MASTER OF PUPPIES IM PULLING UR LEASH
PETTING YOUR HEAD AND GIVING U TREATS
Arf arf!!

roma★
𓃗

izzy's playlists!

Origami Around

PR's Tumblrdome

Love Begins

Andulka
No title available
trying on a metaphor
macklin celebrini has autism
d e v o n

Discoholic 🪩

if i look back, i am lost

pixel skylines
NASA
noise dept.
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
🪼
No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap

seen from Lithuania

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Colombia

seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@celestial-love99
MASTER OF PUPPIES IM PULLING UR LEASH
PETTING YOUR HEAD AND GIVING U TREATS
Arf arf!!
If the woman that JK rowling posted an upskirt photo of had been a cis woman snopes wouldn't have said this was "mixed" and you know it.
Not that it was necessary, but I looked up definitions, and yeah, obviously "taking a photo under someone's skirt" is literally it. Fuck Snopes so fucking hard. I need them to explain to me how it doesn't fit the definition to a fucking t:
And what the FUCK do they mean, "public setting"?? Yeah, upskirts are mistly taken in public fucking settings! That's not an eycuse, that's part of the fucking issue
And truly what do they mean it was in public? Does that mean that the upskirt photos people take on subways dont count because other people are around? OF COURSE IT WAS IN PUBLIC THATS HOW THE PHOTO GOT TAKEN IF SHE HAD BEEN PHOTOGRAPHED AT HOME IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BREAKING AND ENTERING
what do they mean "it wasn't taken surreptitiously"? there isn't any implication here except that because Freda Wallace was in public, she consented to any pictures that might be taken of her? this is just "look at the way she* was dressed". snopes is doing rape culture.
Certain people seem to think lesbianism is #restrictive to human expirence and that bisexuality/unlabeled sexuality is the only path. Similar people seem to think lesbianism is a cisexual invention that we tgirls must distance ourselves from (in a #transfeminist way.)
I think some of you have your heads in your asses and need to realize some people genuinely just dont want to date men. This may be hard to believe, but maybe there is meaning in having a word for "woman who dates women" that we dont need to over conplicate with bullshit or pathetic ideologies.
Went underwear shopping today and... y'all, it was amazing. They actually treated me like a real girl and they were so nice the whole time and I got a really cute bra and panties and just aaaaaaaaaaAAAAAA
insane shit happening over on uquiz right now
These and other questions that transfems get asked every day
https://ew.com/blade-runner-2099-exclusive-first-look-replicant-uprising-12020855
Huh, somehow missed Hunter Schafer was in this, neat!
<3 I AM GONNA BE WATCHING EVERY EPISODE :D <3
A Blade Runner show starring Hunter Schafer and Michelle Yeoh?
< GRABBY HANDS
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY :D
YOOOO
I love this text post so I drew it
When the chronic pain is chronically painful
you truly can't have gimmicks as a transfem, huh.
like (and i know these aren't gimmick blogs but personal blogs with a particular focus), i-suggest-forcefem? plagiarized endlessly by tmras. yay-bunnies? plagiarized endlessly by tmras. they want our product but not us. tho like even blogs with pretty much zero gimmicks have impersonators, like sailatina for example.
of course only the original transfems are banned
checks out. our job is to generate "queer culture" for free and then get swapped out if we're considered uppity about anything
But trans women talking about transmisogyny are the real TERFs didn't you know?? TERFs hate trans men and trans women equally didn't you know?? I promise transandrochud movements aren't a TWERF pipeline really I swear please believe me. It's just a coincidence that so many open TWERFs used the transandrochud movement as their final stepping stone
by all means necessary.
I'm kinda not pulling any punches with these types of drawings.
It’s a scary time to be a trans woman. A lot of people might be scared to go on estrogen because they have unsupportive people in their life.
You can go on estrogen and hide it, you don’t have to come out in order to go on estrogen. It’s easy to diy and most of the effects are subtle, if you’re particularly gifted with boobs that might be a concern but you’d be surprised how much a sports bra can hide.
Just, don’t wait your whole life for the time to be right. You can start medical transition without social transition.
Hey gender isn’t real! Don’t you get it gender isn’t real. Anyone telling you about transmisogyny as a framework for your oppression is trying to prey on you and get you in a cult! How? Well like knowing about transmisogyny means you won’t let me treat you like a sex toy and might seek comfort from other trans women. I can’t have that. I need you vulnerable and alone. No oppression has ever functioned like this btw, ignore misogynoir.
One of my hottest transfeminist takes that I have is regarding drag and ballroom actually. Read the whole thing in depth instead of skimming it then getting mad at me.
I think that the US transfemme desire to disown drag/ballroom is a symptom of both white culture’s destruction of ancestral ties and the importance of cultural continuity, and of the predominantly white ignorance of it as a gentrified Black art form similar to how whites treat other Black art. They want a destruction of it because they see the effects and results of the gentrified version and assume that’s all there is/was.
In particular it’s frustrating because while some drag queens are cis, a lot are trans women, non-binary, or otherwise transmisogynized and drag/ballroom and the tipping culture associated with it existed in part because the transmisogynized are so fucking unemployable and it provided/s a method beyond mutual aid for the redistribution of money, through the labor of performance.
In relation to trans women, I view drag queens as a pathway to transness similar to crossdressers, femboys, (unfortunately) sissies, and similar - where although the perception of them currently may cause harm to the perception of trans women at large due to the ways they compromise with predominantly white cishetero society to allow transfemmes to explore their gender, they are, in fact, still functionally people within the spectrum of transfemininity even if they haven’t fully accepted their gender expansiveness for themselves. Harm they cause to the perception of transfemmes does not lessen them from that societal assignment, any less than we can say Caitlyn Jenner, Blair White, or Kelly Cadigan are less trans women because of the harm they’ve done to the perception of trans women. They are all, in effect, varying levels of transmisogynized whether they realize it or not.
