Drench is the i-umlauted causative of drink
Soā¦quench logically ought to be the i-umlauted causative ofā¦..quink??
ā¦oh?? *kwankijana?? (hehā¦kwankā¦) - so it is a causativeā¦
Ohā¦my aspjfkl;dasfjdsklf god? *kwinkanÄ
? Itās real!! I need to know moreā¦
āUncertainā, huhā¦okay, to go out, makes senseā¦when you quench your thirst, you make it go out. When you drench something, you make it drink (at least that was its original sense).
So, to quink is to go outā¦likeā¦I guess you could say āThe fire quinkedā ? Wait - the past tense of drink is drank, so the past tense of quinkā
YESS!! QUANK!Ā āThe fire quank not long after sunsetā¦āĀ āMy energy quank by the third mile of the raceā¦āĀ āMy love for you quank many years agoā¦ā
Although, considering thatĀ āto quench oneās thirstā is used in contexts that metaphorically express satisfaction, perhaps we could also sayĀ āMy desire for revenge finally quank with his untimely deathā orā¦hmm, quink, quankā¦kwunk?
Letās see hereā¦so, looking it up, the forms ofĀ *kwinkanÄ
starting with kunk- are equivalent to the forms of *drinkanÄ
starting with drunk-. Presumably because Proto-Germanic didnāt allow /kwu/, so it just became /ku/. But that /u/ would have likely become modern English /Ź/, and the sequence /wŹ/ seems perfectly fine to meā¦so we can restore the /w/ through analogy. Though weāll have to spell it kwunk for it to read the way we want. This means we can now sayā¦
āWeāre going to let the fire quink by itself.ā
āSorry, the fire quank hours ago.ā
āThe fire will have kwunk by morning.ā
āMy jealousy will quink when I finally steal her husband.ā
āMy jealousy quank after I stole her husband.ā
āMy jealousy has kwunk now that Iāve stolen her husband.ā
āMy hunger wonāt quink no matter how much I eat!ā
āMy thirst already quank.ā
āOh no, my appetite is quite kwunk with all the food Iāve eaten.ā
āOh, Iām not hungry.āĀ āYouāre not kwunk, are you?? You spoiled your dinner with snacks!ā