Source details and larger version.
Not exactly in Kansas: my collection of vintage Wizard of Oz imagery.
styofa doing anything
🪼
No title available

pixel skylines

Product Placement

if i look back, i am lost
tumblr dot com
i don't do bad sauce passes

#extradirty
Stranger Things

Janaina Medeiros
Cosimo Galluzzi
wallacepolsom
dirt enthusiast
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

ellievsbear
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
sheepfilms

Kaledo Art
will byers stan first human second
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@witchesoz
Source details and larger version.
Not exactly in Kansas: my collection of vintage Wizard of Oz imagery.
Saruman tuning into the Merry and Pippin show
It is Lord of the Rings, but it has strong Wizard of Oz vibes.
Baptism in Kansas (1928) by John Steuart Curry. Whitney Museum of American Art.
Something something about an alternate IRL Kansas...
You can't deny that madame Morrible became truly Mombi-coded... I mean just by the Wicked movie(s) we have this nasty older witch, a schemer making plans with the other witches of Oz, a power-hungry sorceress in cahoot with the Wizard to maintain his rule unchallenged, involved a direct conflict against Glinda, whose name begins with Mo- and who even had purple as her main color on the character-poster promos!
Sure the character was not very Mombi-coded originally, in the book series she had nothing to do with our favorite abusive grandma, but I still headcanon Morrible, by the time of the movies, as this verse's alternate Mombi X)
Source details and larger version.
By decree: vintage queens.
Welcome to: I rate designs of Scraps in different Oz media
Specifically the designs, comparing to her original description, not what I think of her characterization in that media. That will be a different post, I promise. That said some discussion of it will still probably come out anyway.
I will discuss a comparison to her description in the books then my own personal thoughts on it.
This post is rated teen.
Let's go.
1. Neill's illustrations
Please note I am harshest on him as he was the official illustrator for the books when they were coming out. I will not be as harsh on the others.
Compared to her novel description, absolutely awful. None of her described Patches on her face are correct, the clothing is wrong, she also does not have gloves, she has a lot more hair, as y'all have heard many times from me she is repeatedly described as plumb and round, however you interpret that this ain't it.
And this is the iconic illustrations that he created. For official illustrator designs for the books, absolutely terrible.
I do acknowledge they are iconic and obviously you can see I've used some as my pfps, so I don't hate them as much as it may seem. But very disappointing for the iconic illustrator's official designs that have then become how she is mostly veiwed.
Rating: 3/10
I promise everyone else is given a lot more grace.
2. Return to Oz
My biggest issue is I think the mask makes her look a little stiff, I wish they hadn't used Neill's a few strands of hair, but otherwise lovely and very Return to Oz character design. Cute and creepy, as she should be, very much looks like a stuffed doll brought to life.
Very well done and good design, even if clearly Neill's illustrations inspired.
A shame she was only an Easter egg background character, even if I understand why.
Rating: 8/10
3. Dorothy and the Wizard of Oz
And why I'm putting them next to each other, is I feel like she was inspired by Return to Oz's Scraps design more then anything. Just cuter, which makes sense as this is, well, a show for pre-schoolers.
While I wish she had more book based details I have no major issues for this design. She's very cute, very chibi Scraps, I appreciate they allowed her to have more hair though I don't know why it's red, she definitely fits exactly what she's for. Which is a cute cartoon aimed at pre-schoolers.
Rating: 8/10
4. The Rainbow Road to Oz
Link for the YouTube video of when they showed some of the footage for it: Here.
Personally I just skip all the stuff with Walt and get right to the clips.
Before I get into it, it is worthy to note this picture is colorized, this was going to be a black and white movie. We do have pictures of her dress in color, and I was originally going to put one of the black and white images but the best quality ones are the colorized ones.
So, to be fair to it and because it's a mute point I won't put too much focuse on the colors, other then I do appreciate them putting a lot in, unfortunate that it being black and white doesn't show that. But that's the time it was being made in, so again it's kinda a mute point.
Okay, about the design, here's the thing...I love it. She is very much disney-fied (?) And made to be cuter, but also is a little creepy, particularly in the black and white version. Which as I said in Return to Oz, as she should be if Scraps were really real. She gets more grace for being live action rather then a drawing.
They started with a more Neill like design, then based a few details more off the books.
I actually really like it. Not perfect, but one of my favorites. Very cute and Scraps like.
Also while this post about designs, forever saddened this movie never got made. It would have been cheesy and have a lot of Disney tropes but a movie starring Scraps as a main character, as well as Ozma, forever saddened it was never made for I promise you it would be one of my favorites now. Anyway.
