tis the season
I forgot about this
I haven’t seen this show up on my dash ONCE yet this Chanukah season I have to do everything by myself
Happy Chanukah, my peeps, enjoy

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Stranger Things
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

shark vs the universe
Misplaced Lens Cap
Sweet Seals For You, Always
$LAYYYTER
No title available
we're not kids anymore.
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
taylor price
Sade Olutola

pixel skylines

titsay
No title available
ojovivo

Discoholic 🪩

JVL
almost home
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore

seen from Indonesia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from South Korea
seen from Italy

seen from Singapore

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@aaronsjewishlearning
tis the season
I forgot about this
I haven’t seen this show up on my dash ONCE yet this Chanukah season I have to do everything by myself
Happy Chanukah, my peeps, enjoy
Missionaries are inherently xenophobic.
Missionaries to Jews are inherently antisemitic.
There is no debate here - the above statements are inescapable true. Intentions do not matter. It LITERALLY DOES NOT MATTER that Christian missionaries BELIEVE they are doing something good by saving other people from hell. IT. DOES. NOT. MATTER.
Because the people you're missionizing ALSO have beliefs, that are part of their own religions and cultures and histories and ethnicities. And your assumption that only YOUR beliefs are correct and must be spread is the LITERAL definition of xenophobia.
Missionaries and bigotry are not seperable.
If you proselytize in your personal life (congratulations, you are also a model of xenophobia and bigotry), or if you support missionaries or missionary activity (ideologically or financially), you are now being instructed to unfollow me, because I don't like you as a person, and I can't respect you while you willfully disrespect others. In either case, you are also now being instructed to cut that shit the fuck out. No one wants to hear about the love of Jesus from you, and if they do, they will ask you DIRECTLY and EXPLICITLY. Literally no one else gives a fuck.
I will be accepting apologies in writing and reparations via venmo.
I should add some context, since this post has resonated so widely. My statement about missionaries to Jews being antisemitic is what inspired this post, because that's my context and my experience.
There's been a recent scandal in Israel as the leader of deep cover missionary cell was uncovered and subsquent members as well. Proselytizing to minors without parents permission is illegal in Israel, as is proselytizing to someone without consent, and making money through proselytizing. So, being a missionary in Israel is technically legal, but discouraged. This group were gentile Christians (non-Jews ethnically and religiously) pretending to be ultra-Orthodox Jews, and the cell leader, Michael Elk, posed as a Rabbi, wrote Torah scrolls, performed religious ritual circumcision, married couples in the Jewish religion, and his wife Amanda was given an Orthodox burial in a Jewish cemetery, despite not being Jewish at all. She had previously posed as the descendant of Holocaust survivors. The Elks lied to their friends and neighbors for 15 years, immigrated to Israeli illegally, appropriated false Jewish identities, and through their deceit, deeply violated intimate and personal aspects of the personal lives of the community they infected. The marriages he performed are not valid. Neither are conversions. Any circumcisions he performed will be considered ritually invalid by the community he violated. He has thrown into doubt peoples very identity as Jews, or their status as married or divorced. The Torah scrolls he wrote have to be burnt, when they normally would be used for decades or centuries and then given a human burial in a cemetery our of respect when no longer usable. The level to which the Elks and their missionary coworkers violated the lives of this religious Jewish community is untold. And all the while, they were training other Missionaries and secretly spreading Messianic Judaism, leaving tracts on their neighbors cars, etc.
This all also comes in the wake of an extended legal battle between an Evangelical Christian TV station who applied for a permit for a channel in Israel in order to reach other Christians, but then bragged at internal events to their sponsors that they were actually planning to use the channel to try and convert all Jews in Israel to Christianity. Their broadcasting license was revoked, and there was a backlash from Evangelical leaders in America. Dr Michael L. Brown, a Messianic Evangelical leader and speaker, stated quite plainly that he felt Evangelicals in America deserved the right to proselytize openly in Israel because they provide financial support to Israel. Hopefully we don't have to explain how disgusting that is, no matter how you slice it. It's gross from literally every angle.
Finally, I have a personal reason to hate missionaries - I was raised by them. I grew up in the Messianic movement, an Evangelical Christian movement aimed at convering Jews to Christianity covertly and deceitfully by presenting themselves as Jewish as possible. While in the Messianic movement I was abused and traumatized, put through gay conversion therapy BY a Messianic missionary, and then, when I accepted my sexuality and rejected the religious teachings I'd been raised with, had all my old friends and community shun me because the leadership instructed them to. Missionaries, specifically, terrorized me growing up and intentionally destabilized my whole support network as a control tactic. I have PTSD and CPTSD, and my time in the Evangelical movement left me physically, mentally emotionally, and psychologically scarred. I will never be a person who doesn't carry that trauma.
