If you can’t hide the wires, make them part of the decor
:0 holy fuck I’m doing this one day @delena-hupp

shark vs the universe
Game of Thrones Daily

JBB: An Artblog!
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Sade Olutola

oozey mess
h
will byers stan first human second
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Cosimo Galluzzi
almost home
KIROKAZE

★

Origami Around

Andulka
dirt enthusiast
d e v o n
NASA

No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
seen from Ecuador

seen from Japan

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from India
seen from Chile
seen from Venezuela
seen from Iraq
seen from Kosovo
@0x23-blog
If you can’t hide the wires, make them part of the decor
:0 holy fuck I’m doing this one day @delena-hupp
I read once, passingly, about a man named Shakespeare. I only read about him passingly, but I remember one thing he wrote that kind of moved me. He put it in the mouth of Hamlet, I think, it was, who said, ‘To be or not to be.’ He was in doubt about something—whether it was nobler in the mind of man to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune—moderation—or to take up arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing end them. And I go for that. If you take up arms, you’ll end it, but if you sit around and wait for the one who’s in power to make up his mind that he should end it, you’ll be waiting a long time. And in my opinion, the young generation of whites, blacks, browns, whatever else there is, you’re living at a time of extremism, a time of revolution, a time when there’s got to be a change. People in power have misused it, and now there has to be a change and a better world has to be built, and the only way it’s going to be built—is with extreme methods. And I, for one, will join in with anyone—I don’t care what color you are—as long as you want to change this miserable condition that exists on this earth.
Malcolm X (via proletarianfeminism)
Chelsea Manning could have just kept her mouth shut, served her tour, returned home, and transitioned in peace, as many others in her position would have done
she chose instead to throw her life away in hopes that her sacrifice would bring justice to the victims of Amerikan imperialism, and today she learned that freedom is just within her grasp
may chelsea be able to live the life that she deserves, may all political prisoners like her be free someday, and may the victims of the u$ finally get the justice that they deserve
obamas still literally part of the reason chelsea manning was imprisoned in the first place. it was activists that pushed him to make the decision. he still treats and has been treating political dissents like shit lmao and has the audacity to list venezuela as a national security threat because of how they treat political dissents. like shut the fuck up. if there wasnt such a push by activists he wouldnt have given a shit. just sayin.
Yeah like Obama and his administration went after whistleblowers in a way we’ve never seen before and the abuse and torture and suffering that Chelsea Manning experienced was all thanks to that. Like… Chelsea Manning did everything in her very limited power to ensure her voice was being heard. SHE is the one who protested for her rights to be met and SHE is the one who introduced the petition to Obama for a reduced sentence. Activists, human rights groups, and Chelsea herself deserve the praise, not the administration that put her through all this in the first place.
So anyway, I was having this argument with my father about Martin Luther King and how his message was too conservative compared to Malcolm X’s message. My father got really angry at me. It wasn’t that he disliked Malcolm X, but his point was that Malcolm X hadn’t accomplished anything as Dr. King had. I was kind of sarcastic and asked something like, so what did Martin Luther King accomplish other than giving his “I have a dream speech.” Before I tell you what my father told me, I want to digress. Because at this point in our amnesiac national existence, my question pretty much reflects the national civic religion view of what Dr. King accomplished. He gave this great speech. Or some people say, “he marched.” I was so angry at Mrs. Clinton during the primaries when she said that Dr. King marched, but it was LBJ who delivered the Civil Rights Act. At this point, I would like to remind everyone exactly what Martin Luther King did, and it wasn’t that he “marched” or gave a great speech. My father told me with a sort of cold fury, “Dr. King ended the terror of living in the south.” Please let this sink in and and take my word and the word of my late father on this. If you are a white person who has always lived in the U.S. and never under a brutal dictatorship, you probably don’t know what my father was talking about. But this is what the great Dr. Martin Luther King accomplished. Not that he marched, nor that he gave speeches. He ended the terror of living as a black person, especially in the south. I’m guessing that most of you, especially those having come fresh from seeing The Help, may