these fits for Prince Ramil
Sade Olutola
official daine visual archive
Doug Jones
No title available
occasionally subtle

if i look back, i am lost
h
Mike Driver
NASA

Product Placement
The Stonewall Inn
𓃗
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
todays bird
Interview Vampire Daily
macklin celebrini has autism

izzy's playlists!

No title available
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Thailand
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from India
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ecuador

seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom

seen from India
seen from India
seen from Bangladesh
@wildestwalnut
these fits for Prince Ramil
Female mantis engaging in copulatory cannibalism By: P. H. Ward From: Wild, Wild World of Animals: Insects & Spiders 1977
Small Sea Eagle Mask
Gilbert Dawson
The last image shows the artist holding the mask.
Customer: TYPE OF MALE DMV: GANG-14 Verdict: DENIED
DMV: lolol virgin
I need to see BDSM haters go on rants about the evils of capsaicin
It’s ridiculous to believe that anyone truly enjoys eating spicy food, capsaicin literally evolved as a deterrent to keep mammals from eating it… oh you “like” eating spicy food?? You “like” crying and your nose running at the table while you’re trying to just enjoy dinner? Just admit you have brain rot from watching too many episodes of Hot Ones and go…
I would never let someone eat spicy food in front of me… like that’s literally a chemical irritant that burns your tissue, anyone who would willingly let their partner—let alone ASSIST THEIR PARTNER!!!—in this act of obvious self-harm is an abuser. If I was on a date with someone and they ordered Sichuan hot pot I would simply get up and leave.
intellectually dishonest as fuck and yall are eating this up on this website, embarrassing
Taking this argument seriously is extremely difficult esp since its so dishonest and the comparison absolutely ridiculous. But the fact it amassed so much positive attention is incredibly dreadful and alarming. So I'll try to entertain it.
I think what op tried (and failed miserably) to address is that there should be no moralism behind a recieving pain as sexual pleasure and that the choice to seek out pleasure in pain is simply valid. Bc sure, theres nothing pure or unpure, spiritually good or bad, or even any form of value behind one's nervous system being predisposed to enjoying painful sensations or conditioned to do so. And women making choices to experience unconventional sex is not necessarily harmful in itself.
Huge-however....
Feminists that are critical of and/or oppose BDSM with an emphasis on its violent aspects are not usually moralizing pain, and thus the recipient of that pain, and, as with any political analysis, choices women make in society are analyzed in refefence to social phenomena and powet structures that affects them (in this case, heteropatriarchy). So contextualizing the pain inflicted on a "sub" by a "dom" within the r-pe culture such dynamic derives from is basic feminist critique abt how sexual power dynamics betwen women and men are established via oppressive institutions like the nuclear family, marriage, and the sex trade. And ofc, this is relevant to the fact that the pain a sub seeks out is usually born from sexual trauma coupled w female socialization developed from navigating a deeply patriarchal society since birth (not usually a natural predisposition toward maschoism developed through safe and consexual sexual exploration).
But while theres much to analyze wrt motives to seek paim and effects that pursuit has on women and their choices as "subs", the critique and opposition to BDSM is meant to hold accountability toward the males that acts as agents of sexual violence in enforcment of patriarchy in this culture. Men are the majority of "doms" and their role as "dominant" allow them to develop and impose patriarchal fantasies and fetishes against women, especially against those w history of sexual abuse. Males arent inflicting any pain on the recipient, or "sub" either; theyre usually re-enacting scenes of sexual violence most statistucally perpetuated by men against women by pretending to be r-pists, child m-lesters, and domestic abusers and reinforcing the legitimacy of such sexual violence thru orgasm. The very nature of encentuating power dynamics in sex enables and empowers males to inflict what sexual violence they learned from patriarchal society onto vulnerable women, who are made more vulnerable in their role literally as "submissive". The benefactors of patriarchal violence created and use this niche to hide from criticisms and even justice by re-privitizing sex as a non-political manner despite its extrnsive history as a political issue for women.
So op, no. The choice to eat spicy foods or even sour, bitter, and generally unpleasant foods to get satisfaction from the pain they give is not at all like the "choices" women make to to pursue pain in BDSM by mens hands. I think ppl would get this is they didnt so often baselelly compare eating food and other completely non-intimate, non-physically and emotionally consequential things to sex, let alone to having one's body hit, groped, anally/vaginally/orally penetrated, and violated.
Imagine comparing the sensual joys of the noble chili pepper to ~~cOnSeNtInG~~ to some grotty y-chromosoid getting his rocks off by committing what would otherwise be war crimes against you. Let's turn this around and ask why women who are into masochism don't just get their pleasures from chilis and such instead of letting some scrote think he's the king of the world because he gets to obliterate a b**** w**** like the big boys who have the kind of power where they DON'T have to pretend they care about consent or any of that uwu shit that he still has to put up with until he can buy enough crypto seminars to become a real alpha.