It has become clear to me as this has resonated with such a wide audience that most of you might not have been familiar with ANY of this - or of any of the other ways in which Christianity has a problematic relationship to Judaism. Which is to say, supercessionism, replacement theology, millenia of legal oppression, rape, murder, theft, expulsion, massacres, on and on. The relationship between Christians and Jews, historically, has been Christians trapping us legally to take dvantage of us, forcibly converting us, or killing us. In the modern era, Jews have become so resistant to conversion that Evangelicals spend over 100 million dollars a year (I checked public donation records to Messianic orgs in 2018) on trying to convert Jews covertly through deceitful cultural appropriation.
And yet, not knowing any of this, THOUSANDS of you still relate strongly to this analysis of missionaries as inherantly xenophobic and bigoted, because Christianity has been used as a tool of oppression against YOUR communities as well.
So, let me expand on my statement which was originally about missionaries and antisemitism, in solidarity:
Missionaries are inherently xenophobic and bigoted.
Missionaries to Jews are inherently antisemitic.
Missionaries to Muslims are inherently Islamophobic.
Missionaries who target people of any specific religious or ethnic group for conversion to their own religion are committing an act of cultural (and often phydical) violence against that group.
Missionaries to Black people and people of color are inherantly racist.
Missionaries to Indigenous people are inherantly colonialist.
Missionaries spread diseases. It was a problem in the early colonial era, and it's literally still a concern now, because missionaries attempt to make contact with isolated indigenous groups.
Missionaries often spread other forms bigotry along with their message of salvation - sexism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, body shaming. Worst of all, they bring... Christian theology. Original sin. Guilt and shame over natural human emotions and functions. Missionaries introduce harmful ideas and ideologies into cultures that weren't previously there.
Along with spreading harmful ideas, missionaries often actively seek out and destroy sacred and traditional cultural practices of the groups they are religiously colonizing - dance forms, hairstyle, traditional dress, gender roles, sexual positions, and more have all been favorite fixations of missionaries taking an axe to native cultures, stripping away anything that doesn't meet with the missionaries' external cultural standards.
Missionizing often has a strong ulterior motive - for example, white Americans had a strong incentive to convert the African people they enslaved to Christianity, because they were using religious authority to justify slavery. It helps if the people you're enslaving recognize that religious authority as valid. Similarly, missionaries to the native peoples of the Americas had (and have) a strong motive to assimilate indigenous people, both in the sense of cultural erasure and intermarriage or stealing children, in order to erase the people who's land they were/are stealing.
There have already been excellent reblogs from @didyoumeanxianity and @penrosesun in the notes explaining how even the "good" missionaries who focus on providing medical, financial, or other types of aid are still harmful, and ultimately do more harm than good.
Missionaries are bad at best, evil at worst. There are no exceptions. I don't make the facts, I just point them out.
pls pet, am bby
ears
Hello, it is I, your friendly neighborhood historian. I am ready to lose followers for this post, but I have two masters degrees in history and one of my focuses has been middle eastern area studies. Furthermore, I’ve been tired of watching the world be reduced to pithy little infographics, and I believe there is no point to my education if I don’t put it to good use. Finally, I am ethnically Asheknazi Jewish. This does not color my opinion in this post — I am in support of either a one or two state solution for Israel and Palestine, depending on the factors determined by the Palestinian Authority, and the Israeli Government does not speak for me. I hate Netanyahu. A lot. With that said, my family was slaughtered at Auschwitz-Birkenau. I have stood in front of that memorial wall at the Holocaust memorial in DC for my great uncle Simon and my great uncle Louis and cried as I lit a candle. Louis was a rabbi, and he preached mitzvot and tolerance. He died anyway.
There’s a great many things I want to say about what is happening in the Middle East right now, but let’s start with some facts.
In early May, there were talks of a coalition government that might have put together (among other parties, the Knesset is absolutely gigantic and usually has about 11-13 political parties at once) the Yesh Atid, a center-left party, and the United Arab List, a Palestinian party. For the first time, Palestinians would have been members of the Israeli government in their own right. And what happened, all of the sudden? A war broke out. A war that, amazingly, seemed to shield Benjamin Netanyahu from criminal prosecution, despite the fact that he has been under investigation for corruption for some time now and the only thing that is stopping a real investigation is the fact that he is Prime Minister.