not understand what this was all about. But living in the south (and in parts of the midwest and in many ghettos of the north) was living under terrorism. It wasn’t that black people had to use a separate drinking fountain or couldn’t sit at lunch counters, or had to sit in the back of the bus. You really must disabuse yourself of this idea. Lunch counters and buses were crucial symbolic planes of struggle that the civil rights movement used to dramatize the issue, but the main suffering in the south did not come from our inability to drink from the same fountain, ride in the front of the bus or eat lunch at Woolworth’s. It was that white people, mostly white men, occasionally went berserk, and grabbed random black people, usually men, and lynched them. You all know about lynching. But you may forget or not know that white people also randomly beat black people, and the black people could not fight back, for fear of even worse punishment. This constant low level dread of atavistic violence is what kept the system running. It made life miserable, stressful and terrifying for black people. White people also occasionally tried black people, especially black men, for crimes for which they could not conceivably be guilty. With the willing participation of white women, they often accused black men of “assault,” which could be anything from rape to not taking off one’s hat, to “reckless eyeballing.” This is going to sound awful and perhaps a stain on my late father’s memory, but when I was little, before the civil rights movement, my father taught me many, many humiliating practices in order to prevent the random, terroristic, berserk behavior of white people. The one I remember most is that when walking down the street in New York City side by side, hand in hand with my hero-father, if a white woman approached on the same sidewalk, I was to take off my hat and walk behind my father, because he had been taught in the south that black males for some reason were supposed to walk single file in the presence of any white lady. This was just one of many humiliating practices we were taught to prevent white people from going berserk. I remember a huge family reunion one August with my aunts and uncles and cousins gathered around my grandparents’ vast breakfast table laden with food from the farm, and the state troopers drove up to the house with a car full of rifles and shotguns, and everyone went kind of weirdly blank. They put on the masks that black people used back then to not provoke white berserkness. My strong, valiant, self-educated, articulate uncles, whom I adored, became shuffling, Step-N-Fetchits to avoid provoking the white men. Fortunately the troopers were only looking for an escaped convict. Afterward, the women, my aunts, were furious at the humiliating performance of the men, and said so, something that even a child could understand. This is the climate of fear that Dr. King ended. If you didn’t get taught such things, let alone experience them, I caution you against invoking the memory of Dr. King as though he belongs exclusively to you and not primarily to African Americans. The question is, how did Dr. King do this—and of course, he didn’t do it alone. (Of all the other civil rights leaders who helped Dr. King end this reign of terror, I think the most under appreciated is James Farmer, who founded the Congress of Racial Equality and was a leader of nonviolent resistance, and taught the practices of nonviolent resistance.) So what did they do? They told us: Whatever you are most afraid of doing vis-a-vis white people, go do it. Go ahead down to city hall and try to register to vote, even if they say no, even if they take your name down. Go ahead sit at that lunch counter. Sue the local school board. All things that most black people would have said back then, without exaggeration, were stark raving insane and would get you killed. If we do it all together, we’ll be okay. They made black people experience the worst of the worst, collectively, that white people could dish out, and discover that it wasn’t that bad. They taught black people how to take a beating—from the southern cops, from police dogs, from fire department hoses. They actually coached young people how to crouch, cover their heads with their arms and take the beating. They taught people how to go to jail, which terrified most decent people. And you know what? The worst of the worst, wasn’t that bad. Once people had been beaten, had dogs sicced on them, had fire hoses sprayed on them, and been thrown in jail, you know what happened? These magnificent young black people began singing freedom songs in jail. That, my friends, is what ended the terrorism of the south. Confronting your worst fears, living through it, and breaking out in a deep throated freedom song. The jailers knew they had lost when they beat the crap out of these young Negroes and the jailed, beaten young people began to sing joyously, first in one town then in another. This is what the writer, James Baldwin, captured like no other writer of the era. Please let this sink in. It wasn’t marches or speeches. It was taking a severe beating, surviving and realizing that our fears were mostly illusory and that we were free.
