Autistic people! We are having a retreat in Ortonville, Michigan next month. A limited number of scholarships are available if you apply soon.

No title available
Not today Justin
Monterey Bay Aquarium

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Kiana Khansmith

shark vs the universe

#extradirty
The Bowery Presents
No title available
RMH
No title available
The Bright Sessions
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
sheepfilms
The Stonewall Inn
almost home
Color Me Curious
taylor price

izzy's playlists!
KIROKAZE
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Colombia
seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from Germany

seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye

seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
@alliecat-person
Autistic people! We are having a retreat in Ortonville, Michigan next month. A limited number of scholarships are available if you apply soon.
Our mom Donna spent years helping other people as a social worker, Brownie troop leader, and mom. Now she needs help. Donna has been living with type 1 diabetes since she was a teenager, and at age 62 is experiencing many difficult complications: kidney failure, visual impairment, diabetic neuro...
Hello, I haven’t posted to Tumblr in forever for various reasons. But I know there are some great people on here and I wanted to post my fundraiser. My very cool mother has had type 1 diabetes since she was a teenager. Now, she has many complications and needs a lot of care. Medicare won’t cover everything, and we’re still waiting to apply for Medicaid for reasons that are complicated. In the meantime, her monthly care is $6800 a month. We would greatly appreciate any assistance you can spare. If you can’t donate, that’s totally cool. Reblogs are always appreciated. Thanks so much!
My dad and father-in-law appear to be operating under the delusion that what the world really wants is a group email chain in which two old white Jewish guys who have always lived on the coasts discuss what people in “the heartland” want in 2020 presidential candidates. ...this is going to be a long year, isn’t it?
New level of #academicdrama
This dude just called himself out in his own footnotes???
“Notoriously complacent in this regard is Freudenberg (1993).”
……but you *are* Freudenberg (1993) even though you’ve Evolved into Freudenberg (2001).
That’s it. That’s the show.
How would each Animorph be split personality-wise if they were cut in half ala The Separation?
Cassie would probably split into Cass and Cassandra.
Cass is fiance to Ronnie Chambers in the last chapters of #54 (that’s his nickname for her) and she contains all the brutally pragmatic parts of Cassie’s survivalist nature. Cass eats a baby seal if that’s the only food in the Arctic, Cass understands that it’s kinder to kill a wounded skunk than to let it suffer, Cass cuts Jake out and finds a better partner when it’s what she needs, Cass learns to live without the codependent team dynamic in a way that none of the boys ever do. Cass is the side of Cassie who would saw off chunks of herself in order to escape a trap, able to keep going even after everyone around her has fallen and she is herself bleeding out. Cass killed half a dozen innocent humans right along with their yeerks because it was the only way to save her friends (#43), Cass agreed to blow up the yeerk pool for the sake of the greater good (#51), and Cass would survive the war even if she had to leave her teammates and huge chunks of herself bleeding out on the battlefield without a second glance. She wouldn’t be actively cruel, but she wouldn’t bother being nice. Her dynamic with the team would be rough, probably, because she’s that one-woman army (emphasis on one), but she’d still be better than Cassandra.
Cassandra is, well… Cassandra. Just because she’s right all the time when predicting the future doesn’t mean anyone has any reason to believe her. Cassandra correctly calls all the ways that the war will destroy her and her friends, but Cassandra also becomes a voluntary controller (#19) and gives the morphing cube to the yeerks (#50) so frankly she’s not the kind of person who can be trusted. Cassandra is just as hampered by her lack of pragmatism as Cass would be by her lack of long-term idealism. Cassandra is the side of Cassie who is downright condescending when she smugly explains to Marco that there’s no such thing as suppressing free will (#28), and Cassandra is willing to judge Tobias for killing a baby skunk in order to survive (#9). Again: she might turn out to be right in the end, but she’s obnoxious and self-righteous and moralizing and judgmental as fuck about explaining her point of view in the moment. So just because she happens to be right all the time, that’s no reason anyone has to listen to her. If she could learn to explain herself better, to come down from her ivory tower, then she’d get a lot more done.
Ax would become Ax-Man and Aristh Aximili.