Rating: 9/10
Now we start getting more obscure and based in the comics.
5. Caliber's Oz comics
One of the thing about Caliber's Oz is their angles are near always so awkward, this one is awkward for her face. Anyway the reason I used this picture over the Romance and Rags covers is, there is slight differences in the design, and this is what she actually looks like in the comics. Also worthy to note, the comics themselves are black and white, only the covers are in color.
She gets a little grace for being in, very purposefully a full re-imagined world and everyone has a different design (you can actually read about the design process).
Okay so, in comparison to her original description, absolutely awful. And they were, most definitely trying to make her look like a much more conventionally attractive human woman rather then an Oz doll.
Okay but here's my thing, I don't hate it. I have a weird fondness for Caliber's Oz in that, it has a lot of issues and kinda sits in a "So bad it's good" and I only really care about Scraps, Scarecrow, Stitch, and Dorothy and Ozma when not in the main group, but I do enjoy it. But that's all about the story itself.
Caliber is kinda infamous for their Oz designs. They're not great but I feel you can kinda get used to them. (Except for Jack who lives in my nightmares). I promise you she is one of the better ones though.
You can tell she's a doll, she does fit the overall designs and looks in place, I actually, and hear me out, weirdly like how, if they must make her look more human, they also gave her plenty to the doll design which ended up giving her a little bit of a creepy uncanny valley feel. Which, if Scraps is put in a Dark Oz media to look more human, I do think it's the best way to do it.
I'm never really fond of Scraps' designs that make her blonde, I'm still not particularly fond of it, but it's worthy to note that the doll and Scarecrow creatures are considered similarly created to near same in this world, and I believe they were going for the idea of straw hair as they did with some of the other characters.
I like that they made her main color purple, which is different then a lot of other Scraps media designs. While still keeping a lot of her Patchwork.
Not perfect by any means but not the worst for what she's being made for. And I do like it.
Rating: 7/10
6. The Oz/Wonderland Chronicles comics
Also worthy to note Scraps' design changes a few times in this comics and I have different feelings on it. I kinda considered not putting this here and having a separate break down for her designs in this comic. Some I like better then others, this one is probably my favorite out of them.
I feel like the most awkward part of the design is the lips. (But then again, this is Scraps, so) I feel like this design, really, was trying to take Neill's art of her and design what she would look like if she were real. And I do, appreciate them for that.
I think because the design is so close to Neill's, I don't have any, really strong feelings on it, neither a favorite or a strong dislike. This is kinda how I feel about Eric Shanower's.
Also, for the story itself which I won't go into.
My Scraps x Jack shippers.
Y'all are gonna want to track these comics down.
Rating: 8/10
7. The Royal Historian of Oz
Okay for all my rambling this one is going to be very quick.
Does she look like the book description of Scraps? No, barely does she have resemblance other then being a living Patchwork Doll.
Do I still love her design, feel she embodies Scraps' more fun loving and chaotic nature, love her hair and think the rope arms were a brilliant idea to give her as so she could cause more chaos? Yes, absolutely.
Also many of the characters had a re-design so she does get that grace.
Rating: 8/10
8. Zenescope's Oz
Ah yes my beautiful wife.
OKAY, so I actually want to do a review post at some point for Zenescope, because I had avoided it for so long because of the heavy sexualization on the covers. I knew they had an Oz series for awhile, and it was the Patchwork Girl that made me read it. For yes, I love Scraps but also, Scraps is in book 7, if she's in it whoever is making it has a fair amount of Oz knowledge.
It's actually really good and a fun re-imagining, of the entire 14. There is a story and it's set up a lot like a super hero comic book, where many characters will be introduced as, fun villains. The sexualization is there in design and some poses, but, I will say it's not as bad as the covers make it seem. Back to topic.
As this is an ongoing comic series, in a way Indie comics sometimes can which is through multiple mini series, her design changes slightly. The main idea is kept, but there are little changes.
Part of how they do that though, is her characters' patches change with her emotions.
Her hair changes between brown and red, but within canon that can probably be applied to the point above.
At times she is given golden earrings which are clearly a reference to Scraps' gold ears.
She bounces between having button eyes, glowing eyes, and one button and one glowing.
Not sure what the purpose of the cloth is with the way she wears it (look y'all I actually found a fairly tame picture which is actually a cover) but the bow is cute.
Her mouth goes between having string sewn between her lips to her teeth with one or two missing. (This picture actually having both).
