Free Palestine đ”đžđ”đžđ”đž
đȘŒ
untitled
Sade Olutola

No title available

pixel skylines
The Bowery Presents
Misplaced Lens Cap
Keni

romaâ

#extradirty
Jules of Nature

Origami Around

gracie abrams
RMH

Product Placement
h
Claire Keane
macklin celebrini has autism
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Kiana Khansmith
seen from Malaysia

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Singapore
seen from Spain
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Sweden

seen from Ecuador
seen from Poland

seen from United States
@carucath
Free Palestine đ”đžđ”đžđ”đž
please wear sunscreen!!! I've seen "fuck the beauty industrial complex" posts about complicated skincare regimens and am 100% with them except sometimes they mention sunscreen and no. no. absolutely not. sunscreen is a wonderful supportive friend who wants to keep you safe, and you should let her do it. throw out all your other cosmetics and skincare products if you want, but keep your sunscreen. and if you're not wearing sunscreen, start wearing it!!!! this is not about terror of aging, this is not about every tiny imperfection our fucked-up culture has made you feel insecure about, this is about protecting yourself from skin cancer. wear the damn sunscreen.
phm is decently popular in japan and i mostly see this when i check twitter and see accounts posting pictures of handmade rocky plushies that are so fucking round looking it brings a tear to my eye
he keeps me sane
Now that everyone is discussing Nolan's Odyssey movie, I feel like it's a good time to let non-Italians know that the production dumped plastic props into the Italian sea. Weirdly enough I could not find any article in English about it but it's a fucking problem nonetheless.
I might translate this article later today. This one was the most complete one, even in Italian news it's not talked about that much.
Non Ăš la prima volta che la produzione solleva un vespaio in Sicilia. A Lipari una squadra di sub sarebbe perĂČ giĂ impegnata a bonificare i
They dumped plastic skeletons in environmentally protected areas, against the literal contracts they had to sign to get the permits to film in environmentally protected areas. Like they not only did a bad ecological thing that freaked out some divers, they literally broke environmental protection laws and their contract with the Italian government
Concerns about prop disposal as filming on new Nolan film comes to a close | www.italianinsider.it
Hereâs one in English.
my controversial opinion is I donât think Zuko was confused by âmy first girlfriend turned into the moonâ
he was there during siege of the North. he infiltrated the spirit oasis. he has an uncle who studies spirits and the spirit world. he watched the sky go dark then the moon suddenly reappear like everyone else in the entire world did. and most importantly he watched zhao get eaten by a giant godzilla fish spirit.
his entire life since he saw that beam of blue-white light in the south pole has been âthis day has already been so goddamn weirdâ
The only really new information was that that was Sokkaâs girlfriend
Important opinion in the tags that I need to have be part of the post:
Also, Iroh was there? He literally watched Sokka make out with the moon spirit. And you want to tell me that a romantic sap like him would not have immediately told Zuko about this romantic tragedy? Please, Zuko has known about this for ages, he just knows that this is not an acceptable situation in which to say âyeah, I know.â
Sokka: âMy girlfriend turned into the moon.â
Zuko: âI know.â âYes.â âShe sure did.â âUh huh.â âTell me something new.â âAre we still talking about that?â âThatâs rough, buddy.â
[image: tags by samwisethebold: #itâs not that he doesnât get what sokka means #itâs that how on earth do you respond to that]
When you put it like that, this is actually a legendary display of tact on Zukoâs part
"I can't believe humans would hunt the thylacine to extinction, humans are fundamentally evil" Hey, did you know that extinction was long thought to be impossible, and within 50 years of humans realizing that extinction via overhunting was a possibility it practically stopped happening? Did you know that humans are so desperate to prevent more losses that they're funneling millions of collective hours and billions of euros into helping other species? Hours and euros that could be spent on humans, and species on whom humanity's own survival does not depend? Did you know that due to an accidental introduction of rats, the Lord Howe Island stick insect population was brought down to 24 individuals and now there are tens of thousands of them?
This bug. This bug that, to most humans, is utterly useless, relatively gross, and completely foreign. Humans saved it because humans do not want to cause another extinction ever again if they can avoid it.
sheep detectives is finally out on digital which means i can show you guys one of the funniest movie scenes of the year so far