Aristh Aximili is the side of Ax that is caught up in duty before self, in the enormous weight of responsibility he bears by being the sole representative of his people in this vast and foreign war zone. Aristh Aximili would be cold, aloof, unwilling to work with his team unless absolutely necessary. Aristh Aximili tries to kill Visser Three, time and again, even at the near-cost of his own life (#8, #13, #18). Aristh Aximili would tell his friends nothing, would listen to orders from any andalite who is able to give them, and would constantly tell himself that the current situation is temporary so it’s best not to get too attached. Although intelligent and disciplined, Aristh Aximili would be hampered by his unwillingness to admit there’s anything he can’t do. Aristh Aximili fights alongside the Animorphs, but tells himself he is not one of them (MM1) and undermines them when they get in his way (#18, #46). Aristh Aximili is constantly asking himself “What Would Elfangor Do?” and feeling crushed by the sense that he’s letting his brother, and by extension his entire species, down. Aristh Aximili would probably get himself killed young and glorious in some vain attempt to take out Visser Three, and would tell himself that it was ultimately worth it in the end.
Ax-Man is a mouth-sound-playing, cigarette-butt-eating hedonist too busy taking in this whole new planet with an open heart and an empty stomach to worry about doody. Ax-Man doesn’t have to ask himself what Elfangor would do, because he’s already doing it: he’s eating five cotton candies in one sitting, devouring almanacs and “These Messages” to learn about this fascinating new culture, becoming shorms with Tobias, and hanging out at the local Taco Bell with his human friends. Ax-Man views the whole planet Earth as a giant playground for him to explore. He might not get much done, but Ax-Man knows when to get the whole team to take a break and go to CinnaBon (#14, #18) and he appreciates the chance to get a glimpse of human families (#6, #8) even while missing his own.
Jake would split into fascist Jake and armchair quarterback Jake.
Fascist Jake is the “Supreme Leader” we get a glimpse of at the beginning of MM3. He’s the side of Jake that, when push comes to shove, is willing to shout at David and even tell Rachel to smack him around when he thinks it’s necessary to maintain discipline on his team (#21). Fascist Jake is the “Napoleon Junior” who sends all the Auximorphs to their deaths in spite of James’s objections to letting them fight (#53). Fascist Jake would assume that he has absolute authority on the team, and he’d try to get Rachel to hurt or kill Marco in punishment when Marco inevitably objects. Fascist Jake is righteous and rigid, able to make decisions quickly but unable to take criticism. No matter how much Jake experiences genuine reluctance about being a leader, and genuine hesitancy to tell his friends what to do, that side of him willing to send his friends to die still exists throughout the series. Fascist Jake would be terrifying, because he’d have all the parts of Jake that simply assume the world will mold itself to his desires until the continents are forced to move from the sheer power of his will. He wouldn’t be able to sustain it, though, because he’d be demanding unquestioning respect from the kind of team that simply doesn’t do respect for authority. However, he’d still be more effective than his other half.
Armchair Quarterback Jake is the side of Jake that Marco points out during #54, the one who constantly questions his own instincts and has no faith in himself. Armchair Quarterback Jake is that ruminating side of Jake who thinks he had the power to stop every single bad thing that ever happened to any of his friends, and that he was just too stupid or too weak to see the correct way out where no one would get hurt. Armchair Quarterback Jake is the side of Jake who is constantly calling himself stupid and short-sighted for failing to anticipate every single move his enemies make (#11, #16, #36) while also failing to realize that his friends in some ways have just as much responsibility as he does. This side of Jake is the one that won’t make any decision at all for fear of making the wrong one, the perfectionist who is paralyzed by his own impossible standards. If Fascist Jake is a bull in a china shop, charging around not caring who gets hurt in the process of his total war against the yeerks, then Armchair Quarterback Jake would be Achilles in his tent: too wrapped up in what-ifs and self-doubts to do anything at all. This half of Jake might even be unable to function at all, unable to make decisions for fear of deciding wrong.
Tobias would be half-human, half-hawk. Duh.
