THE SPIRIT OF BUSTER KEATON LIVES ON
$LAYYYTER
Three Goblin Art
todays bird
almost home
No title available

titsay

izzy's playlists!
Mike Driver

Andulka

tannertan36
Sade Olutola

Product Placement

Kiana Khansmith

Kaledo Art
Claire Keane

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
No title available
DEAR READER
Cosimo Galluzzi

Discoholic 🪩

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Israel

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Ecuador
@wellmetmat
THE SPIRIT OF BUSTER KEATON LIVES ON
This photo is from the Facebook page PigeonHub; no individual photographer was credited. I just loved it so much that I wanted to increase its presence in the world.
Time to reblog "fluffy gentle pigeons in love loafing and cuddling in a sun-warmed puddle", one of the greatest photos ever.
Near a park where we sometimes walk there are public toilets in a small building with a sloped roof and eaves. It's almost the only place around which is suitable for pigeons to roost in. I've watched strung wires and anti-bird spikes creep over most sittable surfaces around the park, over the course of a few years. There are a handful of pigeons which cling on, sitting on top of the security cameras and wedged uncomfortably around the wires, for where else should they go? There are few sheltered spaces safely off the ground for them to sleep in. Cats can climb. On exposed rooftops owls can see them. They're not tree-perching birds - they don't grip with their toes when they sleep, and in any case they show a clear preference for buildings, as presumably more like the cavey cliffs which their rock-dove instincts recognise as safe. And most buildings don't offer nearly enough ledges, and may even be designed with hostility to birds in mind. My boyfriend and I walked past this evening, it being a rainy night, and looked at the four little scrunched-in fluffballs trying to roost on what remains of the toilet block's eaves, while outside the roof every tree and hollow glittered wet. He said suddenly, "Those wires are just strung on hooks. You wouldn't even have to cut them. I bet I could unhook them, and it might take weeks for anyone to notice." He is tall. He stretched up and fiddled with the ends of three wires, which were strung out a few centimetres above the horizontal roof beams, to make it impossible for birds to sit there. In a minute the wires were laid down flat on top of the beams. The pigeon on the tiny uneven perch of the security camera above poked out its head from its huddled fluff and looked down. I hope it perceived that there was an easier place for it to rest for the night. He walked on pleased. I was pleased with him. We shared a joke story, 'The Mask of Pidjo', in which a Zorro-like figure fights for the right of abandoned domestic birds not to freeze while they're trying not to get eaten. He could, in fact, most likely beat any local council members in a rapier fight specifically, should it come up.
If happiness is a gosling recognising you and running up to say hi, then...
What does several families of them mean? Other than the fact that there's a lot of geese.
That scruffy teenage stage...
Outlines of two alligators that slept through the rain.
During a high speed car chase pursuit, the FOX 11 Los Angeles helicopter had an unexpected moment when they spotted a rooster and a chicken casually walking down the sidewalk right in the middle of the pursuit.
must feel good as hell to be sat down for a private conversation with a famous detective who lays out how & why you killed all those people, after years of concealing lethally curdled resentment
they understand why the indignities drove you to kill, even when those closest to you never saw it
mwah
A hopeful thing for me: a kind relative, upon hearing some description of my besetting faults, gave me some stimulants to try. They temporarily make me more like a real person and less of an inert heap. Bad news: my skin reacted with a rash, a thing which frightens me, after previous skin horrors. But good news! Taking mere over-the-counter fexofenadine daily is suppressing the skin flare. I seem to be able to keep taking both, while the former lasts. What a good thing to have found out. I will carry the favour of my lady Catecholamines and the shield of my knightly defender Antihistamines as I face the giant Work.
Quill I need you to make a ranking with best* behaved seeds (sits nicely) and least behaved seeds (you look at them wrong and they start dispersing)
*best as in best for work not best for plant survival
I mean, boring first answer but corn is a classic. field corn comes in the shapes of ‘flats’ and ‘rounds’, self explanatory, where the flats are nice and flat and the rounds have more of a jagged tooth look to them, but even the rounds aren’t too bad to convince to sit still under a microscope.
Unfortunately in my job I’m not dissecting a whole lot of corn. but in terms of the stuff I DO work with, peppers and tomatoes (or anything in the solanaceae) sit pretty nice and flat regardless of size, as do pumpkins and cucumbers (cucurbitaceae), and anything from the carrot family (apiaceae), like lettuce, carrots wild and domestic, various ornamental flowers, parsnips… a carrot family seed is pretty much guaranteed to at least have one flat face to lay them down on while you work.
