CURSE on Spotify

PR's Tumblrdome
wallacepolsom
$LAYYYTER
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

pixel skylines
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Today's Document
occasionally subtle
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Sade Olutola
Show & Tell
Jules of Nature
d e v o n
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Xuebing Du
Claire Keane
Game of Thrones Daily

#extradirty

JBB: An Artblog!

izzy's playlists!
seen from Thailand
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Jamaica

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@cursemag
CURSE on Spotify
The very talented Ashley Guyot made this digital painting for “Lollie Belongs to the Mountains,” a story by Lila Gray from the latest issue of port.man.teau. See her process above and get a digital or hardcopy of the mag to read the full story.
port.man.teau vol. IV out now!
After putting our hearts and souls into this issue, we’re so excited to present our newest collection of affective, boundary-pushing literature and art.
Order a print or digital version now.
Dear Readers,
In honor of next week's release of portmanteau volume IV, you can now read full versions of all past issues of CURSE & port.man.teau online!
FUN FACT: #CURSE: The Social Media Issue comes with a playlist that you can listen to while reading: sptfy.com/bw
Go to the Issues tab now.
An interview with writer Lisa Butterworth
Lisa Butterworth is the West Coast editor of BUST Magazine, Senior editor at DAME, a regular contributor to numerous publications like Nylon and Time Out New York, and recently helped launch the biannual magazine, Tidal. If she sounds really cool, that's because she is. She answered some of my questions about what it's like to live and write in L.A.
Since you started writing as a career, and maybe even before then, what were some of your long term writing goals? What of those have you achieved and what long term projects are still in the works for you?
To tell you the truth, I’m not a very goal-oriented person. But I’d always dreamed of being a magazine editor, ever since I was a Sassy-readin’ young’un, so joining the masthead at BUST, my favorite glossy, was a pretty big deal. Now my goal is to just continue making a living as a writer and editor and so far that’s working out all right. And I’m pretty sure I’ve got a young adult novel hiding out in my brain somewhere so I guess sitting down and getting that out is one of the long-term projects I think about now.
What are some publications you've always admired?
BUST has been my favorite magazine since the very first day I discovered it while working at Borders books the year after I graduated college. The issue featured Janeane Garofalo and I knew any magazine that put her on the cover was a magazine for me. I also love New York and parts of the New Yorker. There have been some really great indie mags popping up lately too, like Cherry Bombe, Got a Girl Crush, The Gentlewoman, and Gather. I could probably find something to admire about any publication. I love words!
I feel like you really have to weed through a lot of "filler" on the internet to get to the valid, meaningful pieces on pop culture, feminism, and current events. What is your take on the current media landscape and how does that affect what you write for DAME or BUST?
We are definitely living in a world of constant informational bombardment that can be exhausting if we don’t keep it in check. Luckily there are a number of websites I turn to, and even more writers who I admire and trust—Ann Friedman, Kate Harding, Roxane Gay—which makes getting to meaningful content easier. I’m certainly not browsing TMZ hoping to find something that speaks to me.
Has writing for BUST changed the way you looked at women in the media?
I think I’ve always looked at how women are treated in the media with a critical eye, which is why BUST felt like such an oasis in the first place. Of course, working for a publication that focuses on positive coverage of women in pop culture sharpened my sensitivities to the abominable way we’re treated by so many other outlets in print, online, in television and film. But I prefer to focus on the good stuff!
You mentioned that it's a good time for writers to be in LA, and that you wouldn't have said that four or five years ago. What changed?
L.A. is having a moment. There’s an air of excitement here. I used to think New York was everything, that to have a successful writing career, at least in the publishing industry, you had to live there, but I don’t feel that way anymore. I think some of it has to do with how great TV has gotten for women lately, so many of the folks helming female-friendly shows—Mindy Kaling, Amy Poehler—live in L.A. and so many of those shows employ some crazy talented writers. I think that’s infusing the city with a whole new life.
I keep hearing that Los Angeles has a certain energy to it, which encourages people to fulfill their dreams. Do you relate to this at all? How does this differ from the "energy" in New York?
That’s interesting and I’m not sure I can say that I do relate to it. For me, New York has that “fulfilling your dreams” energy, it’s where you work your ass off until you get what you want, then you want more and work your ass off all over again. In L.A. the energy seems much more mellow. People work hard here, but they take time for themselves too. Whereas in New York I might be in the office 12 hours a day, in L.A. I cut out at a reasonable time…I take my dog for a walk, I go to the farmers market, I meet friends and make dinner. The work-life balance here trumps the East coast in every way.
Do you adjust your tone when you write for different publications (for example TimeOut versus BUST) in terms of style or "rules"?
Definitely. Every outlet I write for has its own voice, and I try to incorporate that into whatever piece I’m writing. I like to think my personal style is the dominant voice, no matter who I’m writing for, but I do adapt it to make sure it resonates with a magazine or site’s particular readers.
What have been some of the best interview experiences you've had? What about the most challenging?
