the pitt | i got soul but i'm not a soldier
untitled
No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Game of Thrones Daily

izzy's playlists!
art blog(derogatory)
taylor price

gracie abrams
trying on a metaphor

Andulka
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
One Nice Bug Per Day
Sade Olutola
Cosmic Funnies
$LAYYYTER
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
NASA
wallacepolsom
d e v o n

★
seen from Spain

seen from Ireland
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Belgium

seen from Malaysia

seen from South Korea
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Ireland
@chickencity530
the pitt | i got soul but i'm not a soldier
how to get up in the morning tutorial
how to get up in the morning walkthrough
how to get up in the morning tips and tricks
how to get up in the morning tutorial
how to get up in the morning walkthrough
how to get up in the morning tips and tricks
Im up there in his pussy like a dog drinking water
reblog if you love archive of our own and how they firmly refuse to let censorship have any place on their platform
Big fan of characters with abandonment issues so profound they leave claw marks in everything they touch but would sooner gnaw off their own leg than admit that they desire kindness and safety
do you consider yourself human?
yes
no
nuance
results
[hate to be that guy but if you would consider reblogging for reach i would love to have a larger pool of data here]
"but the jancy breakup didnt feel like a breakup it felt like they were fixing things!" yep. it was both. theyre fixing things by breaking up and still confessing how much they love and care for each other. its a very complex scene and i fear youre all trying too hard to box it into something simple.
Jancy breakup was a beautiful representation of how sometimes love doesn’t work out romantically and that’s ok. Sometimes the person you care so much about just isn’t the person you end up with and that’s ok. Sometimes you have to let go of someone you care about because the relationship you have is hurting the both of you. Sometimes fixing things doesn’t mean keeping them going. Sometimes you will be happier in a relationship without romance. Sometimes “sticking together through the hard times” isn’t enough and you need to be able to be together during the easy times, too. We don’t need our first loves to be our eternal loves. This is a very bittersweet sentiment and this scene captured it so well. There is a lot of depth to their relationship and this scene made that so much more apparent! It’s frustrating that people don’t understand how the nuance to their relationship is intentional.
This is exactly what I’d love for m1leven to get too! I desperately want a resolution over the fact that they do love each other, just not in the way they need to for a romantic relationship to work between them. I’m also a gay Mike truther so him loving El so much but not in that way is very important to me. With jancy, this show has proven that they can handle the complexities of love and healthy breakups. I hope they keep it going.
Hi, I saw that you posted some warnings about spam/bot comments on people's fics, and felt I sould share this one that a friend of mine asked me for advice about. I told her to report it, but idk if others would know to
thank you for sending me this. this one is… disturbing.
psa to all writers, if you get a comment like this, it’s a bot and I encourage you to report it to ao3 as spam.
also I’d like to use this as an opportunity to remind myself and everybody that, with the surge of bot comments plaguing ao3 and how discouraging it can be for writers, it’s so important and appreciated to comment nice things on the fics you enjoy if you can. let the authors know you enjoy their works. seeing a genuine comment from a real person could really make their day.
more about bots and scams on ao3’s comment section
#motherhood at its finest
"they're not gay" I don't know man, I read a masterfully written fanfic on A03 that says otherwise.
Nancy Wheeler had one of the most perfect loss of innocence & coming-of-age arcs I've ever seen.
(AND WE'RE LIKELY TO SEE SIMILAR ARCS PLAY OUT IN SEASON 5 FOR THE PARTY MEMBERS)
Flawlessly executed, loaded with symbolism and imagery, and even a little bit provocative. It's simply perfect.
It all happens in one season, too... which goes to show that it can be done.
She starts the series wearing cute little bows, stockings, and knee length skirts (soda pop wheeler realness). She looks like she's going to freaking church. She's buttoned up and described as a priss. She wants Steve and his friends to think she's cool, even though she's really an intellectual/ academic... aka nerd.
She doesn't even tell her parents about Steve because she's embarrassed or worried, even though Ted didn't care and Karen was mostly curious. I just remembered she even calls Karen "mommy" at the dinner table... baby behaviour. (Love her!)
Then she (rather impulsively) loses her virginity, and at the same time, she loses her childhood best friend. Two things associated with her innocence and childhood naïveté gone in the same instance. That is the most on-the-nose loss of innocence storyline I can possibly think of.
Barb literally calls Nancy's name before she's taken and it's the last thing she ever says – to no response. In the obvious sense it's because Nancy can't hear. Metaphorically, it's because the version of Nancy she's calling for is dead. She can't come to the phone right now – she's starting her major character arc.
