intrusive thoughts are so fucking stupid lmao. why would i do that.

tannertan36

shark vs the universe

blake kathryn
Noah Kahan
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Discoholic đȘ©
Cosmic Funnies
cherry valley forever
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
No title available

if i look back, i am lost

#extradirty
No title available

Origami Around
ojovivo
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
d e v o n
taylor price
One Nice Bug Per Day
art blog(derogatory)

seen from Malaysia
seen from Spain
seen from Argentina

seen from Argentina
seen from Netherlands
seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@caspianloveslesmis
intrusive thoughts are so fucking stupid lmao. why would i do that.
so, arthur is extremely proud. as far as his character traits go, this is a pretty fundamental one. humiliation is one of his biggest fears, and the angriest he gets is when heâs been made to look like a fool (whether it be because he trusted someone who betrayed him, or if itâs suggested that he do something he thinks would be seen as cowardly, etc.). he hates the feeling of being embarrassed. probably the first instance we see of him being genuinely angry is in valiant (s1e2) when the witness dies before the whole snake shield thing can be confirmed and heâs accused of being scared to fight valiant so he yells at merlin for humiliating him, blahblahblah.
ten fucking minutes later though, LITERALLY the next episode, when merlin is in danger from the mortĂŠus poison, uther has arthur imprisoned and instead of being concerned about the optics of being in a cell, arthur fucking pendragon not only begs for merlinâs life, he offers himself up to be put in the stocks for âa week, a month even, i donât care.â he literally SAYS âiâm begging you.â pleading like that is already so against his nature, but volunteering himself for the most public possible humiliation to save a man heâs known for what, a week? iâm sick. he loved him that much already.
i know people often talk about the âno man is worth your tearsâ scene as an example of arthur being mean or thoughtless, but i would like everyone to remember that he started that little speech by saying âmerlin, if i die, pleaseâŠâ. his intention wasnât to shame merlin or to call him weak or to tell him to toughen up. he thought he was going to die and he was telling merlin not to cry for him. one of the last things that he ever thought heâd do was try to make sure that merlin would be okay when he was gone. yeah, it was tactless, and it seems particularly so because the audience knows that merlin had just watched his father die, but arthur, who didnât know that, was only trying to protect him, so i would like everyone to put some respect on my husbandâs name because he has a heart of fucking gold and the best of intentions.
also sometimes i remember that âjust hold me, pleaseâ is an actual canon line said by the most emotionally stunted man on the planet. like i forget itâs not from a fanfic or something. he actually said that. that was arthur pendragonâs dying wish. get fucked, bbc merlin writers. and thank you.
as if the âi havenât seen you smile these past three daysâ scene wasnât already heartbreaking and loving enough, i was watching queen charlotte and it gave me an epiphany about merthur (because of course it did). brimsley in queen charlotte (her servant) is VERY insistent that he must always walk five paces behind her as a mark of respect for her royalty etc. GUYS MERLIN IS FOREVER WALKING IN FRONT OF ARTHUR. particularly noticeable in that scene. just end it all at this point.
when it was revealed that agravaine was a traitor, arthur asked merlin if he, merlin, knew that. in response, merlin, who had tried so hard to tell arthur (only to be treated absolutely horribly in return), didnât say âi told you so,â or âyes, obviously i knew,â or anything that would make arthur feel worse. he just said that he suspected it. because arthur was already so hurt and merlin just wanted him to be okay. could you ever love anybody that much? insane.
just finished merlin. oh my god. oh my god. what the fuck. hello. i was watching it through my tears
the way arthur says âiâm sorry about how i treated youâ when heâs dying GUTS MEEE the way his fucking voice breaks and heâs so obviously trying not to cry and fuck, merlin, can you just give the boy a hug for once PLEASE
arthur knew. in s1e3 the only reason gwen was released was because the afanc had been conjured by nimueh so they knew she didnât cause the PLAGUE. there was no reason to believe that she didnât use magic to save her father, because they know SOMEONE did and why would nimueh do that? why tom, out of everyone? and arthurâs stupid but heâs surely not stupid enough to just completely forget about the poultice and merlin CONFESSED. obviously he wasnât going to bring it up, leave well enough alone, but i swear to god, if only a small part of him, arthur always knew.
today i am wondering if merlin had it to do all over again, would he choose to trust mordred, to tell morgana the truth, and to show them both the kindness that might have saved them from what they became, or would he kill them both before they had the chance? he could have saved arthur by saving them but does he know that, or does he think that his initial attempts to trust them were his hamartia?
expanding on this because i wrote it at like 3am and i have more to say.
if youâve heard of the idea that a story can be tragic because âit was always going to end this wayâ or because âit didnât have to end this way,â youâll know what i mean when i say that this story is so devastating because both are equally true.