explain your gender in 10 words or less without using boring words like âmaleâ, âfemaleâ, ânonbinaryâ, âmasculineâ, âfeminineâ or âandrogynousâ.
go!
your aversion to anything earnest or sincere has affected us in the following ways 1. youre annoyinggggggg
fun how rƔan and nawr are pretty much the same word backwards! is that how either of them originated or is it just a fun coincidence? (I imagine the latter is more likely?)
It's just a very fun coincidence!
The southern 'nawr' is just a compounded version of 'yn awr', which means 'at this hour', while the northern 'rƔan' is derived from 'yr awr hon', which means 'this hour'.
So two very similar phrases with almost identical meanings, but very coincidentally turned into backwards versions of each other!
Drought reveals hidden formal gardens at Chatsworth House
Known as âThe Great Parterreâ, the elaborate ornamental garden was created around 1699 for the 1st Duke of Devonshire to complement the newly completed South Front of Chatsworth House. Measuring approximately 473 feet by 227 feet, the formal arrangement of flower beds, gravel paths and intricate swirling patterns reflected the grand garden style that dominated late 17th-century Europe. The historic layout was removed around 1730 during a redesign commissioned by the 3rd Duke of Devonshire, when the parterre was covered over and replaced with a new landscape design. This summerâs exceptionally hot and dry conditions have temporarily brought the lost garden back into view. The contrast has appeared because the grass covering the former flower beds and pathways has shallower root systems than the surrounding areas, causing it to dry out and brown more rapidly during periods of intense heat and drought. The resulting crop marks have revealed the intricate geometry of the original garden beneath the lawn.
https://www.heritagedaily.com/2026/07/drought-reveals-hidden-formal-gardens-at-chatsworth-hous/158637
not really a fan of the amount of people here who now hear âwar crimeâ and immediately think âfun meme termâ
A good part of the tumblr userbase understands that rape jokes are bad, they understand that using ârapeâ and ârapistâ as âfunny quirky meme wordsâ is fucked up and bad.
But at the same time weâve reached a weird paradigm where a lot of people who understand that consider âwar crimeâ and âwar criminalâ to be Funny Quirky Meme Words without realizing that war crimes very much includes rape!! It very much includes rape of all kinds in all kinds of scales!
It includes doing the most heinous things against children, it includes a wide range of the most heinous things. Just read the definition of war crime.
Why is it that you think that rape jokes are unacceptable but war crimes jokes are funny and cute and harmless?
Isnât it trivializing of actual war crimes the amount of people in this site who now have the immediate reaction on their brain to thing of âwar crimeâ as Funny Meme like a Pavlovian response?
Is it too weird that I think that this is fucked up?
Man.
I just wanna say, when I originally wrote this post I remember wondering if maybe the reason why people have different reactions to rape jokes and war crimes jokes had to do with people being largely ignorant about what war crimes entail.
Now it has gotten increasingly clear to me that it has less to do with ignorance and everything to do with people not thinking of war crimes as something ârealâ the same way they think of rape. Rape is something that can happen to them, within their communities. War crimes on the other hand are something that happens to other people, to other countries, therefore they donât even register it as ârealâ. People treat it as some sort of imaginary concept because the victims donât even register as real to them.
which of these classical texts have you read?
the iliad, the odyssey, and the aeneid
the iliad and the odyssey, not the aeneid
the iliad only
the odyssey only
the aeneid only
the aeneid and the iliad, not the odyssey
the aeneid and the odyssey, not the iliad
I have read none of these
"what if I've read part of it" if it's a large enough part that you would consider yourself to Have Read It in general contexts, then it counts. if it's not, then it doesn't. only you can be the judge of that, but I'm not giving you a nuance button.
any translations count, but abridged retellings don't
obviously, there are lots of other classical texts out there. you might have read none of these and be an expert on greek tragedy. I'm not judging your classical knowledge so you don't need to tell me all that. I'm just curious about combos of these specific texts and their popularity, bc a post i just saw got me thinking about it
#i want to hear from the 1.7% who have read the illiad and the aenied but not the odyssey #<- SAME #you read everything EXCEPT the most iconic story?? #how?? why?? (via @shrinkthisviolet and prev @bobakick)