Human Tobias would probably just be that kid we see in #1 and the flashbacks from MM4: naive, idealistic, crushing on Jake, too willing to commit to a cause. Without his hawk half, human Tobias wouldn’t necessarily survive the war. In #33 Taylor’s metaphorical pressure cooker separates Tobias’s “weak little human boy” from his “raptor self… who knows. Pain is normal. Life is pain.” Human Tobias, with no predator to protect him, would get chewed up and spat out by the war until he was either dead or unable to continue to function. In some ways human Tobias is ready for the world to confirm his fears — that he is weak, inadequate, insufficient — and in many ways human Tobias is so idealistic that he has no idea at all how bad the rest of the world can be. Human Tobias is desperate for love and belonging, and we know that if he can’t find that belonging with the Animorphs then he’ll find it with the Sharing.
Hawk Tobias is all the parts of Tobias that kill dinosaurs and mercora to ensure humans’ survival, that would rather starve than own up to being hungry. Hawk Tobias will eventually cause human Tobias to become his sardonic, fatalistic, darkly humorous self… if they are one and the same. Alone, hawk Tobias would probably just give in to the impulse to escape, to be free, to throw off all human ties. Who knows if that part of him would achieve Tobias’s desire to be fully bird, or if he’d still have some small part of humanity he’d be unable to suppress.
Marco is covered in this post.
for the last……..i don’t know, 5 or so years, my m.o. regarding internet bisexual disourse has largely been to ignore it and encourage other bi people to do the same. it made sense to me because as far as i could see it was an issue that exclusively existed on this site. which isn’t to say i didn’t think it was harmful - i hated myself for years as a direct result of the things other lgbt people said about bisexual women on here - but i thought the harm could largely be avoided by blocking the few loudmouths who were trying to start shit and hanging with people who weren’t evil.
i no longer feel that way.
i no longer feel that way because, as of yesterday, you absolute fucking buffoons have ran your mouth so far that your fire new radical materialist feminist discourse so hot even fellow lgbts cant handle????????? has reached lena fucking dunham
do you want to know WHY your radical materialist feminist discourse reached lena dunham?????
because a bisexual journalist made this simple ass tweet
and in response, some straight white woman decided to tweet this
which would have just stayed straight nonsense if an extremely smart and clever white lesbian writer friend of hers hadn’t decided to join in with a searing hot take based on a radical perspective towards gender that could only have been achieved with her clearly useful phd in queer literature
which would have just stayed mildly irritating if she and the rest of her friends hadn’t proceeded to defend themselves by arguing that bi women deserve rape and abuse actually
which would have only been horrifyingly offensive if all of these people weren’t 1.) people who make money writing about lgbt shit that 2.) were tweeting from their work accounts where 3.) they have enough reach to be followed by actually influential people such as comrade lena dunham
so seeing as the “close your eyes and maybe itll go away” method has CLEARLY failed, i am genuinely pleased to announce my new tactic. its called
“I Am Going To Spread The CDC Stats on Bisexual Assault and Abuse Everywhere Until It’s So Well Known Every Bisexual Has It Memorized and is Pissed as Hell About It”
Can I also just draw out here that their argument is LITERALLY that “women who sleep with men deserve what happens to them.”
Like.
This kind of person is, straight (haha) up, the kind of person who is only here for “I want mine”. If they’d been born a straight guy they’d be the worst kind of bros.
This is a thing that happens: I know PLENTY of straight white women whose grasp of feminism is limited strictly to “this affects me, so it’s important”. And of every other stripe of identity.
But never mistake it for anything than what it is.
I recognize one of the names there
This woman gets paid for writing her opinions, having hot takes like “bi women deserve to suffer because of their sexuality”, “Picasso dating a 17 y/o girl when he was 45 is not that bad” and some bullshit stupid about butch women having male privilege
As somebody from queer journalism twitter lemme just say fuck this bitch and I see this shit all the time
Also fuck that person for saying an autistic woman has 'faux empathy’ tbqh.
Moth and Butterfly Costume Wings
Crafty Annes Artistry on Etsy
See our #Etsy or #Halloween tags
sAyS YOu dr. MAn
HEADCANON FIRMLY ACCEPTED
“'And by the way, Alloran, thanks for standing up for Ax. And all of us.’
