Please read me. 🩷
Must be 18 or older to view this blog.
All trespassers will be blocked on sight.

blake kathryn

No title available

Janaina Medeiros
sheepfilms

oozey mess
No title available
No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement
Xuebing Du

izzy's playlists!
noise dept.

ellievsbear
occasionally subtle
Peter Solarz
No title available

Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER

JBB: An Artblog!
h
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from T1

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from South Africa
seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Mexico

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from Trinidad & Tobago

seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from Germany
@afatlittledog
Please read me. 🩷
Must be 18 or older to view this blog.
All trespassers will be blocked on sight.
they just don’t do any classic homophobic children moments like this anymore
There was really no winning that one
guards! read me my bedtime yaoi
my liege if you keep having all of the guards come to your bedroom to read you bedtime stories, there will be no one to actually guard the castle during that time!
any intruders are welcome to join us for story time
my liege the enemies to lovers yaoi is affecting your perception of the danger of real enemies.
when will it be my turn.
The legislation would also prohibit cellphone use during the school day.
genuine question but can i ask why restricting minors from social media is such a bad thing? im obviously not as educated so im viewing this surface level, but wouldnt this theoretically lead to better overall outcomes? i feel like social media has done a decent amount more harm than good, no?
the reason why it's bad because it will make everyone have to verify their age to use social media which can create bad privacy risks such as having their ids exposed on the internet, putting people at risk for identity theft.
no, the reason it's bad is that social media is a huge part of how people communicate with friends and family, express their ideas and beliefs, form and sustain community, develop individual and group identities, and participate in democratic society, and children have the right to do all of those things because they are human beings.
these laws are not bad (just) because of their side effects, they are bad because their stated goals are immoral.
This kind of rhetoric frustrates me to no end. Laws banning "minors" from social media are bad because young people should be more free, not face state hypersurveillance or ever more extreme parental regulation of their lives. The idea that these laws are bad because of how the affect adults betrays a view of young people as less than human, as less than deserving of freedoms, and of their oppression as morally justified.
"Protecting" kids by subjecting them to state violence and surveillance denies them their humanity.
you put an Apparently Reasonable Amount of dried pasta in boiling water and it turns into Much More Pasta than Anticipated
I see we’ve reached the “blame your failures on communist subterfuge” phase of the AI business plan
"The Theory taking the Babies by storm: Nap time funded by The monsters under the bed?"
lmfao the Scots in town for the World Cup have made a pilgrimage to Boston's world-famous Cop Annihilating Slide
Official Post of Massachusetts
“what’s your dog’s name?” “dijon” “oh, like the mustard!” “no, like dijonathon”
hello instagram artist. your challenge is to do a portrait study of a woman but you’re not allowed to stylize them so their eyes are really big and more cat eyed than the reference photo. You’re also not allowed to make their noses more of a button nose or their lips full and pouty or their faces heart shaped with no double chin. Also you have to draw a fat woman. one thats actually fat and not just slightly curvier than the kpop demon hunters body type. good luck
never not thinking abt this
fun fact - I took this screenshot back in 2018 so it's not that, the guy's name is Ross Draws and he's sucked for a lot longer than that
thank youuuuuu I’ve been seeing a lot of people lately confidently claim art is ai when it was very clearly drawn by a person.
yes, all the changes to the reference were intentional and deliberate and I think that’s important context here
Does Marge have friends? by Raphael Bob-Waksberg — i’ve read this a couple years ago and it has always stayed with me…wanted to draw to it
I think if zoidberg moved into bikini bottom he wouldnt look out of place at all i wouldnt even notice him there
I like how polite he is because he isnt intruding but curious somewhat
Translation: "Chancho! I'm leaving now dude, i'm leaving to go work now dude."
"If someone breaks in dude, you beat the ever-loving shit out of them real hard dude, you beat the shit out of them, Chancho, you hear me?"
"You just beat the shit out of anyone who breaks in!"
translation notes:
The dogs name is 'Chancho', a slang word for a pig. Basically, its like the dog is named 'piglet' 🥺
hello my name is Stray Hair snd my big dream is to play the itsy bitsy spider on broadway. doyou mind if i practice on the side of your head.
i like this fella
good god theyre giving the weevils adderall
very dope of the weeveils to do that
Cannot stand the trend of censoring any and all words that describe concepts that might make you go :( especially when the censoring is done in that quarter-assed way that's just 'did a lil scribble over a vowel so you know that I know this word describes a no-no."
I'm not even going to be vague about what sparked this. Do not fucking censor the word 'stole.' I'm at my fucking limit.
Who does this benefit. Who is made safer by this. Whose life is made better by this. Who is out there going "Wow I sure am glad I didn't have to see that word without it scribbled on a little. That really reduced the emotional impact of reading that word." Can I kill them?