shit like this brings the movement down. everyone cares about transmisogyny til there's a tfem woman of color around.
sheepfilms
trying on a metaphor
🪼
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
macklin celebrini has autism

pixel skylines
NASA
KIROKAZE
Stranger Things
Not today Justin
One Nice Bug Per Day
occasionally subtle
hello vonnie

Product Placement

Kiana Khansmith
Jules of Nature
noise dept.

titsay

izzy's playlists!

Kaledo Art
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Taiwan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from Japan

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from TĂĽrkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@zorgyyy
shit like this brings the movement down. everyone cares about transmisogyny til there's a tfem woman of color around.
can we please acknowledge that tma/tme is a meaningful distinction? a justice of the US supreme court is openly saying that it's legal to discriminate against trans women because the same laws do not target trans men. the transmisogyny is what makes it permissible. your transphobia is fine as long as it has carveouts for men.
since i posted this, many comments and tags have accused me of not caring about trans men's feelings. let me go on the record: they are correct; i do not care about men's feelings. i especially don't care about men's feelings when the US Supreme Court rules that categorical bans on trans women's participation in women's sports are constitutional, overturning precedent from multiple lower courts, and establishing a legal basis for weaponizing Title IX against us.
describing this as generalized transphobia flattens out the differences in how variously trans people are variously discriminated against. framing this as transmisogyny correctly focuses our attention on the ways in which discrimination which uniquely targets transfems is weaponized. there will no doubt be downstream effects felt by any number of transmisogyny exempt people, and they will rightly feel upset about the injustices they will experience. i do not want those things to happen, but they will and it will be bad and wrong when they do. but the first people targeted will be those least able to exempt ourselves from transmisogyny, those named explicitly in the majority opinion.
you'll pardon me for not sparing much consideration for future injustices when my sisters and siblings are already suffering, already being cast out and labeled as dangerous, things whose inclusion is a bourgeois luxury reserved only for when we have the time to weigh the complications and the nuance.
to hell with you all.
Frankly if youre transmasc and you read the above and all you can think is "But what about meeeee" instead of "Oh my god, I'm being used as a justification for the discrimination of my sisters, I must speak up for them, and fight for them with all I have!!! I do not want hate being pushed on transfems in my name!!!", you are heartless, and should make your first priority to find wherever you lost your heart.
While I do think the TADC finale was fundamentally badly written, the Jax trans stuff was like the least of my issues with it. But the fact that it’s canon now and people are focusing on SOLELY that and trying to tell TRANS WOMEN that it’s bad rep is actually insane. Here’s a fun fact for you faggots- you will never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever
EVER
understand the blinding rage it is to be trans, and specifically be a trans woman. In terms of gender, we are literally at the bottom of the patriarchal society. We are genuine, honest pieces of shit in everyone else’s eyes who have to build ourselves up from what is worse than nothing. It’s not so much simple as “letting your inner self shine 🥹” more than it is having to unlearn 20 billion different kinds of bigotry from 20 billion different fucking angles to achieve a happier version of yourself- that other people are already born with- because you’re an amalgamation, disgusting piece of shit. And not to mention, 90% of the fucking time you have to do it ALL on your own. So yeah. I think it’s PERFECTLY fine for a trans woman to make a morally bad character who is a worst case scenario representation of her own internal fears, especially when the narrative genuinely does treat said character like the piece of shit they are. It’s not anyone else’s fault but y’alls own that you’re self-obsessed idiots who never paid attention in HS English, causing you misconstrue what a writer puts down on pen to their actual opinions and morality, FUCKK y’all. Everyone wants to speak on trans women until trans women want to speak on themselves.
being trans and/or facing misogyny yourself does not make you less capable of wielding transmisogyny if you are TME
if you face misogyny yourself then that often actually gives your transmisogyny sharper teeth--that's one of the major things terfs take advantage of, positioning themselves as the real victims of misogyny at the hands of trans women. if you are TME and you face misogyny then you will be considered one of the vulnerable targets of the evil trannies, which very much sharpens the teeth of your transmisogyny
likewise, if you are trans yourself, then consider that one of the prevailing narratives about trans men and other TME trans people is that you have been manipulated into transition by the evil, perverted trans women in the shadows. a lot of propaganda has done the work of coding you as one of our victims. your transness does not defang your transmisogyny at all here, in some ways it makes it more dangerous
these are some of the primary reasons queer spaces are not necessarily safer for trans women, because they can easily fall into, knowingly or otherwise, abusing the above dynamics. you cannot pretend your identity defangs your transmisogyny. it does not
notice, by the way, that the dynamics here are misogynistic and transphobic toward you
it is misogynistic to think of (cis) women and/or "AFABs" as fragile helpless babies who need protection from marginalized women