I’ve been so lucky in terms of the interview opportunities I’ve had. I mean, try telling my 14-year-old self that I’d one day talk to Kim Gordon about punk and fashion, or that I’d get to chat with Kathleen Hanna about feminism and the influence of Riot Grrrl and my head would’ve exploded with utter disbelief and joy. I typically get to interview folks I genuinely admire and am inspired by, which is the most I could ask for. Of course, interviewing famous, or almost-famous, people is not without its challenges. They get asked the same questions all of the time, so breaking through that can be really difficult. And often there’s an incredibly strict time limit, which, when Dolly Parton’s publicist says you have 10 minutes, can really make you sweat. But then Dolly breaks into song halfway through and you can’t believe your good fortune that this is your life.
When writing a feature story, are you ever confronted with doubt? If so, what does it take to get you back on track and to honestly assess your writing?
Ummm, ALWAYS! Always confronted with doubt, every sentence I write. Aren’t we all? No? Just me? Hmmm well, what’s really wonderful about doubt is when you hit the right note in a piece and that doubt turns to confidence. Debbie Stoller, BUST’s EIC, engrained in me that editing (and writing for that matter) is like putting a puzzle together. And when those pieces click you can feel it, no matter how much doubt you’ve been harboring. And to get there, you just have to keep at it. A story won’t fix itself. Anne Lamott’s book Bird by Bird taught me that crucial lesson. You just have to keep at it, one word, sentence, paragraph at a time.
For me, getting pieces edited is in some ways a blessing, but at times it can be difficult to relinquish control, accept criticism, and manage relationships with editors who are often super busy. Have you encountered similar obstacles? In what ways have you succeeded in navigating the world of publishing? (Aside from your obvious success, which speaks for itself!)
I’ve got a bit of control freak in me, for sure. But once I realized what an incredible asset a talented editor is, and how they can really tease out the essence of a story or my writing in ways I couldn’t even see, I realized that taking each round of feedback as a learning experience is much more beneficial than getting bummed out about it. That’s not to say that I haven’t worked with editors that are far too busy to give constructive criticism, or have a style of editing that I ultimately don’t agree with, but those experiences are few and far between. Becoming an editor myself also completely changed my relationship with the editing process. It made me realize that editors have a much bigger picture to think about and work toward than I do as the writer of one specific piece. It helped me to not take edits so dang personally.
Do you ever write fiction or poetry?
I haven’t written poetry since my days of high school stonerism. And it’s been awhile since I tried my hand at fiction but it’s definitely on my to-do list.
What are your feelings about print versus online media?
I love print. It’s what I grew up with. It’s what made me want to become a writer. Poring over the pages of Sassy magazine as a teenager helped shape me into the adult I am today. I used to love nothing more than scouring newsstands for something I hadn’t seen before, a cover that stood out. I still get psyched when any one of my numerous magazine subscriptions shows up in my mailbox. I have bookshelves full of my favorites. But obviously the world of print media is changing. I hope it will never go away (I’m doing my best to keep it around, in fact I just helped launch a new biannual magazine called Tidal; the paper is so nice the pages even feel good when you turn them!). I think that online media affords us a whole new world of opportunities though. Now writers can get instant feedback from readers about their stories. Essays can be written in response to opinion pieces and intelligent conversations about important cultural issues can evolve in real time, something print could never offer.
Blog Tour 2014!
As part of Blog Tour 2014, I've been asked to answer a few simple questions about my writing process. Hopefully, if this goes as planned, you can follow the links back to other blogs and learn about some great up and coming writers. Thanks to Dan Pontius for including me in this project.
1. What are you working on now?
A song and a short story. I publish a literary zine and I'm trying to see what it's like for the writers to write within my guidelines. I guess you can call it flash fiction because of the word limit, though I'm usually pretty forgiving when people exceed that. I'm also writing a bunch of reviews for restaurants I've never been to (for my day job).
2. How does your work differ from others of the genre?
It's less frequent and more amateur? I have miles to go before I'd say I'm defying genres. I mostly write nonfiction and I have a Journalism background, and I will say that I like to focus on bringing less gossipy, click-bait type work into the world. There's definitely a balance to be found between creative nonfiction and straight-up reporting and I'm often trying to find that balance.
When I look for writers or stories to publish for my zines, I like to see pieces that are innovative. Throughout most of our academic lives we're told that there are rules for writers, especially Journalists, and though those rules have been broken by the greats before us, not everyone can do it. I disagree. I think academic settings should encourage breaking literary or journalistic rules as much as possible. Whether through my own writing or the work I publish, I hope to bring more weird and creative writing into the public sphere.
3. Why do you write what you write?
I heard Stephen Chbosky speak this year at the LA Times Festival of Books and he talked about how all writers go through this stage where they can recognize good writing but they can't yet emulate it. I'm continuing to write so that I'm not always stuck in that place. I'm also continuing to read as much as I can and as often as I can. I like to study other people's work. Even if it ultimately won't inform my own writing, I want to know everything else that is out there, including both work from my peers and work from super established writers. I want to be part of the greater literary community and that requires being respectful to all the other members.
