Be yourself as best you can whenever you can.
d e v o n
taylor price
todays bird

blake kathryn

izzy's playlists!
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

Andulka
Mike Driver
No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Origami Around
★
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Cosmic Funnies
NASA
YOU ARE THE REASON

No title available
Today's Document
untitled

oozey mess

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Mexico
seen from Nepal

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Sweden

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from Vietnam
seen from Canada
@asparagien
Be yourself as best you can whenever you can.
I've been thinking about "you cannot solve systemic problems with individual action" a lot lately and it's like. It's not that it's wrong exactly but I feel like it's become a thought-terminating cliche, a rallying cry for apathy and inaction.
You can't change anything with your actions so don't bother. You going vegetarian won't shut down a factory farm so don't bother. You buying something in sustainable packaging won't make a dent in the landfill so don't bother. You donating five bucks to a charity won't solve poverty so don't bother. You buying ethically-made clothing won't stop sweatshops from operating so don't bother.
I agree that the only way these problems are going to get solved is if the government enacts regulations to do so, but the key point here is that the government is not going to spontaneously do that. Everybody says they want to protect the environment and for people to make a living wage in the abstract but as soon as regulations start being passed people start throwing fits about how it's impacting their lives.
If the government banned factory farms, meat would suddenly be priced like a luxury item and people would throw fits about how poor people can't afford protein anymore, if they banned plastic packaging people would throw fits about how we're expected to bear the increased production costs, if they banned imports of items made in sweatshops or by slave labor people would throw fits about how they can't get their coffee and chocolate and electronics anymore.
There's a post on here about how community river clean-ups don't actually make much of an impact on water pollution, because the major cause of water pollution isn't random trash but industrial and agricultural run-off. But the clean-ups are still extremely valuable because they get the community invested in the cause of water pollution, the community starts taking pride in their local environment and start actually caring about environmental regulations on a personal level, and that grants activists the buy-in to push for changes that actually can reduce water pollution.
We absolutely must get individual buy-in before we can expect systemic change. You can't solve systemic problems with individual action, but you can't solve them without it either. Making small changes to your consumption habits isn't going to fix the world, but it gets people invested in and connected to the cause, it makes them feel like they're part of a larger movement, and it primes them to think of these regulations as wins for that movement rather than a sacrifice being forced upon them by the government.
"No individual solution for systemic problems" seems like it's just become a way to justify not having to actually do any work to address issues you claim to care about. It's just "surely someone will do something eventually" writ large.
I'm gonna need people who eat meat to stop coping and just say that you like eating meat and you're not going to stop because you don't want to. It's literally fine and it's way less embarrassing than the hoops some of you are trying to jump through to act like eating meat is the moral high ground
"Ummm actually it's racist to say people shouldn't eat meat because some indigenous cultures rely heavily on hunting" almost every culture on Earth relies heavily on hunting or livestock rearing. Basically every American holiday revolves around what type of meat you're eating. My 99% white high school had to schedule around the start of hunting season because so many people took off for it. Stop acting like indigenous people are uniquely connected to eating meat so you can play the racism card.
Also, "but that's my culture" is never an excuse to do something harmful! If you want to argue that eating meat isn't harmful, then argue that instead of trying to hide behind a veneer of social justice.
"What so you think humans are unique moral agents who are exempt from the natural food chain? Do you think it's evil for a lion to eat a rabbit?" uhhhhhhhhh do you NOT think humans are moral agents? Is "would a lion do this" a standard of behavior we're willing to accept in literally any other circumstance?
I agree that humane hunting and livestock rearing practices are not evil acts! But a) you need to fucking argue that point instead of acting like only a crazed evangelist vegan would expect someone to care whether or not their actions are harmful, and b) 99% of the people making this argument are NOT practicing humane hunting or farming, they're just saying "oh yeah? well what about humane practices?" and then buying their meat from factory farms that torture animals to death while destroying the environment.
