reverse gaslighting where i pretend to know exactly what you are talking about
academic conferences
Three Goblin Art
noise dept.
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

JVL
No title available
Today's Document
RMH

Kaledo Art

shark vs the universe
One Nice Bug Per Day

oozey mess

titsay
Monterey Bay Aquarium

izzy's playlists!

Product Placement
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
taylor price
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
seen from Germany
seen from Lithuania

seen from Singapore

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@countessgradula
reverse gaslighting where i pretend to know exactly what you are talking about
academic conferences
Things that should be easy to explain: what goes into a prospectus
What is, in fact, a nebulous concept that everyone seems to be confused by: what goes into a prospectus
The site is '12ft Ladder' found here:
Show me a 10ft paywall, I’ll show you a 12ft ladder.
When you finally get your degree and go into the real world
a zoom university meme pack created by yours truly to celebrate (approximately) 1 year of remote learning
we’re (or at least i am) nearing 2 years of remote learning now and this post is getting notes again… besties how are we feeling?
Me looking for articles to cite in my paper that I totally procrastinated on
https://twitter.com/academicssay/status/1480183249028751370?s=21
Me waiting to email people until Jan 3 and other people also waiting to email me until Jan 3
If it's anti feminist to point out how white women historically have owned, murdered, and enslaved black people from the very inception of America to the lynchings of the 20th century to the modern equivalent of white women calling the cops on innocent black people, then your feminism fucking sucks lol
bell hooks taught me that love must be at the center of our politics and that revolution could not be possible without love. rest easy bell hooks, thank you for everything
Texas gave up that land so they could keep slavery:
“When Texas sought to enter the Union in 1845 as a slave state, federal law in the United States, based on the Missouri Compromise, prohibited slavery north of 36°30' parallel north. Under the Compromise of 1850, Texas surrendered its lands north of 36°30' latitude.”
Tell me more about how critical race theory shouldn’t be taught in school.
I am a grown ass man and I just learned about this 5 minutes ago. Fuck everything about trying to hide the sins of our past.
Critical Race theory, as it actually is, is a high level class taught in Law School. It focuses on how laws in the US that are supposed to be equally affect everyone, actually disproportionately affect marginalized people.
What the is displayed in OP's image is US history as it is related to slavery.
When certain conservatives are crying about "Critical Race Theory," they are complaining that they don't want certain kinds of history taught in school. Anything that might make people feel bad. Making history nice and palatable instead of actually acknowledging the messy realities.
The making of those past mistakes isn't the problem. It's the fact that so many people are unwilling to own up to those decisions. By making it problematic to teach about certain aspects of history, they will be able sweep under the rug atrocities that are still effecting people to this day.
Have you ever noticed that the students with the most bull-headed conservative views tend to have the hardest time passing a freshman level English class?
There’s a lot of ways to study literary theory, and this is what you’re first introduced to in university. You move from a generalised interpretive approach to a more specialised one. You have cultural, post-colonial, psychoanalytical, feminist, and evolutionary .etc literary theory.
You can’t have conservative literary theory because it’s such a nebulous concept. The closest thing would be historicism, where you could examine the literature in the context of the political movements of the time that influenced its writing. This was my field because I think it’s the only approach that you can’t ignore in any interpretation. You can argue that almost any other theory may be irrelevant in the interpretation of a particular book, but you can’t argue that the book wasn’t written at a time in the past that was different to today.
And I certainly noticed that more conservative people tended to gravitate towards this field, because conservatives think this is what they’re doing when they do things like argue against trigger warnings because “It was written in a different time”. It’s not.
Unfortunately the vast amount of authors throughout history have been liberal or at least critical of those in power, all the way back to Gilgamesh. Also conservative writers are just…terrible. Bootlicking produces the driest, most mind numbingly boring art imaginable. Basically they discover that nothing agrees with their pre-conceived notions about either the past or literature.
They could analyse the liberal interpretations of the works, while still holding their conservative views because it’s nothing to do with them, it’s about the author and the time they lived. But in general they either try to shoe horn in a conservative interpretation that doesn’t fit and so has to be absurdly, convolutedly applied, or they’ll give a criticism of the work’s liberal message, which isn’t the right kind of criticism for literary analysis.
Unsurprisingly enough, they suck at college level history as well, for exactly the same reasons.
Artist: Ilustratorium Sara Szewczyk
academia is 50% crying, 20% research, and 30% coming up with funny titles for every paper that you write
To my knowledge, there are four grad student programs in the US that have either gone or strike or will go on strike: Columbia
University of Chicago
Harvard
Illinois State University
Duke, as of right now, isn’t calling a strike, but they are calling for a fair contract.
Something is going on in terms of grad student labor – I don’t know WHAT, but things are shifting.
We are acting this week at the Universities of California to have our graduate student researched union recognized in a way that includes people on fellowship funding as well as those listed as “trainees.” This includes postdocs.
(Forgive my generalizations, but here’s how it’s affecting me as a California university PhD student researcher in a STEM field. Many researchers in our union are from humanities and social sciences and funding works slightly differently, but much of the same rights are needed!)
For those who aren’t aware, most science graduate programs rely on “students” enrolled in Masters or PhD programs but function less like students and more as employees. They are often given the worst rights of both groups. It is both common and tacitly (or explicitly) expected that in order to make adequate research progress and be deemed worthy of the degree we work towards, a 40+ hour work week is minimum (laughs in 60+). We work in research groups that can range from 2 people to 20-30, all underneath a single professor (research adviser) who is effectively our Boss. Our advisers are rarely if ever trained in management or mentorship and often treat their lab workers reprehensibly. Even in the best scenarios, there are few codified expectations or protections for graduate student researchers.
For example, when the University of California sent their students home at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, graduate students were told to keep working. When they sent their employees home, graduate students were told to keep working. There were no safety guidances, and health concerns were ignored.
The greatest research progress–technology, medicine, energy science, etc–happens only because of the back breaking labor of trainee scientists: graduate students and postdocs. Postdocs are people who have just received their PhD and go on to spend about two years working for a new research professor as a kind of “trail period” before they themselves can start their careers are research advisers.
Graduate students at some universities are promised housing, health care, and living wages. Postdocs rarely are afforded the same benefits.
Our union wants that to change.
The University of California has refused to acknowledge the newly-formed union for several reasons, but partly because they don’t want to extend protections to trainees and graduate students on fellowships.
A fellowship usually comes from outside of the university–from organizations such as the National Science Foundation, for example. These fellowships are basically just checks that a scientific organization writes to your research adviser that says “hey, instead of making the university pay for your student, we’ll foot the bill for their salary.” When you have a fellowship, you’re not suddenly an employee of the National Science Foundation. You are still an employee&student of the university you attend.
Universities are looking for whatever way they can to escape any meaningful changes to the living wage and benefits they give their workers–workers who give and sacrifice so much out of passion and pride for science, engineering, and the humanities. They don’t want to give us ombudsmen or impartial negotiators and investigations into misconduct.
UC Santa Cruz has their walk out today.
UC Irvine will follow on Thursday, and many other campuses are joining UAW as well.
It’s time for nationwide changes to the unspoken cruelties of graduate student research life.
Pay attention – Call your University Presidents – Call your state representatives – Stand in Solidarity.
End union busting.