Funny how that happened.
There’s a second thing people ought to know, and it is about Hamas. I’ve found it really disturbing to see people defending Hamas on a world stage because, whether or not people want to believe it, Hamas is a terrorist organization. I’m sorry, but it is. Those are the facts. I’m not being a right wing extremist or even a Republican or whatever else or want to lob at me here. I’m a liberal historian with some facts. They are a terrorist organization, and they don’t care if their people die.
Here’s what you need to know:
There are two governments for the occupied Palestinian territories in the West Bank and Gaza. In April 2021, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas postponed planned elections. He said it was because of a dispute amid Israeli-annexed East Jerusalum. He is 85 years old, and his Fatah Party is losing power to Hamas. Everyone knows that. Palestinians know that.
Here’s the thing about Hamas: they might be terrorists, but aren’t idiots. They understand that they have a frustrated population filled with people who have been brutalized by their neighbors. And they also understand that Israel has something called the iron dome defense system, which means that if you throw a rocket at it, it probably won’t kill anyone (though there have been people in Israel who died, including Holocaust survivors). Israel will, however, retaliate, and when they do, they will kill Palestinian civilians. On a world stage, this looks horrible. The death toll, because Palestinians don’t have the same defense system, is always skewed. Should the Israeli government do that? No. It’s morally repugnant. It’s wrong. It’s unfair. It’s hurting people without the capability to defend themselves. But is Hamas counting on them to for the propaganda? Yeah. Absolutely. They’re literally willing to kill their other people for it.
You know why this works for Hamas? They know that Israel will respond anyway, despite the moral concerns. And if you’re curious why, you can read some books on the matter (Six Days of War by Michael Oren; The Yom Kippur War by Abraham Rabinovich; Rise and Kill First by Ronen Bergmen; Antisemitism by Deborah Lipstadt; and Israel: A Concise History of a Nation Reborn by Daniel Gordis). The TL;DR, if you aren’t interested in homework, is that Israel believes they have no choice but to defend themselves against what they consider ‘hostile powers.’ And it’s almost entirely to do with the Holocaust. It’s a little David v Goliath. It is, dare I say, complicated.
I’m barely scratching the surface here.
(We won’t get into this in this post, though if you want to DM me for details, it might be worth knowing that Iran funds Hamas and basically supplies them with all of their weapons, and part of the reason the United States has been so reluctant to engage with this conflict is that Iran is currently in Vienna trying to restore its nuclear deal with western powers. The USA cannot afford to piss off Iran right now, and therefore cannot afford to aggravative Hamas and also needs to rely on Israel to destroy Irani nuclear facilities if the deal goes south. So, you know, there is that).
There are some people who will tell you that criticism of the Israel government is antisemitic. They are almost entirely members of the right wing, evangelical community, and they don’t speak for the Jewish community. The majority of Jewish people and Jewish Americans in particular are criticizing the Israeli government right now. The majority of Jewish people in the diaspora and in Israel support Palestinian rights and are speaking out about it. And actually, when they talk about it, they are putting themselves in great danger to do so. Because it really isn’t safe to be visibly Jewish right now. People may not want to listen to Jews when they speak about antisemitism or may want to believe that antisemitism ‘isn’t real’ because ‘the Holocaust is over’ but that is absolutely untrue. In 2019, antisemitic hate crimes in the United States reached a high we have never seen before. I remember that, because I was living in London, and I was super scared for my family at the time. Since then, that number has increased by nearly 400% in the last ten days. If you don’t believe me, have some articles about it (one, two, three, four, and five, to name a few).
I live in New York City, where a man was beaten in Time Square while attending a Free Palestine rally and wearing a kippah. I’m sorry, but being visibly Jewish near a pro-Palestine rally? That was enough to have a bunch of people just start beating on him? I made a previous post detailing how there are Jews being attacked all over the world, and there is a very good timeline of recent hate crimes against Jews that you can find right here. These are Jews, by the way, who have nothing to do with Israel or Palestine. They are Americans or Europeans or Canadians who are living their lives. In some cases, they are at pro-Palestine rallies and they are trying to help, but they just look visibly Jewish. God Forbid we are the wrong ethnicity for your rally, even if we agree.
This is really serious. There are people calling for the death of all Jews. There are people calling for another Holocaust.