Which - again, so am I! But at least I'm not acting like people are oppressing me for acknowledging the basic reality of the situation.
Time to shut up anti-vegan leather glazers for good.
“If [leather’s] footprint is shocking or seems high to people, I think it should be a push to keep reflecting on the impact of raising animals for products,” Roncevich said. Leather may benefit (along with wool and other animal-derived materials) from a natural image, but on closer examination, it helps sustain one of the world’s most polluting, environmentally destructive industries.
Animal leather has plenty of toxic baggage of its own, from the chromium salts and other pollutants generated by tanneries to the manure runoff and water pollution associated with cattle ranching.
The original paper:
Sources: (paywalled) Vox article:
https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/494511/leather-carbon-emissions-vegan-meta-analysis
Open access paper: The Carbon Footprint of Leather: A Comprehensive Reassessment Using Global Livestock Data and Meta-Analysis. Roncevich et al.
Im sure everyone is asking you your opinion of Nolan's Odyessy, so rather than throw another in there i'll ask
How funny is it that the Hadestown Proshot was in theatres at the same time?
squandered the crossover potential smh
I’ve got a lot of Thoughts(tm) about The Odyssey at the moment, but damnit Blum I’m an archer, not a film critic, so here’s something in my lane!
i miss the empress of light. more people should just draw her as cool and badass and not just as hot woman i think. i like women too but like. it gets a little annoying when shes my second favourite boss and all of her art gives her like ZERO clothes. stop.
Whole Summer Solstice ☀️ 'Falling right there by the sunset, falling right there by you' Prints | Ko-fi | Patreon | Bluesky ⭐
Miss you guys. Creatures of all time
First time asker. How or where did you learn to write? I’m perpetually stuck and your work feels like what I’d want my work to look and feel like. If you respond, thanks so much!
Fascinating question. I really appreciate the implication that I'm not still learning to write.
The short answer is by reading and watching and overall consuming stories written by other people. The stories that move you are also the stories that inspire you, and inspiration is direction that helps you figure out what you want to pursue. When a story hits you with a moment that cuts right to your core, you might want to figure out why that moment hit you so hard, what parts of it worked, what parts of the rest of the story built up to it, how it's doing that. Possibly even more vitally, when a story is absolutely losing you, chase down what's broken about it and why that might be happening. Once you start seeing how stories are put together, it becomes a lot easier to build your own.
It's not enough just to read. Writing can't be done in a vacuum. You have to read what other people write in order to write your own works, but you have to also go out into the world and experience it in order to build worlds of your own. Writing is an act of creation, but it's also an act of consumption; you the writer are consuming the things that you've learned and experienced and turning them into something new. You can't do that on an empty stomach. Step zero of writing is touching grass.
Writing makes you hungry, and hunger gives you direction. If fantasy inspires you, that might give you the direction of researching folklore and mythology and the other pillars that inspired the great works in the fantasy genre. A love of battle anime might turn into a pursuit of martial arts. Mystery novels might lead you into forensics or psychology or anatomical study. The things you love reading about are connected to other things you'll probably love learning, and once you learn them they'll become foundational substrate in your mind from which your own stories can grow.
Sometimes the harder question isn't how to write, it's how to stop writing. Storytelling is a hard habit to break, arguably impossible. The majority of us do it mostly unconsciously or in times of stress - catastrophizing, fears, anxieties are us telling ourselves scary stories about worst case scenarios. What if the worst possible thing happened, or this nightmare played out; what if I fell here, what if this killed me, what if they hate me, what if they gave me reason to hate them, what if I woke up and a scary guy was there? Our minds concoct stories constantly and compulsively, usually unprompted. Learning to recognize this for what it is is a very useful first step in the pursuit of writing on purpose.
It's easy for these stories to compel us when we spin them, because we're our own captive audience. The hard part of writing is figuring out how to take that story out of our heads and get it into someone else's instead. This is where the craft of writing comes into play, and it's again best learned by reading. How do the stories you experience influence your thoughts and feelings? What methods of phrasing and framing do they use to comfort you, intrigue you, gutpunch you? What matters to the writer to communicate with specificity, and what are they leaving up to you, their audience? Why did the writer choose to do it like that? How would you do it?
