the fact that they finally addressed this is so so important to me!!!! this is a massive elephant in every single scene, and in fandom discussions about armand, his sexuality, and the ways in which other characters interact with him. i really hope the show has the care to portray how asian men were perceived both when armand was trafficked and when he lived in venice with marius. his status as âexoticâ wouldâve made him even more vulnerable to the men and women seeking to âloanâ him from marius.
armandâs entire view of himself and his sexuality has been warped by this exact stereotype. we keep seeing it over and over again in how he makes himself small and as unobtrusive and passive as possible.
oh, i just hope we get to see an exploration of it!!!!
check out the complete interview! itâs so insightful all around
As the manipulative Armand in "The Vampire Lestat," his character may not be easy to like, but he has still stolen many fans' hearts.
Not in the âIâm listening to a fictional rock star that has been the basis for my ENTIRE life thereafterâ kind of way; definitely more in a âholy fuck, why are there so many unintelligent and illiterate children here, make it stop, please shut upâ kind of way (that was, I admit, a little juvenile).
The question remains though: What are with the INSANE takes in this fandom? I have never seen anything quite like the level of hatred (and dumb-assery) here, and let me be clear, I was/am a Supernatural Girlie. I am flummoxed (defn: âbeing so utterly confused, bewildered, or perplexed that you do not know what to doâ). I admit, as an elder (please take this in any way you see fit of these examples â age, knowledge, experience), I am standing in this room looking around saying: Some of you have never failed school, AND IT SHOWS. Thatâs not a compliment. Itâs meant as a derogatory, inflammatory insult. I am saying that as clearly as possible to show you, the people who have less than zero reading comprehension, or critical thinking skills, that you cannot read this in any other way: It is EXPLICIT.  I am Angry. At You (and maybe your teachersâŚno, definitely also your teachers).
Introduction: (The breakdown of the points that will be explored. Those points might not be in order, or quite as well delineated as they are below, but they will be touched)
Stop needing things (and by things I mean explicit x-rated sexual things) out of a show. You have fanfic for that. Itâs why it exists. Go. Write it. I do. Bye.
This show is neither Racist or Homophobic. Nor are the writers. Shut up and fucking get over yourselves. I am Apoplectic (Defn: an adjective that means extremely and fiercely angry. It describes someone so consumed by rage that they might appear visibly shaking, red-faced, or on the verge of losing control)
This show closely follows the canon of the literature and is, in fact, exactly what it is meant to be as an adaptation (Defn: âthe act or process of modifying somethingâor changing one's own behaviorâto suit a new environment, condition, or purposeâ) of an original piece of fiction.
This season has a different name, and therefore this is a different show than the one you were previously watching (self-explanatory as that remains, it still seems lost on a great number of people, so we will explore this further as well). This point is linked to the last.
If your entire personality exists to just insult the media and the people involved with said media, maybe just, donât watch it. If you would like to get the show cancelled, this is your best option* (Thatâs a hint).
Body: (This might require a bit of actual reading, but I will try to sum these things up as clearly as possible so that the un-educated angry masses can understand).