Daily Kos :: Most of you have no idea what Martin Luther King actually did
Reblogging this so I can come back to it in the spring when I teach the Civil Rights Movement to my 5th graders.
(via copperoranges)
Reblogging this for all the non-black people who like to quote MLK like he’s theirs.
(via heathenist)
I think I’ve reblogged this before, but I’m doing it again. Even growing up on the South Side of Chicago, going through a public school in which most of the students were black, and in which Martin Luther King was a celebrated hero who got his own honors and assemblies every year, even then I was never taught this.
(via pentag0nal)
Politicalprof: a must read.
(via politicalprof)
A must read, indeed.
(via pol102)
I know now that what I was taught about MLK was sanitised propaganda that only made us more complacent about racism in the US.
(via thesuperfeyneednoshoes)
In an incredibly bold move, the British Academy of Film and Television Arts announced last week that it will no longer nominate and award works that do ...
“In an incredibly bold move, the British Academy of Film and Television Arts announced last week that, beginning in 2019,works that do not demonstrate inclusivity in their production practices will no longer be eligible for its annual awards, the BAFTAs, often considered the U.K. equivalent of the Oscars. Eligible projects must showcase this in two of the following ways, as the BBC reported: On-screen characters and themes, senior roles and crew, industry training and career progression, and audience access and appeal to underrepresented audiences.”
Freddie Oversteegen was 14 years old, when a gentleman visited her family home in the Netherlands to ask her mother if she would allow her daughters to join the resistance.
Ninety-year-old Freddie Oversteegen was one of the few women that were active in the Dutch resistance during WWII – along with her sister Truus and the famous Hannie Schaft, who was killed just before the end of the war. When Freddie was 14 years old, a gentleman visited her family home to ask her mother if she would allow her daughters to join the resistance – no one would suspect two young girls of being resistance fighters, he argued.
And he was right. The Oversteegen sisters would flirt with Nazi collaborators under false pretences and then lead them into the woods, where instead of a make-out session, the men would be greeted with a bullet.
tactics!!!
DAMN 👀👀👀
The real Black Widow
that’s murder. and it is not badass at all even though the victims were shitty people. please celebrate resistance fighters who actually tried to help instead of killing a couple of touch starved, brainwashed dudes….
So do you just think other resistance fighters just sat around and sang kumbyah with the Nazis until the weren’t Nazis anymore? Do you think the Warsaw Ghetto Revolt was a sit-in? Maybe they passed around some petitions, that’ll keep the Nazis from murdering us for sure.
But yeah, let’s think of the poor, innocent Nazis. Like what the actual fuck.
“it’s wrong to murder the enemy during wartime.” wat
horse people are spectacular to listen to bc they love to go on about the “trust” between horses and people and it’s just enchanting. I leave that conversation completely mesmerized by the idea that a person actually trusts one of those fucking demon creatures when you can see it on their face that there is no life or love in their eyes. horses are the ready vessels of a vengeful, hateful god and we should leave them to eat the fucking ground in peace
The important thing to realize about neo-nazis and modern nazi sympathizers, because it’s the one thing they can’t deny, is that they’ve learned to use their own absurdity as a defense mechanism, to a degree not even Sartre predicted. Having a cartoon frog as their symbol is a strength for them, because it means whenever the media reports on them, they get to turn the narrative into “haha, the mainstream media is talking about a cartoon frog! We got ‘em good!”.
This is part of a wider asset of modern neo-nazism. Truth means nothing to them, primarily with regard to their own members. “Trump’s Phantasmagoria” is an excellent article about this- it explains how trump’s complete disregard for facts actually helped him, because it let people who disagreed with some of the awful things he’s said say “oh, he didn’t really mean that.” And this attitude is everywhere on the right. When milo tells his fans to sexually harass women on his birthday, they respond “he didn’t really mean it! Lighten up!”. When he suggests women in STEM should be limited to 10 or 15%, they say “it was just a joke! He’s not a misogynist!” and laugh at all the people taking it seriously.
There’s no real limit to this. It could turn up that one of Trump’s cabinet picks has actually said “I agree with hitler” or “we should wipe out the jews”, and people would still defend him. This isn’t up for debate- countless internet conservatives have said things like this already, and yet we still have legions of people who don’t consider themselves anti-semites or racists lining up to defend them.
