(( bob has so many probs help him. ))

I'm Conrad / 17 / male and I'm probabbly crying right now.

[4thsun]

[lenoirlivre]

Big hoe energy, yeah definitely

[frigid-fendi]

this is, without a doubt, the worst similarity I saw

[conplicated]

someone please delete this its giving me anxiety

[spellswisp]

summer mood

[benepla-deactivated20180521]

shaggy wearing a knee length flowery dress…..Fred completely naked hiding his junk w a surfboard…..power playing the ghosts

[sergle]

pot-head

[kiwi]

HELP IM SITTING AT THE BARBERSHOP AND THE LORAX NOTICED ME TAKING PICS

[passionpeachy-deactivated202312]

Top 10 Photos Taken Seconds Before Disaster

[jksrdehtjkdfgh93-deactivated202]

SO CUPNOODLE JP RELEASED A VIDEO OF KIKI AS A 17 YEAR OLD SCHOOL GIRL FROM KIKIS DELIVERY SERVICE AND IM LIVING!!!!!

[watacco-deactivated20181130]

“imagine i had i bowl of skittles and three of them could kill you-”

[ruinedchildhood]

[dumbasian-deactivated20170720]

google search: how do i make myself interesting enough for my followers to send me random asks

[wev]

I love boys so much…. I love theater nerd boys…. I love artsy boys…… I love punk boys…… I love bubbly boys…….. I love quiet boys……… I love boys a lot……….

[conplicated]

🍀🌻 I'm alive i guess 🌻🍀

[marketplace]

Made from medical-grade silicone, the Emojibate is completely body safe. Though tinier than any real life “eggplant”, it’s sleek but pleasurable. Whether you’re a beginner looking for something simple and fun for a first toy or just obsessed with emojis, the Emojibate is the toy for you.  [GET IT HERE]

[goodness-gracious13]

This is what the vegans want. This is vegan propaganda

[sergle]

real quick dood

[conplicated]

You've Heard of Validation

Now get ready for: Giving it to me.

[tokijin-deactivated20170926]

[chinesegook]

I reblogged this once and found $999 on the floor.

Reblog the Money Susie and you’ll have money coming your way too 💵💵

[mareya]

Holy shit I just won the lottery this really works

[tomblogger]

How do you find $999 on the floor?

[chinesegook]

I Reblogged The Money Susie Thats How .

[iwiazumi-deactivated20150910]

DO NOT!!! SCROLL PAST!!! THIS!! REALLY!! WORKS!! i didnt really believe in things like these but when i saw it on my dash i thought, well, why not, ive really been needing money for the new game i want to buy anyway. and i hit reblog. the next day my mom gave me $100 in CASH and when i asked her why she said that she just felt like increasing my allowance!!i dont know if shes going to keep on giving me $100 allowance so im reblogging again just to make sure

[coolcud]

Fuck it

[juanfernandova-deactivated20190]

[reverseharem-deactivated2020021]

is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what

[kiefbowl]

That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING

[houroftheantichristwolf]

What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that?

[auntiewanda]

It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot. 

It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for. 

[brithwyr-deactivated20170122]

I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..?

[auntiewanda]

And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters. 

[brithwyr-deactivated20170122]

Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing.

[auntiewanda]

We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine. 

What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do.

This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks: 

Also: 

[feminism-is-radical-deactivated]

He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence.

[dyketales-deactivated20180601]

You can see her butthole for chrissakes

[pmastamonkmonk]

I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.

Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity.

Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs.

Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock.

Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.

[aglassroseneverfades]

This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.

[imin-loveanon-deactivated202006]

@angstymelon