As a comparison to book description, she sits in the more okay category. But she does get grace as she is a full on re-imagining of Oz and not attempting to be the original characters or a re-telling. (This version was a human named Jenny Patch, accused of Witchcraft and drowned, then became the villain Patchwork Girl who has the ability to turn other people into dolls she can control).
I also, personally. I really like her design. I wish it wasn't as sexualized but unfortunately that's a given with Zenescope women but I feel they tried to use that to their advantage somewhat. She is also often used for a horror angle so they tried to incorporate her Patchwork into the design.
I love Oz, I love Scraps, I love horror, I enjoy a lot of super hero comics (I love the DC Batman Rogues Gallery) so I feel like I appreciate a lot of the angles in it for many reasons and as a re-imagining I do actually really like the design.
Here is a picture of her with a half glowing eye by the way that was clearly trying to go for the more horror angle.
I'm going to use this as a point for the last Scraps design on the list.
Rating: 8/10
9. The Zombieful World of Oz
To which I feel like she looks like the love child between Caliber and Zenescope.
As she's so close to those designs I don't feel like I have to really give the comparison. But, I will say she is very clearly the Scraps character in this context and even as we are leaning into more humanized territory for the whole comic she is made of Patchwork and clearly not human still.
I always kinda hate it when they give her a flesh colored patch because I feel like it makes her look more human and part doll. But this is actually a horror comic so I suppose that was what they were going for, for all I know that's what it's going to be.
Not my favorite but I don't hate the design, it fits what it's for.
5/10
I do want to state particularly as I come to the end of this post, because I have hit the limit of how many pictures I can put in a post, no matter what I think of her design I am always excited to see any Oz Media include her.
Some others I do want to get to if I make other parts of this:
Legends of Oz: Wicked West ~ Comic
Emerald City Confidential ~ Game
Oz Kids ~ Show
Ozopolis ~ Comic
Magic Merge ~ Mobile Game
Eric Shanower ~ Books/Comics/Art
Oz Squad ~ Comics/Book
Otis Frampton ~ Comics
There are very few more but, compared to the hundreds of media Oz there is the ones that have Scraps is actually very few, even fewer as a main character and I am determined to find everything with her.
If you actually read all of this or even skimmed through it thank you so so much I know this is a lot. I'd love to hear any thoughts you may have, either on her designs or the media itself!
Let me know if you'd like to see a part 2 to this. Or, if you'd like to see a similar review but instead of designs I talk about her character and portrayal in each media. It will knock out some that are just cameos but allow me to include some like Oz media books that have her.
Kinda like my reviews project which is being worked on in drafts, the real point of this is to talk about obscure Oz media, this or a character review having focuse on Scraps since she is my favorite underrated Oz character. I may make a poll later.
Again, thank you for reading!
Since it's Pride month, do I get to show everyone pictures to show my love for various versions of Scraps?
I mean I know and a lot of others know my main way of enjoying fandoms is with ships, and Scraps x Scarecrow is my main ship, but my autistic lesbian mind may have attached to her too much.
This isn't even near all of them, I just hit the limit for the first grouping. Scraps may not be in a lot of Oz media by comparison, but the little she's in, I'm determined to find and read/watch all of them. I've read/watched all of these and more, I may make a list at some point.
Anyway I absolutely adore her.
So we were watching a movie in class of this old play we're gonna be reading
and like
that's just straight up Miss Glinda The Good Witch™
like girly is doing THE MOST with her outfit and I'm kinda living for it tbh
Oh freakin' heck X)
It's L'Avare de de Funès!
Every French people will know this. The most famous movie adaptation of Molière's classic "The Miser", "L'Avare", due to being created by Louis de Funès, considered the greatest humoristic actor of 20th century French cinema.
Hey, do you as an Oz expert know what's the deal with Lurline? I've been hearing this name thrown around in the Oz/Wicked fandom and this idea that she's the creator goddess of the land of Oz, is this bit of lore from the Baum books or a Maguire/Wicked original? Also, is she really the mother of the original books character Princess Ozma, as I have heard? Does she have any connection to the witches? Is there any particular book about her or featuring her?
Before answering I want to point out I am not an Oz expert! I am flattered you think so but I am actually more of a casual fan who always like to check out stuff X)
That being said no need to be a huge expert to tell you about Lurline because she is one of these things Oz fans learn as early as just checking out the Baum books - because yes, she was invented by L. Frank Baum and then was reinvented by various Oz adaptations. Well, Baum did not invent the name "Lurline", it was already going around before (like in the opera of the same name, where she was presented as a water nymph, one of the "Rhine maidens" - the very name "Lurline" being a variation of the famous German figure of the Lorelei), but Baum made her an entirely different character.