This leads to a really sickening mentality. The tumblr alt-right’s reaction to the current stream of articles about them is basically “Ha ha, this article about how nazism is experiencing an unprecedented resurgence and LGBT people, Jews, and Muslims fear for their lives said Richard Spencer is the leader of the movement, when it’s actually completely decentralized! Hilarious!”
And of course this is all richly flavored with the traditional reactionary bitter ironies. They expect us to ignore all the terrible things they’ve said because “it’s just a joke”, yet they insist that everyone who’s ever said “kill all men” was 100% serious. They adopted “facts over feelings” as their rallying cry, yet the ultimate fruit of their work is the post-truth world.
‘The goose-step, for instance, is one of the most horrible sights in the world, far more terrifying than a dive-bomber. It is simply an affirmation of naked power; contained in it, quite consciously and intentionally, is the vision of a boot crashing down on a face. Its ugliness is part of its essence, for what it is saying is ‘Yes, I am ugly, and you daren’t laugh at me’, like the bully who makes faces at his victim.’
- Orwell, The Lion and the Unicorn
This is why making fun of nazis with anime avatars, while entertaining, never phases them because anime avatar or not these people have no shame. They wear their embarassing symbolism proudly so that you can’t hurt them for pointing it out.
I’ve been thinking about this a lot. I’ve been starting to keep tabs on neo-Nazi sites (which is horrifying but somebody needs to do it) and the first thing I’ve noticed is that everything’s shrouded in 1000 layers of irony to the point that no matter what they say or how wrong they are about anything, they can claim that they were joking or trolling or got you good. It’s a bizarre and effective defense to any kind of criticism.
This combined with a complete refusal to see the hypocrisy in whining about anything the left jokes about makes them impossible to argue with, so don’t bother. They should all simply be rejected as terrible people.
this is the best thing i’ve read all year
15 things JK Rowling could include to treat Native people and culture respectfully:
1. Don’t make the centerpiece of the story about a boarding school. If you’re white you probably don’t know this but, boarding schools were used to genocide Natives for centuries.
2. Bother to do some research on the cultures you’re trying to write about. Natives are not simple. They are complex and deep. In some ways much more so than the European colonizers.
3. Natives had the most advanced and sophisticated government structures in the world at the time. International war laws, reverse hierarchical federalized democracies, independent economic entities, the clan systems, the most expansive road and trade networks in the world, the list goes on just do some reading.
4. Don’t diminish or dismiss the natives as backward or simple in the fiction either. JKR decided that natives don’t use wands for magic and stuff because they don’t do specific or focused magic, that’s racist nonsense.
5. Natives would do some wild shit like Onondaga fire magic or Aztec surgical stuff. There were Mixtec oracles and mystics who cut the flesh from their face and replaced it with gems, that shit is metal.
6. The wand thing could be replaced with turquoise gem totems, or obsidian magic knives or some shit like that. Taking the tools away from them is dehumanizing imagery.
7. Don’t mess around with pipes or anything like that. You’re white JKR, you’re white.
8. If you have a character run away into the woods in Massachusetts, she is gonna run right into Native cities. Don’t pretend that America is this open uninhabited nature reserve. That wasn’t true and it is racist.
9. Don’t pretend that American societies are going to be as backward and prejudiced as other places. Most American languages didn’t have gendered pronouns. American cultures did not have the institutional patriarchal bullshit or homophobia. We would probably be pretty accepting of people that could do magic.
10. There should be magical clans… that sounds dope.
11. There should be magical schools already and there could be a really cool plot about protecting them from the Spanish and the English.
12. They should not be schools as much as campus communities, workshops instead of classes. The predecessors to the Cherokee would create communities and give them a purpose, which was a practice common throughout North America. There would be a half-dozen schools the size of massive cities centered around dope pyramids like Cahokia.
13. Magic using medicine men would come to villages to teach the citizens that couldn’t leave or something like that.
14. Instead of skinwalkers which are too specific and appropriationy, try something like the Witiko, which is about cannibalism and evil deeds freezing your heart or something (fluctuates according to region). Could very easily be related to evil magic users.