There are 14 million Jews in the world. 14 million. Of 7.6 billion. And you think it isn’t a problem the way people treat us?
Anyway (aside from, you know, compassion), why does this matter? This matters because stuff like this deters Jews who want to be part of the pro-Palestine movement because they are literally scared for their safety. I said this before, and I will say it again: Zionism was, historically speaking, a very unpopular opinion. It was only widespread antisemitic violence (you know, the Holocaust) that made Jews believe there was a necessity for a Jewish state. Honestly, it wasn’t until the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting that I supported it the abstract idea too.
I grew up in New York City, I am a liberal Jew, and I believe in the rights of marginalized and oppressed people to self-determine worldwide. Growing up, I also fit the profile of what many scholars describe as the self hating Jew, because I believed that, in order to justify myself in American liberal society, I had to hate Israel, and I had to be anti-Zionist by default, even if I didn’t always understand what ‘Zionism’ meant in abstract. Well, I am 27 years old now with two masters degrees in history, and here is what Zionism means to me: I hate the Israeli government. They do not speak for me. But I am not anti-Zionist. I believe in the necessity for a Jewish state — a state where all Jews are welcome, regardless of their background, regardless of their nationality.
There needs to be a place where Jews, an ethnic minority who are unwelcome in nearly every state in the world, have a place where they are free from persecution — a place where they feel protected. And I don’t think there is anything wrong with that place being the place where Jews are ethnically indigenous to. Because believe it or not, whether it is inconvenient, Jews are indigenous to the land of Israel. I’ve addressed this in this post.
With that said, that doesn’t mean you can kick the Palestinian people out. They are also indigenous to that land, which is addressed in the same post, if you don’t trust me.
What is incredible to me is that Zionism is defined, by the Oxford English Dixtionary, as “A movement [that called originally for] the reestablishment of a Jewish nationhood in Palestine, and [since 1948] the development of the State of Israel.” Whether we agree with this or not, there were early disagreements about the location of a ‘Jewish state,’ and some, like Maurice de Hirsch, believed it ought to be located in South America, for example. Others believed it should be located in Africa. The point is that the original plans for the Jewish state were about safety. The plan changed because Jews wanted to return to their homeland, the largest project of decolonization and indigenous reclamation ever to be undertaken by an indigenous group. Whether you want to hear that or not, it is true. Read a book or two. Then you might know what I mean.
When people say this is a complicated issue, they aren’t being facetious. They aren’t trying to obfuscate the point. They often aren’t even trying to defend the Israeli government, because I certainly am not — I think they are abhorrent. But there is no future in the Middle East if the Israelis and Palestinians don’t form a state that has an equal right of return and recognizes both of their indigenousness, and that will never happen if people can’t stop throwing vitriolic rhetoric around. Is the Israeli Government bad? Yes. Are Israeli citizens bad? Largely, no. They want to defend their families, and they want to defend their people. This is basically the same as the fact that Palestinian people aren’t bad, though Hamas often is. And for the love of god, stop defending terrorist organizations. Just stop. They kill their own people for their own power and for their own benefit.
And yes, one more time, the Israeli government is so, so, so wrong. But god, think about your words, and think about how you are enabling Nazis. The rhetoric the left is using is hurting Jews. I am afraid to leave my house. I’m afraid to identify as Jewish on tumblr. I’m afraid for my family, afraid for my friends. People I know are afraid for me.
It’s 2021. I am not my great uncle. I cried for him, but I shouldn’t have to die like him.
Words have consequences. Language has consequences. And genuinely, I do not think everyone is a bad person, so think about what you are putting into the world, because you’d be surprised how often you are doing a Nazi a favor or two.
Is that really what you want? To do a Nazi a favor or two? I don’t think that you do. I hope you don’t, at least.
That’s all. You know, five thousand words later. But uh, think a little. Please.
I hate it when I’m trying to look up a good golem recipe and the rabbi prefaces it with ten paragraphs about his life in 17th-century Prague. Like, I feel for you, Maharal, but there are anti-semites going unsuplexed while I’m searching for the ingredient list
When I made my needle felt golem the Cantor told me how to make him come alive and then said "now don't do that"
Fun fact! Water actually turns “blood red” when it is contaminated by sulfur creating sulfuric acid. And scientists have discovered that around the time of the plagues a volcano went off that disturbed Egypt’s environment. So the plagues are scientifically proven. The other parts of the plagues are explained by the sulfuric acid river making the animals leave the river and escaping into the human population.