When I was in DC I knew a lot of drag kings/queens and literally 95% of them are trans and either came to drag/ballroom as a way to explore their gender through art and/or make money bc poor, or started it and it was a gateway to unlocking their gender. Not counting the cis performers elevated by stuff like RuPaul, who is explicitly transphobic, I think I can count on my hands how many cis performers I’ve met. Hell, even with RuPaul shit a number of drag artists who have been on his shows later come out as trans (such as Bosco, who I literally grew up with), in part because they suppressed their transness publicly to maintain their career until they reached a point the blowback of coming out wound impact them less. Pulling a F1NNSTER to keep cash flowing for survival, if you will.
Iunno like. The earliest Balls we have records of were literally 1880-90s, predominantly Black (the oldest drag/ballroom performer we have records of was a Black trans woman from DC), and was one of the only safe places for trans people to exist as themselves. So I find the idea of writing it off due to a much more recent gentrification and commercialization of it as ignorant as how people often treat other demonizes or commercialized Black art.
“I just don’t like the spectacle it makes of transness and harm it causes-“
Baby all Blackness is spectacle to crackers and An Amount of modern drag is white people doing minstrelsy of all Black women - not in the sense of gender at all but in the sense of race.
Like. A lot of Black culture in the US specifically is Big and Loud *because* of the repression of it we’ve faced and the force towards respectability politics, which has echoed to queer culture because queer culture in the US is made vast majority from Black culture. Our existence is a spectacle so why not make a show out of why they hate us and try to erase us so that they can’t get rid of even more.
Hating “the spectacle” of an actual performance art form is solidly rooted in white supremacy and white cultural notions of propriety/respectability. Many aspects of “spectacle” seen in drag are directly taken from Ballroom or adapted from it/vogueing.
In summary: traditions are meant to change with situational, cultural, and environmental need but still be sustained as part of a culture. Gentrification is a poison to this that makes it harder for those the culture belongs to to practice it as it should. White ancestral shame is a poison that makes them think they should nuke everything historic/cultural that makes them uncomfortable regardless of whether it’s theirs or whether it’s something they stole and gentrified. Also yeag like,,, it’s a job/gig income predominantly for societal “undesirables” to make money when they’re under/unemployed due to marginalization. And it’s also been gentrified to *gestures at RuPaul, et al.*
No matter what you think about drag or ballroom, poor predominantly racialized trans folks still gon be doing it because it is part of our culture no matter what tv shows and big names and people who have only seen those do to it, and it’s always going to be seen as one of the “disreputable” pathways to transness that makes other trans people look down on them because of the complicated ties to transmisogyny, because until someone publicly says the words “Im also a trans woman”, WE also view them as a personification of what we fear the world sees us as—a man in a dress—rather than an egg finding their way to gender in a way we deem unacceptable because it doesn’t align with how we think it “should” be done.
And I think that’s on us honestly, not on them. If we say it can take as long or as quickly and as easily or messily for someone to sort out their gender as needed, this also has to be extended to the transmisogynized we view as “disreputable” regardless of if/when they reach a conclusion we deem acceptable or whether they die in the shell, never able to remove their masks fully.
Aight yall gon head and eviscerate me now
here's two articles about how JK Rowling just posted on X an upskirt photo of Freda Wallace, a transgender woman, after deadnaming her and misgendering her repeatedly online.
The wealthy author escalated a social media spat that resulted in posting a photo from a 2023 event at the Institute of Economic Affairs in
Rowling posted the picture taken from below because the trans woman, she said, was "refusing to debate me."
Thank you for posting without the fucking destiel meme
a lot of people assume psychosis hallucinations are super intense all-consuming horror movie shit like the memes about the hat man or always horrible debilitating things that make you dangerous to be around
but in my experience 95% of my hallucinations are getting spooked by very clearly hearing someone knocking on my door or calling my name from another room or hearing footsteps walking behind me which are "just" my brain recreating the horror of an abusive childhood
i *have* gotten the "bugs crawling all over me" hallucination once or twice though and yeah that one is exactly as terrible horrible as it sounds AUGH
(not trying to put you on blast specifically, you're just a good example to jump off of)
media and pop culture hypes up psychosis a lot as The Worst That Can Happen out of sanism, so even when you try and filter that cultural bias out you still assume it's based on something
when, no, psychosis is actually very simple: it's just hyperactive pattern matching. it's your brain's signal-to-noise ratio being off balance, it's seeing images in random static. it's not always this special uniquely big thing, it's in fact quite mundane a lot of the time.
no one is immune to psychosis, it's not purely the realm of the insane. anyone is one bad night of sleep or one bad case of food poisoning or one bad fever away from being just like me on my worst days.
and this, indeed, is why solidarity with the insane is so important: you, yes you too, are just one bad day from joining us, and no perceptions of being a "temporarily embarrassed sane person" will save you from the oppression of the psychiatric institution.
Wait what
Oh