Aqua Utopia｜海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Janaina Medeiros
Monterey Bay Aquarium
h
Kaledo Art
Sweet Seals For You, Always
PR's Tumblrdome
NASA
No title available
No title available
Sade Olutola
Peter Solarz
titsay
JVL
Cosmic Funnies
$LAYYYTER
#extradirty
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
noise dept.
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from T1
seen from Singapore
seen from Belgium
seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from South Korea
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
@definitellie
6/1/26
• Books I've Read •
fandoms/topics currently cooking in the brain
dottore genshin impact
honkai star rail
genshin impact
clean, closed door, and/or epic fantasy/romantasy
hierarchy series (james islington)
fireborn epic (gillian bronte adams)
on the back burner:
zenless zone zero
baldur's gate 3
where winds meet
fields of mistria
stardew valley
fire emblem three houses
trigun
and many more
steps to make character
Take standard character trope
Add a contradiction
Take one part of their personality, preferably not contradiction, instead of balance, weigh everything in them towards that.
Choose something they want, then something they value. Pick which one they'll chase over the other.
Give them friends. Preferably enemies.
Shake vigorously.
Male positivity does not detract from female positivity
Reblog if you agree
addition: if you need to bring down another gender, you’re clearly suffering from self-confidence issues
Idc how mad you are. Saying fucked up things out of anger is not ok. Control yourself.
On what part of your body is your biggest scar?
head
torso
arms/hands
legs/feet
a different part of my body
I have 0 scars
okay so @writerxwren ‘s farawyn/anti booktok post made me come back to this line of thought I’ve had for a while so it’s not wholly my idea BUT
I think one of the reasons wildehopps as a ship is so beloved amongst fans of these films (and just in general on the internet) is because they are the quintessential booktok romance done right. they are the best version of what everyone goes to booktok looking for. In fact, I’d go as far as to say they’re the most Jane Austen-coded couple I’ve seen in a long time. Hear me out okay I’m going somewhere with this
I don’t personally frequent booktok (I don’t have the TikTok app, I get all my info from YouTube or Tumblr), but as a writer who knows sometimes ya gotta dig into bad stories in order to figure out what makes them bad, I know enough about what that side of the internet enjoys in the way of tropes. Normally, I’m not someone who would suggest writing a story based on tropes alone, but even I can agree that having one in mind can be helpful in figuring out your characters’ dynamics and arcs. The most widely talked about romantic tropes on the clock app to my knowledge are enemies-to-lovers and banter and grumpy/sunshine and slow burn and an MMC who would ruin the world for his love, to name a few. The problem I’ve found with most booktok promoted books, however, is that these tropes are taken and written without an understanding of what makes them work. Enemies become lovers in 50 pages, the banter is spiteful and mean or just downright not clever (the ‘should I call you Prince, or pathetic?’ ‘You could’ve just called me yours’ audio I hear on YouTube drives. Me. Insane.), the sunshine is almost always a ditz or a show-off who falls head-over-heels for the grump, a controlling manchild who just wants someone to sleep with, and the “burning of the world to protect her” becomes so unhealthily close to obsession that it’s frightening for the girl in question.
all of these ideas are used without digging any deeper into why they originally clicked with readers, before they were so overdone that everyone sort of rolls their eyes at just hearing about them. they’re the frosting on a hollow cake: you might have something that tastes sweet at first, but there’s zero depth, and you’re left unsatisfied.
and here’s why I think wildehopps does it all right where many others get it wrong.
think about it for a second. Judy is the optimistic, bubbly girl boss who takes no bull from anybody. she’s witty and intelligent and would fight the sun if she were capable and angry enough. She’s what all the booktok FMCs want to be, but what makes her different is that she’s also kind. She can be gentle with those around her. She’s emotional, she allows herself to cry and embrace her loved ones. She likes to dress up (as seen in the z2 gala scene) and enjoy more feminine things, she’s a girl’s girl (“I love your hair!” as a seemingly innocuous moment that ends up saving hers and Nick’s life), she always sticks her neck out for someone in need, she is so very invested in doing the right thing no matter what. She is not a stoic soldier who only thinks of herself and how powerful she could be. And what else? It makes her flawed. She bore hurtful biases against Nick in z1, even if she didn’t realize it. She has a savior complex that gets her in trouble, a tiny thirst for glory she doesn’t truly recognize in herself. She’s prideful and pushes herself too hard because she’s scared that the world could perceive her as weak and unskillful. A dumb bunny. Despite being a rabbit, she feels incredibly human. Real.
