They don’t care you’re a cat person!

@theartofmadeline

titsay
macklin celebrini has autism

★
Monterey Bay Aquarium
YOU ARE THE REASON
will byers stan first human second
No title available
Noah Kahan
The Stonewall Inn
Fai_Ryy
Sweet Seals For You, Always
NASA
EXPECTATIONS

oozey mess

Origami Around
Cosimo Galluzzi
sheepfilms
RMH

bliss lane
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye

seen from Lithuania
seen from Türkiye
seen from Iraq

seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Nigeria
seen from Germany
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@batman224147
They don’t care you’re a cat person!
Just remember. There is no such thing as a fake geek girl. There are only fake geek boys. Science fiction was invented by a woman.
Specifically a teenage girl. You know, someone who would be a part of the demographic that some of these boys are violently rejecting.
Isaac Asimov.
yo mary shelley wrote frankenstein in 1818 and isaac asimov was born in 1920 so you kinda get my point
If you want to push it back even further Margaret Cavendish, the duchess of Newcastle (1623-1673) wrote The Blazing World in 1666, about a young woman who discovers a Utopian world that can only be accessed via the North Pole - oft credited as one of the first scifi novels
Women have always been at the forefront of literature, the first novel (what we would consider a novel in modern terms) was written by a woman (Lady Muraskai’s the Tale of Genji in the early 1000s) take your snide “Isaac Asimov” reblogs and stick it
even in terms of male scifi authors, asimov was predated by Jules Verne, HG Wells, George Orwell, you could have even cited Poe or Jonathan Swift has a case but Asimov?
PbbBFFTTBBBTBTTBBTBTTT so desperate to discredit the idea of Mary Shelly as the mother of modern science fiction you didn’t even do a frickin google search For Shame
And if you want to go back even further, the first named, identified author in history was Enheduanna of Akkad, a Sumerian high priestess.
Kinda funny, considering this Isaac Asimov quote on the subject:
Mary Shelley was the first to make use of a new finding of science which she advanced further to a logical extreme, and it is that which makes Frankenstein the first true science fiction story.
Even Isaac Asimov ain’t having none of your shit, not even posthumously.
You know what else was invented by women? Masked vigilantes, the precursor to the modern superhero. Baroness Emma Orczy wrote The Scarlet Pimpernel in 1905. The character would later inspire better known masked vigilantes such as Zorro and Batman.
Got that?
Stick that in your international pipe and smoke it
I have literally been telling people this for over a year.
the first extended prose piece - ie a novel, was not, as many male scholars will shout, Don Quixote (1605) but The Tale of Genji (1008) written by a woman
The first autobiography ever written in English is also attributed to a woman, The Book of Margery Kempe (1430s).
The day may come when I find this post and do not reblog it, but it is not this day.
Women invented language while men were hunting. I mean…
“As a man I’m flesh and blood. I can be ignored. I can be destroyed. But as a symbol, as a symbol I can be incorruptible, I can be everlasting.”
Alexandre Dumas, eat your heart out!
Jason Todd Aesthetic for those who, like me, are tired of only seeing him characterized with blood and bruises
I HAVE MISSED THIS VIDEO MORE THAN ANYTHING IN THE ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD COME TO MAMA YOU FUCKIN TRIBAL ASS FUNKY WASHING MACHINE
Tom Holland behind the scenes of Captain America: Civil War
This gorgeous human being
Oh my god
Light of his life, fire of his loins Keep me forever, tell me you own me…
Does nobody realize the abusive relationship they have?
Like why would you ship it when you should be taking notes to not fall in love and let this happen
@xwishingforbonesx ^^^ it’s just a movie. And also, Harley knows exactly how he is. She knows what he’s doing is wrong. And she fucking loves it. She wants to stay with him, she wants him to stay the same, because otherwise she’d get bored. Harley chose to join him in insanity when she was Harleen, and she chose to stay with him afterwards. And plus, she doesn’t let him get away with everything. Sometimes, she does it back to him in exactly the same way. They’re villains. They fuck shit up together. Yet they still care about each other. They’d tear the world apart to protect each other. But there’s always gonna be that part of their relationship that’s twisted and broken, but that’s just because of their evil, psychotic nature. They can’t help it and they would never try and change it.
