Deldrynn

Danny, He/they, self taught artist and history student I speak polish, english and french. Mostly fanarts here, but I change fandoms all the time

[klimtsonian]

lovebirds 🪶

My finished illustration of Polish old man yaoi for ‘My Liege’, a zine about gay knights organized by @dames-zine and @novaandmali !!

[trainwrecksys]

Basil turns to drawing the French once again

[do-not-u-dare]

Im always scared to call someone my friend because what if they dont consider me a friend and hate me because of that

[lukelemon-art]

Sometimes character bleed is so strong it takes you places. Not college, but places 🫦

A redraw of an old fanart for the incredible fic "In Der Nacht". Here's a character version…

...

…and here's a biblically accurate version.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna run away and hide 🙃

[skogsdotter-draws]

Ghost of Thermidor Past

[aggressivelyanalysingeverything]

thermidor? no. no more. i’m thermidone

even thermidormaxxing robespierre from black book is done

bonus valid crash-out too

[skogsdotter-draws]

The scorching sun of Thermidor

[darcymolloy]

[andlatitude]

[skullingwaydraws]

when the devil’s minion

[jubigiuu]

My attempts at drawing devil's minion

They drive me crazy

[deldrynn]

I don't know if to laugh or cry, this paragraph is so ridiculous

Translation (rough one, made by me. English is my like third language so probably not grammatically correct)

[Robespierre] didn't feel sympathy towards neither Brissot nor Condorcet, not even in the first phase of the revolution, also because that for years he had been persistently working on building his imagine in the eyes of the public opinion as the Only Just One in the revolutionary dissaray. This monument was in fact build and the people gave Robespierre this such desired by him nickname of the Incorruptible. Of corse if it's good to be the Incorruptible it would be much better to be the only Incorruptible among the revolutionary leaders. Do we hurt Maximilien Robespierre with such reflection? Let's remember that much more hurt, and because of petty reasons was the philosopher of the Revolution - Condorcet.

Like this sentence is amazing. Like those two last ones. Like brooooo, why to you have to insult Robespierre to say that you believe Condorcet deserved better. I don't know if he did, I don't know if the part about Robespierre it's true. Actually even if it is, and I doubt is as even author himself admits that it might be unfair opinion (and his opinion on Max is negative), but that's actually unimportant now. Like what the fuck? Why do you have to write such a thing in fucking scientific text? In my eyes that undermain whole work, as you don't even try to hold your personal prejudices, especially as such a thing was not even needed there. He said that just to be mean.

The book is "Sylwetki spod gilotyny" by Stanisław Salmonowicz and I do not recommend it (but tbh K don't think it's translated so little danger someone will find it)

If I got a nickel for every sentence wrote in this manner I saw this month I could pay France's debt before 1789. Just saying. After my research will be done I'm gonna make a ranking.

[icybloodtigrss]

This sounds like a crappy book about Maxime among many...

[deldrynn]

Good thing it's not about him, there's like four chapter

1. Condorcet

2. Brissot

3. War in Vendée

4. Saint-Just

Author loves condorcet and brissot and its crappy

[icybloodtigrss]

I do not understand the author skipping over to first the Vendée and then Saint-Just. In any case, I have to ask, is the author covering Brissot's and Condorcet's positions on abolishing slavery, giving women rights including voting, etc?

[deldrynn]

As from what I understood it's like collection of essays. And when it comes to informations actually theres not much (but whole book has like 160 pages and theres no bibliography, you know sources only from annotations lol). I havent read it very carefully, as I'm doing reaserch on slightly different topic, but he was more focused on what they did before revolution, especially their writing, with condorcet also about his time in hiding, and how bad historians dont give them enough attention. Nothing about women rights, about slavery only that Brissot was part of that society and thats all. Really nothing informative.

also worth to mention that author finished law not history, but on wikipedia he's described as law historian and published several history books. And from what I see thats not unusual thing to happen.

His standpoint is not suprising, as it's usual for anti comunist oppositionist (not happy about that fact, but what can one do. Like i cant say I;m surprised when other side had more syphathetic opinion), but still he kinda spreads lies.

[deldrynn]

I don't know if to laugh or cry, this paragraph is so ridiculous

Translation (rough one, made by me. English is my like third language so probably not grammatically correct)

[Robespierre] didn't feel sympathy towards neither Brissot nor Condorcet, not even in the first phase of the revolution, also because that for years he had been persistently working on building his imagine in the eyes of the public opinion as the Only Just One in the revolutionary dissaray. This monument was in fact build and the people gave Robespierre this such desired by him nickname of the Incorruptible. Of corse if it's good to be the Incorruptible it would be much better to be the only Incorruptible among the revolutionary leaders. Do we hurt Maximilien Robespierre with such reflection? Let's remember that much more hurt, and because of petty reasons was the philosopher of the Revolution - Condorcet.

