I’ve missed you on my dash. Was just thinking of you earlier today ❤️
OMG I was thinking of you too! ♥️ how are you??

@theartofmadeline

#extradirty

pixel skylines
dirt enthusiast
hello vonnie
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
AnasAbdin

No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
cherry valley forever

Origami Around
Claire Keane
almost home
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Product Placement
Keni
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
$LAYYYTER
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea

seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Nepal
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Thailand
@woodswit
I’ve missed you on my dash. Was just thinking of you earlier today ❤️
OMG I was thinking of you too! ♥️ how are you??
The main issue with the passage of time is the numbers keep getting too big. Don't care for it. If I think about how close we are to the year 2030 I'll throw up
John Steinbeck, Journal of a Novel: The East of Eden Letters
screw nonchalance embrace being crazy and intense about everything
LOL
Sidney swearing like no tomorrow. He sounds like a gamer being ragebaited lmao
Video credits to @tracypop3 on tiktok
Jon Snow & Sansa Stark reunited in Game of Thrones 6x04 - Book of the Stranger (May 15th, 2016)
Oh, it would be so sweet, to see him once again.
- A Feast for Crows - Alayne II
“Let’s talk about nasty for a second. I think the Rangers strike the right balance between nasty and finesse; I think the Penguins do because inherently their best player is a bastard. Make no mistake, Sidney Crosby is a bastard - I love Sid, but he’s a bastard. He’s crafty, and he’s dirty - that’s why we like Sid.” - MvsW 1/23/13
consuming media like
anytime I talk to @woodswit about book 3
a weekly audit of recent skincare, wellness, and beauty finds & trials
my latest substack on beauty, aesthetics, and wellness is live! happy sunday, tumblrinas - may your sunday be filled with sunny walks and fresh laundry.
What are your tips to write dialogue?
there are some basic tips that I won’t repeat here since you probably already are aware. IMO the rules for dialogue will largely be dictated by the rules you’ve set for the world you’re building. in a story, dialogue can trigger the next action/scene, inspire change, or bring the reader up to speed on something (among many other things), so knowing what kind of world you’re in and what your rules are will act as both guard rails and inspiration for how dialogue should do these things.
as an example it irks me when dialogue is too pointed or tidy in a contemporary romance (the world is already arranged for a cute storm in a snow globe; why is everyone also perfect? what is the point of setting perfect machines free in a simple world?), but I’m fine with it in a high fantasy (quick communication of symbols between archetypes is expedient in an overloaded story).
(I will also say that I do research for a living and interview transcripts REALLY drive home how rare it is for normal humans to speak in full, eloquent yet direct sentences… so I’m probably hypersensitive to this.)
for me it’s not just about genre; it’s more about what the engine of your story is and what you want to do with the genre rules. so for example a slice of life where the author wants to nod to magical realism while never actually using it will have different dialogue rules than a slice of life where the author wants to discuss how impossible it is to know our fellow humans. In both stories the dialogue CAN be a lot more strange and unexpected, your word selection can have a lot more freedom, etc. - but how that plays out on the page will be specific to the story.
and here is my controversial take: It doesn’t need to be what the reader expects or what the reader wants/thinks is good. It just has to work in concert with everything else you’re doing to build the universe and experience. if you’re creating a mystery where you want the world to feel bigger, lusher, and more complex than the protagonist grasps, you might have side characters use esoteric words here and there that they might not typically use. it’s like an extra stitch of a color that wasn’t in the main palette but when you step back it adds dimension and changes the tone, or quietly signals that the rules of the game may be different than expected. the reader might pick up on it as “wrong” but that’s what you wanted.
dialogue is a litmus test for me, in that if I know my characters and they’re ready to be played with, I don’t overthink the word choice or rhythm and it just comes to me; rounds of editing allow me to add in those further stitches. this isn’t true for everyone and it’s not necessarily a sign that your dialogue is “good,” or that your characters have distinct voices (which is another aspect of dialogue that will be shaped by your universe’s rules, since the voices you need will be partly dependent on the end result you’re looking for). it’s just, for ME, a sign that I’ve done my homework sufficiently… or that I have more universe development to do. so if I’m thinking too hard about dialogue when drafting, it’s generally a sign that I’m not ready to write.
this is a lot like the advice around using adverbs and filler words: it’s not that you can’t use them, it’s that they have an effect and it’s worth it to be aware of the effect. if your dialogue is the only thing that ever triggers a plot point, it’s possible that you have too much of it - otoh this may be what you’re going for. if your dialogue spans many pages and has many characters speaking, you may be suffering from “group chat syndrome” - otoh this may be one of your story’s quirks that hooks the right readers and turns off the wrong ones.
this was probably not very helpful and basically my answer boils down to “if you have a vision then you can do whatever you want” but it’s my honest answer so. there is that! *slinks off*
Have you seen the new Devil Wears Prada movie?
I have not!