it is transphobic to think that trans men only transition because they've been manipulated into it
and yet both of these dynamics still sharpen the teeth of your transmisogyny, despite said dynamics harming you too
happy pride to all the lesbians
i came across the term "transemasculation" for the first time today, and at a cursory glance, it seems to be a far more useful way for trans masculine people to talk about things such as the "confused butch girl" myth than the transmisogynistic "transandrophobia" baseline. my thought is it emphasizes that these are men being denied manhood due to transness, not being oppressed for being men. i'm curious what the larger transfeminist community thinks of this term
Yeah it's the better conception than transandrophobia for sure, and it centers the understanding that this isn't a separate axis of oppression, which helps a lot.
Of course, the transmisanbros won't use it (or if they do, they just use it as a more acceptable term and not a different conception of the whole idea) because they are more interested in denying their capability to participate in transmisogyny then actually describing their experiences.
continue to be flabbergasted by the genre of trans guys who will say “trans men are men!!!” until they’re blue in the face, but when it’s time to talk about male privilege and transmisogyny, suddenly they’re poor little AFABs with glass bones and paper skin.
No one is saying you don’t face transphobia. We’re saying you have privilege for being men within a patriarchy. why does that make you so angry and why do you feel the need to call me a dumbass nazi terf about it
you have to fuck her neovagina so hard you give her a pregnancy scare. it's the only way
i love the word transsexual (not because it "sounds cool radical transgressive" ew i'm not the brand of tboy who fetishizes being oppressed -particularly being transmisogynized. i love it because when trans people transition they change their sexgender not "just their gender" like every liberal self appointed "ally" believes). but then you have to deal with people who think the thing that makes you transsexual is like. a surgery. i'm gonna kms why do trans people feel the need to reinvent transmedicalism every 5 minutes.
Made this in 10 minutes but you see the vision, statement
As an ace, this is true allyship.
@justcakethanks original template
Beach episode but awesome???
as a tme person with a transfeminine sister it is extremely clear to me that we absolutely do not have an equivalent experience.
she did not experience "male socialization." when i look back on our childhood, it is easy to understand that there was no privilege to that concept. she was forced to try and shrink herself into the shape of a man, and was abused when she didn't succeed at playing the part. being "raised as a boy" only highlighted the stark incongruity between what was expected of her and what she was. this repeatedly led to her facing violence.
and to be clear i genuinely don't care if you think a rude comment from an exasperated trans woman online is as equally bad as the literal risk of her being murdered when she walks outside. this is not a competition, being the most visible is not a prize. i genuinely fear for my sister's life.
Stephen King released a novel last year with just a straight up uncomplicated uncritical rendition of the plural tranny psycho killer antagonist and in the afterword was like "i wanted to do something like Psycho :)"
these things have not been reckoned with
this isn't directly related to the ongoing discussion of this trope in horror and the transmisogynistic legacy of seminal horror films like Psycho, but i think it's worth talking about as a larger illustration of the narrative roles afforded to transfeminized characters:
there is exactly one other explicitly transfeminized character in this series by King (the Bill Hodges/Holly Gibney series of detective novels). she appears in the climax of End of Watch (2016) as one victim in a montage of victims coerced into suicide by the antagonist. she is described very clearly as a trans girl, but is directly referred to by the text as a gay boy. i won't go into detail, but her on-page suicide (unlike the others in the montage) is a dark comedy beat, played for laughs
yes! nail on the head right here. like yes, it's worth it to be like "fuck stephen king" and criticize the particulars of his transmisogynistic writing, but the broader point is that this is what transfemininity looks like in pop culture and it's what it looks like right now!
this isn't history or a settled issue, it's our current reality
"trans men have been historically included in lesbian spaces!" and trans women have been historically excluded from them, what's your fucking point? and also by historically they always mean america and european countries, which is the only queer history they know of
One of my hottest transfeminist takes that I have is regarding drag and ballroom actually. Read the whole thing in depth instead of skimming it then getting mad at me.
I think that the US transfemme desire to disown drag/ballroom is a symptom of both white culture’s destruction of ancestral ties and the importance of cultural continuity, and of the predominantly white ignorance of it as a gentrified Black art form similar to how whites treat other Black art. They want a destruction of it because they see the effects and results of the gentrified version and assume that’s all there is/was.
In particular it’s frustrating because while some drag queens are cis, a lot are trans women, non-binary, or otherwise transmisogynized and drag/ballroom and the tipping culture associated with it existed in part because the transmisogynized are so fucking unemployable and it provided/s a method beyond mutual aid for the redistribution of money, through the labor of performance.