Also, and this kind of echoes what I said in the last question, there's some really lame stuff on the internet these days. Journalism is getting a bad name because photos of celebrities wearing yoga pants are making headlines on Yahoo and whatnot. We can do better.
4. How does your writing process work?
I'm definitely more productive in the morning. If I start writing, even if I really don't feel like it, I can totally get sucked into it. Beer or coffee helps. I just have to force myself to start. If it gets too weird or I feel too close to it I'll leave it for a few hours or until the next day if I can. When I'm finished I rewrite it completely or edit over and over again. You really need to give yourself distance from your writing before sending it off into the world.
Blog Tour 2014 continues next Monday, 8/11 on the Stripped to Sentiment blog run by my friend, Zach Fischer, a part time writer who abandons his work as quickly as
by any other name
Holden. Lolita. Raskolinikov. Sick Boy. Hester.
Certain character's names are unforgettable— but too often I find myself turning to the Internet to find out the name of a protagonist, even those from books I've read recently.
If a name is unforgettable, what does that say about the character? Maybe selecting the right name is the mark of a talented writer, and with that name will come a strong, well-developed hero or heroine. Or, maybe the name is intentionally generic because it doesn't define the character, or its insignificance says something greater about that person's role in the novel's universe. Maybe it doesn't make any difference at all, and we associate a character's strength with their name regardless of what that name might be.
Whatever the situation, I can't imagine an author taking the naming of character lightly. Faulkner's famous "Kill your darlings," quote reveals how invested we are in our written creations, and I imagine naming a child and naming a character in a book involves comparable time and consideration. A bad name could limit their potential. It could change how they are perceived by others. The decision is also often final—unless you're working on an early draft—you're probably stuck with what you picked.
If you're lucky, a good name might occur to you without much effort—maybe one day you'll hear it on the radio and it'll click. Your protagonist might even share a name with someone significant: a beloved character in an old TV show or someone you knew in the past.
There is no set answer, no perfect equation, but I do believe that people have a certain sense of when something just fits. What's your method for picking names for people in your stories? What are the names of some of your favorite characters, or some of your least favorite? Tell me on Facebook or email me: [email protected].
Write me with any questions or inquiries regarding submitting a story to be featured on the blog. Have a great week!
-Rachael
Image by Loui Jover via Homegirl London
Heroic Motivations
guest post by Ben Parson
What makes a man wear a mask and fight evil?
I'll ask that another way: Why do any of us do anything at all? Seriously, what could possibly be so important, so validating that it would warrant the effort of getting out of bed and making choices?
Like any journey or heroic voyage, getting out of bed is about one thing: clarity. We wake up, plunge headlong into a world of unforgiving trials and aggression to finally return to our safe and comfortable beds with a clearer and more confident notion of self; maybe somewhere along the line we defeated a cyclops or wrestled a wolf that was trying to eat the world, but these are really just details. We are all of us characters—or heroes if it’s a good day—asking the same question: “Who am I?” What makes each of us unique and interesting is the manner in which we ask that question, so I reiterate: What makes man wear a mask and fight evil?
Superheroes provide me with equal parts clarity and contradiction. Times when I feel stunted or confused by the milieu of adult life are when I need Batman the most, or maybe even Wolverine, or Hawkeye, or Dr. Strange—you get the point. However, my desperate binges inevitably end with the same feeling; once the grand emotion and swashbuckle has passed, I‘m left with self-defeating dictators who destroy and contradict the very communities they attempt to protect and safe-guard (I also tend to over-analyze at these moments). But I keep going back, time and time again. The clarity I derive isn’t the grand emotion or even the swashbuckle, it’s simpler and quieter than that; to explain this, I can think of no better example than Darkwing Duck. Just bear with me.
Darkwing Duck (a.k.a, Drake Mallard) was the ostentatious, self-aggrandizing, and hard boiled (ugh) hero who defended the city of St. Canard every Saturday morning. His modus operandi pulled from all the dark classics of crime fighters like The Shadow, Dick Tracy, of course the Batman, and a slightly less appreciated hero who I will come to in a moment. In his very first appearance, Darkwing is shown to be capable to a degree but aimless; he pursues popularity and fame with no real goal or focus for his abilities. His world is completely changed when he meets, and ultimately adopts, Gosalyn, a young girl orphaned by the villains of the first episode (you weren’t expecting this anthropomorphic duck cartoon to get dark?). Both Darkwing’s motivation as well as the persona of Drake Mallard are born when he sings Gosalyn to sleep, and in one tender moment the hero finds purpose as well as himself; purpose and self are one in the same.