a lot of my job is dissecting seeds for a test called a tetrazolium test, or a TZ test. you can run a TZ test on damn near anything as long as you can expose the embryo to the chemicals in a way that lets them evenly stain. Your best case scenario, as a guy running this test, is a small amount of big, flat seeds you don’t need a microscope to see the inner flesh of, so pumpkins and stuff— but most of the stuff I’m dissecting is best done under a microscope. So, in that case, what’s easiest is anything well-gripped by forceps or with a flat face that isn’t too difficult to cut with a razor blade. Carrots have at least one flat face AND neat lines along the back that show you where you should cut, which unintentional on the plant’s part, but nice.
Grasses tend to be a little rounded on the back, and the structures to aim to cut through are on the front flat face, so they can be a little tricky but ultimately aren’t too bad, although they need more attention and time the smaller the species is. Asters are pretty round but tend to be conical with some kind of point, so they’re not rolling everywhere, those also aren’t too bad.
Getting to the weirder stuff, though. Wildflowers vary incredibly based on the family, shape, and size, oh my god. Asters (the sunflower family, asteraceae) tend to have big structures on either end that keep them in place, but listen: THEY ALSO CAN BE EMPTY. When I’m actively counting plant embryos and putting them in chemicals, a seed that’s supposed to have an embryo and doesn’t is something that counts against the sample, as in, for the purposes of the test I have to mark it down as a dead seed that didn’t even have the chance to prove itself by changing colors in a chemical soup. Depending on how domesticated they are, this can end up being a significant chunk of the sample.
Brassicas, that is, mustard seeds and the wider brassicaceae family of kale, Brussel sprouts, that sort of thing…. These are ROUND. they DO roll everywhere. Often they’re big enough to be able to handle with forceps comfortably enough, especially once they’ve soaked up some water in the preconditioning stage of the test, but they ARE breaking free of my grip and attempting to escape. The smaller the very-round seed, the more crazy it can get with it.
The smaller the seed in general, the harder it is to cut. Catnip is hard because it’s both very small and has a hard, kind of brittle seed coat to it; BUT it also has a flat-ish face and two characteristic ‘eyes’ on one end, which make it easy to tell which side to cut. Also one that tries to disperse itself while cutting, because the hard seed coat makes it flick away into the aether that much easier. Basil is annoying because it has the same oblong ‘little black seed’ kind of thing going on, BUT it has no markings to guide a cut with a razor blade, AND, as some basil enjoyers may know, it makes a gelatinous goo when exposed to water. Cutting basil seeds with a razor blade for this test means notching the middle while simultaneously cutting through the layer of mucus, which makes the seed stick to the forceps and whatever surface you’re using to cut them on under the scope. they are not getting away, but they aren’t enjoying it, either.
along those lines, the smallest seeds we do. At a certain point the industry guidance does away with trying to cut them with razor blades and instead advises poking through the seed coat with a sewing needle attached to a metal handle. Poppy seeds— oh my god, you can only imagine. Little tiny herbs like feverfew are kind of crazy, stuff like seedbox (winter primrose family), too.
About once every other week, my coworkers and I get a weird little plant or flower I’ve never heard of in my life, from a plant family I’ve never read about, and we’ll be at the TZ handbook planning an Apollo 13 mission on something named like… yknow how Victorian British guys named flowers, ‘winter’s last blushing kindness’ or something that says distressingly little about the creature itself. I’m not complaining by the way it’s just baffling every time. you CAN run a tetrazolium viability test on damn near anything— I once put larkspur seeds with mites on them into TZ solution, and the mites’ bodies had stained red when I pulled them out. that was crazy.
(I should have explained this earlier. the point of the test is that the cells that are still breathing inhale the solution and undergo a reaction that stains them red, so you can see which tissues are alive. In the case of seeds, we compare the staining pattern to a handbook that says what is and isn’t acceptable as a living seed. an embryo that stains red in a certain way can be called dormant instead of dead, even if it didn’t germinate in the germination test. we want things to turn red! red means a higher score!)
I’ve also done TZ tests on sheep’s sorrel, a seed from polygonaceae with three flat faces, which was difficult not because it couldn’t sit flat, but because the cuts the book prescribed were kind of odd and complex for the shape of the seed, and the three flat faces were hard to grip with forceps. all sorts of stuff can get TZed and be hard for interesting and unforeseen reasons.
I think the hardest thing to cut for this test is German chamomile, actually. It has layers. Not only is it incredibly small to the point the sewing needle risks doing significant damage to it if you pierce it wrong, the embryo itself is in a sac that shifts around a little within the seed once it’s hydrated, so actually piercing both the seed coat and the anatomy holding the embryo is pretty challenging, especially when not pushing hard enough just causes the seed to roll to one side of the head of the needle (and yknow, the size means it sticks to it a little with the surface tension of moisture being what it is… it’s a whole thing.)
