The most useless writing mechanic, I argue, is not the semicolon, but the paragraph.
I once read a quote that went somewhere along the lines of, the only thing that semicolons show is that you’ve gone to college. Doesn’t that quote jolt your soul out of your body a bit? It’s very direct, unambiguous, and slightly didactic, isn’t it? It’s a wide-appeal style of quote that would hit a chord in lots of people. When I read that quote, I felt some dissonance, like I was putting on shoes without socks. On one hand, I think the quote is saying that semicolons don’t achieve anything that other punctuation doesn’t already, and using them is pretentious. On the other hand, the authoritative tone of quote counters the point about semicolons. Semicolons are pretentious, but a sweeping rejection of them is not?
If we had to abolish one writing mechanic, I would vote for the paragraph, although it makes me sad because the paragraph would not even make it on the list in the first place. People love the paragraph so much, so I’m forced to use it.
Think about it: do paragraphs achieve anything extra? The words and ideas are already on the page. All paragraphs do is break them up. But why is it the job of the writer to explicitly delineate where one idea ends and where another begins? Isn’t the reader responsible for thinking about that too? It should be up to the reader to extract ideas important to himself and decide where he might want to pause a little bit to ponder. As the writer, separating thoughts for the reader is not much different from spoon-feeding information to the reader.
But I get that that’s not really why paragraphs are popular. Paragraphs as a thought separator is only a secondary effect. The main reason is that paragraphs hold the reader’s attention. Back when there was not much else to do in the day besides plowing and resting, people might have had longer attention spans to read a whole book or a long passage. These days we have so much digital distractions around us that as soon as we see a big block of words, we give up before even getting to know what it is about, whether we might enjoy it. We prefer to inhale in small, bite-sized pieces. Paragraphs serve as milestones for readers in a way: Yay, you have made it here, now move on to the next paragraph! Yet when you remove the paragraphs, that big block of words is no different from shorter blocks of words with empty lines between them. It is absurd to say that paragraphs add anything meaningful to the message.
But readers aren’t the only ones afflicted with ADHD. Writers may be too. Something that may happen and may already be happening is that writers write with paragraphs in mind. They think up ideas in terms of this paragraph construct. It is like someone gives you a square box, and you start to think what can I put in this square box (reminded anyone of the high school five-paragraph format essay?), instead of what do I have, then I’m going to make a container for it. The fact is our stream of thought is continuous. Paragraphs are artificial breaks that we insert later. But slowly, writers may just acquire the habit of doing it the other way around: start with the paragraphs, not the limitless thought.
I actually like using semicolons and find them pretty useful. Semicolons add another layer to ideas. Full stops are for separate thoughts. Conjunctions like “because”, “and”, “but” explicitly state the relationship between two clauses. Semicolons are an intermediate between full stops and conjunctions. Maybe your two thoughts are closely connected, but you don’t want to “give away” the relationship between them, or the relationship between them isn’t clear and is up for interpretation. In that case you might want to use a semicolon, as neither full stops nor conjunctions feel right.
Semicolons add subtlety to writing and may be most analogous to real life: Oftentimes events are not really connected but they’re not unconnected either. Using something like “because” would be over-describing the relationship, like when you use a complicated mathematical equation to fit a graph, you risk overfitting it. Semicolons show that a potential relationship is there, but the exact relationship may not be as simple as “because”, “and”, or “but”.
Paragraphs, on the other hand, take away subtlety. Different people reading a plain, unformatted passage may come up with different locations of pauses. When paragraphs are used, the writer gives people the “right answer” straight away by telling them what to think and where the emphases are.
Since when is adding subtlety a bad thing and removing subtlety a good thing in literary writing? “The only thing that semicolons show is that you’ve gone to college”? I can’t say I agree with that at all, not until paragraphs are similarly scrutinized.