He's constantly mentally and physically a used her countless times in the animated series, comic books and games! Don't dare say that it's her fault! She has the most extreme Stockholm syndrome; if you don't know what that is its where you fall in love with your capture after being kidnapped... So let's not ship abusive relationships. Cmon guys
justice league + year of 1st appearance
The Bat-Family
Created by Phil Cho
So Alfred turns into Ace? 😜
These exchanges between a bigot named Brendan Sullivan, and a heroic troll named Robert Graves, will be the best thing you read all day, I promise.
The Batman
Super-selfie. Having some fun with iconic DC characters.
Talk about a work romance gone wrong…
i don't care about the critics but the mcu makes more money than the murderverse, it just does. even a movie about a fox and a rabbit made more than that freakin flop called bvs. just pack up and go home dc fans.
I agree about one thing: I don’t care about the critics. As for everything else, let’s break it down.
the mcu makes more money
Let’s look at the numbers.
Here’s what you can see by looking at this:
- From their first to their second movie, the MCU went down more than $300 million; the DCEU went up more than $200 million. The MCU then went up more than $300 million; let’s see what happens with the DCEU.
- The DCEU’s first and second movies made more money than the MCU’s first and second movies.
- It took the DCEU two movies to make $1,5 billion. It took the MCU four movies to reach that same anount.
- Man of Steel made more than 7 out of the MCU’s 13 movies. BvS made more than 9 out the MCU’s 13 movies.
So, yeah, 13 movies make more money than 2. That’s more than obvious. But you have to go beyond that to get a clear picture of who really made more money.
even a movie about a fox and a rabbit made more than that freakin flop called bvs
You’re talking about Zootopia here. Here’s the thing: I love Zootopia. It’s my favorite movie of the year. It has great animation, a great story, a great message and it has character development (something you don’t see very often in animated movies). I love that it made $1 billion. And it doesn’t bother me that it made more than BvS.
And if we’re talking about animated movies and their box office, let’s again look at the numbers.
As you can see, the only MCU movie to make more than every single movie on this list is The Avengers. Frozen made more than all the others. The other 9 movies made more than 9 out of the 13 MCU movies.
EDIT: I made a mistake here. Avengers: Age of Ultron also made more than all the movies on this list. My bad.
Animated movies make more money. They just do.
Also, BvS was far from being a flop. Did it underperform? Yes. Was WB expecting $1 billion? Most likely. But none of that means it flopped. Add the home video sales (and BvS is extremely successful in that front), digital sales and merchandise, and it more than made up for the production costs.
A lot of people think “Well, this is Batman and Superman. They should make more”. And here’s why it didn’t (from http://kingarthurofgeek.tumblr.com/post/145732515012/allons-y-areli-stephenstrvnge):
1. Due to the popularity of the heroes, everyone has an idea of what Batman and Superman are “supposed” to be like, thus making many people disappointed, unlike with Guardians. It is also the third cinematic Superman and sixth Batman, so it had to live up to their standards.
2. Controversial casting
3. The mixed reactions to Man of Steel
4. A month after Deadpool, a month before Civil War
5. Generally shit on by the media, including over-exaggerating the negative responses and saying stuff like it failed ^^
6. Coming after years of MCU movies, which have made people think there is only one way to make a superhero movie (A serious superhero movie? What??? They have to be self-mocking because superheroes are for NERDS)
7. Mass confusion due to it coming only four years after Nolan’s Batman Trilogy
8. A three-year wait that made many people lose interest.
9. An attempt to start a franchise eight years after Marvel did.
To this I would add that, in this day and age, the characters being well known is no longer a guaranty of box office results. You know what is? An established franchise. The MCU made $1 billion on its 6th movie. It took James Bond decades to make $1 billion. Harry Potter only got there on its 8th movie. And $2 billion? Unless you’re Star Wars or James Cameron, that’s practically impossible.
just pack up and go home dc fans
No, I don’t think I’ll do that. Box office aside, I like these movies. I like this universe. And I’m looking forward to see what it will bring.
As for box office, dig deeper next time. The numbers are not subjective. The numbers are the only facts you’ll get when it comes to movies. And I’ve pointed out the facts.
Batman and Robin (2011) #04