this is what upstairs neighbors have

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Claire Keane
macklin celebrini has autism
occasionally subtle
sheepfilms
Fai_Ryy

tannertan36
★
almost home
Xuebing Du
Sweet Seals For You, Always
tumblr dot com
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
NASA
hello vonnie

if i look back, i am lost

Love Begins
EXPECTATIONS

shark vs the universe

Andulka
seen from Russia

seen from Ukraine
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Switzerland
seen from Chile
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Canada

seen from Brazil
seen from Philippines

seen from Portugal
seen from Bolivia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from Russia
seen from Pakistan
@butyoucancallmebuggy
this is what upstairs neighbors have
Personally I think I'm shockingly normal for someone who has spent every day on the internet since they were 12
There are a lot of reasons to oppose monarchy but one of the most overlooked is that the king is always getting stuck in some kind of hazardous puzzle chamber filling up with gravel or lava or something. Do your fucking job man
i think we should stop devaluing lust as a form of attraction/acting like lust is inherently worse or more abusive or less trustworthy or whatever in comparison to romantic love. it's just amatonormative and arophobic!
having sexual desire but not romantic =/= not valuing a person, not liking them, treating them like an object, etc. you can lust for someone and not be in love with them and still respect them and have a good relationship with them. lust isn't inherently "shallow" or "surface level" either; you can lust after someone's personality just as much as their body. we need to stop demonizing non-romantic sexual relationships and we need to stop acting like people who are sexually attracted to someone without being in love with them are evil abusive predators who treat other people like objects- thats textbook arophobia.
#it's also not reflective of reality#more than ince has someone been in love with me and treated me poorly. love doesn't protect you from that#but you know what does? respect.#and sexual desire is not BY NATURE disrespectful#some people use their sexual desire as a way to show disrespect. but they use plenty of other ways too
YES!!!!!!!!! genuine 100% honestly felt real romantic love can be disrespectful and shallow. sexual lust with 0% romantic or monogamous intention can be respectful and deeply emotionally intimate. i cannot rest until everyone understands this.
it actually feels good as fuck to tilt your head at a slight angle when you don't understand something. the animals were right
I actually hate when food youtubers say "this recipe only takes x minutes to make" because they only ever make these recipes with the best circumstances and never take learning time into consideration. It's dishonest and it grates me
like a cheese
like a cheese.
this is the plot of Dune
feel like people should see the death grip of the full image
It's their birthday everybody. They're here.
happy first birthday, child who will outpizza the hut
HAPPY FIRST BIRTHDAY TO THE CHILD WHO WILL OUTPIZZA THE HUT!!!
TONIGHT
Tonight!!!
TONIGHT!
TONIGHT!
TONIGHT
extremely underrated subgenre of tumblr post: when someone makes a general statement about something, and another person offers a counter-statement that's just completely nonsensical, and the OP just agrees instantly even if it makes no sense at all
examples:
sometimes you'll see a bird for the first time and when you look it up you learn that its name is the Common Dirt Bitch and its range is Everywhere and there are 400 million of them in your state alone
this sims 2 ad has like such deep gay energy to it. Like this feels like queer history to me
The funny thing is that it wasn't even an intentional stance taking. They just forgot to code a check to make sure characters genders "matched", resulting in that characters could get into relationships regardless of gender.
What the hell are you talking about? They didn't forget anything. A programmer for the sims 1 was a gay man who programmed gay relationships into the game and they kept adding it back, intentionally, in each game.
Actually, you’re both correct. It was an accident and a deliberate decision by one gay developer:
“During The Sims’s protracted development, the team had debated whether to permit same-sex relationships in the game. If this digital petri dish was to accurately model all aspects of human life, from work to play and love, it was natural that it would facilitate gay relationships. But there was also fear about how such a feature might adversely affect the game. “No other game had facilitated same-sex relationships before—at least, to this extent—and some people figured that maybe we weren’t the ideal ones to be first, as this was a game that E.A. really didn’t want to begin with,” Barret told me. “It felt to me like a fear thing.” After going back and forth for several months, the team finally decided to leave same-sex relationships out of the game code.
When Barrett joined the company, in October, 1998, he was unaware of the decision. A fortnight into his new job, he found himself with nothing to do when his supervisor, the game’s lead programmer, Jamie Doornbos, took a short vacation. Jim Mackraz, Barrett’s boss, needed a task to occupy his new employee, and he handed Barrett a document that outlined how social interactions in the game would work; the underlying rules for the game’s A.I. that would dictate how the characters would dynamically interact with one another. “He didn’t think I could handle it with Jamie off on vacation, but he figured that at least I’d be out of his hair,” Barrett told me. “Neither he nor I realized that he’d given me an old design document to work from.”
That design document predated the decision to exclude gay relationships in the game. Its pages described a web of social interactions, in which every kind of romantic relationship was permitted. That week, Barrett confounded the expectations of his disbelieving boss. He successfully wrote the basic code for social interactions, including same-sex relationships. “In hindsight, I probably should have questioned the design,” Barrett, who is gay, said. “But the design felt right, so I just implemented it. Later, Will Wright stopped by my desk,” Barrett said. “He told me that liked the social interactions, and that he was glad to see that same-sex support was back in the game.” Nobody on the team questioned Barrett’s work. “They just pretty much ignored it,” he said. “After a while, everyone was just used to the design being there. It was widely expected that E.A. would just kill it, anyway.”
In early 1999, before E.A. had a chance to kill the design, Barrett was asked to create a demo of the game to be shown at E3. The demo would consist of three scenes from the game. These were to be so-called on-rails scenes—not a true, live simulation but one that was preplanned, and which would shake out the same way each time it was played, in order to show the game in its best light. One of the scenes was a wedding between two Sims characters. “I had run out of time before E3, and there were so many Sims attending the wedding that I didn’t have time to put them all on rails,” Barrett said.
On the first day of the show, the game’s producers, Kana Ryan and Chris Trottier, watched in disbelief as two of the female Sims attending the virtual wedding leaned in and began to passionately kiss. They had, during the live simulation, fallen in love. Moreover, they had chosen this moment to express their affection, in front of a live audience of assorted press.”
- from The Kiss That Changed Video Games by Simon Parker