She first appeared in "The Tin Woodman of Oz", aka the 12th Oz book, where Baum invents a backstory for the reason Oz is as it is (beyond the Witch of North's earlier comment that Oz simply is part of the lands of Earth that remained "untouched by civilization" due to its isolation) - in this book it is claimed Oz turned into a "fairy country" because Queen Lurline, ruler and creator of all fairies, placed it under an eternal enchantment - the same enchantment that Baum used to justify all the strange "rules" he later added in Oz that make it an otherwordly place (like how people somehow never die in Oz, a later addition to the lore that Baum made the work of Lurline's spell, among other things). While not the creator of Oz, per se, she is presented as the source of Oz's magic, otherwordliness and "fairyness". This is notably why in adaptations it was easy to jump into "Lurline created Oz". As Maguire did... sort-of.
Maguire did made Lurline into a divine figure and at the core of a religion (which was, obviously, not the case in Baum's books where Oz has no religion), but it was part of his... Dare I say "90s edgy dark fantasy" project since, of course, it takes place in a traditional "Christianity versus paganism" battle so dear to fantasy authors from Mists of Avalon to A Song of Ice and Fire - though again, closer to Mists of Avalon (I keep saying Maguire's Wicked keeps making parallels and coincidences with Mists of Avalon, it's crazy) since in Maguire's Oz Lurline/Lurlina is the central Goddess at the heart of Oz's original, "pagan", religion, that gets replaced in the times of the book with Christianity... Sorry, I mean, the religion "Of the Unnamed God", Unionism. And she also is the central figure of "Lurlinemas", which despite her being a pagan goddess makes her a Christian one since she is supposed to be the God/Jesus of Christmas? It's... it's complicated. As with anything involving the original Wicked book(s).
Back to the original Oz canon, is Ozma the daughter of Lurline? Well... yes? No? Sort of? Maybe? The same way Lurline was a late addition to the Oz lore that became a "canon", Baum used her to retcon, yet again, Ozma's backstory. The royalty of Oz is without a doubt one of the most unstable parts of the "original Oz canon" since Baum gave us like three or four different versions of it and keep changing it. While in the first books Ozma is but the long-lost heir to the throne and the last descendant of a line of kings and queens very much human, from "The Tin Woodman of Oz" onward Baum started and followed upon the idea that Lurline, before leaving Oz, left one of her fairies behind to rule over it as a maiden-magical-queen... And it was Ozma. Yes, somehow the same Ozma we are told was just a baby when the Wizard arrived and isn't a human girl anymore but an immortal fairy.
Mind you, it had been stated before that Ozma was a fairy, not a regular human girl - as early as the 9th Oz book, The Scarecrow of Oz, Ozma was presented as the last descendant of a "long line of fairy queens" - with Lurline's addition later on, this builds a picture that several adaptations used for their own worldbuilding, that Lurline left behind a fairy to rule Oz who became the first Ozian queen and the first Ozma, who then had descendants who in turn became the new fairy queens of Oz, all named Ozma. HOWEVER Baum started changing his mind after introducing Lurline - in "The Magic of Oz" (13th Oz book) he introduced the idea that, despite Ozma looking only fourteen, she was in truth very old, impossibly old, so old nobody, not even Glinda, knew how old she was ; and this info was to prepare the "final" reveal, in the last Oz book he ever wrote, "Glinda of Oz", that Ozma (the one Dorothy hangs out with) is the same as the fairy Lurline left behind when she enchanted Oz...
Which of course does not make sense with the "line of queens" we were introduced before unless, like several adaptations, you choose to believe in reincarnation. Various Oz media decided that the simplest way to deal with all this was to make it so that the original fairy Lurline left behind reincarnated herself constantly as the new Oz fairy-queen, explaining why there was a line of "fairy-queens" named Ozma and why the current Ozma was just a baby when the Wizard arrived yet is so old not even Glinda knows her true age...
A quick trip to the Wikipedia page for Lurline can also introduce you to the debate among Oz fans about whether the various fairy queens in Baum's non-Ozian works are also Lurline, because he kept reusing variations of her name (the Queen of the Wood Nymphs is Zurline yet different from the character of the Queen of Fairies, in the IX book you have another fairy queen named "Lurlea"...), and it doesn't help he later made a huge crossover placing all these different lands next to each other meaning all these fairy queens somehow coexist... Are they all sisters or one and the same? That's for you to judge! The same way is she the literal mother of Ozma or just her queen-creator figure and thus "mother"? Again, up for you to decide... Some adaptations did a variation by having Lurline actually loving Pastoria, the human king before the Wizard arrived, and Ozma being their child (since Baum never ever wrote about Pastoria's wife and she is mysteriously absent), which is another way to try to concile the contradicting versions.
