Re: the post you reblogged about Bush. I'm 21 and tbh feel like I can only vote for Bernie, can you explain if/why I shouldn't? Thanks and sorry if this is dumb or anything.
Oh boy. Okay, Iāll do my best here. Note that a) this will get long, and b) Iām old, Tired, and Iām pretty sure my brain tried to kill me last night. Since by nature I am sure I will say something Controversial ā¢, if anyone reads this and feels a deep urge to inform me that I am Wrong, justā¦ mark it down as me being Wrong and move on with your life. But also, really, you should read this and hopefully think about it. Because while Iām glad you asked this question, it feels like thereās a lot in your cohort who wonāt, and that worries me. A lot.
First, not to sound utterly old-woman-in-a-rocking-chair ancient, people who came of age/are only old enough to have Obama be the first president that they really remember have no idea how good they had it. The world was falling the fuck apart in 2008 (not coincidentally, after 8 years of Bush). We came within a flicker of the permanent collapse of the global economy. The War on Terror was in full roar, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were at their height, we had Dick Cheney as the cartoon supervillain before we had any of Trumpās cohort, and this was before Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden had exposed the extent of NSA/CIA intelligence-gathering/American excesses or there was any kind of public debate around the fact that we were all surveilled all the time. And the fact that a brown guy named Barack Hussein Obama was elected in this climate seems, and still seems tbh, kind of amazing. And Obama was certainly not a Perfect President ā¢. He had to scale back a lot of planned initiatives, he is notorious for expanding the drone strike/extrajudicial assassination program, he still subscribed to the overall principles of neoliberalism and American exceptionalism, etc etc. There is valid criticism to be made as to how the hopey-changey optimistic rhetoric stacked up against the hard realities of political office. And yetā¦. at this point, given what weāre seeing from the White House on a daily basis, the depth of the parallel universe/double standards is absurd.
Because hereās the thing. Obama, his entire family, and his entire administration had to be personally/ethically flawless the whole time (and they managed that ā not one scandal or arrest in eight years, against the legions of Trumpistas now being convicted) because of the absolute frothing depths of Republican hatred, racial conspiracy theories, and obstruction against him. (Remember Merrick Garland and how Mitch McConnell got away with that, and now we have Gorsuch and Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court? Because I remember that). If Obama had pulled one-tenth of the shit, one-twentieth of the shit that the Trump administration does every day, he would be gone. It also meant that people who only remember Obama think he was typical for an American president, and he wasnāt. Since aboutā¦ Jimmy Carter, and definitely since Ronald Reagan, the American people have gone for the Trump model a lot more than the Obama model. Whatever your opinion on his politics or character, Obama was a constitutional law professor, a community activist, a neighborhood organizer and brilliant Ivy League intellectual who used to randomly lie awake at night thinking about income inequality. Americans donāt value intellectualism in their politicians; they just donāt. They donāt like thinking that āthe elitesā are smarter than them. They like the folksy populist who seems fun to have a beer with, and Reagan/Bush Senior/Clinton/Bush Junior sold this persona as hard as they possibly could. As noted in said post, Bush Junior (or Shrub as the late, great Molly Ivins memorably dubbed him) was Trump Lite but from a long-established political family who could operate like an outwardly civilized human.
The point is: when you think Obama was relatively normal (which, again, he wasnāt, for any number of reasons) and not the outlier in a much larger pattern of catastrophic damage that has been accelerated since, again, the 1980s (oh Ronnie Raygun, how you lastingly fucked us!), you miss the overall context in which this, and which Trump, happened. Like most left-wingers, I donāt agree with Obamaās recent and baffling decision to insert himself into the 2020 race and warn the Democratic candidates against being too progressive or whatever he was on about. I think he was giving into the same fear that appears to be motivating the remaining chunk of Joe Bidenās support: that middle/working-class white America wonāt go for anything too wild or that might sniff of Socialism, and that Uncle Joe, recalled fondly as said folksy populist and the internetās favorite meme grandfather from his time as VP, could pick up the votes that went to Trump last time. And that by nature, no one else can.
The underlying belief is that these white voters just canāt support anything too āun-American,ā and that by pushing too hard left, Democratic candidates risk handing Trump a second term. Again: I donāt agree and I think he was mistaken in saying it. But I also canāt say that Obama of all people doesnāt know exactly the strength of the political machine operating against the Democratic Party and the progressive agenda as a whole, because he ran headfirst into it for eight years. The fact that he managed to pass any of his legislative agenda, usually before the Tea Party became a thing in 2010, is because Democrats controlled the House and Senate for the first two years of his first term. He was not perfect, but it was clear that he really did care (just look up the pictures of him with kids). He installed smart, efficient, and scandal-free people to do jobs they were qualified for. He gave us Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor to join RBG on the Supreme Court. All of this seemsā¦ like a dream.