Once the story is out of your brain and into a first draft, editing and constructive criticism become possible. Step one was "make it exist", steps two through forever are "make it good." You intend your story to impact in a certain way, but you won't know how well you've succeeded until you see how other people take it. Not all critiques are equally useful, so at this stage it's mostly good to find people whose perspectives you trust and value and listen to them. Once the story exists in its final form, disregard this step and stay out of your story's reviews. Those aren't criticism of your writing process, they're buyer testimonials for readers. They're not useful for you.
Coffee also.
Inflicting our heatwave onto the wizards (And the sunburn I got from the beach)
The three sisters
Single Mages are dying to meet you!
[lawyer voice] mothers and fuckers of the jury-
DO YOU KNOW HOW OFTEN I THINK ABOUT THIS POST??? IM IN LAW SCHOOL THIS POST IS GOING TO RUIN MY LIFE
reblog to ruin a law student’s life
oh hello you’ve returned to us
The Odyssey but retold as a low-stakes modern adventure of one guy out with his girlfriend leaving the bar with his buddies to do just one (1) simple thing real quick, it'll take like 15 minutes tops, he'll be right back, but then some bullshit happens and the trip keeps getting more complicated as more bullshit keeps happening while he just tries to get back to the bar because he promised his girlfriend that he'd get back and he knows that she's still there because she told him she'd wait there.
And by the time he finally gets back it's almost 3 am and the bar is about to close while she's sitting there stone cold sober, surrounded by 5 drunk guys unsuccessfully trying to convince her to give up on waiting for him and go home with one of them instead. And the guy shows up to proceed to beat the shit out of them before explaining himself to her like hey sorry bullshit kept happening, my phone fell into a storm drain and my wallet got stolen when I was trying to find someone who'd borrow me a phone so I could call and
His girlfriend had been fending off the 5 drunk guys for most of the evening by explaining that even if she was going to ditch her boyfriend, she can't possibly leave without finishing her beer, which she is keeping perpetually full via careful sleight of hand where she's just pouring it back and forth into and out of the pitcher.
However the drunk guys are also drinking, and eventually she can't afford to buy another pitcher for the table so she can't keep up the ever-full beer glass trick. At this point she has to resort to setting up the pool trick shot that she's never seen anyone but her boyfriend pull off, and says she'll leave with whoever manages the shot first.
That buys her another hour or so and then, finally, her boyfriend makes it back. He looks like shit, hair down and just a mess, he's wearing an entirely different jacket that he got from an alley, and barely recognizable—especially to 5 guys who've been drunk for hours now. He lurks for a minute, finds out what's going on, and proceeds to pull off the trick shot first try. Throws the jacket off, fixes his hair with a hair tie his girlfriend lends him, finally looks like himself again, and THEN beats the shit out of them with the pool cue.
yuh i was there, that's how it happened
EVERYBODY post your struggle/lazy/easy/low spoons go-to meals so when we all struggle next we can explore the notes.
Flavored brats/sausages with cheese or fruit etc can be delicious air-fried and plain, and wrapped in a paper towel and eaten by hand without dirtying plates and cutlery. (If you’re up to it, add buns/side/toppings to your ability level.)
Okay, I took a quick scroll through my doc to check dragon sizes/lengths and here's a quick few notes from the books: Yellow Reapers are normally 50 feet long, with an 80 foot wingspan. Temeraire is noted to be 20 feet shorter than Maximus, who as a Regal Copper is at most 120 feet long, but also that's mentioned in the second book and I'm pretty sure Temeraire is noted to have grown longer after? As of the second book he is also 30 feet high, but I'm not sure how that's measured. In the fifth book he is also mentioned to have eyes half a foot across, and his (serrated) teeth are the size of a man's hand at smallest. I would link the Google Doc as future reference but I've been intending to update it for years because I definitely missed some notes on my last reread.
oh thank you!! i'll try to use the measurements to see what that'd look like. and if you ever finish up that doc i'd love to see it!
if it might help, after a quick search a yellow reaper would be roughly equal in size to a Boeing 80 (56ft length and 80ft wingspan)
A regal copper is close to a Boeing 737 Classic (102-120ft length, weight 32-35 tons)
(note the door size)