Now, does Lurline have any connection to the witches? So far... It seems that no? I have never seen or heard of any direct connection, interaction or link between Lurline and the witches in any Oz media. I am sure in the various table-top roleplaying games of Oz there are connections made between the witches and fairies, mostly due to them using magic - with some backstories and magic systems provided... But beyond this, no. The closest tie they could have with Lurline would be through Ozma, since the witches' true interactions are with Ozma (Mombi or Glinda mainly). Unless you take Maguire's Oz, because in this version Nessarose is a devout (if not fanatical) religious power for the Unnamed God imposing Unionism upon Oz - and thus an enemy, theologically speaking, of Lurline seeking to erase her "pagan cult"...
The only times "Lurline" has some connection with witches would be... When she is not Lurline X) I am thinking about the two cases where the creation of Oz is not the doing of a fairy-queen but of a legendary wizard. In the mini-series "Dorothy and the Witches of Oz", where the creator of Oz is now Bini Aru (character from "The Magic of Oz", reinvented as a historical wizar) and his grimoire which contains the very powerful, sacred words of magical creation that made Oz are either defended by the good witches and wizards, or sought after by the wicked ones. And in the Soviet rip-off - sorry, "alternate telling" - "Tales of the Magic Land", where the titular Magic Land was now enchanted/created by the wizard Hurrikap, who doesn't have any actual relationship with the cardinal witches (he was dead when they arrived I think?) but was the one who helped defeat and lock away the wicked witch that plagued Oz before the others came, Arachna the spider-witch...
As for any specific book featuring her, she appears here and there in books and short-stories, either written by "Oz Historians" after Baum or by other Oz writers beyond the Famous Forty, but I can't give you any precise name.
EDIT: @chicoodm pointed out there is one piece of Oz literature where Lurline is connected to the witches! Quote:
I know at least one piece of Oz media in wich Lurline and the witches were connected and interacted, the book Paradox in Oz by Edward Einhorn, in it they were involved in Lurline's enchantment of Oz and were taught magic directly by her.
I think some or all of the Witches were said to be children of Lurline in the March Laumer books, but I can't remember for sure.
Imelda Staunton as Dorothy Gale (1987)
Some of the Wizard of Oz's songs performed by the Cetra Quartett + title cards and scenepack of the wicked witch from the 1949 italian dub of the MGM movie. This was the only dub that translated the songs alongside the spoken words into italian
@themousefromfantasyland @witchesoz @ariel-seagull-wings
I do not recall if I posted this here before. As I checked the books out of my library a long time ago, I stumbled upon this one book, and it contained this one specific map of "Oz and neighboring lands" created for it:
This is the French version, of course, since I am French. I don't know if an English exists. In French it is called "Dictionnaire des lieux imaginaires" (Dictionary of imaginary places), by Alberto Manguel and Gianni Guadalupi.
I saw this cartoon on Pinterest, and now I want this to be a secret twist in some future Oz adaptation
@ariel-seagull-wings @thealmightyemprex @the-blue-fairie @witchesoz
When I was a child I misread the line in the Wizard of Oz where Glinda says "I'm a little muddled" as "I'm their little mother," so I for a while thought the Munchkins were all her children.
That's very interesting.
Let me see if I can think of some childhood misconceptions I had about popular stories... So far I can only think of one.
When I first read The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, I didn't know what Turkish Delight was and didn't know there was a country called Turkey as well as a bird, so I imagined Edmund eating some type of fancy turkey sausage.
Also on the subject of porridge, when I was a little kid and I watched the Wizard of Oz for the first time, i had never encountered the word courage yet so I thought the cowardly lion just really wanted some porridge. And I always thought it was weird that the scarecrow and the tinman wanted a brain and a heart and the lion just wanted some porridge but kinda just accepted that what was the film. But I hated that lion for years bc I didnt think his wish was that deep.
This reminds me of when I thought "Turkish delight" was "turkey delight," and thought Edmund in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe was eating cubes of turkey sausage instead of candy.
Except this is funnier.
Especially because in the original Wizard of Oz book, the Cowardly Lion does sample some porridge at one point, when Dorothy and friends stop at a farmhouse just outside the Emerald City, and he doesn't like it.