Evil of my evil
noise dept.
wallacepolsom
Mike Driver
Game of Thrones Daily

ellievsbear
d e v o n
$LAYYYTER
we're not kids anymore.
Jules of Nature
tumblr dot com
Sweet Seals For You, Always
No title available

bliss lane

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available
official daine visual archive
Stranger Things
h
Xuebing Du
🪼

seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Vietnam

seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Japan

seen from South Korea
seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil

seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil
@b1uetrees
Evil of my evil
Assad Zaman as Armand in Season 3 of INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE AMC
exactlyyy
My first memory
also one more vampire lestat thing. the dialogue was so much more quippy and not in a good way; i get it for lestat! he sounded cringe in the 80s too, that's his vibe. but why the fuck would daniel molloy refer to himself as a 'yaoi manter' or why would the vampire armand say 'girlies'
jacob & assad's reaction to a question about the state of loumand's relationship in s3
is that a nothing in your pants or are you just normal to see me
... That is a good thing. The talented Mr. Ripley (1999) dir. Anthony Minghella
and if i said nolan's odyssey starring no greek actors and with no recognizable aspects of greek culture or involvement by greeks, is the direct legacy of white supremacist colonialism that treated ancient greece as not just the pinnacle of ancient culture, but of an artificially created "european" culture, which white western europeans and their settler descendants, as the new pinnacle of culture, were the sole spiritual inheritors of.
l o n g
2x05 | 3x04
in the best of all worlds, assad zaman plays the most devastating heathcliff ever seen
lmao
ASSAD ZAMAN The Vampire Lestat: After Dark | MONTREAL
living under a rock is so fun i love watching a movie that’s been famous for decades and being like wow this is so good.. did you guys know about this
HUD (1963) dir. Martin Ritt
thoughts about the vampire lestat (not really positive! i have really mixed feelings about this season) (also, spoilers duh)
-great ideas, for the most part! bewildering execution!
-when i saw the first scene and the framing device, i was immediately hooked and interested how the records were going to affect the pacing and the tone
-uhhhh. yeah. the pacing was so strange, mostly because i think there wasn't a good balance between the flashbacks and the present day stuff; parts of lestat's backstory were glossed over so quickly
-particularly nicky and magnus; like, when i watched the first two seasons i had not read the novels, but i didn't feel like i was missing anything. here, on the other hand, i'd read the first half of the vampire lestat and if i hadn't, neither nicky nor magnus would feel as important as they are tbh
-gabriella. sigh. i don't like that she's been flattened into the originator of all of lestat's issues, i think it's the most boring direction they could have taken with their relationship
-why were the writers so cruel to louis?? what'd he do?? the regina storyline was pretty interesting, but...idk it's weird that he had to apologize to lestat and armand
-there was way too little armand!! if he's plotting, if he's desperate, couldn't we see him be desperate? a bit more build up? something? even the whole setup with louis in the final episode could have worked better if we had any reason to believe armand was so angry at him; having it as this gotcha! twist felt really cheap and just made no sense at all (refer back to the writers being cruel to louis)-- maybe it would be better if we got more development between lestat and armand?
-daniel molloy. i liked how obviously lost he was as a vampire, and the knowledge of armand's interference in his life should have triggered a profound crisis we should have seen-- because him and armand suddenly being companions? again, it could make sense! it is compelling! but the delivery is so uneven! i have no idea why daniel is acting the way he is in the last two episodes or what would motivate him to follow armand. that's an issue!
-in general, it feels like there was a lot of telling, to make up for what they didn't have the time to show. but, couldn't they have restricted themselves to half of the book? i feel we don't know that much more about lestat after this season, and i feel everyone else has been flattened. it bums me out!
-overall, i'd say this season just had so much misplaced focus, and i find it hard to belive it was done entirely on purpose. and it doesn't hold a candle to seasons one and two! which is a real shame in this case. :^/
-overall, is it just me or is screenwriting in general a lot worse these days? it strikes me as really odd that a room of profesional, educated people came up with this. the acting, the production, the music-- all of these are stellar. yet, the writing! what a baffling season.
PS!!!!!!!! No one talked about the trial!!! THE TRIAL was not addressed once!!!!! huuuuuge ommission!