oh, we are fully aware of how unrealistic the weights are. dragon biology is very clearly not novik's strength. this fandom is full of nerds, we know. i was just trying to figure out their sizes so i would know how to draw them. i am also a bit of a paleontology nerd, so i do know about the biggest pterosaurs and that they weighed waaaaayyy less. we weren't even talking about the weight, but the length in this post.
i hope you didn't mean to come off as rude/annoying, because this comes off as if you think we don't know anything about the subject. i'm a know-it-all in recovery myself, and now it's time for me to be a bit of an annoying know-it-all;
it would have been more appropriate to make your own post to complain about the dragon weights, and we would probably have complained with you. it's fandom etiquette to not be negative on other people's posts
I know it's not the point, but honesty the easiest Watsonian explanation for me is that the characters in the novel are simply vastly overestimating their dragons weight. Weighing something that big is very difficult and the infrastructure to build a scale that big very expensive. So it's likely that the weight was calculated based on measurements and data from smaller creatures and guesswork initialy, and over time this "weight" became common knowledge passed down as the truth. Something that big being very heavy also feels right and intuitive to people - even if it's wrong - so most people wouldn't question it. That also makes it less likely for updated more accurate models to catch on - it just feels wrong.
Add in the fact that dragons are highly politically important and a source of national pride and there is probably litte actual desire to admit that your dragons are a lot smaller that previously expected. And in the end it doesn't really matter that much to most people working with dragons anyway, everything has already been calculated and built with the inflated weight in mind and based on experience everyone knows what a "6 ton" vs a "30 ton" dragon looks like so why change it. Later on when the real weight is conclusively found it probably only causes the weight to split into something like "Actual Dragon weight" and "Dragon Ton class" or something.
yeah, i've been thinking along the same lines! it's funny way to explain the problem.
i'm not sure how, or if, they weighed things that big back in the day. i guess water displacement would be a possible way? if you have a big pool with a known amount of water.
The dragons are a lot lighter due to their air sacs, there's actually a bit of lore on this in the epilogue of His Majesty's Dragon
Prefatory Note from the Author on the Measure of Dragon Weights
INCREDULITY IS THE likely response of most of my readers to the figures which appear hereinafter to describe the weight of various dragon breeds, as being wholly disproportionate to those which have hitherto been reported. The estimate of 10 tonnes for a full-grown Regal Copper is commonly known, and such prodigious bulk must already strain the imagination; what then must the reader think, when I report this a vast understatement and claim a figure closer to 30 tonnes, indeed reaching so high as 50 for the largest of this breed?
For explanation I must direct the reader to the recent work of M. Cuvier. In his latest anatomical studies of the air-sacs which enable draconic flight, M. Cuvier has drawn in turn upon the work of Mr. Cavendish and his successful isolation of those peculiar gases, lighter than the general composition of the air, which fill the sacs, and has correspondingly proposed a new system of measurement, which by compensating for the weight displaced by the air-sacs provides a better degree of comparison between the weight of dragons and that of other large land animals, lacking in these organs.
Those who have never seen a dragon in the flesh, and most particularly never one of the very largest breeds, in whom this discrepancy shall appear the most pronounced, may be sceptical; those who have had the opportunity, as I have, of seeing a Regal Copper side by side with the very largest of the Indian elephants, who have been measured at some 6 tonnes themselves, will I hope join me in greatly preferring a scheme of measurement which does not ridiculously suggest that the one, who could devour the other nearly in a bite, should weigh less than twice as much.
SIR EDWARD HOWE December 1795
Howe' mention of Henry Cavendish makes me think that the gas in dragon air sacs is literally just hydrogen
Probably, since it’s what The Flight of Dragons used. I’m not accusing Novik of plagiarism since it’s a very obvious idea, but the book is super interesting anyway. Its concept was borrowed for the movie with plot from Gordon R. Dickson but the book goes into greater detail.
I did keep wondering while reading how you would weigh something this big in ye olden times (or how something like a ship is weighed nowadays for that matter). Because Im like 85% convinced they cant weigh dragons and are just extrapolating from smaller animals or guessing. And people are already very wrong irl about the weighs and sizes of real animals, of COURSE they would be about a much more unintuitive animal. And I love moments of characters in (semi)historical settings being confidently wrong about something we know better with modern science/technology.