Like this sentence is amazing. Like those two last ones. Like brooooo, why to you have to insult Robespierre to say that you believe Condorcet deserved better. I don't know if he did, I don't know if the part about Robespierre it's true. Actually even if it is, and I doubt is as even author himself admits that it might be unfair opinion (and his opinion on Max is negative), but that's actually unimportant now. Like what the fuck? Why do you have to write such a thing in fucking scientific text? In my eyes that undermain whole work, as you don't even try to hold your personal prejudices, especially as such a thing was not even needed there. He said that just to be mean.

The book is "Sylwetki spod gilotyny" by Stanisław Salmonowicz and I do not recommend it (but tbh K don't think it's translated so little danger someone will find it)

If I got a nickel for every sentence wrote in this manner I saw this month I could pay France's debt before 1789. Just saying. After my research will be done I'm gonna make a ranking.

[icybloodtigrss]

This sounds like a crappy book about Maxime among many...

[deldrynn]

Good thing it's not about him, there's like four chapter

1. Condorcet

2. Brissot

3. War in Vendée

4. Saint-Just

Author loves condorcet and brissot and its crappy

[icybloodtigrss]

I do not understand the author skipping over to first the Vendée and then Saint-Just. In any case, I have to ask, is the author covering Brissot's and Condorcet's positions on abolishing slavery, giving women rights including voting, etc?

[deldrynn]

I don't know if to laugh or cry, this paragraph is so ridiculous

Translation (rough one, made by me. English is my like third language so probably not grammatically correct)

[Robespierre] didn't feel sympathy towards neither Brissot nor Condorcet, not even in the first phase of the revolution, also because that for years he had been persistently working on building his imagine in the eyes of the public opinion as the Only Just One in the revolutionary dissaray. This monument was in fact build and the people gave Robespierre this such desired by him nickname of the Incorruptible. Of corse if it's good to be the Incorruptible it would be much better to be the only Incorruptible among the revolutionary leaders. Do we hurt Maximilien Robespierre with such reflection? Let's remember that much more hurt, and because of petty reasons was the philosopher of the Revolution - Condorcet.

Like this sentence is amazing. Like those two last ones. Like brooooo, why to you have to insult Robespierre to say that you believe Condorcet deserved better. I don't know if he did, I don't know if the part about Robespierre it's true. Actually even if it is, and I doubt is as even author himself admits that it might be unfair opinion (and his opinion on Max is negative), but that's actually unimportant now. Like what the fuck? Why do you have to write such a thing in fucking scientific text? In my eyes that undermain whole work, as you don't even try to hold your personal prejudices, especially as such a thing was not even needed there. He said that just to be mean.

The book is "Sylwetki spod gilotyny" by Stanisław Salmonowicz and I do not recommend it (but tbh K don't think it's translated so little danger someone will find it)

If I got a nickel for every sentence wrote in this manner I saw this month I could pay France's debt before 1789. Just saying. After my research will be done I'm gonna make a ranking.

[icybloodtigrss]

This sounds like a crappy book about Maxime among many...

[deldrynn]

Good thing it's not about him, there's like four chapter

1. Condorcet

2. Brissot

3. War in Vendée

4. Saint-Just

Author loves condorcet and brissot and its crappy

[deldrynn]

I don't know if to laugh or cry, this paragraph is so ridiculous

Translation (rough one, made by me. English is my like third language so probably not grammatically correct)

[Robespierre] didn't feel sympathy towards neither Brissot nor Condorcet, not even in the first phase of the revolution, also because that for years he had been persistently working on building his imagine in the eyes of the public opinion as the Only Just One in the revolutionary dissaray. This monument was in fact build and the people gave Robespierre this such desired by him nickname of the Incorruptible. Of corse if it's good to be the Incorruptible it would be much better to be the only Incorruptible among the revolutionary leaders. Do we hurt Maximilien Robespierre with such reflection? Let's remember that much more hurt, and because of petty reasons was the philosopher of the Revolution - Condorcet.

Like this sentence is amazing. Like those two last ones. Like brooooo, why to you have to insult Robespierre to say that you believe Condorcet deserved better. I don't know if he did, I don't know if the part about Robespierre it's true. Actually even if it is, and I doubt is as even author himself admits that it might be unfair opinion (and his opinion on Max is negative), but that's actually unimportant now. Like what the fuck? Why do you have to write such a thing in fucking scientific text? In my eyes that undermain whole work, as you don't even try to hold your personal prejudices, especially as such a thing was not even needed there. He said that just to be mean.

The book is "Sylwetki spod gilotyny" by Stanisław Salmonowicz and I do not recommend it (but tbh K don't think it's translated so little danger someone will find it)

If I got a nickel for every sentence wrote in this manner I saw this month I could pay France's debt before 1789. Just saying. After my research will be done I'm gonna make a ranking.

[bonebeautyart]

“Uh, I don't understand why Robespierre was so paranoid.”

Average day in the Comitee:

[janellefeng]

I took a little bit of creative liberty in terms of the order of events and Saint-Just's unpronounced last speech. Anyways, Thermidor is upon us again...