hi it's me op that's my combo!
firstly, i don't think i've ever particularly thought of the odyssey as more iconic than the iliad, so that's the exact kind of cultural attitude towards the texts that prompted me to make this poll; it seemed from conversations that @postarcadian was having in the notes of related posts that in north america at least, it's very dominant, but i wanted to see how widespread this was. i think this particular dominance or preference is not global. in england, for example, you wouldn't read the odyssey in school unless a) your school offered classical civilisation as an elective subject (already a minority of schools) and b) opted to do the odyssey-specific module (only one of lots of modules). if they don't do class civ, you probably wouldn't read any ancient texts in school!
my school did class civ but not the odyssey module, so it never came up, which brings me onto:
this is the module for which i read the aeneid and the iliad when i was 17 and in secondary school. we read the whole thing although the commentary passages were from selected books. the odyssey was not relevant to this module and we did not have time to read it unnecessarily. but you can see based on the themes and focus of the modules why the aeneid-iliad combo would be chosen!
(sidenote to the person in the notes who said they think you need graduate level study to understand the cultural context and references in the aeneid... i don't think you do? they're teaching this to 17-year-olds reading in translation with no latin background? i mean, obviously if you do it at a graduate level you're going to understand it more and in greater depth and get more nuance and whatever. but it's not Impossible To Comprehend The Aeneid And Its Themes as a layperson. can attest that 17-year-old me managed it well enough)
now obviously i'm 30 now so there's been loads of time to read the odyssey since then for funsies. and i've had it in my house since 2018. and i've started it multiple times. and i just can't get through it tbh. one day i'll get there maybe. but as a medievalist the latin texts were always a lot more relevant (medieval authors primarily had access to the classical world via latin) and i work on heroic literature of a very particular sort so i've ended up more in the aeneid - statius - latin histories end of things insofar as i look at anything classical (which isn't very much)
i have however read Merugud Uilix which is the medieval irish version of the odyssey and which is completely bonkers and absurd and absolutely nothing like the actual Odyssey
and finally there's an extent to which when something is very culturally well-known you just kinda take it in via osmosis and then it feels less compelling to read the original. like i read a bunch of retellings as a small child i think? and things like Ithaka by Adele Geras. and that filled the niche. that was enough odyssey for me. wasn't really fussed. maybe one day i'll get through the rest of the real thing though.
#heads up op there are english lit degrees that include the Iliad as a foundational text you have to at least read in translation #but not the odyssey #so that is probably part of your UK bias findings (via @distressednoise)
well yeah, that's exactly what i'm saying. the idea that the odyssey is the default first text that everybody is expected to read is not a universal one! in some countries, if people study classical texts at all, it might be the iliad they do instead, or the aeneid; my own studies at secondary school did not involve the odyssey
my poll currently is very dominated by americans (based on the wording of their tags / how they describe their schooling), because i posted it late last night so most of the votes were in their timezone so far. so i am not currently finding any uk bias in the poll. i am hypothesising that there is US bias in the poll, and that this is not universal. there's no way to prove that with this poll, of course, i'm just interested to see the combinations of texts
i have no cultural conception of the odyssey as more iconic or commonly read than the iliad, but this poll suggests many people do. i would not have expected the aeneid to be read so much less than the others, because most of the classicists i know have done a lot of latin even if it's not their main specialism, and a lot of the non-classicists i know haven't read any of them in full, just know them vaguely from retellings or adaptations. so the greek dominance is slightly surprising but bears out the conversations that prompted the poll in the first place. (i'd also be interested to know whether new translations like emily wilson have changed this balance significantly, and if the picture would've been different ten years ago, but there are too many other factors in that window even if i could go back and poll people in 2016)