Discovering Tsukasa: A Quaint Hideaway in Yokohamabashi's Back Streets
Location: Yokohamabashi, Minami Ward, Yokohama, Japan Timestamp: 18:40 on December 19, 2023
Fujifilm X100V with 5% diffusion filter ISO 160 for 1.0 sec. at ƒ/6.4 Astia/Soft film simulation
Venturing into the dark, narrow alleys branching off from the brightly lit main drag of Yokohamabashi Shotengai shopping street, I discovered a quaint bar and eatery named “Tsukasa.”
The establishment, run by an elderly woman, served homemade dishes and drinks to customers engrossed in the sports news broadcast from a tiny TV perched atop a refrigerator in the corner behind the kitchen counter.
Inebriated salarymen in business suits and equally red-faced blue-collar workers, still in their factory uniforms, laughed loudly and became vocally excited about the baseball news emanating from the small screen.
This shop, absent from Google Maps with zero online reviews, barely seems to exist in the modern world. The only way to discover it is through word of mouth or by stumbling upon it while meandering through the back alleys branching off from Yokohamabashi Shotengai’s brightly lit main street.
As mentioned in previous posts, I appreciate the wide variety of noren curtains, particularly those with charming, traditional designs that hint at the owner's character, the establishment's vibe, and sometimes reveal a shop’s heritage.
I love the understated noren of this shop with its classic indigo blue called “ai” (藍) in Japanese. This indigo, made from the leaves of the Japanese indigo plant, was initially used by aristocrats and samurai. It can now be found adding color to everything from kimonos, blue jeans, linen, and of course, noren curtains.
The young bamboo plant motifs in the noren blend well with the real potted bamboo plant positioned just below it.
The storefront sign indicates “Sapporo” (the type of beer served at the shop) and, from top to bottom, right to left, reads “家庭料理・katei ryōri,” which means homemade cooking, and “つかさ・Tsukasa,” likely the owner’s name. Next time I visit, I hope to remember to ask about the origin of the name!
Explore other shops near Yokohamabashi Shotengai, and find references to related articles for further reading on my blog post: https://www.pix4japan.com/blog/20231219-yokohamabashi
Just saw a post saying genderqueer was good because their were "no rules". There are no rules for being female or male either. You just literally are. like just live girl you don't need a gender about it
You’re actually enforcing rules by repeatedly badgering females who are doing it “wrong”, into identifying as not-female
Yeah but that's yucking the yum of all the stunning and brave sissy fetishists who knew they were actually a girl when they shaved their legs and got a boner. :/ And only the most hateful fascists would yuck somebody else's yum. :/
I asked a nonbinary ex-friend of mine why TRAs oppose gender abolition and essentially just make more boxes to fit in and why radfems and TRAs don’t have the same goals. Cause like, they should, right? We both understand gender is oppressive and both understand that your sex doesn’t define what you like and who you are.
You want to know the answer? You want to know what the response was to “isn’t gender inherently oppressive? Why would you want to make more of them instead of everyone just not having a gender?”
The answer was: “because some people like the idea of having a gender. Besides, it’s impossible to abolish gender, so why not make more.”
O….Okay? So, TRAs want to uphold the oppressive nature of gender and gender roles because….they like the idea of just…having a gender?
And they call themselves leftists but say “abolish gender? Too hard. Let’s continue to use an oppressive system that kills women,” yet claim to be fucking anarchists, revolutionaries, and apparently can abolish the entire police force and scream ACAB (which I agree with, fuck police brutality) yet abolishing gender is just “too hard.”
Womp womp. They created a fucking gender out of not having a gender (“agender”) and they’re so close to getting it but so far.
Real revolutionaries would NEVER yuck a comrade's yum
trans women will be like "why won't you let us in spaces you're vulnerable in??? oh you're scared of male brutality? I'll show you brutality when I shove my girlcock down your throat, transphobic cunt" with no sense of self awareness.
And the thing is... It works! Exactly BECAUSE it's male brutality!
Yes they’re called lesbians
lavender scare, TWO!!!
Imagine being alone with women who categorically refuse to have anything to do with your penis. 🙀 literally shakign please tag your existential horror
Weaving around the world
Bukhara, Uzbekistan Kano, Nigeria Urubamba Valley, Peru Tehran, Iran Toraja, Indonesia Telangana, India Kampala, Uganda Chiapas, Mexico
M.J. Wolf, A monograph of the Felidae or family of cats by Daniel Giraud Elliot, 1883. London. Via Teylers Museum.
¡Bienvenida primavera! 🌸
—->
Arte y Cultura Alternativa Mexicana
lesbian: yeyyy i can’t get pregnant!
motherfuckers with rapey, homophobic tendencies:
"What about transgirls?????" They will never get pregnant either. 😇
今日はハロウィンという事で
過去画像ですが載せます😅
Past painting
Terfs have such serious brain rot. All you have to say is that it's not humiliating to wear a skirt and that men should be allowed to wear skirts, and women should be allowed to wear pants, and they'll immediately cram themselves down your throat and scream men can't wear skirts and women can't wear pants.
Embarrassing that they call themselves feminists.
huh???
I would like to see evidence of this happening please. I want to see a radfem say that women cannot wear pants. Please, show us, so we know who to educate.
And are the feminists who believe women shouldn’t wear pants in the room with us right now