feel free to re-spin if you don't recognize a character)
These two Star Trek characters are now stuck in a time loop, are the only two people aware of it, and need to work together to get out of it. How are they doing?
nobody has ever broken out of a loop faster before
good! they work together pretty well
eh. it's ok-ish
could go either way
it's not going well...
they're never making it out of there
other hyperspecific answer
Lwxana and T'pol... I think it would be over quickly but it would be a bit of a catastrophe
Ash Tyler and Michael Burnham....
😬
If you were born between 1987-2004, which is many of us, there’s a Star Trek episode closest to your birthday. Mind the overlap between TNG (Sep 1987-May 1994), DS9 (Jan 1993-May 1999), and Voyager (Jan 1995-May 2001).
Do you like the Star Trek episode released closest to your birthday?
It’s basically my favorite episode!
It’s good and I like it
It’s good but I don’t like it
It’s bad but I like it
It’s bad and I don’t like it
I hate it and think it sucks
It’s too batshit to tell if it’s good or bad
I have no particular opinion about it
I haven’t seen it
Born outside the age range / see results / bald / other
You do not have to say what episode it is. I’m not.