Alloran turned his main eyes to me. He gave me a strange look. <I never hoped to be free again. You freed me. I have done what I have done in my life. I am what I am, though I may have gained at least some wisdom through the years of enslavement to Visser One. Just the same, I will always be Alloran, the Butcher of Hork-Bajir. Alloran, the only Andalite to be taken alive by the Yeerks. But, disgraced, even despised, for whatever I am worth, I am yours to command.>
The speech was delivered in a low thought-speak tone, all emotion severely controlled. But then Alloran whipped his tail blade over his head, so fast it cracked like a whip. He smiled the subtle Andalite smile and yelled, <Do you know who did that? Do you know who moved my tail? I did. I did. I did it.>
I smiled, but more for him than for me. If he would forever be the Butcher of Hork-Bajir, what would my name be?”
- Book #54: The Beginning (Jake), pg. 56 (by K.A. Applegate)
anyone who thinks manual labor you don't enjoy doing isn't a KEY feature of like commune/cooperative living has never been anywhere near one lol
Well I’m planning to sign up for pickling beets and playing soothing lute music to people working in the fields, that’s an option, right?
This weekend I was schmoozing at an event when some guy asked me what kind of history I study. I said “I’m currently researching the role of gender in Jewish emigration out of the Third Reich,” and he replied “oh you just threw gender in there for fun, huh?” and shot me what he clearly thought to be a charming smile.
The reality is that most of our understandings of history revolve around what men were doing. But by paying attention to the other half of humanity our understanding of history can be radically altered.
For example, with Jewish emigration out of the Third Reich it is just kind of assumed that it was a decision made by a man, and the rest of his family just followed him out of danger. But that is completely inaccurate. Women, constrained to the private social sphere to varying extents, were the first to notice the rise in social anti-Semitism in the beginning of Hitler’s rule. They were the ones to notice their friends pulling away and their social networks coming apart. They were the first to sense the danger.
German Jewish men tended to work in industries which were historically heavily Jewish, thus keeping them from directly experiencing this “social death.” These women would warn their husbands and urge them to begin the emigration process, and often their husbands would overlook or undervalue their concerns (“you’re just being hysterical” etc). After the Nuremberg Laws were passed, and after even more so after Kristallnacht, it fell to women to free their husbands from concentration camps, to run businesses, and to wade through the emigration process.
The fact that the Nazis initially focused their efforts on Jewish men meant that it fell to Jewish women to take charge of the family and plan their escape. In one case, a woman had her husband freed from a camp (to do so, she had to present emigration papers which were not easy to procure), and casually informed him that she had arranged their transport to Shanghai. Her husband—so traumatized from the camp—made no argument. Just by looking at what women were doing, our understanding of this era of Jewish history is changed.
I have read an article arguing that the Renaissance only existed for men, and that women did not undergo this cultural change. The writings of female loyalists in the American Revolutionary period add much needed nuance to our understanding of this period. The character of Jewish liberalism in the first half of the twentieth century is a direct result of the education and socialization of Jewish women. I can give you more examples, but I think you get the point.
So, you wanna understand history? Then you gotta remember the ladies (and not just the privileged ones).
ask historicity-was-already-taken a question
Holy fuck. I was raised Jewish— with female Rabbis, even!— and I did not hear about any of this. Gender studies are important.
Why Gender History is Important (Asshole)
“so you just threw gender in there for fun” ffs i hope you poured his drink down his pants
I actually studied this in one of my classes last semester. It was beyond fascinating.
There was one woman who begged her husband for months to leave Germany. When he refused to listen to her, she refused to get into bed with him at night, instead kneeling down in front of him and begging him to listen to her, or if he wouldn’t listen to her, to at least tell her who he would listen to. He gave her the name of a close, trusted male friend. She went and found that friend, convinced him of the need to get the hell out of Europe, and then brought him home. Thankfully, her husband finally saw sense and moved their family to Palestine.
Another woman had a bit more control over her own situation (she was a lawyer). She had read Mein Kampf when it was first published and saw the writing on the wall. She asked her husband to leave Europe, but he didn’t want to leave his (very good) job and told her that he had faith in his countrymen not to allow an evil man to have his way. She sent their children to a boarding school in England, but stayed in Germany by her husband’s side. Once it was clear that if they stayed in Germany they were going to die, he fled to France but was quickly captured and killed. His wife, however, joined the French Resistance and was active for over a year before being captured and sent to Auschwitz.