WHY DIDNT ANYONE TELL ME THE PLAGUES WERE PROVEN
if anyone wants a full list heres how they happened:
basically they all stem from a massive eruption of a volcano on the island of santorini off the coast of greece. the ash then floated over to egypt which kickstarted the plagues
1) blood: the ash carried the mineral cinnabar, which has the capability of turning water red
2) frogs: the ash also had many toxic and acidic substances so naturally, all the frogs are gonna flee the river
3) lice: given what was going on insects would have burrowed into dead animals/peoples skin and laid eggs, which then hatched
4) beasts: everything is getting poisoned from the ash and toxins, causing animals to freak the fuck out/die
5) pestilence: toxins again
6) boils: the ash would have caused storms that carried acid rain which when it fell, would irritate peoples skin causing boils
7) hail: the storm again
8) locusts: again with the insects and the amount of dead bodies and such which attract more insects. a lotta insects basically.
9) darkness: the ash covered the sky, blocking out the sun
10) slaying of the first born: given that children’s bodies were found in higher numbers than others, some archeologists think they may have been sacrificed to stop all the destruction, but they aren’t 100% sure about that. this is just me but I would say another possibility is that babies/kids are a lot more susceptible to toxins and shit, so while an adult may have been fine or gotten a bit sick, it might have been very dangerous/deadly for kids or babies
the volcano would also attest for the parting of the sea weirdly enough. the red sea was in fact the ‘reed’ sea, and was very shallow, probably waist deep or so. given the amount of shit dumped into the ocean from the volcano, this wouldve caused a tsunami to head towards egypt. the water would get sucked out from the reed sea right before the tsunami hit, letting people pass it easily, then the actual tsunami would hit, fuckin up anyone who tried to follow.
another theory is that the red water was caused by algae, which would cause the frogs and stuff to jump out as well. the algae also carried substances toxic to animals so if they ingested any they’d get sick and die, so more insects. in this theory there was a sand storm coincidentally that caused the rest
some sources: X X
The volcano wasn’t ON Santorini - it WAS Santorini, then called Thera. It completely blew away the Minoan settlements on the island and was one of the largest eruptions in human history.
The tsunamis from the Theran eruption devastated Crete, weakening the then-powerful Minoan civilization, leaving them open to being invaded by the Mycenaeans.
The volcanic winter it created devastated crops in China leading to the fall of the Xia Dynasty.
The abrupt and catastrophic loss of the people of Thera may have also inspired the myths about Atlantis.
this is blowing my fucking mind
I love that if you really boil all this information down, what you get is something approximating “the sinking of Atlantis caused the 10 Biblical plagues of Egypt” which is, like, one of the greatest mythological mash-ups I have ever heard of.
I do not… Have the SPOONS to explain why this is wrong, damnit. But I want to so badly.
Long story short: there IS some factual stuff up there. Like Santorini. There was TOTALLY a Volcano, and it DEFINITELY eliminated Santorini, which may have spawned the Atlantis Myth. But. My guys, my dudes, my dudettes, and my non binary peeps, the timeline is WRONG. So wrong.
I can’t remember whether it was @rudjedet or @thatlittleegyptologist, or even @somecunttookmyurl, but ONE OF THESE THREE. Has a post. Which explains better. GO. READ IT. SEE THE FRUSTRATION OF AN EGYPTOLOGIST.
Ok, so I’m an Egyptologist and I’m goddamn sick of seeing this post. It’s wrong. They haven’t been proven. It’s been hypothesised badly that this is what caused them, if they did in fact happen, which again there is no proof for.
So I got anon asking about this a while back, and explaining it all took some kind of massive collaborative attempt by @rudjedet, @ikchen, @somecunttookmyurl, @23-tiny-wishes, @shatar-aethelwynn, @bubobubosibericus and myself, to properly go through it (i.e. several Egyptologists, someone familiar with biblical archaeology/theology, and a Geologist). Sadly we forgot about it for a long time and I never responded to the ask, but I do still have the google doc we worked on, so I’ve posted part of it here and the rest under a cut. I’ve bolded all the links to external articles to make them easier to find.
So the post claims the Thera/Santorini eruption was at the root of the 10 plagues of Egypt, and the alleged scientific proof for it. The OP sources a Time article and a Telegraph article, which are both based on the 2010 NatGeo documentary ‘The Ten Plagues of the Bible’. In this documentary, scientists look for potential scientific explanations for the ten plagues as described in the Bible book Exodus. Since I’m an Egyptologist, and not qualified to talk about Biblical events or geology, I asked several people for their professional opinion. Please be advised that this will be a very long post, because the topic is more on the level of a MA thesis than a Tumblr post. We can’t address it in three paragraphs.