with mordred the main issue when merlin first met him was that mordred was just a kid, combined with the fact that merlinâs friends (morgana especially but gwen and arthur too) cared about him (mordred). itâs also worth noting that merlin was still very young and had not yet witnessed quite how much danger arthur was really in. as such iâm not even convinced that he fully believed that this tiny, injured, innocent boy was going to harm arthur. if he believed that it was inevitable, i think he would have let him die when he was first presented the opportunity. as it was, he had no way of knowing for sure, and indirectly killing a child is not something you do if youâre not certain that you have to. what i wonder is if he was given the chance to do it again, having lived through the events of s5, would he then believe that it was inevitable? would he think that fate couldnât be thwarted, that mordred was always destined to do what he did and there was never anything to be done about it beyond killing him first, or would he blame himself for what mordred became, thinking instead that if he had been kinder to him, if he had chosen to trust him, if he had rescued kara, if he hadnât tripped him, if he had advised arthur to legalise magic to save him, then maybe everything would be different?
with morgana itâs more complicated because merlinâs reason for initially sparing her was more personal. merlin LOVED morgana. i genuinely believe that he did, all the way to the end. he knows what sheâs becoming but he tries so hard to change it, partly because he loves her and he doesnât want to lose her, and partly because of how much *arthur* loves her. he poisoned her because he had to, but he chose to tell morgause how to save her. he knocked her down the stairs because he had to, but he saved her. he threw her against a tree in the forest (and she had *fully* turned against arthur by that point) but even when sheâs unconscious and apparently past saving, he doesnât try to kill her. even when he finally does kill her, he lowers her to the ground so gently. he loved her no matter what she became, he just loved arthur and albion more.
when arthur says that he, arthur, âcould have saved her,â merlin says that there were others better placed to help morgana, suggesting that he blames himself for *not* saving her. does that mean he wishes heâd told her the truth about his magic? about hers? does it mean that he believes he *could* have changed the outcome for her?
merlin is arthurâs. he loved morgana, gaius, gwen, gwaine, lancelot, etc., but he was always arthurâs. his devotion was such that i think heâd have burned the rest of the world to the ground to save him if he had to. thereâs nothing and nobody he would not sacrifice for arthur. by the end of the series, merlinâs humanity is all but gone because *nothing* but arthur matters. he has the chance to free himself and everyone like him but he turns it down because saving arthur is more important. so if he could go back, even knowing exactly how he could have saved mordred and morgana, would he even bother to try, or would he, unwilling to risk a second failure, kill them on sight, even before theyâd done anything wrong?
i donât know the answer. i suspect there might not have been enough of merlin left by the end for him to be willing to try to save anyone but arthur. he might sacrifice morgana. mordred. might even sacrifice the unity of albion to protect arthur, especially after heâd already gone through the loss of him once.
âI asked ChatGPT-â yeah okay I asked Victor Hugo and he talked about Waterloo for five hours
today i am wondering if merlin had it to do all over again, would he choose to trust mordred, to tell morgana the truth, and to show them both the kindness that might have saved them from what they became, or would he kill them both before they had the chance? he could have saved arthur by saving them but does he know that, or does he think that his initial attempts to trust them were his hamartia?
MORGANA @merlinbingo | 1. Tumblr post, inanotherunivrse / 2. Sisters, Elizabeth Fishel / 3. Elektra, Anne Carson / 4. The World at its Beginning, Dustin Pearson / 5. Unknown / 6. Ariadne, Jennifer Saint / 7. Comment by Nilo / 8. Tumblr post, maykitz / 9. Antigonick, Anne Carson / 10. Workingman's Blues #2, Bob Dylan / 11. After Abel, Dante Ămile / 12. Unknown / 13. My Sister's Keeper, Jodi Picoult / 14. Antigone, Sophocles / 15. Infinite Gradation, Anne Michaels / 16. Ariadne and Minos, author unknown / 17. Killing Flies, Michael Dickman.
happy barricade day!!!!
guess who finally remembered his password just for the occasion.
since it's almost barricades days and i've seen new people joining our fandom, i would like to list u all some very nice adaptations i really like that u can watch (and that are better alternatives than the bbc adaptation) (and i included links!!!!!):
what to watch ?
- i feel like this is a classic, but the 2012 movie adaptation by tom hopper, obviously. while it's not the best adaptation, it is still really good (also i feel like it made a lot of us join the fandom in the first place)
- also pretty obvious but the west end musical by claude-michel schönberg and alain boublil (i'm pretty sure u can find decent bootleg on yt) + honorable mention for the 25th anniversary concert but i feel like u need to know a bit about the musical before seeing the concert
- a personal favourite, the 1982 french movie by robert hossein, it is three hours long tho, but it's worth it; the adaptation is really good, especially the portrayal of Les Amis (here's the yt link to the whole movie)
- shojo Cosette is also pretty decent, tho i've only watched the episodes with Les Amis (the barricades are heartbreaking just like we love)
- it's really obscure but the silent short film l'enfant sur la barricade (the child on the barricade) by Alice Guy. the sources diverge from whether it's an adaptation of les mis or an adaptation of a poem hugo wrote called "sur une barricade" and taking place during the commune of paris but the character could be inspired by gavroche