The Vampire Chronicles (and in this we will be using the first two books only: IWTV and TVL), as a series, is implicitly queer. But it is, as a piece of fiction, that you read, NEVER explicitly queer. There are no SEX scenes, none. Zero. But, I digress, I believe the initial issue here will be the differentiation between the meanings of Implicit and Explicit. Implicit is âto express or understand something indirectlyâwithout directly stating itââ; Explicit is âan adverb that describes doing something in a clear, exact, and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion, doubt, or implicationâ. I believe that one of the hardest things for people engaging with media today is to understand IMPLICIT, as a concept, where EXPLICIT is not required to Improve the quality of the media you are consuming. At no point in this season of The Vampire Lestat; as a desperate fan of having Jam Reiderson/Loustat on my screen did I WANT or NEED them to explicitly FUCK/KISS or show me that they were anything beyond the greatest loves of all time to one another. The Yearning was AMAZING â and it was also the point of the relationship seen this season. We were Explicitly shown the depth of their physical relationship in season 1 of IWTV (outside of anything ever stated as such in the books ps â this was ADAPTATION), but never since. We couldnât have them being EXPLICIT in season 2 as Lestat was, arguablyâŚdead(ish) and was viewed mostly through the lens of being a figment of Louisâ consciousness.Â
It feels as though after ALL that Trauma, the majority of viewership wanted these two fated epic loves to just crash together like a storm. That is NOT it. Itâs a precarious, tortuous, traumatic and yes, TRAGIC rebuild. Itâs Trust that needs REBUILDING. Sex is not, nor should it ever be, the be all and end all of a relationship (I think a few of you are too young/naive to recognize this). Intimacy however, played a very key role in how this season rolled out (thereâs an elephant in here, and I will not address it currently â if you donât know what the elephant is after that statement, youâre not reading at the right level yet). Â
This is not Heated Rivalry. That piece of media is amazing for many reasons, and I loved it, I mean it no insult, but its depth is not one of the things that makes it amazing. Its IMPLICITY is absolutely not one of them â that is an EXPLICIT piece of media from start to finish, and I think that has been lost somewhere in the Need for people to grab at all queer media like itâs porn on our screens. I understand that the concept of explicit queer media is rather new; and I am ALL for it. Please, world accept this queerness into main stream media and allow it to flourish publicly. Yes. I love it. But if a show, which is ADAPTING a piece of 40 year old literature which was NEVER explicit, does not make your little boys explicitly kiss/fuck just because you wanted to SEE it, does not, nor will it ever make that piece of media homophobic. I would like for you to point out even one STRAIGHT relationship in this piece of media (Iâll wait). If you came back with Lestat/Gabriella, I am actually going to throw you across the room.  We have a very diverse batch of fans that are extremely talented writers. These writers can write those scenes you want via Fic. This is one of the points of Fic. Let them write in the explicit parts. Let them write the really juicy bits. But do NOT confuse that as something that is therefore MISSING from the media as it was presented (derogatory). It was not missing. It was not the focal point.
We are also (and this one is confusing), provided Explicit AND Implicit proof of the other Queer Ship that everyone wants â Daniel/Armand. No, once again you are not going to get these two (old or young), making out and fornicating all over our screens. That was NEVER going to happen in TVL. Getting confirmation alone that theyâre aiming to take it there? That shouldnât have been given at all until the next book/season/series, so RELAX. Armand has confirmed â Companion. Armand has confirmed â watched you for 52 yearsâŚ(This is such a fun trope. If youâre unfamiliar, Booktok will help you find some delicious stalker dark romance); Show Confirmed â (attempted) Murder Husbands. What on earth more can you possibly WANT? This is not QoTD, this is The Vampire Lestat. Read it again.  Stop Jumping AHEAD. Armand YEARNING was so fucking delicious. Thereâs that word again. I think maybeâŚDefn: âa deep, tender, and often intense longing for something, someone, or a time that is absent or difficult to attain. It goes beyond a simple wish, carrying an emotional weight of desperate desire, pining, or nostalgiaâ: Yearning.
So now weâve visited both Loustat, and Devilâs Minion. Do we need to also discuss the Nickistat, Lesmand, etc. of this season? All also being IMPLIED with a little (but not zero) explicit peppering just to help yâall. I will allow a certain amount of complaint over the lack of Lesmand. As I would like more of that dynamic, but not having them does not make this season homophobic or a failure (see what I did there? No, clearly notâŚYou are listening to The Failures). It makes their desire for the audienceâs attention to be elsewhere clear.
WHERE IS ELSEWHERE? On the trauma. On the history. On the fucking story. On the Denial, on the Healing, on the extremely dense, EXTRORDINARILY dense plot points. On the unravelling of the ABUSE, the RAPE, the horrendous things that have happened to this character â on what MAKES Lestat the vampire he became. My god, the number of people who still donât see the issues with his turning as being a physical/sexual/emotional assault, EVEN THOUGH the show EXPLICITLY compared it to Claudiaâs Rape is really REALLY telling of the level of intelligence of the viewership â and it is FUCKING DISGUSTING. Â
[Aforementioned Elephant incoming...] The number of people who arenât willing to face the fact that the incestual abuse of Gabriella is foundational-childhood trauma that created this vampire we see today, that this abuse is consistent, non-consensual, centuries long, and he does not know HOW to get away from it, because all he ever wanted was to be Loved and Cared forâŚand the one person who is meant to do that has twisted that into something fucking implicitly (and in this case explicitly: never say they didnât try to show you what was actually important) sexual, andâŚthe fandom says: Oh, haha, I donât wanna deal with this weird (and yes, gross) trauma, I just want my little pretty men to fuck. LISTEN TO YOURSELVES!  You are ILLITERATE and SHALLOW. Or you are denying your own trauma and should seek a professional.