And Nick! He is the textbook example of the snarky MMC with a dark past but a heart of gold buried beneath his tough exterior. He can be shifty, he behaves as though nothing anyone says can wound him, and he would do anything, even give up his own life, to make sure Judy is safe. He smirks nonstop, but his sincere smiles vastly outshine them. He even does the “lean against the doorframe” thing that’s so popular right now, but in more of an endearingly awkward, “I can’t let Judy see my shrine of her just inside my apartment” than seductive way. He is what everyone tries to write the Perfect Boyfriend as, yet like Judy, what makes him different is that his flaws are not treated like points of attraction, but like traits he must work on and learn to overcome. His inability to open up with Judy about his past and his fear of losing her isn’t expressed as though he were the dark and brooding bad boy, the tortured prince who was dealt a rotten hand in life (though never actually tries to fix it). His silence is a problem in his partnership with Judy. It’s something to sympathize with but it isn’t a characteristic of being attractive, it isn’t good that Nick bottles his feelings up and plans never to share them with the best thing that ever happened to him. The films correctly portray Nick as hurting himself because he’s choosing not to be honest with his partner. It doesn’t make him mysterious, it makes him relatable, someone you actively root for to improve.
Even better, when he does decide to take the leap, he ends up being incredibly vulnerable with Judy—“I make jokes about your ears and I tell you that you try too hard, when the truth is I just don’t want you to get hurt.”—which she reciprocates because she knows she can trust him with her emotions. Nick has endured hell and back and does not want to be alone any longer, but never once is this conveyed as “uwu soft morally gray Prince Charming” by the narrative. He is not a SJM type character, he’s just a decent guy who’s attempting to turn himself around by virtue of his altruistic partner’s faith in him.
Furthermore, Nick isn’t controlling or manipulative of Judy. He’s sly and sneaky in the first film, but he never does anything that could hurt her, even before they were friends. He never throws her into danger and expects her to find her own way out of it, he never coerces her into situations she would be uncomfortable with (apart from the Naturalist Club, though he gives Judy an out before they even go in and she doesn’t take it), he never uses her for his own means. His love isn’t based on what she can do for him. It isn’t self-centered. She is not his plaything, she is his person.
Speaking of that, unlike several, confusingly popular booktok couples (Rhysand and Feyre, Paedyn and Kai, Violet and Xaden, etc.), we actually comprehend as an audience why Judy and Nick love each other. While yes, it is a family-friendly series so you can’t go too deeply into it regardless, and physical attraction is necessary to an extent, Nick doesn’t love Judy because she’s “hot” or “sexy”. There’s no ogling of her physique, no fixation on outer beauty. He dislikes her a great deal in the beginning, but what wins him over is her compassion, her resilience, her idealism, and her belief in who he could be. She’s passionate and she’s brave, smart and relentless. And she gave him a chance, showed him there was more to life than just surviving. And when it comes to protecting her, yes he does it because he doesn’t want to lose her, but he also cannot stomach her being in pain. He stands up for her when her career is threatened, he is always looking for a way to comfort her through gentle touches. Instead of “burning the world down for her”, he shields her from the fiery darts by taking them for himself. He doesn’t take away her agency by stopping her from doing her job just because it’s dangerous, rather he walks through the mayhem with her, even whilst being afraid. He is ride or die for his bunny without a doubt, and I know we as a fandom like to joke about them being codependent, but Nick isn’t snarling at anyone who so much as looks at her (in z2, he only began to show his jealousy when Pawbert was actively flirting with her). He isn’t romanticizing being feral or insane about her. He loves her for who she is, and she for him. They would do anything for each other. Selflessness.
Same with Judy. She loves him because he’s intelligent and cunning, he believes in her when no one else does, he brings her back down to earth when her head is in the clouds, and he’s a profoundly considerate person as well as fairly emotionally intelligent when he’s encouraged to be. He’s good, and she wants to see him be good, she wants him to excel to his fullest potential. Like Nick, she would give up the rest of her days in a heartbeat if it meant he would be safe from harm; in Zootopia 2’s climax, she throws herself off a wall to reach him without having any idea Gary was behind her to catch her. She was willing to die with him if she couldn’t rescue him. She wants what’s best for her fox without asking for anything in return.
Then there’s the age gap. From what I’ve seen, people on booktok love age gap romances. Specifically if it’s between a 19 yr old human girl and a 500+ yr old faerie man. Good stuff, for sure (I say in complete sarcasm). Not only is it incredibly creepy that an eldritch god would be dating a teenager just because she’s “the chosen one”, it also adds a power imbalance that makes it so he is always in control over her, and she must go along with whatever he decides is best for her. He labels it as being protective, but it’s nothing more than abuse given the girl literally cannot fight back, or she’ll be punished in some magical, Lovecraftian way. Because these MMCs are never emotionally stable.
Nick and Judy, though? Boom, baby, 8 yr age gap. Far more reasonable than hundreds of years in between. As of z2, Judy is 25 and Nick is 33. Both are well into adulthood, thus nothing creepy can be construed, and there is no power imbalance because they are equal partners. They work together, they share the weight of the world together. She may be leading the team but she does not boss him around or force him to do whatever she says because she’s saying it, and he most certainly doesn’t follow like a subservient puppy…he goes where she goes so that he can keep her safe. In the second movie, when Nick proposes running away together to Outback Island about a dozen times during the mystery, to Judy’s consistent refusal, at any moment he is free to walk away. She wants him with her, but she isn’t keeping him there against his will. Still, Nick doesn’t leave her. The age gap is wonderful too because it allows Nick to have some knowledge of life and the way the world works that Judy doesn’t without it seeming as though he has an advantage over her. Her view of the city needing someone to help make it better is her hopeful mindset not having been crushed by the cruelties of reality yet, and Nick insisting the world is what it is, Carrots, is his reality rearing its ugly head. She gives him hope to dream, he reminds her not to let her imagination run away with her. Time and past trauma has cultivated who they are, but together, they’re learning they can be more than that.