the smallest seed I’ve ever seen TZed was at my last workplace, by my old boss. she had to check to see if the orobanche seeds she recovered from a sample were still alive; orobanche is a parasitic, extremely invasive plant with a ‘dust-like’ (literal technical term) seed, and checking samples of crop seeds for it means literally washing them and passing the water through a series of sieves, then putting the resulting leftover residue of dirt and chaff to dry on filter paper, and checking for them manually under a microscope. My old boss had found some in a sample (incredibly rare, only time I’ve ever seen an orobanche test come back positive), and if they were proven to still be alive, it would have repercussions on where and how the company could legally sell that seed lot in the US. She did a TZ test on them— I really doubt she cut them, actually, the seeds are way smaller than the tip of a sewing needle, I’d assume she put them in the solution whole and sieved them back onto filter paper— and the seeds were, in fact, still alive and staining red. Saw it with my own two eyes. It was crazy.
but yeah, top seed lab seed that tries to get away? Soybeans, actually, another seed I don’t get to work with as much anymore. Which is dire, because they’re perfectly round, easily damaged (they have a paper-thin seed coat that offers no protection from impacts of any kind), and big enough to noticeably cause problems if they fall on the floor and get crushed underfoot. They get everywhere and are often transported in 50 pound cloth or reinforced paper sacks that never AREN’T primed to burst and cause a soybean tsunami at any moment. just think about that.
catchin up w my dear friend over a tea
not trying to be conspiratorial or anything but
I've never seen them in the same room
JUST ASKING QUESTIONS!!!!
they aren't even trying to hide it
oops! all klemmeri
I'm genuinely curious if there's any sort of useful, authoritative guide to vegan baking, because I have had dreadful luck in finding information about that. For cooking resources in general, both the internet and bookstores seem almost useless these days, but actual vegan communities also do not seem great, as they're light on genuine interest in the topic and heavy on, you know, those strained chipper pep talks about how This is Fine.
The trouble with baking is it's infamously fussy, and I am bad at it, so I rely on recipes. When adapting a non-vegan recipe, though, the choice and method of ingredient substitution seem very contextual, and I do not get the sense that intrinsically vegan baking is very developed as its own thing. Even the best guides I've seen tend to bottom out at "here's a bunch of things you can try, just experiment to find out what works", which is sort of a euphemistic way of saying that you should spend a lot of time and money on food no one wants to eat, and it would be nice to be able to leverage the insight of people who already did that step.
Veganbaking.net might have some of the qualities you want. The author is interested in precision, reproducible results and the mechanical role of different ingredients in creating taste and texture.
(It's about fifteen years since I was regularly consulting it; I just had a quick look to check that a sample of the sections were still there; apologies if the site has degraded in the meantime, or if you already knew about this one as obvious.)
Sucks how many people were taught that "horses put their ears back when they're mad" but then never taught the difference between "angry backwards ears," "mildly annoyed backwards ears," "pain backwards ears," "concentrated backwards ears," "sleepy backwards ears" and "just happens to be listening to something behind it."
"Horses put their ears back when they're mad" idk man i think it depends
These are all completely different expressions in completely different scenarios, and only two of them are decidedly negative.
Actually, I wanna talk about the third horse, the one putting its ears back in pain. Over the last 15 years veterinarians and animal scientists have worked out pain scales for most domestic animals by taking photos of the during routine procedures.
We know vaccines painful, and by comparing horses at rest with horses getting vaccinated, we've been able to determine how they express pain visually. By looking at horses with disorders like colic, broken bones, wounds, and so on, we can determine their facial expressions during more severe pain.
At zookeeper school we were drilled through the pain faces of the most common lab animals and livestock. Nowadays I believe this has become a routine lesson in all animal related fields, but the general public still doesn't know that this is a thing that exists.
Here are all the pain face/grimace scales I've been able to find. Please study them if you interact with any of these animals on a regular basis:
i think the crux of human misery stems from the fact that our skeleton just wants to sit around and accumulate dust in an ancient barrow (that is the innate imperative of all skeletal remains in-case you didn’t know) but our meat has its own agenda which creates this fundamental conflict of interests
"O who shall deliver me whole From bonds of this tyrannic soul? Which, [...] wanting where its spite to try, Has made me live to let me die; A body that could never rest Since this ill spirit it possesed."
- Andrew Marvell's body complaining about his soul making it move around and do things. (It is more than three hundred years since his skeleton, the surprise contender, won.)
Looking for a snack.