Hey, im Dude! This is a discourse and system blog.
Not going to really say anything about me aside from bodily im an adult and im a complex dissociative identity disorder system. I'm not the host but I am a host.
Feel free to just send me whatever, I like to chat, too! It doesn't have to be syscourse. I'm always open to new friends!
Minors above the age of 13 (to comply with Tumblr ToS and for my own comfort) are allowed on this blog but i ask you do not participate in any paraphilia or sex-related discourse on my blog barring topics of pedophilia (when the op is NOT a pedophile themself, if they are the tag #unsafe op will be used) as I think minors should have voices in conversations about their safety, as a victim myself who never had any voice.
If you interact with me and are under 13 I will report your blog. Tumblr is already unsafe enough for anyone 13 and older, if you are under 13 as someone who was on tumblr below that age in the past, I seriously recommend you leave.
Please do not interact with me if you are a dd/lg/lb blog, diaperplay, or post irl gore/sh/ed related material. I check the blogs that interact with me because I like to follow new people, it saves us both trouble.
Endos can interact but you will be treated as you treat me. If you come in insulting me, dont expect any respect.
Tag guide:
#dude says! - non syscourse or discourse related post
#syscourse
#discourse - a broader tag for anything from para discourse to trans discourse. Containment tag.
#unsafe op - a tag to warn especially minors that an op is potentially dangerous and to not interact (adults interact at their own discretion)
#shit endos say - tag for complaining about endos (not engaging in discourse)
Blog stances:
Obviously anti-endogenic and that comes with also being anti any other "identity" that comes with attempting to invade dissociative disorder spaces and demedicalize these disorders through attempting to state that you can naturally fail to integrate ego states.
When it comes to religious practices and using things such as internal family systems to view yourself in multiple facets, I have no issue!
I am anti radqueer, anti NLM and anti para.
When it comes to paraphilias, specifically the big (3, 4, whatever. The harmful ones.), I do not think anyone is a bad person for a disorder, however, I draw the line at people attempting to say you can engage with these desires harmlessly even in fiction, because there are numerous studies showing that leads not only to resistance to real urges breaking down, but to internal justification. As a paraphile (non big 3 but a harmful one) myself, i stand firmly by avoidance and other methods of coping that do not at all involve indulgence.
I would be willing to believe in a form of natural plurality if there were proof, however I still firmly believe that endogenics enroach on traumagenic spaces and that endos and traumagenic systems have vastly different experiences and that trauma survivors deserve their own separate spaces and exclusive language. Its not that trauma makes you superior as I see many people try to say we argue, its simply accomodating the disabled. DID and similar dissociative disorders are disabilities. Natural plurality is by definition not a disability, rather a different manner of being.
I do not hate endogenics. I would have no issue with them if they did not constantly try to enmesh these communities, even if endogenics were simply just people who chose for some reason or another to be more than one. The difference is that I am less than one masquerading as many, as a survival mechanism. We will never be the same.
Plurality is also incomparable to being transgender, and I find this sentiment immensely harmful. Endogenic or not, but especially if you attempt to argue being trans is in any manner similar to having a CDD. You are parroting transmedicalist rhetoric and being transgender is not inheriently a medical condition in need of treatment.
I will always support victims of trafficking and abuse. My status of victimhood of anything should not need to be disclosed for me to say i stand by ramcoa victims and programmed systems, and that their language and existence is not automatically antisemetic for the creator of certain terms being a peice of shit and because christians, who are often the perpetrators of violence such as cult torture, decided to perpetrate antisemetic violence and scapegoat victims of torture.
I will not engage with anyone arguing about ramcoa or programming.
Maybe unpopular opinion but I kinda want any and all DID education to stop focusing on the rarity of things and start focusing on the mistreatment of us as trauma survivors...
It's funny watching endos scream "ableism" at anti endos. Like... do you have a disorder or not? "Anti endos are ableist" sure some of them can be but saying the anti endo "belief" (read- truth) is ableist is so funny. So being "endogenic" disables you then? So it's.... drum roll... a disorder?
Not even going to touch the other contrasting beliefs they have like "nondisordered CDDs" and disorderd endogenics and the whatnot they spew.
I think for disability pride month every endo, willo, transplural, etc owes an actual system money. Amount dependent on how annoying or cruel they have been to systems.
By the way, endos pointing to a statistic about "not all DID cases being from abuse" have utterly failed to be literate, and it's a gross statement. to claim you are the people who is not the majority, when the people in question are people who developed CDD's from non-abuse-related traumatic experiences like war, natural disasters, environmental instability is inherently ableist.
These people are already struggling with being dismissed, for their trauma is less common in CDD treatment, and you are erasing them just to replace them with yourself.
You have no right talking about "oppression" when your roots - and modern presence - is rooted in talking over survivors.
Yet another willomancy education post because I am tired of it being the most misunderstood form of created plurality.
Willogenic is spelled with one w not two. You automatically look like you haven't researched it if you spell it with two.
Willomancy was created in the plural community not the singlet community which shaped how the practice developed significantly. It is mostly used for headmate creation in those who are already plural NOT system creation.
It can be 100% traumagenic and many traumagenics utilize the practice to elaborate fragments and aid in difficult traumagenic splits. It has never been a solely endogenic thing.
It also does not need to be consciously done. Any wish something could exist in a certain way even subconsciously or not actually expecting it to do anything or even being aware of the system enough to know anything can come of it still counts.
It is a very commonly discussed traumagenic experience. Those times you thought or wished you could be something else to escape from or cope with your trauma(whether conscious or subconscious) and that became an alter in your system? That falls under the definition of willomancy. It does NOT need to be identified as such as part of the identity is literally your perception of your experiences but it falls under what people are talking about when they use the term. You can have whatever problems with the term and identifying with it as you want but the experience it describes is a common one that some traumagenics benefit from identifying.
After re-reading the endo history post, I do wonder what the system community would be like if those endogenic groups hadnât been a thing. Endos often say they âbuilt the plural communityâ (without acknowledging that they built it off of the suffering and demedicalization of cdd systems), but there WERE cdd groups back then (who else would the Lancers have targetted lamo).
I do think it would be smaller with less terms, but I think that would be worth it.
I mourn the idea of a system community where you donât have the specify youâre a cdd system. You can just say youâre a system and everyone will know.
I mourn the idea of a system community without people who donât have the disorder thinking they can relate.
I mourn the idea of a system community without the harassment, ignorance and ableism done by endogenics.
I mourn the idea of a system community without endogenics.
More rent lowering gunshots, we don't gaf about actual delusional people who ID as D/As and IRLs. Please remember that.
We believe that in putting those groups on your dni you're actively making an unsafe space for delusional people.
Because I'm delusional and experience them a lot and even while none of us ID as those we still are majorly uncomfortable being around people who have those on their DNI.
A lot of you seem to love the idea of taking away delusional peoples choices, and that's fucking weird. You people act like we can't make our own decisions and that because we experience delusions (which is usually for a period of time and ENDS eventually) our judgment can't be trusted. It's weird as fuck ! You people are weird !
Oh, and I specified "delusional people who ID w/ that term" because 90% of the people who use that term are random teens who have never met a delusional person in their life. Just fyi. The vast majority of the people you're fighting against aren't even delusional, they're just kids.
nah ur actually so wrong for the puritanism. you don't wanna die on the "I think censorship of art is okay when it's gross to me specifically" hill. you're not the kind of person I would expect to parrot fash talking points without doing your own research.
Ah yes the common fascist talking point âits bad to create erotic images of fictional children with the aim of gratifying pedophilesâ. The thing Mussolini said