Am I straining your attention? Okay, let’s get away from ducks for a moment. Zorro is cool, right? He's essentially equal parts Batman, Indiana Jones, and the Scarlet Pimpernel—how could you not think he’s cool? However, he is not one of the most vivid characters in all pop-culture—at least not until 1998. The Mask of Zorro is a fantastic film (don’t mention its sequel, my brain could potentially melt); it has an amazing cast, great writing, a director who specializes in home runs (cough::Goldeneye, Casino Royale::cough), and was widely popular. But why? Sure, Zorro was a common enough hero during the 50’s and 60’s, but how does that become an oscar nominated blockbuster at the end of the century? The same reason that for the last two decades the escapades of Darkwing Duck have held some level of gravity in my subconscious. Zorro is shown to be the father of young baby girl (a lullaby scene strangely reminiscent to that of Darkwing) and the film’s conflict begins when that child is taken from him: he loses purpose as well as his sense of identity as a result of his daughter’s abduction, and for the rest of the film he trains a successor to take on the mask.
Let’s return to the original question. What makes a man wear a mask and fight evil? At the outset, it’s a really silly idea—too far from anything at all familiar to those of us who struggle with getting out of bed. What intrigues me as a writer is the challenge inherent in concepts like this one: how do you find the humanity in the fantastic, because, like anything to spawn from our collective brain juice, the humanity is always there. A man wears a mask and fights crime because he’s a father, because he has something worth protecting, because there exists something so precious in his life that doing objectively stupid or morally contradicting swashbuckling nonsense is a matter of course. When characters are born in our minds they’re superheroes: larger than life, exciting, invincible, and vague. But rather than striving for some type of desperate complication that must be true simply because of its intricacy, I believe we should steer into the slide.
Find a simple truth for your hero, find the thing that pushes them into the world and puts a mask on their face—complexity and authenticity grow from simple seeds, things we all know and share as truth. The question may be different for each of us, but we are looking for the same answer.
--
For the forum, write a short scene that contains a simple but defining moment for you or your character. Real or fiction.
Lost Generations
“Adolescence is a new birth”—G. Stanley Hall
I reread Catcher in the Rye this weekend for the first time since high school, and I must say at whatever cost that I got really into it. Salinger manages to strike that perfect balance: writing for adults through the mind of a teenager. Holden is 16, but a lot of his experiences are adult experiences; some of his actions are childish but his thoughts are bitterly self aware. He doesn’t realize the extent of his instability, which almost makes him more mature, but at the same time he feels isolated and isn’t capable of seeing beyond his own (often insular) world. I guess that can be a characteristic of someone at any age.
Reading this book again, I didn’t have those cringe-filled moments that often accompany re-watching shows or movies from when you were a kid. I was reminded of how I felt when I read certain lines for the first time, but it was a distinctly different experience.
Reading Catcher in the Rye also brought into question why certain books are given to high school students, almost as rule. I’ve always assumed that what I was assigned in high school was a book intended for “young adults," but I don’t know if that’s actually part of the agenda. In high school we read a lot of dystopian novels, or novels that dealt with moral dilemmas. Sure, we were “coming of age,” but any number of subjects can inform that experience, and any of those subjects can be meaningful at different stages in life.
At 14, 15, or 16, you’re in the midst of experiencing what is largely accepted as the most crucial stage in life, and ‘young adult’ novels can demystify your experiences. Depending on to what extent you were coddled as a kid, though, your coming of age could have happened at any time.
I do firmly believe that from age 14-17 is where the collective unconscious draws significant memories and houses its nostalgia. Regardless of where we were mentally, many of us share similar circumstantial and emotional truths from that time and to relive that is cathartic.
Revisiting those experience seems to be more popular than ever. Strangely, though, the concept of "teenager" hasn't always existed—it was borne out the industrial revolution when many kids had to grow up quickly, choose political sides, struggle to find employment and purpose, and decide whether they were really ready to give up partying for good. Many were not.
Not only is adolescence a time we obsess over, but it’s a time for obsessing; It’s a time to join or incite a movement, which is often accompanied by a little red book. I use the term YA loosely, but it has really come to mean a few different things. Unless the language is decidedly easier, we shortchange coming of age books by labeling them for young adults. Who doesn't want to hold onto youth or at least relive it on occasion?
This week in our forum, spend 45 minutes or less writing a short story about adolescence (or adolescents) with only one scene. Real or fictional.
Quote discovered via teeangefilm.com.
Holden Caulfield illustration via Mibba.com
Sketches of Cities
New York
New York is a ballroom. Underneath constellations dancers exhaust a manic waltz. I look up and release my shoulders with a breath that’s drawn out for effect.
New York is the dizzying red of blood in the middle of the night down a side street in Brooklyn. New York is so big and sometimes New York loses you when you’re alone and you have no place to sleep and New York gets brisker the longer it takes your friend to pick up the phone.
New York is that place we went that time for fish tacos and margaritas and we were bad and got two each and nothing has ever tasted better or sweeter. New York is that time the waiter walked away because he thought we’d ordered enough food and we still wanted more and that made us laugh. New York is the walk back to your apartment and we take a detour and sit by the water and I’m a little drunk and I want to grow up and be just like you. New York is your home, you say, swinging your legs back and forth over the rock ledge and I believe you.