That said: here we are in a place where Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren are the front-runners for the Democratic nomination (and apparently Pete Buttigieg is getting some airplay as a dark horse candidate, whichā¦ whatever). The appeal of Biden is discussed above, and he sure as hell is not my favored candidate (frankly, I wish heād just quit). But Sanders and Warren are 85% - 95% similar in their policy platforms. The fact that Michael ā50 Billion Dollar Fortuneā Bloomberg started rattling his chains about running for president is because either a Sanders or Warren presidency terrifies the outrageously exploitative billionaire capitalist oligarchy that runs this country and has been allowed to proceed essentially however the fuck they like sinceā¦ you guessed it, the 1980s, the era of voodoo economics, deregulation, and the free market above all. Warren just happens to be ten years younger than Sanders and female, and Sandersā age is not insignificant. Heās 80 years old and just had a heart attack, and thereās still a year to go to the election. Itās also more than a little eye-rolling to describe him as the only progressive candidate in the race, when heās an old white man (however much we like and approve of his policy positions). And hereās the thing, which I think is a big part of the reason why this polarized ideological purity internet leftist culture mistrusts Warren:
She may have changed her mind on things in the past.
Scary, right? I sound like Iām being facetious, but Iām not. An argument I had to read with my own two eyes on this godforsaken hellsite was that since Warren became a Democrat around the time Clinton signed Donāt Ask Donāt Tell, she sekritly hated gay people and might still be a corporate sellout, so on and etcetera. (And donāt even get me STARTED on the fact that DADT, coming a few years after the height of the AIDS crisis where it was considered Godās Judgment of the Icky Gays, was the best Clinton could realistically hope to achieve, but this smacks of White Gay Syndrome anyway and that is a whole other kettle of fish.) Bernie has always demonstrably been a democratic socialist, and: good for him. Iām serious. But because thereās the chance that Warren might not have thought exactly as she does now at any point in her life, the hysterical and paranoid left-wing elements donāt trust that she might not still secretly do so. (Zomgz!) Itās the same element thatās feeding cancel culture and āwokeness.ā Nobody can be allowed to have shifted or grown in their opinions or, like a functional, thoughtful, non-insane adult, changed their beliefs when presented with compelling evidence to the contrary. To the ideological hordes, any hint of uncertainty or past failure to completely toe the line is tantamount to heresy. Any evidence of any other belief except The Correct One means that this person is functionally as bad as Trump. And frankly, itās only the Sanders supporters who, just as in 2016, are threatening to withhold their vote in the general election if their preferred candidate doesnāt win the primary, and indeed seem weirdly proud about it.
OK, boomer Bernie or Buster.
Hereās the thing, the thing, the thing: there is never going to be an American president free of the deeply toxic elements of American ideology. There just wonāt be. This country has been built how it has for 250 years, and itās not gonna change. You are never going to have, at least not in the current system, some dream candidate who gets up there and parrots the left-wing talking points and attacks American imperialism, exceptionalism, ravaging global capitalism, military and oil addiction, etc. They want to be elected as leader of a country that has deeply internalized and taken these things to heart for its entire existence, and most of them believe it to some degree themselves. So this groupthink white liberal mentality where the only acceptable candidate is this Perfect Non-Problematic robot who has only ever had one belief their entire lives and has never ever wavered in their devotion to doctrine has really gotten bad. The Democratic Party would be consideredā¦ maybe center/mild left in most other developed countries. Itās not even really left-wing by general standards, and Sanders and Warren are the only two candidates for the nomination who are even willing to go there and explicitly put out policy proposals that challenge the systematic structure of power, oppression, and exploitation of the late-stage capitalist 21st century. Warren has the billionaires fussed, and instead of backing down, sheās doubling down. Thatās part of why theyāre so scared of her. (And also misogyny, because the world is depressing like that.) She is going head-on after picking a fight with some of the worst people on the planet, who are actively killing the rest of us, and I donāt know about you, but I like that.
