fallout new testament

professional fallout lore/IP consultant - updates daily - no minors -(pond/31/f/white/autism) - [main: @swordquest] - learn about the LANDBACK Initiative

[calder]

fallout wiki editors trying to determine if couriers stash is canon

[calder]

[poourii]

We love our little Tommy 🌼

[calder]

[calder]

Hatchet's visual design is stunning

THANK YOUUU!!!! n_n

[calder]

twisted metal s2 - "so you just make cars out of black people?"

[karnessah]

to boldly go where no ghoul has gone before

[calder]

[schedude]

[cryptotheism]

Los Angeles as a city is powered digestion-like by the spiritually deranged.

[worm-suggestion]

My machine

I didnt make it and it doesnt work anymore but I hope one day I can fis it.

[mortalityplays]

Americans will see someone express mild discomfort that they teach their children obliterating two civilian cities in the most horrific manner humanity has yet devised was a defensible wartime strategy and be like "to be fair,"

[ninefoldrin]

Fun fact! The Japanese were literally trying to surrender and were going through the Soviets (the US' allies throughout WW2) to negotiate but were only really holding out because they wanted assurances that America wouldn't execute the emperor (go figure, the leader didn't want to die because he said he gave up). America wasn't actually planning to execute him, but refused to accept anything less than unconditional surrender, and that was a condition. Regardless of conditions, Japan was going to be surrendering the moment the USSR invaded, which was planned to happen imminently. America knew this. America knew that once the USSR entered the war with Japan, they would have a seat at the negotiating table.

Anti-communist sentiments were already strong in US leadership. The US didn't want communists gaining any more ground on the world stage and nuking Japan was a way to kill two birds with one bomb: end the war before the USSR entered and show the USSR that the USA could wipe out any of their cities in the blink of an eye. People sometimes try to argue that the second bomb had to be dropped because Japan didn't surrender after the first, but Japanese leadership didn't even meet to discuss the first bomb until shortly before the second dropped. At that point, losing an entire city had little effect on leadership. They already had entire cities leveled with conventional weapons. They hadn't yet processed that Hiroshima was leveled by a single bomb. It didn't matter though. The fact that they delayed at all gave America an excuse to prove to the USSR that they could do it again. The US obliterated two cities in Japan ultimately as a shot across the bow for the USSR.

What popular history likes to gloss over is the chain of events that lead to Perl Harbor. The US initially supported Japan (along with selling resources to all sides in the European war), even as Japan committed war crimes across China and Korea. The US had good relations with Japan at that point and saw Japan's invasion of China as a way to get a foothold in a country that had a history of being restrictive of foreign trade. Japan didn't roll out the red carpet for America though; they realized that they had something that the USA wanted and planned to use that to their advantage in global politics and trade. In response, the US stopped selling steel to Japan for their war effort. US leaders/strategists were very aware that cutting Japan off from resources they'd been relying on for their war would invite retaliation, and thus Perl Harbor happened. The US only ever cared about gaining greater access to markets and labor and was willing to fight a war over it, but in such a way that Japan would make the first move.

The US might have ended up on the right side of WW2, but not for the right reasons. The war in Europe was already going in the allies' favor and the entrance of the US only really expedited the war, but it gave the US a seat at the table when deciding what happened after the war. It let the US build military bases in Europe and bring more US businesses into Europe. The US suffered the least from the war and was able to take advantage of the fact that they didn't need to rebuild entire cities like every European country did. it was politically and financially beneficial to the US to join the war late on the side that was already set up to win, especially with a little extra push.

And for the future, the US had a chance to show the world that they weren't afraid to wipe out entire cities with a single bomb. They didn't care about the children incinerated at school, or the handful of survivors who would die because of the radiation. There was no reason for the US to obliterate two cities in a single moment. The US could have chosen to end the war by then but refused to accept any conditions of surrender. The US only used those bombs to show the world how heartless they could be, and then spent decades feeding the public propaganda about how it was necessary so that no one would question why they would ever be willing to do something so horrific.

[nukaposting]

yo mista white. we're in the wasteland bitch

[zoestarqueen]

I animated that one Dr.Dala Interaction

[kefirstushyu]

Commission <3 (comms info in pinned post)

[calder]

Visit Original Link

ＩＳＮ＇Ｔ ＩＴ ＢＲＩＧＨＴ ＷＨＥＲＥ ＹＯＵ ＡＲＥ？ ＨＡＶＥＮ＇Ｔ ＴＨＥ ＰＥＯＰＬＥ ＣＨＡＮＧＥＤ？ ＤＯＥＳＮ＇Ｔ ＩＴ ＭＡＫＥ ＹＯＵ ＨＡＰＰＹ ＴＯ ＢＥ ＳＯ ＦＵＣＫＩＮＧ ＤＥＲＡＮＧＥＤ ＩＦ ＴＨＥＲＥ＇Ｓ Ａ ＬＩＧＨＴ ＷＨＥＲＥ ＹＯＵ ＡＲＥ ＩＦ ＹＯＵ ＣＡＮ ＳＰＡＲＫ ＴＨＥ ＦＬＡＭＥ ＹＯＵ ＣＡＮ ＣＡＴＣＨ ＴＨＥ ＧＯＤＳ ＳＵＣＣＵＭＢＩＮＧ ＴＯ ＩＴＳ ＰＡＩＮ -----------------

[calder]

reviewing oasis scripts

harold hides his suicidality from sapling yew

man hold on

[calder]

[arizonaranger]

GOT A JUMP SCARE?