New York is that big window next to your bed and I watch Freaks and Geeks and eat craisins out of your pantry and make tea and spill half on the counter and fall asleep before you get home. You get into bed and the light from your phone is bright and clean, and you eat ice cream next to me and I pretend to sleep. New York is so annoying, but we haven’t slept in the same bed since we were kids so I keep quiet.
“We’ll always have New York” we joke, and it’s supposed to be cheesy and we fake-yell it to each other as we break up over several weeks. New York, where we conclude we travel well together and won’t take the subway for three days straight and we’ll see how far that gets us and we’ll save so much money. New York is where we drank tall boys under the scaffolding because we didn’t have a place to sleep and we had to think. New York is where we woke up the next gray morning on the top bunk in a hostel and I have never felt so grateful to know you and wake up here and have the world awaiting us right outside that window.
New York is right outside that window I think when my alarm goes off at six but I can’t see anything other than white falling into white. And when my eyelashes are coated in white ice that mixes with my mascara New York is a blurry Narnia and I turn toward the warm green orbs in the distance and walk forward through a blizzard. New York curls around Prospect Park and goes deep into the ground and across a terminal of dirt that glitters as you walk through it.
New York whistles and coughs into the subway station before it spits you out into the current of briefcases and charcoal suits and brown, clicking heels out of an Adrian Tomine sketch. New York is exactly what you think it is.
For this week's exercise, write about a town or city using one or many vignettes. This can be a real or fictional place.
New media doesn't replace old media. It changes our relationship with it and our approach to it.
This thought, which came from Jon Christensen, editor of Boom Magazine, was borne out of a discussion on publishing literary magazines at the LA Times Festival of Books.
We all knew, sitting in a lecture hall at USC on an overcast Saturday, that the question of sustainability (of print media, of literary magazines, of writing as a career), would come up sooner than later.
Four out of five panelists preached optimism about the future of the lit mag. New media doesn't replace old media. I've believed for a long time that publishing physical literary magazines is kind of a Luddite thing to do. If that's true, then so are many of the things I love: reading exceptionally well-crafted stories, the tactile sensation of flipping a page, and bringing writers together.
For as many people as there are developing or subscribing to new technology, there are also many emerging young librarians, people who make paper zines, and people who still buy and love real books. Who says these are mutually exclusive activities?
A student at USC's MFA program, which will be completely dissolved by 2016, asked the panel what they could offer to the generation of writers who want to make it work, who are learning about the craft of Journalism and writing yet are constantly being told that it’s not a viable path.
The panelists mostly agreed that a passion and need to write was enough to justify the pursuit. Moderator Bruce Bauman said he simply doesn't believe all the pessimism about the state of the print and literary world. Panelist Robert Scheer offered that if she wrote about her experience as an MFA student facing opposition, he’d publish it on his website, Truthdig. Not a bad offer.
Walking through a congested crowd as the gloomy day turned bright and almost brutally hot, I walked by countless indie presses, writers and readers buying, selling, and talking about books and magazines. Teenagers stood in hour-long lines to get John Green's autograph (author of "The Fault in Our Stars"), poets huddled in corners of booths reading their work aloud, and participants took turns writing short stories on a typewriter. The future of print media isn't as hopeless as we might think.
At the festival, I was also lucky enough to hear Stephen Chbosky, author of “The Perks of Being a Wallflower" speak. He introduced a new writer, Ava Dallaira, whose book “Love Letters for the Dead” came out this month. Chbosky said he has a near-foolproof method for starting books and stories. Write down every idea for your novel or a story that you have; empty out your brain. Then, ask five to ten people you trust to tell you which one would work the best. He admitted that sometimes you just have a need to tell a certain story, even if that one didn’t get the most votes, but I think it’s worth testing out either way.
For this week’s writing exercise, write down all of your story or novel ideas. Empty out your brain. Share them in our writer’s forum, and of course, offer each other feedback on the ideas. If you get feedback early enough, write the beginning of that story, but if not, I think lists themselves are fun and interesting to read.
I also want to share some of the literary magazines I learned about this week that take submissions and like to publish new writers. Their advice was simple: read the submission guidelines and follow them as closely as possible:
Zyzzyva
Rattling Wall
Black Clock
Boom
Also, not a magazine but a great resource for writers: Pen Center USA
Have a great week!
-Rachael
Last night I went to the Griffith Observatory for their monthly "star party," where the public is invited to line up and look through telescopes at the top of the southern slope of Mount Hollywood among replicas of Galileo. The observatory is open late, allowing you to walk through pristine exhibit halls and learn about our solar system.
I've hiked the mountain in daylight many times, but in the dark it took on a completely new meaning. Instead of the usual landscape of buildings, it was tiny lights the size of pinpricks blinking constantly, a sea of pale yellow illuminating major roads. Walking around the museum at night reminded me of running around my high school after hours, like if you wandered down the hall to open your locker while the spring concert was going on—surreal and forbidden.