i have been interested also by people who did classics degrees in the UK/in england (education is devolved) saying that they didn't dedicate much or any time to the odyssey during their degree. this supports my vague impression that, overall, it has slightly less cultural power here. i couldn't tell you why it's the most popular one in the US but not in england, though i would expect a latin bias in english educations historically to be a small factor -- while latin is a minority subject in state schools, greek is vanishingly rare outside of private schools and uncommon even there, and if you go back a few decades you'd get more latin in grammar schools and so on. and we didn't do ancient texts in "english" classes in england; in my school, we didn't go further back than shakespeare, though i've heard rumour that a few schools (usually private schools, not exclusively) dabble in chaucer. after all, these texts are not in english originally, and i don't think we read anything else that was in translation.
obviously, the education system doesn't account for what people do with themselves independently and as adults. but it does shape what they might be prompted to seek out. in recent years there's this been this whole rash of greek myth pop culture, but i feel like that wasn't as strong when i was young. for kids, we had books like the Roman Mysteries series (i'm ever so slightly too old for Percy Jackson, though it was starting to catch on among some weaker readers in my age group when i was a teenager), and various roman britain-set adventures, like Eagle of the Ninth and other rosemary sutcliff. i remember in primary school we had a Roman Day where we all dressed up as romans and they taught us about roman food and reclining at the table and stuff like that lol. the cultural background knowledge in my area of england when i was a child was roman-focused! so, although we did have some greek myth retellings around, that felt like a niche interest, not something that was expected of a significant proportion of children (i do think that's shifted somewhat, partly bc of things like percy jackson)
anyway, not @ you, but in general the tags that really frustrate me on this poll are the ones that say "i did these in middle school, i can't believe how many people haven't read any of them". one of the things the poll is intended to explore and demonstrate is that education systems are different. people who went through a different education system will read different combinations of texts, or none, because their culture and country values different material and has different priorities. so for those people, here's another poll. how many of these classical authors that i read in state school (that's public school to americans) as a teenager in the course of one module have you read? did your school put these on the curriculum? have you been prompted to seek these out independently? why or why not? what might this tell you about how different education systems work and how they shape people's knowledge?
Burnham apparently getting rid of digital ID, but also apparently keeping the social media ban
So we'll all have to give IDs across to companies and websites anyway because by default everyone will be assumed under 16, or at best get an evening curfew, if that's the case
I guess no centralised digital ID is good, because there's not somewhere to just steal everyone's identities from. But also, places actively sell our emails and phone numbers enough to know they'll be flogging IDs uploaded too
Thereâs a quality that certain books/movies/TV shows have that leads me to say, âYeah, I can see people making fanfiction of that.â Itâs something to do, I think, with how tight the story is, how much feels open-ended or like it could be elaborated on.
Something like Breaking Bad, for example, has low squiggability (thatâs what Iâm calling this quality). Itâs tightly written, the characters are consistent, thereâs little left to interpolate or extrapolate. Obviously, people DO write fanfic of Breaking Bad, but it still has a low squiggability score. Whereas something like Supernatural has a high squiggability score. Fantasy and science fiction often have high squiggability scores. This suggests squiggability could also be related to worldbuilding and potential for people to borrow a premise or setting.
And sometimes youâll read or watch something and youâll say, âAh, low squiggability,â and then youâll open tumblr and find out that everyone else seem to think its squiggability was very high indeed.
One of the most important features of something that will inspire fanfic to me is if you say "fuck, this would be so good if it was good".
another important feature is "This would be so good if it was gay."
âWhat if poor people abuse the system?â
The system intrinsically abuses poor people.
Hope this helps.
"What if poor people abuse the system?"
Rich people abuse the system far more and out of pure greed, not necessity or desperation so idrc about that