
Origami Around

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
occasionally subtle
The Bowery Presents
No title available

bliss lane

shark vs the universe
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
$LAYYYTER
The Stonewall Inn
Game of Thrones Daily

No title available
No title available
EXPECTATIONS

★
Sade Olutola
h

PR's Tumblrdome
Show & Tell

seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Vietnam

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from Netherlands
seen from India

seen from India

seen from Germany

seen from Argentina
seen from Dominican Republic
seen from Pakistan

seen from Colombia

seen from Argentina

seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from India
seen from Venezuela
@azimachra
It’s such a funny coincidence that humanities fields are devalued now that they’re dominated by women… surely those two phenomena couldn’t have anything to do with each other…
Okay, I need to add some clarification and correction to this.
This photo is known as The Pale Blue Dot. It was taken by Voyager 1, a space probe meant to explore the outer reaches of the solar system. Far from dying, she's still out there doing her job and is the furthest human made object from Earth.
In the mid 80's, they knew Voyager 1 would soon pass beyond where her cameras would matter and she needed to save power, so the question became: what's the last thing she should take a picture of?
Carl Sagan and Carolyn Porco both independently had the same thought: take a picture of Earth. Us. Yes, it would be essentially just one pixel. It wouldn't be scientifically useful. It might even damage the camera because of how intense the sun is, even forty times as far from Earth as Earth is from the Sun. But they got it sorted because it's NASA.
3.7 million (not billion) miles away, that's Earth. Caught in bands of light, artifacts of the Sun's incredible power even 4 million miles away. We are an island in a sea of radiation and vacuum and it's all we have.
I can't say it better than Sagan did, so I'll let you alone with his words:
From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of any particular interest. But for us, it's different. Consider again that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar", every "supreme leader", every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there – on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.
Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.
It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
— Carl Sagan
I think the truth is just a lot better.
started reading the mistborn books, here's my girl vin <3
sources: l.e.s. by donald glover // this year by the mountain goats // maya hornbacher, madness // watchisjawdrop on tumblr // wuntrum on tumblr // kim kardashian // unknown // godblessryankent on tiktok // nayyirah waheed // unknown // lev st. valentine
on hope, finally
“i’ll protect you with my wife”
“do you mean your life?”
“no.”
*buff woman with brass knuckles enters the room*
unfortunately i dont think its queerbaiting if the creator is just so terminally heterosexual that they never remotely considered the same gender relationship their show is centered around could be read as romantic. it is deeply painful however.
Maybe accidental queer baiting? The way someone may not mean to say something rude, but it may come off rude, so it's rude. Frustrating either way.
Not being a dick, just a friendly clarification.
By definition you can't accidentally queerbait. Queerbaiting is specifically using a same sex pair from the show to market the show to queer audiences with no intention of ever following through on a romantic relationship.
There is officially licensed Destiel merch signed off on by Kripke. Teen Wolf had a commercial with the actors for Derek and Stiles draped over each other talking about being "on a ship." Both shows actively used scenes between them as marketing while actively mocking fans for wanting them together. Sherlock has multiple characters refer to Johnlock as a couple, including characters we're supposed to believe are never wrong about human behavior and pushed those scenes in marketing. Then they acted insulted when fans saw them as a couple.
That's queerbaiting.
Done on accident it would just be queer subtext. Done because they had no other choice due to censorship is queer coding.
The specific meaning of the word is really starting to get lost and it's a pretty important one to keep accurate. It describes a very specific phenomenon that was done repeatedly and maliciously for decades and is meant to examine that specifically.
Doing it on accident sucks, but it isn't a tactic of capitalism intentionally intended to suppress queer representation while making money from queer fans.
Reblogging to keep the accurate definition and examples of queerbaiting circulating in the world
Also a reminder that INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE cannot queerbait. A straight actor who plays a gay character is not queerbaiting. Someone who has not come out as any non cishet identity but dresses in ways associated with queer subcultures is not queerbaiting. And whether you like it or not, demanding that someone either come out or “stop queerbaiting” is pretty much always way more harmful than helpful and reinforces bigoted binaries and delineations.
Sorry but it's not complete without...
Some sneak peeks of my most recent project!
my house is scary at night
Interpreted this initially not as shelves, but as your cat having erected defensive fortifications
I'm really feeling Hiccup's "there were dragons when I was a boy" speech from the httyd books as someone who's been coming into adulthood in recent years. So much has physically, literally changed in the world since I was a kid. What tales of childhood might I tell when (if) I make it to 80?