Nightfall changes everything; I hardly recognize my street as the same place from morning to night; the problems that consume us as we try to fall asleep seem insignificant when met with daylight. I remember school dances held on days that we were dismissed early—the teachers would try and block the giant gym windows, but seeing the bright white sun peeking in from the corners of the pale vinyl shades made everyone hyper-aware of the moment.
What is it about nightfall, regardless of the actual hour, that makes us unsatisfied with a day's work, brings us relief, or makes us uninhibited? Why are innocuous settings suddenly terrifying (or more beautiful) at night?
This week, spend no more than one hour writing a piece that is heavily reliant on nighttime as an element. Real or fictional. Click here to visit the writing prompts section.
night sky photo by Jason Kinnan via Science Blogs
My New Favorite Place to Write
After two years and $10 million, the Brand Library and Art Center in Glendale, CA, which was converted from an early 20th century mansion, reopened this weekend to reveal some beautiful renovations. The mansion was originally home to Leslie Coombs Brand, who is credited for developing Glendale, and his wife, Mary Louise Brand.
The library is spacious with a lot of natural light pouring in, and several rooms with oversized armchairs perfect for studying or writing. When the library was first renovated in 1956, few were concerned with preserving the original architecture, but the most recent renovation was designed to uncover some of the original structures and details. Throughout the process, a plaster pedestal with the initials "LCB" for Leslie Coombs Brand was discovered behind a hidden door, as well as hand-painted ceilings in several rooms. While the pedestal has been restored, the ceiling paint was too fragile and had to be removed. However, a historical restoration firm called Spectra was able to repaint the ceilings to match the original. They sprayed water on the old paint, which gave them a more accurate idea of what the original colors were.
The collection mostly consists of art and architecture books, LPs and CDs. I really look forward to returning on a day that is less crowded, and settling into the Brand's old dining room or living room. They also have a beautiful art gallery, art studios, and recital halls.
Where do you go to write or get work done? Find that place, do a free write for no more than 30 minutes to get a head start on a piece that you've been wanting to write, and post the results in the writing prompts section.
Have a great week!
-Rachael
I used to love decoupaging notebooks and other things in my house with pictures I'd cut out of fashion magazines; the texture and shine to a finished collage really appealed to me. I would try to evoke some sort of feeling with these collages, although they usually just reflected frenzied chaos.
I don't want to ruin anything in my house anymore with a shitty collage, let alone cut up a sacred print magazine that cost me a precious six dollars (!) but I still have the desire to capture feelings visually. It's hard for me to justify projects like this now, namely because I over think everything, but also because most of us, now that we're no longer kids, need to give our art and writing a purpose. I love writing a creating, but I have to admit that I think about what will happen to a piece of writing once I produce it. What does it achieve just by existing? Who will eventually read it and how will they interpret it? What have I gained? Expression in itself can be satisfying, necessary, and important, shared or not shared, but sometimes it's hard to just let something sit, and wonder if it's good or if you accomplished what you set out to do.
As you may know and as I recently learned, fashion designers will create collages or 'mood boards,' often times for inspiration. Learning about mood boards has reminded me that this type of creating does have a purpose. Decoupaging, at least the way I've been doing it, won't necessarily give me some standalone artwork that I'd want to share, but it could inform some other work of art, story, song, etc.
This week, create a story that doesn't necessarily have a beginning or an end, but establishes a mood through the details, characters, and/or setting. Spend no more than 30 minutes on this exercise. If you're feeling super crafty, or if you're not into writing this week, create an actual, visual mood board online or with paper and share it with us. I'd also like to hear from you about why you create. Do you think art and stories, regardless of whether or not we share them, have a purpose? Tell me in the comments.
I look forward to seeing what you come up with. There are new stories to read in our forum, so check those out, write your own, and have a great week!
-Rachael
Featured Mood Board by Helen S. Stanley via her blog, Helen's Wardrobe.
Blogs That Will Actually Add Value to Your Day
A lot of blogs make me sad. I feel like we have a tendency to push around useless information, to over-analyze, to give too much weight to the words and actions of a celebrity. We're obsessed with creating platforms for argument and debate, which sounds positive, but it's really not. We're obsessed with proving each other wrong to cover our own asses, with attacking writers for their opinions, and ganging up on strangers in the comments section, just for the sake of it.
With any major media outlet there is pressure to generate information constantly. By now, the hundreds of thousands of followers of a certain website expect several share-worthy Op/Eds a day. I think it's great and vital to analyze what you see on screen and to not buy in to the weird unrealistic standards of the media. I worry, though, that this is having a very negative effect on us, and that we're under the impression that music videos and commercials have more power to influence us on a political level than they actually do. No doubt, some media influences us deeply and insidiously, but there are ways to combat that without giving insignificant moments prolonged limelight.