ST Anon: Very interesting thing you said about TV as a medium, because a multi-seasons show is such a unique way to tell stories when you think about it. I genuinely can't think of any other storytelling medium where you're as limited as TV, just in terms of how much your breadcrumbs may become boulders you'll have to carry through the rest of the show while having very limited visibility on what you'll be able to portray on the next season. It's different from stories that span through multiple books because TV is a logistical nightmare on top of that: it's expensive, actors age, drop out, you lose locations, sets and crew... I watch a lot of TV and I've noticed that there's definitely been a rise of showrunners who seem clueless about the reality of their own craft. That or they're downright arrogant enough to think they'll be able to override these limitations through sheer genius. Many people said that but the real genius of Vince Gilligan as a TV writer is definitely his complete inability to actually predict where his story goes and let himself be surprised by what naturally occured. I just think you have a responsability to your story and to carry it out to its NATURAL conclusion, and I'm really surprised by how many "showrunners" now want to believe they can retain complete control over their stories. In the case of ST, they deliberately wrote a queer character in love with his best friend in a setting where social stigma and homophobia was rampant and then tried to get away with not addressing it, which is crazy because they made these choices! Now that it's there, the only way to respect your audience and not lose them is to address it.
yeah and I think the role of the audience has changed so much. a lot of these show runners are on social media and even if they weren’t, there will be marketing teams for the streaming services who are paying attention to critical and fan reception to episodes and seasons and that will inform decisions. some of the worst writing mistakes I’ve made were because I either got input on an idea that wasn’t baked yet, or I tried to imagine what input I’d get on said idea, and then caved to that.
so I wonder how often showrunners fall victim to this, where the reception of a creative choice drives them away from their original intent. I’ve become incredibly guarded with my writing because it’s just too hard to filter useful feedback from what amounts to differences in taste or vision, and it’s just not worth it to me. I’d rather have something that is potentially shitty than something that bent to someone else’s taste - but I also know that at the end of the day I’m weak and want validation so it’s better for me to just not expose my stuff until it’s done and there’s no room for me to pull back on my original vision. I absolutely could NOT be a TV writer!!!!
what you’re getting at is something that has been bugging me a bit lately - the blurring of art and engagement, where entertainment is in the overlap between these two things and they both require craft so it’s easy to mistake them but only one requires your soul. I don’t know how to quite articulate it except that if everything is created to be engaged with then the stakes for putting real soul into it are just too high and art (such as stories told via tv show) increasingly feel soulless or cheap. and you can’t fix it with writing rules or better writers. maybe at the start of ST there was a real grain of a story there but maybe it tested poorly or that writer got fired or something and whatever bit of soul was driving that thread got lost? idk
This is extremely random but I always wondered what would be your reading on the dynamic between Will Byers/Mike Wheeler in Stranger Things. You probably haven’t seen ST (as you should) but their dynamic is definitely one of the most compelling I’ve ever seen, even from a non-shipping aspect. They wrote the show so that the natural resolution of all their ongoing conflicts (interpersonal AND intrapersonal) and the SUPERNATURAL plot was them getting together and I genuinely felt like I was being gaslit when it didn’t happen. Very interesting case of ‘writing yourself into a corner’ to me (and I’m not even going into the very nasty queerbaiting of it all).
yeah i think writing television is a cursed art because you're constantly laying out random breadcrumbs with the assumption that a different writer may or may not pick them up in a future season. i can't think of too many shows where i felt like the sum of the show's parts was equal to its whole (happy valley is the only one that comes to mind at the moment) - but for a longer series like ST, there's almost no way to win.
i've heard that there was strong disagreement from the creators in how to end the series. it's a shame. i was never going to be interested in it because i don't care to follow teenaged characters, but it seemed like they had a lot of compelling characters and dynamics to start with.
re: the queerbaiting, this is a very interesting topic to me. obviously there's a line where the dynamic goes from compelling to clickbait. this is even weirder and harder to parse with teenaged characters. it's one thing i HIGHLY suspect will be terrible in winds of winter (if it ever gets published, unlikely i guess). based on the sample chapters, seems like GRRM wants to explore Arya's burgeoning sexuality and you could say it's exploitative of his audience (the SHOCK of it!!) but it feels a bit more like we're just walking in on him doing something private. in other stories, like euphoria, the exploration of teen queerness feels both exploitative/baiting and also fetishized. and yet there are stories out there that should be told, for example of two teen boys who maybe have a something between them that they can't identify or explain but maybe never gets acted on/fulfilled. i don't really have a point here, except that i feel like this is a topic that middle aged/elderly men need to just set aside for a while.
anyway thanks for the ask - i'm sorry that the show wrote itself into a corner like that. tbh it sounds like EVERYBODY was mad about that ending!
How many blogs do you follow here?
A little over 700. Why?
Congrats on your Flyers moving forward.
I’m still in happy disbelief that my Wild are moving forward. (It’s been 11 years since we moved to the next round.)
CONGRATS TO BOTH OF US!!!
I watched a few of your games—SO fun, that was a good series.
If we get even one win in the next series, I’ll be proud of my guys. I think more than that would take an act of god 😂 but I’m so proud of them for getting this far!
yes
YES