Two points before we dive into the contents of the post and documentary:
Anyone who claims they proved massive events described in any religious text (in this case the Bible), should be regarded as suspicious. This goes double if they don’t take the local historical record into account.
Documentaries are under no obligation to tell the truth. They can, and often will, skew facts in order to make for a more compelling story.
Anyone who claims they proved massive events described in any religious text (in this case the Bible), should be regarded as suspicious. This goes double if they don’t take the local historical record into account.
Documentaries are under no obligation to tell the truth. They can, and often will, skew facts in order to make for a more compelling story.
Viewers have misinterpreted this particular documentary’s intention and reported its hypotheses as fact. The documentary doesn’t try to prove the 10 plagues actually happening, it’s looking for possible scientific/natural explanations for the plagues if they had happened. And although the scientists are legitimate, with solid publishing histories in their respective fields, none of them are active within Egyptology, and they do not take Egyptian history and chronology into account. Even if their hypotheses make sense in theory, this is reason to doubt their conclusions as they pertain to Egypt.
Keep reading
I am once again asking people to stop trying to treat Torah as a very old newspaper: it’s much, much more interesting than that.
Moral truths and cultural foundational myths do not need to be literal, provable, historically correct events in order to have spiritual weight and meaning and even binding covenantal authority. To be perfectly honest, this is an excellent demonstration of why biblical literalism is such a problem - if you view the Bible this way, and then realize that it is not actually provable, you are now in a situation where you must choose between facts or faith. If you choose faith, then you’ve chosen to make objective, scientific reality negotiable, and it’s a very easy ride from there to viewing all inconvenient facts as suspect or outright lies.
Both Judaism and xtianity have solid bases for non-literal belief. The entire midrashic and aggadic traditions within Judaism, as well as more certain aspects of our mystical tradition show the truth-within-a-truth. The point is less to argue that they are all literally true (many midrashim are actually mutually exclusive) but rather to use as a means of exegesis, commentary, and learning. Within xtianity, the parables of Jesus are meant as fables to use as an object lesson for the disciples rather than as factual stories.
My point is that religious truth is is rooted in moral truth rather than in historical fact, and trying to use the latter as a rubric for the former will yield disappointing and (frankly) dangerous results.
I agree with @unbidden-yidden about trying to root religious truth in historical fact being a bad idea. In an academic context, not religious, the Bible is still a very interesting historical document. For those who are interested in this type of biblical scholarship (looking at the text more than content and comparing it to verified historical record to get a sense of the cultural and political values and tides of the eras), I highly, HIGHLY recommend Richard Elliott Friedman's books "Who Wrote the Bible" and "The Exodus". The latter is of particular relevance to this post because it addresses the thoroughly debunked theories presented here.
DPD Chief Pazen, who is fond of the STAR program, says it frees up officers to do their jobs: fight crime.
“The policing alternative empowers behavioral health experts to call the shots, even when police officers are around.”
purim cats commission for @hanukcat!
Purim cats! Soon we will have cats for all the holidays!
Purrim is on February 26th and it is coming up! Get those hamentaschen ready and maybe consider a cat based mishloach manot to your nearest rescue or shelter?
First, we have to understand that in Judaism we do not pray. Prayer is an English word. What Jews do is l’hispallel.
L’hispallel is a unique experience, but as with most Jewish things today, this holy word has been changed into an English word with a western connotation. The word “prayer” actually comes from the Latin word meaning “to beg” — exactly what most people feel prayer is. They imagine a big king in the sky who is getting a big ego boost from watching his subjects beg. This is a terrible image of our selves and of G-d.
L’hispallel has nothing to do with begging G-d to change His mind. L’hitpallel is a reflexive verb and it means to do something to your self, not to G-d. When you are praying, your question should not be, “Is G-d listening to my prayers?” For sure he is. What you should really ask yourself is, “Am I listening to my prayers? Does what I say impact me? Have I changed?” - Rabbi David Aaron
"When we encounter difficult texts in our tradition - texts in the Torah or Talmud - what do we do? Women who learn have no choice but to figure this out. And since all women should learn, everyone has to figure it out.
Options that are off the table: 1. Ignore. 2. Apologize. It's the Torah. We can't ignore it. And saying things like "well it was different back then" is just silly. Yes the world was worse, and B"H the world has gotten better, but the Torah speaks to us in our own times. I think those apologetics are basically the same as ignoring.