Oh, and the banter. “It’s called a hustle, sweetheart.” “I think you’d actually make a pretty good cop.” “Ugh, how dare you.” “I was small and emotionally unbalanced like you, once.” “Har har.” “Darling, I think you’re giving me white hairs.” “Oh, I’m sorry, is my fear hilarious to you?” “No, of course not. We’re partners, and whenever I’m uncomfortable, you’re always very considerate of my feelings—LOOK OUT SNAKE SKIN!” “What is your problem? Does seeing me fail somehow make you feel better about your own sad, miserable life?” “It does, 100%.” “Love ya, partner. But I am still me, so you’re only getting that once a decade.” “Hopps and Wilde?” “Wilde and Hopps!” Listen, I could go on forever, okay?
And unlike dozens of booktok stories that claim to be “slow burns” yet get the main two characters together 3/4 of the way into the first book, Nick and Judy are a genuine slow burn. The way it’s looking, they won’t officially be together until around the end of the final movie in their trilogy! Unless Disney decides to make more than three installments in the franchise, it’s going to take almost the entirety of their story to come together. That’s a freaking snail’s pace and I love it, it’s torturous.
wildehopps is the enemies-to-lovers, grumpy/sunshine, slow burn, girlboss/chill guy ship booktok goes nuts over, but they’re characterized with depth. they’re fleshed out, they behave like actual people, they aren’t obsessed with physical appearances (again, family movies, but even still), and their love for each other is based on self-sacrifice. Judy is not a power-wielding boss babe who demands praise and worship from absolutely everybody, Nick is not a violent or possessive dark lord who hurts his partner but calls it love. They didn’t like each other upon first meeting, but mutual understanding and fondness shaped them into friends, and unwavering loyalty through hardship further shaped them into what we can safely assume will one day be romantic partners. They look after each other. They are best friends that are also in love. As Jared Bush himself has said, they are soulmates.
yes, I’m very aware it’s a disney movie, made to primarily be enjoyed by kids with families around. you have different guidelines when you work with animated films, I get it. nevertheless, what makes these two so compelling is the fact that they are what so many look for in fictional relationships done healthily (minus the smut but tbh, is that really necessary?). so, uh. writers on booktok, do better. Read more Jane Austen. A fox and a bunny are outpacing y’all. anyway thank you for coming to my ted talk
I have GOT to stop spending $30
oh I know how to make a poll's results look like the letter E watch this
what is the rightmost digit of the number of responses this poll has right now? (it should be visible before you vote.)
0, 1, or 2
3
4 or 5
6
7, 8, or 9
reblog this and put in the tags at least two (2) songs you are listening to on repeat right now
After 13 years of this, it's still funny to me that detailing a full mental breakdown on tumblr is standard fare, but posting a nice selfie is a fraught decision.
this is the correct way around and every other social media site is wrong
self-awareness check, list five things you like that aren't media pieces in the tags now ‼️
alright I've got to do some quick math to explain attitudes towards AI to my boss.
we're looking to create an AI policy, and when we were talking about this, my boss (older millennial) was genuinely shocked to hear that younger people do not (seem) to view AI positively (a la the recent commencement speakers being booed)
please rb for larger sample size!
Question 1/3
What is your age, and do you feel AI is a net positive or net negative in our lives today?
under 18, AI is a net positive
under 18, AI is a net negative
18-29, AI is a net positive
18-29, AI is a net negative
30-45, AI is a net positive
30-45, AI is a net negative
46-60, AI is a net positive
46-60, AI is a net negative
over 60, AI is a net postive
over 60, AI is a net negative
Question 2/3
How often do you visit or interact with museums/archives (whether in person or online)?
Frequently (multiple times per month)
Often (multiple times per year)
Occasionally (a couple times per year)
Rarely (once every couple of years)
Never :(
Question 3/3
If you saw a museum was using AI in exhibits, marketing, research, etc., would you be more or less inclined to visit that museum?
under 18, more inclined
under 18, less inclined
18-29, more inclined
18-29, less inclined
30-45, more inclined
30-45, less inclined
46-60, more inclined
46-60, less inclined
over 60, more inclined
over 60, less inclined
Thank you for helping with this data collection. Please rb for as big a sample as possible!
🫶
trade offer: you get ten thousand neuvillette portraits; i get to
draw ten thousand neuvillette portraits
pick whatever option the person you're following who reblogged this post didn't pick. if they didn't say in the tags what they picked or if you're seeing the original post and not a reblog, pick at random instead.
first option
second option
I wonder how Zandik treated his youngest segment
When you thought it would be easy peasy lemon squeezy but it turns out to be difficult difficult lemon difficult.
Wait that’s actually really good, gonna pop this out of the tags