Her wardrobe changes immediately after losing her virginity and losing Barb, even if it is subtle. No pretty pastels, skirts or bows of any kind. She's in muted colors, jeans and sneakers. The next day she's in jeans and sneakers again. She's wearing pastel pink, but the shirt is loose fitted with the sleeves rolled up, making it look more casual and carefree.
She's a little dressed down, almost like she stopped caring so much about putting on a cute little coordinated outfit – she has more important things to worry about than acing Kaminsky's test and impressing Steve (childish fancies).
Then she lies to the police and loses respect for the authorities altogether. A loss of trust and respect for authorities and people in power is also a loss of innocence, because it means you know you can't just inherently trust anyone. That's something a naïve child does. She takes matters into her own hands despite not really needing to – something an adult does.
When Karen presses her about her sexual relationship with Steve, Nancy says it doesn't matter, because it really doesn't. This mirrors how an adult views sex; something that only matters if you make it matter.
She feels that she's not being listened to, that she's being gaslit ("There was no car.") this is also something we do to children. Adults routinely shut children down – ignore them, lie to them, tell them what to believe.
But Nancy doesn't allow it. She's becoming an adult. You don't get to tell her what she saw, or what does and doesn't "matter."
She says "I know it!" with chilling conviction. She's trusting herself more than anyone else in the world. That takes guts.
Nancy then teams up with Jonathan the "weirdo" and "freak" even though he took those pictures of her. There's a more nuanced conversation to be had about the photographs (I think it relates a lot to the Byers' complicated relationship to boundaries and privacy thanks to Lonnie), but her reaction shows that she's not embarrassed.
To clarify, I'm not saying that an adult is never mortified of having photos taken of them without consent – but narratively, this scene serves a function. Nancy went from being fully buttoned-up and embarrassed to admit she had a boyfriend, to flirtatiously asking Jonathan what she was "saying" in her half-dressed photograph.
This scene is partially about sexual agency.
"So you saw me half naked... what did you think about that?"
Funeral Nancy doesn't say thank you when Karen tells her she looks nice because she doesn't care. She doesn't take up the offer to wear Karen's black heels. A child might jump at the opportunity to play "grown-up" by borrowing an adult's clothes. High heels in and of themselves are a kind of symbol for womanhood because children don't wear them.
Nancy rejects it because she's becoming her own woman. She doesn't need to borrow from Karen or play dress up. She doesn't need the heels.
Then we have butch Nancy™ (lol, sorry) in her flannel, fingerless gloves, and sherpa jacket. It's very tomboy-ish. She's swinging a freaking bat (phallic imagery!).
Steve asks her out and she blows him off because she has plans to kill an interdimensional monster. In my opinion, Steve even lowkey gives her the ick in this scene. She's not as easily impressed or swooned as she once was by Steve's boyish charm (because it is boyish, and she's no longer girlish).
Then we have more phallic imagery with the gun. Unlike Will, she uses it with confidence. Unlike Jonathan, she's not afraid of it. Another cue which tells us Nancy has sexual agency.
The gun also symbolizes violence and the ability to take away life. The ability to give life (menstruation or birth) and take it away (kill) is associated with adulthood and coming-of-age.
When Nancy says "I don't think my parents ever loved each other." this also shows a loss of innocence. An innocent child believes their parents to be in love, because marriage must only be about love. Just like having babies only comes about due to "love." It's the stuff of Disney movies – Jonathan even references Thumper from Bambi.
Nancy understands it's more complicated than that. She denounces the nuclear family. Could you see episode 1 Nancy saying this?
Oh, then we get even more symbolism about loss of innocence. Nancy and Jonathan come about a dying deer – right after our Bambi reference. What do you know...
What is more tragic than the death of an innocent animal? (Okay, a lot of things, to be fair...) but Bambi was a lot of children's rude awakening to themes of mortality, tragedy, and loss. After the death of her childhood best friend, Nancy is now reckoning with the death of another innocent. It's a test to see what she has learned, and how she handles difficult and upsetting situations.
She handles it well, taking matters into her own hands (something adults do). Jonathan offers to do it, but it was Nancy's idea to end its suffering.
Then, like any true hero on a hero's journey, Nancy crosses the threshold between worlds. She enters the Upside Down.
She didn't know she was entering another dimension, but there's something to be said about the fact that she chose to enter.