In relation to trans women, I view drag queens as a pathway to transness similar to crossdressers, femboys, (unfortunately) sissies, and similar - where although the perception of them currently may cause harm to the perception of trans women at large due to the ways they compromise with predominantly white cishetero society to allow transfemmes to explore their gender, they are, in fact, still functionally people within the spectrum of transfemininity even if they haven’t fully accepted their gender expansiveness for themselves. Harm they cause to the perception of transfemmes does not lessen them from that societal assignment, any less than we can say Caitlyn Jenner, Blair White, or Kelly Cadigan are less trans women because of the harm they’ve done to the perception of trans women. They are all, in effect, varying levels of transmisogynized whether they realize it or not.
When I was in DC I knew a lot of drag kings/queens and literally 95% of them are trans and either came to drag/ballroom as a way to explore their gender through art and/or make money bc poor, or started it and it was a gateway to unlocking their gender. Not counting the cis performers elevated by stuff like RuPaul, who is explicitly transphobic, I think I can count on my hands how many cis performers I’ve met. Hell, even with RuPaul shit a number of drag artists who have been on his shows later come out as trans (such as Bosco, who I literally grew up with), in part because they suppressed their transness publicly to maintain their career until they reached a point the blowback of coming out wound impact them less. Pulling a F1NNSTER to keep cash flowing for survival, if you will.
Iunno like. The earliest Balls we have records of were literally 1880-90s, predominantly Black (the oldest drag/ballroom performer we have records of was a Black trans woman from DC), and was one of the only safe places for trans people to exist as themselves. So I find the idea of writing it off due to a much more recent gentrification and commercialization of it as ignorant as how people often treat other demonizes or commercialized Black art.
“I just don’t like the spectacle it makes of transness and harm it causes-“
Baby all Blackness is spectacle to crackers and An Amount of modern drag is white people doing minstrelsy of all Black women - not in the sense of gender at all but in the sense of race.
Like. A lot of Black culture in the US specifically is Big and Loud *because* of the repression of it we’ve faced and the force towards respectability politics, which has echoed to queer culture because queer culture in the US is made vast majority from Black culture. Our existence is a spectacle so why not make a show out of why they hate us and try to erase us so that they can’t get rid of even more.
Hating “the spectacle” of an actual performance art form is solidly rooted in white supremacy and white cultural notions of propriety/respectability. Many aspects of “spectacle” seen in drag are directly taken from Ballroom or adapted from it/vogueing.
In summary: traditions are meant to change with situational, cultural, and environmental need but still be sustained as part of a culture. Gentrification is a poison to this that makes it harder for those the culture belongs to to practice it as it should. White ancestral shame is a poison that makes them think they should nuke everything historic/cultural that makes them uncomfortable regardless of whether it’s theirs or whether it’s something they stole and gentrified. Also yeag like,,, it’s a job/gig income predominantly for societal “undesirables” to make money when they’re under/unemployed due to marginalization. And it’s also been gentrified to *gestures at RuPaul, et al.*
No matter what you think about drag or ballroom, poor predominantly racialized trans folks still gon be doing it because it is part of our culture no matter what tv shows and big names and people who have only seen those do to it, and it’s always going to be seen as one of the “disreputable” pathways to transness that makes other trans people look down on them because of the complicated ties to transmisogyny, because until someone publicly says the words “Im also a trans woman”, WE also view them as a personification of what we fear the world sees us as—a man in a dress—rather than an egg finding their way to gender in a way we deem unacceptable because it doesn’t align with how we think it “should” be done.
And I think that’s on us honestly, not on them. If we say it can take as long or as quickly and as easily or messily for someone to sort out their gender as needed, this also has to be extended to the transmisogynized we view as “disreputable” regardless of if/when they reach a conclusion we deem acceptable or whether they die in the shell, never able to remove their masks fully.
Aight yall gon head and eviscerate me now
Also as a clarification, I am not saying that you, personally, must enjoy/like/do drag or ballroom. Im saying that drag, crossies, sissies, femboys, etc. are all transmisogyny paradoxes because of the way they interface gender exploration with surviving doing so in a transmisogynistic system by compromising for safety or a degree of acceptance within spaces they’ve found accept it.
Like, as an example, I *hate* sissies because of the racism endemic to sissy culture, but I still recognize they’re transmisogynized regardless of the harm they do or the disgust I feel towards them.
I also had someone comment on it as a facet of US cultural imperialism, of which I do want to note - drag/ballroom based on Black origins was spreading outside the US back in the 1800s/early 1900s too, there’s photos from other countries of balls explicitly influenced by Black Balls mainly started by Black folks in said countries, an example being early 1900s photos from France of both transmasculine and transfeminine Black people. While modern gentrified drag is 100% exported as part of US cultural imperialism, its original spreads outside of the US were via Black diaspora in-culture. I honestly couldn’t tell you definitively where it stuck and where it didn’t from that original wave, but it’s important to know it existed that way.
I have some physical books on this I might see if I can add to the archive tbh, if I can I’ll reblog this again with links.
đź©·Braiding Hairđź©·
They're girlfriends your honor!