- Les Amis webserie, that u can find on yt, or here :
Les Amis is a web series that puts the characters from Victor Hugo's Les Miserable onto a modern college campus. A documentary film club st
it's a web serie made by fans for fans and it's amazing
- All That's Left Of Us, another web serie made by and for fans. it's beautiful and absolutely heartbreaking. u can find it on youtube or here:
and on the overall anything that eli southern does about les mis is pretty amazing so i encourage u all to go check @thecandlesticksfromlesmis
(although i feel like u need to know a bit about the fandom before jumping right into the webseries)
- and obviously, The Brick, the original masterpiece that is Les Miserables by victor hugo; if u have the courage i promise that it's worth it
annnnd that's all ! at least for my favourite one, but there are a looooot of different adaptations for every taste i guess ! anyway have fun and take care of y'all during barricades days !
The real tragedy about the barricade is that we donât know how much is true. Victor Hugo was there at the June Rebellion, so what is fact and what is fiction? That question gives me chills because weâll never know.Â
Charles Jeanne (who I think is probably actual real life Enjolras) wrote an in-detail account of the ACTUAL barricades in a letter to his sister after the fact
you can read it, tenlittlebullets translated it into English :)
itâs really graphic, he leaves no gory details out, just FYI if youâre gonna read it, keep TW: VIOLENCEÂ in mind
#how is he real-life enjolras if he survived (via metellus-cimber)
Iâm so glad somebody asked this, because the answer is: when they finally ran out of ammunition, Charles Jeanne rounded up everyone who was still standing, went, âlook, if weâre going to die, we might as well die fighting,â and led a suicidal ten-man charge against an entire flippinâ infantry column, armed with nothing but bayonets. The first few ranks of soldiers were so unprepared for such a spectacularly insane attack that they were too surprised to shoot. They crossed bayonets and tried to hold the insurgents off in hand-to-hand combat, but Jeanneâs swordsmanship was apparently aces, because he held off a bunch of them at once and covered his friends as they tried to breach the ranks. And once they were in, nobody could shoot them for fear of taking out their own guys.
So the last stand that the insurgents had intended as a noble suicide ended in them breaking through the ranks entirely and winding up in the next street over, outside the combat zone, going âwell shit, what do we do now?â (Iâm guessing the infantry column wasnât very deep; central Paris at that point was a rabbit warren of narrow twisty streets, and assembling troops en masse for an organized attack was a logistical nightmare.) Unlike the National Guard, the army werenât total chumps and got themselves turned around to give chase and start shooting once they werenât at risk of friendly fire any longer⊠and thatâs when all the civilians holed up in their houses went âno way, youâre not getting your hands on these crazy bastardsâ and started hurling furniture and crockery down on the soldiersâ heads. Jeanne was understandably distracted at the time, but afterwards somebody informed him that the barrage of unlikely projectiles included a piano. A piano. That is some straight-up Looney Tunes slapstick right there. No wonder Hugo went for the heroic death scene instead; if heâd stuck to real life, he probably wouldâve gotten complaints that heâd wrecked his readersâ suspension of disbelief.
Anyway, someone opened an alley gate for them to shelter in and take stock of the casualtiesâmost of them survived(!!!), but a few were pretty nastily wounded. Their host then had to lock Charles Jeanne in to keep him from charging right back out and taking on the whole goddamn army singlehanded. He probably wouldâve broken down the door if the poor man hadnât pointed out that going back out would give away his wounded comradesâ hiding place and the identities of the people sheltering them. They sat there listening to the gunfire gradually slow and go silent, and then in the middle of the night the ones who could still walk were allowed to slip away one by one at long intervals from each other. Charles Jeanne went straight home, slept like the dead for a few hours, was woken up at five in the morning with a warning that heâd been denounced and the building was surrounded, and then slipped out in disguise and managed to evade the police for four months before a former comrade ratted him out and he was arrested.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why Charles Jeanneâs letter is an absolute treasure that deserves to be available to anyone in Les Mis fandom who wants to read it. Incidentally, âhow Actual Historical Enjolras survived the barricades by being too good at his suicide missionâ is also one of the stories I tell when anyone asks me what the hell is so interesting about researching people nobodyâs ever heard of from an obscure chapter of French history.Â
Bringing this back for Barricade Day! To answer a few questions that keep coming up in the reblogs: hereâs my translation of Jeanneâs letter, which was my main source. Jeanne stood trial, was imprisoned instead of executed (because can you imagine what a martyr he wouldâve made), and died of tuberculosis just a few years later. Despite his improbable survival story, the RL June Rebellion was not an everybody-lives AUâlike the revolt in Les Mis, it ended in a hard-fought retreat into one of the buildings on the street, followed by a massacre. The guys who led a suicide charge and accidentally won were, unfortunately, the exception.
liberté égalité bicuriosité
how could this post be from two days ago when it is so clearly something i would have written under tasteful fanart of enjolras and grantaire going at it circa 2015