Instead: look at it squarely. This text is misogynist. But then move past that to investigate for truth, because it's Torah so we start out knowing there's truth....is it harder to raise girls than boys today? Because then I have to work against the whole system [that] everywhere tells them they matter less, are less smart, are less capable? With daughters we have to fight the whole world. So maybe having sons is fortunate, at least a little bit?
Someone commented to me that in their opinion I am doing "gymnastics" and I just want to own that. Gymnastics takes years of training, precision and strength. It's uncomfortable, it's hard and it's worth it because this is an ancient tradition and it is ours"
- Rabbanit Leah Sarna on Pesachim 65, "fortunate is he whose children are males, and woe to him whose children are females."
Do perisex trans people know that it’s not solely up to them to decide what language we use for sex and what parts of the false sex classifications we do and do not use? Like are they aware that their comfort with afab=vagina and amab=penis doesn’t actually matter? That their comfort with afab=xx and amab=xy doesn’t actually matter? That their opinions on sex, the validity of sex, and the language we use about sex don’t actually matter nearly as much as intersex opinions do?
Are perisex trans people aware that intersex people exist, have different experiences from perisex cis and trans people, can be cis/trans/neither, and generally are the ones who should be making decisions about and be front and centre in discussions about the false sex binary and sex-based language?
Do perisex trans people know that just because they may be personally comfortable with equating sex with genitals/chromosomes/hormones/etc. it doesn’t mean that opinion matters? Do they know that all of this is much more harmful to intersex people than to perisex trans people and is inherently an intersex issue first and foremost as the main site of our oppression? And that if they don’t face negative consequences for the equation of sex with those characteristics, that’s their perisex privilege and not a sign that actually the false sex binary is fine? That their intersexist use of sex as though it’s the same as genitals/chromosomes/hormones/etc. isn’t any less intersexist because they’re trans and comfortable with that use of language?
Do perisex trans people know that they’re capable of—and often guilty of—intersexism, and that being trans doesn’t negate that?
If anyone, especially perisex cis people, use this as an excuse to be transphobic I’ll go fucking ballistic. This is an intersex and trans issue and I’m an intersex trans person, the only voices whose opinions need to be heard on this post are intersex voices (cis, trans, and otherwise) that aren’t transphobic.
Perisex trans people can interact with this post, but only in the context of trying to learn and do better as intersex allies.
hi! I hope I’m not being That perisex trans person by asking, but what language would you prefer to be used to describe/categorise primary sex characteristics?
Not at all, I’m very happy to answer questions about this sort of thing! I always appreciate people trying to learn!
I very much prefer to be as accurate as possible with my language, and the best way to do that without having to say a whole bunch of words with a whole bunch of caveats and whatnot is (in my opinion at least) to just… talk very specifically about whichever sex characteristic is relevant in the moment.
For example, if we want to talk about testicular healthcare, rather than labelling it as “amab healthcare” or going through the whole “cis men, trans women, and some intersex people” (which is also less accurate because cis men and trans women could also be intersex or for any other reason might not have testicles), it’s much easier to just say “people with testicles.” It’s relatively short, it’s simple, and it’s more accurate than any of the somewhat bumbling attempts at inclusivity that are often used.
And this can go for things like hormones or chromosomes too, not just organs. If something is carried on a y chromosome, then say “people with a y chromosome.” If something is more common for people with xx chromosomes, then say “people with xx chromosomes,” and also possibly look into whether that means your chromosomes are just xx, or if it’s any combination of chromosomes that includes xx. If something is more common in people with lower testosterone levels or higher estrogen levels or whatever, just say “people with [level] amounts of [hormone].”
Additionally, everyone needs to keep in mind how much of sex-based medical research has intentionally excluded intersex people. When people make the argument that we need sex labels in medicine to give people accurate treatment, remind them that 1) we can accomplish the same things by just defining everything by the sex characteristic that affects it/is affected by it and 2) that sex labels have explicitly caused medical harm to intersex people and will continue to until we get rid of them because sex isn’t real and pretending it is denies critical healthcare to intersex people. Sex-based things like “male” vs “female” heart attack signs are not only profoundly unhelpful to intersex people who don’t know where we fit into them, but also actively contribute to the false sex binary that’s used to facilitate medical abuse of intersex people.