Mind you, the gates in Stranger Things are yonic imagery. To be perfectly blunt, they closely resemble vaginas – often red and fleshy, with viscera strecthing between them like a hymen, and coated in fluid.
Nancy enters through the yonic gate into the Upside Down, faces and escapes death, and returns reborn.
She's been becoming a woman this entire time, but THIS is the moment she truly becomes one once and for all.
She washes away her guilt for what happened to Barb in the shower. She faced and survived the very thing that felled her best friend.
Water is about cleansing. She's terrified and upset and afraid... but she's born again. Whether she realizes it or not.
She takes initiative and asks Jonathan to sleep next to her. It's not sexual, but it still shows sexual agency. She's not embarrassed or uncomfortable to share a bed with a man.
When Jonathan tries to comfort Nancy by telling her the demogorgon can't reach them inside, she responds, "We don't know that." It's not pessimism. It's acceptance of reality and mortality.
Then she's buying hunting gear, weapons and lighter fluid. It's something that would be insane for episode 1 Nancy, but makes complete sense for her now. She's changed so much.
Oh, and she gets slut-shamed. This was an amazing way to follow up Nancy's loss of virginity arc: actually addressing the workings of misogyny and sex negativity.
I've seen younger fans criticize the writers' choice to have Nancy and Steve have sex in s1 (seriously...) calling it "weird." This sentiment is following us into s5, with people getting squeamish and holier than thou at the mere possibility that of any of the party members may have their own loss of virginity arcs. I think those fans need to rewatch s1 and pay more attention to Nancy's arc.
Then we have the build up of the season's climax. The puzzle pieces are coming together. Nancy and Jonathan reunite with Hopper and Joyce, and the party.
Hopper and Joyce trust them to continue taking matters into their own hands as they have been. They're one of the adults, now. Like them.
Nancy notices El wearing her old, pastel pink dress with a frilled collar. It's a passing of the torch: welcome to girlhood, El – Nancy doesn't need it anymore.
Nancy shocks Mike with her show of strength in breaking the lock. It's something episode 1 Nancy wouldn't have done. Her womanhood is manifesting physically now, too. She's stronger and more capable than she looks.
There's also an irony to Nancy's "no more secrets" line because it matches with her arc earlier in the season, in which Nancy was sick and tired of being gaslit, dismissed, and lied to. She tells Mike they'll "tell each other eveything" but that's not the case.
What did I say earlier? Adults lie to children. Nancy is now an adult, and Mike is still a child. Now she gets to lie to him.
It's its own rite-of-passage, albeit a funny one.
Then we have El in the void. This entire time, Nancy has held a torch for Barb, hoping against hope that she's still alive.
The manner in which she learns Barb is truly dead is swift and brutal. There's no fanfare, gentleness, or reverence. El simply says, "gone." It's over.
This is how adulthood feels – reality hits you in the face without apology, and doesn't wrap it up in a pretty bow for you.
And then we circle back to the ability to take a life. Nancy and Jonathan never got to shoot the deer, because the demogorgon got to it first. Nancy can give life (she doesn't need to get pregnant and prove it), but can she take one?
As a matter of fact, yes. She can. She's also stood beside two men (who tower over her) as an equal in strength, bravery, and fortitude.
And there you have it. Nancy's perfectly executed loss of innocence and coming-of-age arc, which wrapped up in one season. The rest of her storyline is more about navigating adulthood, despite still being a teenager.
All of this happened when Nancy was about 15-16. A sophomore, and younger than the party is going to be in season 5 (16-17).
Taking from the Nancy Wheeler's Guide to Coming-of-age Book, I've made a list of things we can expect:
Who's going to enter the Upside Down for the first time? (Probably Mike and Lucas…)
Who's going to scream about not being listened to?
Who's going to lose their virginity?
Who's going to have a metaphorical rebirth? (Possibly Will, with water imagery…)
Who's going to kill for the first time?
Who's going to become disenchanted with their lover? (My bet is on El…)
Who's going to wield a phallic weapon? (Looks like it'll also be Mike with the shovel…)
And most devastatingly, who's going to lose a childhood friend?
I feel compelled to bring back the s1 Jancy and s5 Byler costume parallels. This is our first hint at what to expect.
Let's notice the signs and note the patterns...
Mike will lose his younger sibling Holly (like Jonathan losing Will), and Will is on his journey of "coming into his own as a man" and taking ownership of his sexuality (like Nancy).