15. The basic thing I think is to do some research and maybe ask some natives before you try shit like this.
To be clear for some white people who think I’m being sensitive or something. First off, fuck you, the second thing is JK Rowling is trying to make a shit ton of money with this. And she will so she should at least not contribute to the immolation and genocide of Native peoples at the same time.
The US would have the opposite of the European schools, instead of one or two schools per a country the US would have hundreds. Tribal, New Orleans Voodoo, European colonial, African schools popping up after the end of slavery as African wizards travel to help their muggle born stolen generations, and dozens of mixed schools. Also have the statute of secrecy be considered one of the greatest acts of bureaucratic evil in the US and other colonized countries because of how much wickedness the wizard community had to ignore, and wizards hold long grudges.
okay liberals listen up coz im gonna put this in terms you can understand
fighting voldemort didn’t make harry as bad as voldemort
But vandalism and hurting innocent bystanders would have made him.
1. how much damage do you think got done to like, the coffeeshop and the Ministry and the wizard bank and hogwarts and idk general places where the fighting happened, even in your dumbass statement that Harry fucking Potter would’ve been just as bad as the genocidal Voldemort if he had committed “vandalism” you reveal you didn’t pay attention to what happened in the god damn books 2. shut the absolute FUCK up
didn’t fred and george literally flood the great hall purely to stick it to umbridge, an act which was portrayed as fucking awesome
God people actually saying vandalism is as bad as genocide OH MY GOD.
they outlawed this move just because she was the only woman who could do it.
Surya Bonaly was infamous for (among other things) doing aone blade backflip in the 1998 Olympics, and is the ONLY figure skater who’s ever pulled that off. Not just the only woman, the only figure skater PERIOD. There’s like all ofthree Olympic-class male skaters who did backflips in their routines, and NONE of them could do it one blade.
But wait, there’s more.
Backflips were banned from the 1976 Olympics onward on the official justification that skating jumps are supposed to be landed on one blade, whereas backflips are landed on both blades. The unofficial justification was it was too dangerous, both to the athlete and to the rink — if you didn’t land it perfectly, you could not only break your ankle, but also punch THROUGH the ice surface.
Surya Bonaly was openly contemptuous of the figure skating judges, because they were a bunch of openly racist white men who always screwed her over by giving her lower scores than she deserved. That one-blade backflip was her ultimate FUCK YOU! to the Olympics judges, because she took an “illegal” backflip and made it legal by landing it on one blade. Pretty much DARING them to mark her down for being epic awesome and pulling a move that their precious coddled white girls didn’t have the guts to even think about.
They did, of course. White racism knows no bounds. But she utterly owned them with that move.
not only did she do a fucking backflip and land, she landed then went right into a triple loop. like holy fuck
don't👏watch👏SAO👏if👏you👏haven't👏been👏trapped👏in👏a👏game
you👏couldve👏stopped👏at👏dont👏watch👏sao
broadway antique market
i bought this telegram, because it’s probably the best thing i’ve ever seen. i’m framing it. it cost $1.
I need to end all my correspondences with “Get me” now
fuck steampunk. it’s not a real genre, and it’ll never be (until an author comes along and makes it so, but so far it’s just fantasy and imperialist wet dreams). it’s an aesthetic where you just put cogs on everything.
Too many people keep insisting asexuals face no discrimination whatsoever, despite me having provided numerous responses to these claims, so here’s a single post:
Asexual’s are viewed less favourably by straight people than any other sexual orientation according to the very first study that’s been done.
Asexuality was treated as a sexual dysfunction up until the DSM-V which says only self-identified asexuals are valid. If you don’t know you’re asexual, or have never heard of asexuality (which is actually very likely), you will still be treated for a disorder, where none may exist. Asexuality was only partially demedicalized in 2008.
Asexuals are very likely to receive threats of rape, and do often get raped because they are asexual. Many asexuals report being raped by a significant other or sexually assaulted by a stranger because of their asexuality.
Asexuals are more likely to be discriminated against based on their asexuality than any other orientation, and ALL orientations are most likely to be discriminatory against asexuals over all others.
Stop ignoring that we face discrimination. Stop telling us we face no discrimination just because you, personally, haven’t seen it happen in front of you. You haven’t seen it because you’re engaging in it happily.