>only straight male fans complain about unsexamalized outfits
Do you want me to explain what’s wrong with the feminist concept of “Sexualization”, or “Bad Sexy”? Because I can do that, or I can just judge you for believing in it.
The feminist idea of sexualization is that a female character is “Sexualized” if she’s sexy and feminists don’t approve. If feminists approve, she is strong and empowered and goodright, but if feminists do not approve, she is weak and unempowered and badong, but most of all, she is Sexualized and For The Male Gaze. What does that mean? It means men can gaze at her. Yes, really, that isn’t a joke.
Bayonetta? Sure, she’s tall, she’s powerful, she could probably kick Dante from DMC’s ass, but she’s attractive, and men like her, so she’s sexualized, unempowered, and not in line with feminist ideals.
The new shittily-drawn Cheetara? She’s in a show made by a cucked soyboy non-artist “Storyboarder”, so feminists approve of her. She makes man angry by being an insult to the original character, so she very good, yes.
Katara from Avatar? Sure, she’s strong, intelligent, motherly, and a good person, but she’s attractive in most episodes, and she ends up marring a straight man, so she’s sexamalized.
The Crystal Gems, who’ve lost more on-screen fights than they’ve won, have the maturity of toddlers despite being many years old, and generally being terrible people and worse guardians of earth? Feminists like them, so they’re empowered goodright non-sexualized good women characters.
There is no consistency to this belief system because it exists solely so feminists can push dumb, gullible people into joining them in shaming writers, artists, and other creators for creating female characters feminism does not approve of.
dededos
dailybridgerton
baratheonpilled
kianamaiart