"there were blue skies when I was a girl."
"there was enough food when I was a girl, even though it wasn't distributed."
"there were more types of bees than we could have ever hoped to know when I was a girl."
"there was coral when I was a girl."
"there was still time to reverse our trajectory when I was a girl. We could have still made different choices."
I don't want it to be any of these. But I'm scared. I'm so scared. I'm scared of looking back over my lifetime and seeing decades of loss; organisms and concepts that will only exist for the future generations in stories. Animals that could fade into legend and experiences so foreign and far removed as to be fantastical. Will our children or children's children wonder how we could ever take something so incredible as the american beech as anything other than wondrous? How will they mourn the slow drowning of their ancestral homelands? Will the devastation of unnatural disasters-- the fires and hurricanes and heat waves and droughts and floods just be weather to them? Will a time where those events were exceptional be more strange to them? Will they resent us, all of us, for not doing everything we could to ensure that they didn't inherit a maimed planet? How much magic and beauty and life and wonder will only be seen in retrospect?
If I have kids, I don't want this for them. I don't want frogs to occupy the same space as dinosaurs. And I'm trying. I'm fighting for a world where they won't. But I'm so scared and sometimes - most of the time - I have no idea what to do. And there's so much that's still worth fighting for. There's so much that we can save. And yet the fear that we won't, that we've already missed the boat, eats me alive.
I’ve been trying to make a new patch design! Here are the most recent attempts (tho not the first attempts).
in more pleasant news: this year is seeing the biggest humpback migration in Australian history, bigger than it was PRE whaling. That's right, there are more humpbacks migrating off the coast of Australia than there were BEFORE industrial whaling started.
A huge, fat W for environmentalists and Greenies. what an achievement
we did it! we saved the fucking whales!!!!
Once hunted almost to extinction, the population of humpback whales currently migrating down Australia's east coast has bounced back and is
Further info for those interested
Environmental activism works!!! If they tell you its hopeless they're lying and/or selling some shit!!!
I find the reasoning that people prefer no gi Jiu Jitsu because it’s more realistic for real life application so funny. Like I seriously doubt that you’re fighting someone who’s fully nude. If I’m ever in a situation where I need to defend myself you’d best believe I’m not gonna avoid grabbing their shirt or jeans or whatever because it’s illegal under ibjjf rules.
I know a gym that does Halloween open mat where everyone wears shitty suits and I really want to bring it to my gym
bro that must give a whole new meaning to lapel chokes...
back to regularly scheduled critters
What program did you use to create the weevil embroidery? My mom has just gotten into machine embroidery and I very much want to create patterns for her!
I draw my files in procreate on a tablet, and then upload the separated layers to inkscape on a laptop, and turn them into patterns with the ink/stitch extension. Inkscape and ink/stitch are both free and open source. There's a definitely a learning curve to learning the program but I'm happy to answer any questions!
Some unsolicited advice that may spare you some of the struggles I wasted hours on:
Dowload inkscape before downloading ink/stitch. Ink/stitch is an extension and you need the former to run it.
Change the canvas size to the size of the embroidery field of your machine. For me, that's 4"x4". You can go to file>document properties and change the format to "custom" and resize it make sure to change the units too. I also find it helpful to use a 1" grid (also in the same pop up under the "grids" tab) to give me a sense of scale.
Look things up if you're confused. It may not help but usually it doesn't make things worse.
Use the troubleshoot feature by going to extensions>inkstitch>troubleshoot>troubleshoot objects.
Convert your objects to paths using the trace bitmap feature. This allows the program to read an image not as pixels but as bounded areas that can be understood or something like that.
Keep copies in separate layers in case you make a grave error as I have on many occasions.
Use the simulator feature by going to extensions>inkstitch>visualize and export>simulator.
You can customize a ton of stuff using the params (extensions>inkstitch>params) feature but tbh I wouldn't mess with that stuff until you've done a bit of practice with the more basic settings.
Having multiple layers is essential if you want to change colors or textures. Each layer will basically be one action for the machine. When designing your layers be thoughtful about efficiency of changing thread colors (e.g. if you have color a and b, and your layers go ababababa but the layering doesn't matter, change it to aaaaabbbb and save yourself time and rethreading). If you want I'm happy to elaborate on this with what I did for the weevil pattern.
Don't put too many layers of embroidery on top of each other. It causes the needle to jam and you to have to adjust your thread tension a bunch. Instead, only leave thin areas of overlap from one layer to the next to ensure continuity but prevent the issues. This also saves you thread.
I hope that this was helpful and not too obnoxious.