@8yk ᵃᵘᵗᵒᵐᵃᵗᵉᵈ : click this link to learn more
© 8yk — do not steal my dividers or theme edits.
blog is 20+ and intended for adult audiences, so minors (20 and younger) do not interact. you will be blocked.
NASA

PR's Tumblrdome
ojovivo

Janaina Medeiros
Cosimo Galluzzi
we're not kids anymore.

No title available
noise dept.
trying on a metaphor

Kaledo Art
No title available

No title available

Kiana Khansmith

#extradirty
h

Andulka
Mike Driver

roma★

No title available
taylor price
seen from Canada
seen from India
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Switzerland

seen from Macao SAR China

seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Jordan
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
@8yk
@8yk ᵃᵘᵗᵒᵐᵃᵗᵉᵈ : click this link to learn more
© 8yk — do not steal my dividers or theme edits.
blog is 20+ and intended for adult audiences, so minors (20 and younger) do not interact. you will be blocked.
Blows off dust
Im alive and maybe ill get to writing again idk
The way i genuinely shrivel when a man hits on me needs to be studied
I take this back, only one man is allowed to hit on me
PLEASURE CLOUD - Suna Rintaro
Word Count: 500
Contains: AFAB!READER. Stoner! Rin, intoxication (weed smoking), crotch rubbing (f!receiving), established relationship.
Note: this is disgustingly short.. im ashamed. But it was rotting my brain😔
SHOULD’VE BEEN ONLYFANS - Streamer!Scaramouche
Word Count: 638
Contains: FEMALE READER. cockwarming, consensual filming?, mean scara, degradation (whore), dirty talk, humiliation, exhibitionism(?), reader is in just a shirt, pre-established relationship
DARLING DOVE - Ayato Kamisato & Thoma
Word Count: 922
Contains: AFAB!READER (they/them pronouns). chubby!reader, free use, voyeurism, mating press, breeding, power imbalance (s/d dynamics), title usage "lord", implied thoma/ayato, pet names (baby, dove), mind break, objectification (squint), overstimulation, unprotected sex, heavy creampie (a lot of cum), praising, aftercare, body worship (reader)
Lord Ayato who can’t help but share his perfect little baby with his favorite housemaid, Thoma.
Lord Ayato who delights in the way his two precious little belongings squirm in delight from each other's ministrations, both writhing in their pleasure.
Lord Ayato who doesn’t mind when Thoma just can’t help but reach out and play with their pretty little tits, who gets harder at the prospect of sharing what’s his.
The way i genuinely shrivel when a man hits on me needs to be studied
"I don't want to read this" is totally valid.
"This is disgusting to me" is totally valid.
"I don't want to read this because it is disgusting to me" is totally valid.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
Bro, blocking someone and then using their tag like this is, all offence, weak as fuck. Like all you had to say was, na bro I don't promote pedo protags on this here blog, because I wholly agree with the premise of your argument given contexts (i.e., writing abusive relationships to show the evils, great; writing abusive relationships to show the romance, yikes).
This response is so, so comically shitty within the context of that tag, oh my god.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
"Censorship of some topics in fiction and art is good and I would be happy if it were to be enacted in a way I approved of"
and
"some things should be banned from ever being written or read about in fiction"
are both authoritarian viewpoints to hold and express, even if you don't have the power to enact them.
If you hold these viewpoints you are holding authoritarian viewpoints.
DUDE IT’S PEDO FICS EVERYBODY THINKS THEY’RE NASTY
Let me explain this to you in simple terms.
Something being nasty is not a good reason to ban fiction about it.
If we accept that "something being nasty is a good reason to bad fiction about it" then we give a foot in the door for all the people who truly, genuinely believe that queer people are nasty to ban all queer literature.
This is not about defending bad people this is about defending the freedom of good people from tyranny, you moron.
I think if you take it to its logical extreme. Say, banning people from writing stories of sexual abuse. That could then be said "well ANY talk about sexual abuse is bad."
And from that, you could ban books that talk about it irl. Or books like how to recover after being abuse. If its not something to be discussed AT ALL.
The fact that I’ve seen this post in some form on my dash like 100x and each time there’s new idiots who do not get that you can’t have *some* censorship.
Either you’re for it or you aren’t.
The moment you agree that something should never, ever exist in fiction is the moment that anything can be banned.
Remember a while back how Tumblr banned a bunch of tags, including many popular innocuous ones that even people who are for censorship used and were upset about?
When censorship happens, stuff YOU like can and will be banned. That’s how it works.
Remember how a bunch of people had their accounts terminated here only last year for writing about their own sexual abuse?