(Also, entirely unrelated side note but we’re talking about medicine so it feels relevant, perisex trans people really need to start understanding and acknowledging how much of trans healthcare has been built off research done by medically abusing intersex people, especially intersex infants and children)
[tweet from “Inspiration Information” @telushk: Black Jews will get called antisemitic for pointing out that some Jews are white, that some of those white Jews have found common cause with Nazis, and that it’s *really* not as rare as it should be…Don’t blame the messenger.
retweeting from Christiaan Triebert @trbrtc: The guy dressed in fur pelts and a bullet proof vest is the son of a Brooklyn Surpreme Court Judge, whose also a prominent Orthodox figure in Brooklyn and former president of the National Council of Young Israel.]
Trump Fur-Ever: Costumed Capitol Rioter Is Son Of Brooklyn Supreme Court Judge
The man’s father is Shlomo Mostofsky, a prominent modern Orthodox figure in Brooklyn and former president of the National Council of Young Israel. He was elected to the Kings County Supreme Court last January with the backing of the Brooklyn Democratic Party.
Neither father nor son returned repeated inquiries from Gothamist. In an interview with the NY Post, Aaron, who declined to give his last name, said that he stormed the building because “the election was stolen,“ adding that he found the riot shield on the floor.
…
His brother, Nachman Mostofsky, is the vice president of the South Brooklyn Conservative Club, and an elected district leader in the borough, who claims to have connections with high-ranking members of the Trump administration. Nachman also attended the rally on Thursday, but said he left before the group entered the capitol.
“My brother did nothing illegal,” Nachman told Gothamist. “He definitely was not part of the riot.” Asked how he ended up in the Capitol building, Nachman said his brother was “pushed inside.”
“You’re full of shit. You’re a dishonest person. My brother went as a citizen of America,” Nachman continued. “You find me one [Black Lives Matter] riot or one Antifa riot from over the summer that didn’t have way more damage.”
Plain fact is, white American Jews have increasingly engaged with white supremacy each successive generation. When we talk about how afraid Jews are of fascists taking over the Capitol… remember that they include some of us. It ranges from people like Jared Kushner to Eric Cantor to Stephen Miller. It’s on the rest of us to 1) monitor their presence and acts, 2) openly and loudly reject all their beliefs and actions, 3) remove them from our spaces and communities. We cannot call ourselves a Jewish community if we refuse to aggressively protect those of us who aren’t white.
However overwhelmingly liberal and progressive and humanist American Jews are as a whole, we can’t pretend that there’s not this appalling subset of people who have embraced the worst of the country’s ingrained racism. It’s our duty to reckon with this phenomenon and eliminate their influence and power in both our community and the country at large.
*hits button violently*
MOSES NO!
I love anti-theists.
Indigenous people can talk about how our stories and traditions tell us to learn from the world around us, to look at the plants and animals and the non-living beings in the world as teachers and guides, and to take the lessons they give us and apply them to our lives so that when we're gone, we've left the world a better place than it was when we were born.
We learn how to gather and prepare food from the squirrels and rabbits and other herbivores. We learn how to hunt and how to abstain from the predators. We learn how to work together and act as one from the trees.
Our traditional knowledge is built on observance and testing, using what Mother Earth teaches us because the other beings walking her with us are older and more knowledgeable about the world and we have so much to learn from them.
And yet anti-theists will still look at our traditional knowledge and practices and call them useless superstitions, refusing to hear the lessons in them and comparing them to the psuedoscience that was started by white ableists.
We're told that we're ignorant, that we refuse to listen to reason and logic, by the same people who think that any knowledge that isn't theirs is automatically wrong. Traditions that sustained both the environment and the people for thousands of years are dismissed just because they didn't come out of a lab and aren't presented in a way that's "scientific" enough.
Indigenous Knowledge Is Science.
Hear this. Take it in. Let it settle behind your teeth until you understand what it means.
Indigenous Knowledge Is Science.
"My colleagues might scoff at the notion of basket makers as scientists, but when Lena and her daughters take 50 percent of the sweetgrass, observe the result, evaluate their findings, and then create management guidelines from them, that sounds a lot like experimental science to me. Generations of data collection and validation through time builds up to well-tested theories."
— Braiding Sweetgrass by Robin Wall Kimmerer, pages 304-305
it’s comforting to know that the universe prefers life over death. they are constantly evolving animals to survive longer, one creatures death will allow for the continuation of another’s life, everything will collapse in on itself some day so that a new life could be created all over again. the universe is addicted to living, so when u make someone’s life easier to live you are literally doing gods work