Thankfully, some blogs are doing it right: I get updates from them maybe twice a day at the most and I find value in what they write about. The staff takes creative approaches to subject matter and analyzes things in non-hotheaded ways. I respect their audience (for the most part). I think you can tell a lot about a website based on the comments section, though I'm practically retired from reading the comments on any website ever again. Usually, if you have a lot of readers who respect you enough that the majority of comments reflect that, you're doing something right. Here are some blogs I love:
1. The Hairpin
2. Rookie
3.The Airship This is the blog for Black Balloon Publishing. It's a great resource for writers and anyone who loves literature.
4. Ann Friedman's Blog. She makes awesome pie charts!
5. The Society Pages Many blogs including Jezebel cross-post pieces from here. Most of the writers have a PhD in sociology and the articles are well-thought-out and educational.
6. Medium ! A mix of personal essays, opinion pieces, and fiction. Anyone can contribute, but the best stuff is often recognized and recommended by other readers and I've read some amazing pieces here. Writers, you should post something!
7. Earth Wind and Unhired
How about you? What blogs do you look to for inspiration that don't make you want to bang your head against a wall? Let me know! And as always, check out this week's writing prompt, read each other's work, and email me with anything at all.
See you next week!
-Rachael
10 Questions for Luke O'Neil
Luke O'Neil is a regular contributor to the Boston Globe, Esquire, Mediaite, MTV Buzzworthy, and one of my personal favorite publications, Bullett Media. His work has appeared in the Village Voice, Vice, Slate, The New Republic, the LA Times, Alternative Press, the Wall Street Journal, Gawker, and Dazed Magazine.
Luke answered some questions I had on writing about pop culture, inappropriate Tweets, and self doubt.
How do you define success in your writing?
Success can either be outwardly or inwardly perceived, depending on the case. If something is widely shared, that's great, but it doesn't always mean it's good. Often times something I spent ten minutes crapping out is a lot more popular than things I spent a week researching and reporting. It's the latter that makes me happier though. The satisfaction of a job well done, even if no one else really sees it. There's also the thrill of having your peers and people you respect like something you've done. Sometimes no one will react to something I've written besides a handful or friends or other writers I admire, and that's good enough.
Also the fact that I can make a living. That's about it. Work, as I always tell younger writers who ask me for advice, is work.
One thing I've always admired about you as a writer is the way you cover pop culture. You don't completely buy into it, but you don't completely chastise it either. It's creative and refreshing. Are you fascinated or repulsed by pop culture? Or both? Do you choose which aspects of pop culture you'll write about or are these things assigned to you?
Thanks, that's nice of you to say. Funny enough, this is something I just addressed in a piece this week about the whole #normcore thing that everyone was talking about for a while there: http://bit.ly/1hZIbNt
First off, however, as someone writing about culture, music, film, whatever, online, you can't really afford to focus only on high brow or esoteric material. You have to cast a wide net when you're looking for things to write about, or taking assignments. For the most part, at this point for me, the things I write about tend to come from me pitching to editors. But it works the other way around often enough. The beauty in freelancing, or having enough work if you're lucky, is that you can say no to things you really don't want to cover at all. That said, there are a few publications I write for where I don't always like the stuff that much personally, but you have to approach it objectively and understand why the people who do like it do. Or you can just completely shit on it. Either one!
Back to the normcore thing though. I think, personally, that disdaining pop culture is ten times lamer than liking it. Oh, wow, you think Miley Cyrus is bad? What a brave stance. Popular music is popular for a reason. A lot of times it's awful, but it's not de facto awful. A critic recognizes the distinction, and can talk about why that is. A good one anyway.
In the same vein, do you think that to be a successful journalist, one should expect to write about celebrities at some point in their career?
I think I addressed this above, but yes. It's funny, I write for some sites that are perceived to be more cutting edge or whatever, and if I post about a celebrity people will complain sometimes. Meanwhile I'll have just posted about some brand new band or artist or author and no one clicked on it or shared it. It's a necessary evil for most sites. We need people to look at the site or we'll go out of business. It's the rare publication that can pay the bills on avant garde.
To me, it seems that you're not afraid of writing "offensive" things in a public forum, specifically Twitter. I know if I asked my old professors about Tweeting something inappropriate, they'd warn heavily against it. When did you feel that you were established enough to say whatever the fuck you wanted to online?
I often wonder why some of the more old guard traditional places I have written for for a long time have never said anything to me about toning it down. In part that's because I'm a freelancer, so don't really technically represent any of the places I write for in an official capacity, so there's more leeway.
I had a discussion about this with a writer friend the other day who is also somewhat of a brick thrower. In part it's because, living in Boston instead of New York, he said, gives me more freedom to sort of launch missiles at people form the outside.
I recognize all of this sounds super self important and douchey to explicitly say, by the way.
But, the point is, for every person who might be offended by being aggressively critical or coarse online, there is going to be another one who appreciates someone telling it like it is. I'm sure I've Tweeted myself out of a potential job and then right back into one many many times.
How do you feel about the fact that Bullett has gone completely digital? As a former newspaper editor, are you nostalgic for print media in general?