When you ban “pedo” topics, say, any talk of child sexual abuse in any form, that means people can no longer write about their own experiences. It means people cannot educate others so they can learn how to protect themselves or get help from these situations.
Censorship is authoritarian. Full stop.
Even if “everyone” agrees something is “gross” and “shouldn’t exist,” that does not fucking matter.
Do you know who generally believes queer people are gross and shouldn’t exist??
The same people who are banning books left and right solely because they have queer characters or relationships.
The same people who attack and kill queer folk for simply exisiting.
This is not just some fandom matter or a case of being chronically online.
Protecting freedom of expression is essential, and if you do not get that, I don’t know what to say to you.
And the people who keep bringing up child sex abuse as a reason for censorship are doing it very specifically because everyone feels like then they HAVE to agree with the person in favor of censorship.
It’s not that there isn’t widespread societal agreement on this. It’s that they want you backed into a rhetorical corner where you feel compelled to agree with them.
Also, like, we KNOW how this shit shakes out in fandom because it's happened before.
In 2007, Livejournal capitulated to the "pedophilia and sex crimes!" cries of (hate group) Warriors 4 Innocence, and you know what communities got shut down? Slashfic communities. Sexual assault survivor support communities. Authors who'd written non-smut m/m fic even got caught up in it. It was DEVASTATING to fandom spaces. I think pretty much everyone knew at least one person whose account was literally DELETED, or were a member of a community that was wiped off the map because they were considerate enough to include topics like "sexual assault" or "BDSM" in the profiles under the badly-named category of "interests" to indicate that posts on said blogs or communities may include discussion of things like that. Even if it was for a SUPPORT group. And it was because a group of religious bigots came to LJ and said essentially "EVERYONE thinks it's gross and that it's promoting CSA, we should ban it."
Like, strikethrough and boldthrough were a large part of what propelled AO3 out of a more unfocused conversation on one person's blog about hosting a site INTENDED for fandom content, into being an actual archive and nonprofit. And it's a large part of why you won't find AO3 banning topics that you find "gross".
Censorship is authoritarian and it will ALWAYS have more collateral damage than you can imagine.
Going to add that fiction which had sexual abuse and communities which played around with it as a writing topic are the very things that protected me from irl sexual abuse when I was a teenager. I was in a dicey situation, and realized that while my situation did not match up to any of the superficial or textbook cases mentioned in passing (if at all) through school, it matched up a LOT to what I'd learned about irl sexual abuse through works of fiction and the rhetoric of my communities. I got out of that situation and dodged what was, in retrospect, one hell of a nasty bullet. If it hadn't been for that "nasty" fiction and those "nasty" communities, I would very likely have been abused, and subject to further violence spiraling out from that abuse.
you can’t have *some* censorship.
Yup! It really is, in fact, pretty much that simple:
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
Storytime!
I had a friend. We were 12. We had just discovered fanfiction and were obsessed. We read anything and everything we could get our hands on. One of the stories we read was a "pedo fic." It exposed us to scenarios and language that hadn't ever been touched on in Sex Ed at school or with our parents. To be frank, it "corrupted our young minds with topics we shouldn't have to deal with." It also gave my friend words to finally describe why her neighbor creeped her out so much. "He's creepy and weird" gets a 12 year old scolded and lectured on being nicer. "He's a sexual predator" gets adults asking questions and involving the cops. Her neighbor "moved away."
Censorship is pro-pedo and anti-child-safety. There is no communicating what's wrong if there are no words to describe what's happening. Bad things will happen whether you have the words to ask for help or not. Censorship takes those words away.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
“Bad things will happen whether you have the words to ask for help or not. Censorship takes those words away.”
In a world where curly bushes are more recognized and loved, i see you and i love you straight bushes
I need to stay off tiktok, i saw someone call sundays dick “the weekend”
daddy not now kitten is trying not to kill herself
Rex Incognito
Size difference but the character is the shortie
I need to be pinned in a full nelson and fucked
So many people so many…. Him huffing in my ear 😶😶😕
Im so normal
I need to be pinned in a full nelson and fucked
the conditions dont have to be perfect to live a good life
☆ gachiakuta • zodyl typhon.
♡ like or reblog if you save/use.
@nagumoan