We can even split Nancy's s1 arc into two major themes:
Reckoning with death and mortality, facilitating new beginnings (hence the loss of Barb)
Ownership of sexuality and sexual agency, facilitating self-confidence (hence the loss of her virginity)
In my opinion, Mike is going to mirror Nancy's arc concerning death and mortality: He's going to lose someone important to him, reckon with his own mortality by coming close to death, and cross the threshold into the Upside Down for the first time.
Will on the other hand is going to mirror Nancy's sexuality arc: He's going to confront his sex and sexuality-based trauma, own his queerness, and yeah – I think he may lose his virginity, too. It just makes sense.
So, thank you Nancy. You demonstrated a seamless – yet extremely messy and difficult – transition into adulthood that our teens can emulate in season 5.
I'm looking forward to the chaos.
What Stranger Things truly means: What most lost sight of
This idea was not planned out perfectly, so I apologize if this is scattered as this is my live thoughts. A few minutes ago, I saw a repost of a particular speech from David Harbour as he spoke about the meaning of the show. And just then, it just came to me. I advise you to watch this video as its what my feelings parallel and I’ll reference it frequently.
If you feel out of place in this world - lost, strange, stupid, weird, and such, Stranger thing was supposed to be the show you saw yourself in. That's what its purpose is - to find the”freaks” and try to connect with them. “Freaks” were their target audience before they went mainstream.
This series was made to break the stereotypes of the 80s, and welcome a feeling of understanding. If you look closely… none of the characters don’t do that. It's especially shown in the characters themselves.
Let's go over some "strange” characters that broke 80s stereotypes.
JOYCE BYERS: Single Mother
Starting off unnoticeable to most. Joyce isn’t your typical 80s mom, she's a single mother- freed from an abusive relationship. Back in the eighties, single moms weren't as normalized or spoken about much. As some were shamed or seen as weird. Nowadays it's a bit more frequently talked about.
Joyce struggles a lot, she has a lot of stress built up in her. This wasn’t seen as typical for the standard American family ideals in small American towns back then.
WILL BYERS: Queerness
This one is more noticeable and talked about: Will Byers.
The LGBTQ community in the 80s were heavily ostracized, especially in a small american town - in INDIANA may i add.
From the start, Will is bullied by both his father and kids at school for his differences. When Will is missing, Joyce states that L*nnie used to call him “queer” - considered a slur back then.
Him being queer was one of the main reasons he was bullied and felt out of place. Because in a small American town, that's not seen as normal. Adding on the fact that L*nnie knew this and used his queerness as an insult. This caused him to feel like a freak along with his “zombie boy” title.
NANCY WHEELER: A badass.
Originally starting off as your typical 80s teen. In a relationship, in a standard four member home with a stable living. In early season one, she conforms to the standards and expectations of the town.
She just resonated with books and education - that was the “most weird” thing about her. Despite her status she was quite grounded, yet to others seen as a spoiled brat who dates the most popular guy in school.
By late early season one, Nancy learned how to pick up a gun - already breaking one standard - and stuck with a presumed “freak” aka Jonathan. After picking up a gun, she became THE “walk em down wheeler”. Her usage of guns and taking care of Jonathan, broke the “damsel in distress” or weak woman character trope. It is interesting to have this dynamic and this character to be seen in the 80s. Live, Laugh, Love Nancy Wheeler.
ROBIN BUCKLEY: Queer and Autistic.
Robin has been talked about a lot recently. People pointed out that Robin lost her sassiness and character in season four/five. They're partially right but heavily WRONG.
Robin is written and made with autistic characteristics. Excessive hand movements, constant rambling, can’t control her tone of voice (thus making her sound insensitive sometimes), often doesn’t understand social cues, hiding signs of autism (SEASON THREE.). This also includes attention to small details (being able to crack the code in season 3, realizing Will is like an antenna, etc.).
In season three, I heavily believe she's masking.
“Masking is a strategy used by some autistic people, consciously or unconsciously, to appear non-autistic”
Because, as soon as she's drugged, she loosens up. She’s rambling, and showing more of her personality outside of sassiness and being smart… but instead being free.
I also believe she’s gotten used to the party and the crew. Getting to know them, becoming closer. Oftentimes, with autistic people, whenever they get close to people they slowly unmask.
I will NOT tolerate Robin hate EVER.
Either way, she is not seen as normal - as being autistic especially queer in the 80s… IN A SMALL TOWN. No wonder she masked. She even has a girlfriend, Vickie, who is kept a secret because they're gay. Back then it was seen as a disease and disgusting.
DUSTIN HENDERSON: “Toothless”
Dustin has CCD, a genetic bone development disorder that affects teeth. He was bullied because of this, often being called “toothless”.
