Fai_Ryy
almost home
occasionally subtle
Today's Document
Sweet Seals For You, Always
noise dept.
Monterey Bay Aquarium
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

No title available

shark vs the universe

Andulka
Cosmic Funnies

pixel skylines
DEAR READER

Product Placement

PR's Tumblrdome
trying on a metaphor
wallacepolsom
No title available
Show & Tell
seen from Chile
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Poland
@afunnyfeminist
Today, U.S. district judge Richard Leon blocked Trump from proceeding with construction of his $400 million ballroom on the site of the White House’s demolished East Wing. This has halted, at least for now, one of Trump’s most visible efforts to reshape the symbolic center of the federal government’s executive branch. The decision by Judge Leon puts the ballroom project on hold while the lawsuit continues. Trump has repeatedly emphasized that his ballroom is funded entirely by private donors, so its cost won’t be borne by taxpayers and it doesn’t need a congressional appropriation. He says he’s raised hundreds of millions of dollars from personal backers and around two dozen tech, cryptocurrency and defense corporations to fund the the structure without government support. Translated: he’s effectively extorted from monied interests eager to suck up to him. To real-estate developer Trump, all that matters is being under budget, ahead of schedule, and at no cost to taxpayers. Even if he demolishes the entire White House and erects a Trump Tower in its place. Even if he extorts every CEO in America to pay for it. Even if he erects a giant arch across the Potomac with his name emblazoned on it. But the people have not authorized him to do any of this. Which means — as long as we have an independent federal judiciary, and have any hope for a Congress that will stand up to him — he cannot.
Let’s see how many private donations he gets when he has to return that part of the White House to its original condition.
Reblog and you’re guaranteed to be successful at whatever you do next!
yessssss
The moon looks amazing tonight. I hope you’re somewhere you can see it. Maybe riding your bike or walking through town or sitting on your porch.
It’s sad what half of this country is willing to give up in order to feel happy about treating immigrants and transgender people like garbage.
I thought trump had the worst hair of any world leader, but then …
Legislation and public opinion clash over student pronoun recognition.
"Americans divided on whether to randomly be assholes to children" is really a more accurate headline, but i can see why that doesn't sell.
If you insist on calling Bobby Roberta, you're as much of an asshole as if you insist on calling Bobby Robert. If someone insisted on calling me by the surname I had when i was born, they'd be as much of an asshole as if they decided to call me by the legal first name I used until 2019.
If you strip away the transphobia and justifications, it's just rudeness, and honestly, I think that's probably the winning tactic here with a lot of people. Not with the real dyed-in-the-wool bigots, but with the people who "can see both sides": ask them how they'd feel about someone calling their mother by her maiden name and refusing to use her married name (assuming her name has changed, etc.). Chances are, they'll say that's unacceptably rude, but if they reply that Mom changed her name legally, you can take one of two tacks:
Is it acceptable, then, to call a newlywed by her maiden name until the paperwork goes through legally changing her name, which can take weeks?
Is it rude to call someone who goes by their legal middle name by their first legal name? If John Alexander goes by Alex, is it rude to refuse to call him anything other than John?
What about that one guy everyone knows who goes by a nickname he's had since he was five? If Colin Martin Jr. has been called Buddy since childhood, is it rude to insist on calling him Colin, or Junior? What if he decides he's 18 now and he would rather go by Colin, is it rude to keep calling him Buddy?
If you can get through people's heads that it's just plain fucking rude to not call people the name that they ask to be called, pronouns are a relatively easy argument.
The only purpose of a pronoun - any pronoun - is to stand in for a noun in situations where it's more convenient or more grammatically sensible to use the pronoun. And once you establish that it's rude to randomly call people names that they don't go by, it's also fucking rude to call people by the wrong pronouns.
Taking that tack starts to take the legs out from under their justifications, and if the lightbulb doesn't go on over their heads, it's pretty easy to just shrug and say, "Well, maybe your momma raised you to be rude like that, but mine didn't. In my mother's house, we addressed people how they prefer to be addressed, but, you know. My mom was very big on manners and respecting others. Maybe yours didn't care about that so much." Once you hit that point, it's pretty clear that the difference is transphobia, but you can make that clear by backing them slowly into a corner where they have to admit that they're just being rude because they think trans people are icky and don't deserve respect.
I don't recommend wasting your energy like this on every transphobe on the internet, but if there's someone in your actual life that you think you can reach, this tactic, rather than falling back on "that's transphobic," or talking about suicide statistics, has proven way more useful to me. People can easily get super defensive and shut down or deflect to other arguments about ROGD and so on if you talk about transphobia and mental health in trans teens, but it's a lot harder - especially for older folx - to brush off the "hey, that's just rude, that's all it is," especially when served with a side of "well, maybe your mother raised you like that but mine didn't."
“It’s rude” has also worked for me on transphobic gays who feel it’s their right to shout loud and clear about how they’d never fuck a tranny and they shouldn’t be required to because they’re GAY.
Buddy, you can fuck or refuse to fuck whoever you want for whatever petty reason, that’s how consent works. But if you dont want to fuck a fat person, it would be unaccountably rude to explain to them in detail all the reasons why you don’t find them attractive instead of just saying “no thanks.” You don’t have to fuck trans people but you don’t have to be a jackass about it either.
It’s amazing how people just seem to forget how basic manners and decency work when they’re faced with a trans person. As if they were some alien species and not just another human being.
Republicans are lying.
Trump is lying. JD Vance is lying.
Undocumented immigrants can go to an ER. They can not be refused care.
That is not the same as buying health insurance through a state market place.
Subsidies are for residents.
Mind you, every Republican in Congress gets free health coverage paid by our tax dollars.
Why not share what they get with everyone else?
Republican selfishness and racism is exhausting.
Context:
Republicans want eligible Americans to lose their affordable health care.
These Red States are killing their own.
happy anniversary
ABC pulled Jimmy Kimmel's show off the air. This is the last thing he said.
Are you ready to fight fascism? It's here.
Insane
Always remember Umberto Eco's 8th characteristic of Fascism:
Fascist societies rhetorically cast their enemies as "at the same time too strong and too weak."
It's why Joe Biden was both "a sleepy old man" and "head of a crime family"
They don't just do it because it's rhetorically convenient. They do it because holding two contradictory ideas in their head makes it difficult for their followers to form a coherent worldview, and makes them more reliant on what the leaders say to make "sense" of the world.
If a democrat was assassinated could you imagine what would be going on right now?
Hell the Right didn't even want to lower flags to half staff for Jimmy Carter!
First things first: this is amazing.
Secondly, most of you reading this aren’t doctors. I’m not a doctor. The vaccine denialist is definitely not a doctor. That’s why it makes no sense to argue with these people. Instead, tell them to consult their doctor. Not a doctor. Their doctor. It’s a reminder that what they read on the internet or hear in a podcast isn’t the professional opinion of a doctor they trust. It’s also a reminder that there was a time when they had informed opinions before the internet and podcasts. It’s more effective than an argument.
People doing the real reporting.
White supremacist tropes and ironic viral jokes illustrate the administration’s project of redefining who belongs in the United States.