(This is probably my favorite of these stories) The third story is about a young woman who saved her fiance and his father after Kristallnacht. She was at home when the soldiers came, but her fiance was working late in his shop. Worried for him, she snuck out (in the middle of all the chaos) to make sure he was alright. She found him cowering (quite understandably) in the back of his shop and then dragged him out, hoping to escape the violence. Unfortunately, they were stopped and he, along with hundreds of other men, was taken to a concentration camp. She was eventually told that she would have to go to the camp in person to free him, and so she did. Unfortunately, the only way she could get there was on a bus that was filled with SS men; she spent the entire trip smiling and flirting with them so that they would never suspect that she wasn’t supposed to be there. When she got to the camp, she convinced whoever was in charge to release her fiance. She then took him to another camp and managed to get her father-in-law to be released. Her father-in-law was a rabbi, so she grabbed a couple or witnesses and made him perform their marriage ceremony right then and there so that it would be easier for her to get her now-husband out of the country, which she did withing a few months. This woman was so bad ass that not only was her story passed around resistance circles, even the SS men told it to each other and honoured her courage.
The moral of these stories is that men tend to trust their governments to take care of them because they always have; women know that our governments will screw us over because they always have.
Another interesting tidbit is that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that Kristallnacht is a term that historians came up with after the fact, and was not what the event was actually called at the time. It’s likely that the event was actually called was (I’m sorry that I can’t remember the German word for it but it translates to) night of the feathers, because that, instead of broken glass, is the image that stuck in people’s minds because the soldiers also went into people’s homes and destroyed their bedding, throwing the feathers from pillows and blankets into the air. What does it say that in our history we have taken away the focus of the event from the more domestic, traditionally feminine, realms, and placed it in the business, traditionally masculine, realms?
Badass women and interesting commentary. Though I would argue that “Night of Broken Glass" includes both the personal and the private spheres. It was called Kristallnacht by the Nazis, which led to Jewish survivors referring to it as the November Pogrom until the term “Kristallnacht" was reclaimed, as such.
None of this runs directly counter to your fascinating commentary, though.
READ THIS.
I do think Kristallnacht evokes shop windows and Night of the Feathers very clearly relates to the personal, domestic sphere in a way that Kristallnacht doesn’t.
However, this post doesn’t touch on another aspect of gender.
Remember that the Nazis burned vast archives of what we would now call LGBT literature and many, many men were sent to the concentration camps with the pink triangle, which was supposed to identify homosexual men, but also included bi men and trans women.
The history of gender isn’t about one ‘half’ or the ‘other’. The history of gender is also realised in trans and non-binary identities that are often shoved aside and ignored.
Genuinely curious here. This five year old post is discussing a very specific set of issues regarding gendered behavior within the German Jewish community in 1938, and how the Nazis engaged with those behaviors.
How do you extrapolate from that that I have interest in ignoring and erasing LGBT identities in Holocaust history? Is it because I used intentionally hyperbolic language I used towards the end for rhetorical purposes?
If I sound defensive it’s because I am defensive. Sorry, it’s been three weeks since someone resurrected this post. I’m not great at accepting critique from people who know nothing about my background with this stuff even though it’s right there on my “About” page but are totally willing to make all kinds of assumptions about my scholarship and historiographic intent.
—your friendly neighborhood female Holocaust historian who btw you know nothing about how I sexually ID
Failure to cover every single aspect of a complex historical topic in a single blog post is not a sign of erasure. Also, it is okay to talk specifically about women. Women’s historical experiences (and in particular Jewish women’s experiences) are horrendously underrepresented, even in our own communities. We have the right to talk about that without covering every single other aspect of history. Gender history is about a lot of things. But it also started as WOMEN’S history, and I don’t think we should overlook that.
some Animorphs quotes I screencapped last night:
1. Rachel is me. I am Rachel. I read this one to my parents, and my mom howled because she and I have probably had that exact exchange before.
2. I fucking love Marco
3. Tobias describing Rachel. these kids are so romantic, and so appreciative of one another. it’s precious!
I follow this page on Facebook called Toilets With Threatening Auras and well…
POST MORE
As you wish!
And just because…