One of the bullies even threatened to take out the rest of his teeth, which so… ugh!
LUCAS SINCLAIR: Race/ “Midnight”
One of the main reasons Lucas was bullied was because he’s black living in a small town in Indiana. Lucas faces racism so often since they're in the 80s in America. The bullies called him “Midnight” obviously talking about his skin tone. The color of his skin is seen as irregular especially in such a small town.
MAX: Tomboy Skateboarder
The first time we see her, she has already broken a standard, a girl playing video games. This was seen as uncommon and not “girly behavior”. She skateboards, which is also seen as strange, breaking the stereotype of “only boys can skateboard”. Because of her confidence in her behavior and uncommon hobbies for a girl then, she stands out a lot.
AND SO SO MUCH MORE.
RELATIONSHIPS:
SEASON 1 NANCY AND STEVE: Exception that didn’t last
This was the typical 80s romance In season one, people believe that they’d last longer or come back to the surface of water. Eventually, despite Steve's behavior and Nancy’s. Nancy never said I love you and Steve was a jerk to so many, especially Jonathan. But the relationship was so toxic, they broke up.
Lets speedrun through these ships:
Robin & Vickie: Gay Relationship in the 80s
Jonanthan & Nancy: Girlboss x Protective (forgot what this trope is called)
Joyce & Hopper: Both struggling but they connect families (Byers and Hopper) + more
Lucas & Max: Interracial couple & Opposites attract
Dustin & Suzie: Smart x Smart & long distance
—------------
All of these examples are meant to show NONE OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS ARE "NORMAL". They are meant for the target audience of freaks, to allow people to see themselves on screen even though it's a different time period. This show is supposed to break stereotypes and expectations in order to get through to the misunderstood and “freaks”.
As the show got more mainstream, it attracted less "freaks" aka people who feel out of place in the world.
So many have lost sight of the meaning, they criticize people when others "overanalyze” and look past the surface level. Yes, the show is about fighting monsters and family, but that just shows that you don’t try to understand what you watch. This show allows people to theorize - to look closely at the details and the props to discover what comes next. Even if theories are wrong, it helps expand the brain and help people see details to unlock a deeper understanding.
The show basically starts off with the main characters being called freaks, but as they embrace themselves over the show, they become something bigger. They become heroes, they get closer, they have a family “extended”. They were meant to stand out. Therefore irregular ships (not illegal - there's a difference) are perfectly fine. From Jancy and Rovickie, to Byler and Ronance.
It's okay to look deeper, you are meant to. Anyone who says otherwise, doesn’t want to understand or at least try. There's so much effort put into this show - from mannerisms and talking to behavior, eyes, props, set design, and camera direction.
This show is supposed to be deep - its not just about monsters, its about:
Acceptance.
Family.
Love.
The marginalized.
The “Freaks”.
Credits/Inspiration: Byxxrs on tiktok
Sometimes when I go hundreds pages deep into people’s Tumblr archives, I find really funny posts and I weigh the pros and cons of liking/reblogging them.
Pros: I’ll have access to them later because they’re fucking hilarious
Cons: They might think I’m creepy. Despite the fact that it’s public and on the Internet, it is not socially acceptable to let anyone know the extent that you creeped their archives.
I hereby extend blanket permission for anyone to creep on my archive, and to like and reblog posts from it if they want to. It’s really quite flattering.
“it is not socially acceptable”
Wrong. It is not only acceptable but expected here. Adhere to whatever “etiquette” you will on other sites. Share and be shared here.
Yeah, this isn’t a Tumblr thing. Everyone here loves it when they wake up to 97 notifications and they’re all likes and reblogs from the same person of shit you posted five years ago.
I love it when someone is obviously going through a specific tag of mine.
the power of a bowl of rice mixed with some fucking bullshit cannot be overstated
the emotion i just experienced is kind of indescribable
the funniest part of this post to me is that the reblog:like ratio is nearly 1:1. nobody’s just liking everyone who sees this video goes yeah i gotta inflict it on as many people as possible
a reminder that ao3 was created as an archive. not a social media.
ao3 is run on fans’ donations. it’s a nonprofit organization, run by fans, for fans. it has no ads. no capitalism or algorithm bullshit.
ao3 allows works that depict all kind of taboo, morally questionable, disgusting, socially unacceptable subjects, no matter how graphic, how explicit it is being portrayed (that’s what tags, warnings and ratings are for!).
ao3 does not have censorship, nor does ao3 allow censorship.