Bullett was a beautifully designed print magazine, and the tablet is still great looking. But I've mostly been involved with the site for the past couple years. I still do a good percentage of my work for print pubs, like the Boston Globe, where I've beee contributing for about ten years, so I do appreciate the legacy of print. I don't read print anymore, however. I don't know that I miss it, except on rare occasions where it's a respite from the oppression of the screen.
What is the dynamic at Bullett between contributors and the editor(s)? Do you have a chance to interact with a lot of people on staff?
I do most of my interacting with the digital editor Ben Barna. We pass ideas back and forth all day. Sometimes he'll see something up my alley and give me an idea, or vice versa. He gives me a lot of leeway, however, and for that I'm thankful. That sort of “telling it like it is” approach I take there often has, as I said above, gotten me a lot of offers from other publications, so I'm thankful for that. I meet the rest of the staff here and there when I go down to NY for events. I was just there for the launch of the new store in Tribeca. It's super cute.
On your website you call yourself a "journalist." Can you explain why you have it in quotes?
Sometimes I am journalist. Sometimes I am a blogger. I still believe the two are very different things. I don't know what the split is now, maybe 40% journalist. That's not to say blogging is dumb, or frivolous, although it often is, it's just a very different thing than reporting. I have the utmost respect for hard working, old style Journalists. Sometimes I live up to those lofty standards, other times I write poop jokes about celebrities.
Have you ever written fiction? If so, what was that experience like? If not, what do you love about nonfiction?
I studied creative writing in grad school, and have published a thing or two here and there over the years. I am not that good at it. I wish I were. I decided a long time ago that no one reads literary fiction anymore, so why devote my life to something that will be even less appreciated, and pays less, than journalism.
How much time would you say you dedicate to writing every week? How much of it feels like work?
It's always work. I was just saying the other day when I had to go review a concert, my job is to go to shows and drink and write about it, but I still complain every time. No matter what you do in life you will complain about it. I ruined everything by taking the two things I really love, music, and cocktails, and writing about them, because now I can't listen to music or drink without having to THINK about it.
It could be a lot worse. I could have an actual job. So I know I'm lucky, believe me.
I am on the computer either reading, writing, or looking for things to write about from the minute I wake up until I go to bed. I don't have weekends or vacations. Then again, I can, working from home, just go stare at the wall for a couple hours if I want to.
A lot of writers I know, myself included, are very self-critical. If you relate to this at all, what do you do to silence your own doubt?
I don't know but if you figure it out let me know. I am my own worst critic. The best way to silence it is to press publish I guess. Too late to do anything about it then. On to the next thing.
Thanks for reading! Follow Luke on Twitter @lukeoneil47
For more updates and writing advice Follow CURSE @cursemag on Twitter, like us on Facebook and join our interactive writer's community for fiction writers, nonfiction writers, and poets here.
There's a completely unrelated writing prompt up here. Have a great week!
-Rachael
Anti-Clickbait
What does it mean to capture an era? How do you know, as a writer, what musician is to be a household name for all eternity, or whose presence will be evocative of another time? Does that change who you choose to write about or whose album you critique?
What about the details of your own life that you put on paper? Will the depiction of a certain freeway or street sign hold significance in the future? Maybe the way you'd describe a storefront now will change so drastically over time that your writing will be a relic, that a scene centered around a park or movie theater you frequent will be valuable just because that place no longer exists.
It's difficult, and maybe even a waste of time, to think in these terms. We soak up so much information daily, come across countless articles, that detailing the age in which we live seems besides the point. Most of the blogposts we read, including this one, will maybe exist in an archive somewhere for years and years, but will be so insignificant that they will more or less disappear. And the pop songs we dissect or the tv episodes we recap aren't necessarily more valuable because we wrote about them. But maybe they could be.
While reading Joan Didion, I thought about how much value she adds to every person's life that she writes about, every snippet of conversation, every freeway she exits, just by writing it down. She describes everything so eloquently and bitterly, in political terms and in relation to her own experience. It's your gift, as a writer or artist or photographer, to be able to capture moments, to find meaning in inchoate thoughts and events. In writing fiction you do the same thing. Your stories exist within your own reality; they are a product of your experiences and a reflection of your feelings.
Maybe you're tired of seeing "trending," articles on the side of your Facebook feed. Maybe you feel super alienated by the topics that are "important" enough to be shared a million times. And how often do we think of the writer behind those pieces? What unpaid intern with dashed dreams of becoming a writer is stuck covering Justin Bieber's jail sentence? And if these events do indeed capture our times, should we try to cover that up so no one will remember it in the future? Or is there a way to talk about it that pushes the envelope a little bit, that says something greater?
Describe a day in your life as you experience it, or current events as you interpret them. Write in your very own style or try something weird, and describe everything in as much detail as possible. Whether it is political, personal, musical, whatever. Real or fictional. Metaphorical or literal.
Thanks so much to those of you who wrote pieces these past two weeks. I've truly enjoyed reading your stories. Can't wait to see what you come up with this week. :))
<3,
Rachael