Of course: none of this will mean squat if she (or the eventual Democratic winner, who I will vote for regardless of who it is, but as you can probably tell, sheās my ride or die) donāt a) win the White House and then do as they promised on the campaign trail, and b) donāt have a Democratic House and Senate willing to have a backbone and pass the laws. Even Nancy Pelosi, much as sheās otherwise a badass, held off on opening a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump for months out of fear it would benefit him, until the Ukraine thing fell into everyoneās laps. The Democrats are really horrible at sticking together and voting the party line the way Republicans do consistently, because Democrats are big-tent people who like to think of themselves as accepting and tolerant of other views and unwilling to force their membersā hands. The Republicans have no such qualms (and indeed, judging by their enabling of Trump, have no qualms at all).Ā
The modern American Republican party has become a vehicle for no-holds-barred power for rich white men at the expense of absolutely everything and everyone else, and if your rationale is that you canāt vote for the person opposing Donald Goddamn Trump is that youāre just not vibing with them on the language of that one policy proposalā¦ well, Iām glad that you, White Middle Class Liberal, feel relatively safe that the consequences of that decision wonāt affect you personally. Even if weāre due to be out of the Paris Climate Accords one day after the 2020 election, and the issue of climate change now has the most visibility itās ever had after years of big-business, Republican-led efforts to deny and discredit the science, hey, Secret Corporate Shill, am I right? Canāt trust āer. Letās go have a craft beer.
As has been said before: vote as far left as you want in the primary. Vote your ideology, vote whatever candidate you want, because the only way to make actual, real-world change is to do that. The huge, embedded, all-consuming and horrible system in which we operate is not just going to suddenly be run by fairy dust and happy thoughts overnight. Select candidates that reflect your values exactly, be as picky and ideologically militant as you want. Thatās the time to do that! Then when it comes to the general election:
America is a two-party system. It sucks, but thatās the case. Third-party votes, or refraining from voting because āit doesnāt matterā are functionally useless at best and actively harmful at worst.
Either the Democratic candidate or Donald Trump will win the 2020 election.
There is absolutely no length that the Republican/GOP machine, and its malevolent allies elsewhere, will not go to in order to secure a Trump victory. None.
Any talk whatsoever about āprogressive valuesā or any kind of liberal activism, coupled with a course of action that increases the possibility of a Trump victory, is hypocritical at best and actively malicious at worst.
This is why I found the Democratic response to Obamaās ādonāt go too wildā comments interesting. Bernie doubled down on the fact that his plans have widespread public support, and heās right. (Frankly, the fact that Sanders and Warren are polling at the top, and the fact that theyāre politicians and would not be crafting these campaign messages if they didnāt know that they were being positively received, says plenty on its own). Warren cleverly highlighted and praised Obamaās accomplishments in office (i.e. the Affordable Care Act) and didnāt say squat about whether she agreed or disagreed with him, then went right back to campaigning about why billionaires suck. And some guy named Julian Castro basically blew Obama off and claimed that āany Democratā could beat Trump in 2020, just by nature of existing and being non-insane.
This is very dangerous! Do not be Julian Castro!
As I said in my tags on the Bush post: everyone assumed that sensible people would vote for Kerry in 2004. Guess what happened? Yeah, he got Swift Boated. The race between Obama and McCain in 2008, even after those said nightmare years of Bush, was very close until the global crash broke it open in Obamaās favor, and Sarah Palin was an actual disqualifier for a politician being brazenly incompetent and unprepared. (Then again, she was a woman from a remote backwater state, not a billionaire businessman.) In 2012, we thought Corporate MormonBot Mitt Fugginā Romney was somehow the worst and most dangerous candidate the Republicans could offer. In 2016, up until Election Day itself, everyone assumed that HRC was a badly flawed candidate but would win anyway. Andā¦ we saw how that worked out. Complacency is literally deadly.
I was born when Reagan was still president. Iām just old enough to remember the efforts to impeach Clinton over forcing an intern to give him a BJ in the Oval Office (This led by the same Republicans making Donald Trump into a darling of the evangelical Christian right wing.) Iām definitely old enough to remember 9/11 and how America lost its mind after that, and I remember the Bush years. And, obviously, the contrast with Obama, the swing back toward Trump, and everything that has happened since. We canāt afford to do this again. Weāre hanging by a thread as it is, and not just America, but the entire planet.
So yes. By all means, vote for Sanders in the primary. Then when November 3, 2020 rolls around, if you care about literally any of this at all, hold your nose if necessary and vote straight-ticket Democrat, from the president, to the House and Senate, to the state and local offices. I cannot put it more strongly than that.