This show is also not picking on Louis because heâs a person of colour. The man, in the books was a white plantation owner. PUHLEASE pull yourselves out of your own asses. Claudia, in the books a little white girl (And, PS, I will actually SAVE you from the implied relationship that they fucking AVOIDED in this show between those two).  The evisceration of the writers for having Claudia get MAD and say MEAN Things (that were, objectively racially motivated in their appearance), were not racist. They were the words and actions of a SCARED, ANGRY, Dead Child who died in a world where those insults would be commonplace. She is not of your generation â She did not go through sensitivity training â She is not here to make you feel comfortable with yourselves. That was, arguably one of, if not, the most, intense scenes of this entire season, do not degrade it to a racially motivated slur said by a lonely child in the heat of the moment.  Your hatred of the writers for that is both obscene and unfounded.
Claudia, Regina AND Louis are not being targeted because theyâre BLACK (and weâll toss in Armand as a POC as well). Theyâre being targeted because this is LESTATâs STORY, and he is, ostensibly, correcting the record with his OWN opinion. That doesnât make it the RIGHT opinion. It makes it a DIFFERENT opinion. But let me be clearâŚ.you are aware that LESTAT is the Main Character, right? Like OVERALL? FOREVER? Whether or not you Like that is not the point. He actually IS the main character. That fact also does not make the show racist. That doesnât make the scenes where Louis is having a no good very bad day, or the scenes where Armand, or Regina or Claudia are all (at one point or another) having No Good Very Bad Days, racist. It just doesnât. It doesnât make the writers racist either.Â
If itâs not sexist that Gabi is the only female lead this season, then itâs not racist when more than half the main cast are people of colour. If itâs not sexist when the white female lead this season is a very horrible person, thenâŚwell you see where Iâm going. PS the show is also not sexist. Iâm using this as an example, not a spring board. Claudia and Regina are also characters, but while an important part of the season is designed AROUND Claudiaâs death, she is very rarely on screen.
Lestat sees Daniel as a petulant little fuckwit. And therefore, thatâs how heâs portrayed this season. If that wasnât clearâŚno, Iâm not even touching the people who think his writing was horrid. Read the words, understand the depth. Understand the POV (asking too much, I know, Iâm getting bored of repeating myself). Find your sense of fucking humour.
So. Hereâs the thing. Stop reading ahead. I think this is probably a pretty good point to make. The first two full seasons of the series Interview with the Vampire dealt, exclusively with the paper version of that story [There are of course many candid and obvious moments of foreshadow, the depth is impressive, but ultimately the story is THE STORY]. The Vampire Lestat series (new name, please take note), done for EXACTLY this reason, also tried very admirably to stick to the paper. When things that take place, or donât take place further in the future (QoTD, Body Snatchers etc.) have not been fully revealed yet? Thatâs OK. We arenât there yet.
Season 3 was short! But that was the allotted time. So thatâs what we got. If you have an issue with that, take it up with AMC. We have zero announcements for the future of the series or what it might hold. Are they going to change the name again for Queen of the Damned? We will wait and see, but we will absolutely not get any LESS intelligent in the presentation of the story and the adaptation (ADAPTATION) that is being presented to us, the fans. I PRAY they do not dumb this down. Continue to be implicit in the messaging, without being explicit. I will continue to be Outrageously mad at the takes I see online. But I would much rather that to them butchering and turning the show into pornographic slop for the masses. Yeah, I said it. If you donât like it? Stop fucking watching it. But I hope that you are intelligent enough to recognize that the more you watch it, even if it is to mercilessly and unintelligently insult it within a breath of your life, that youâre helping us, since viewership rates higher than âreviewsâ in the grand scheme of whether a show is continued. Â
Rotten Boy. That's all this Marius has to say of his Amadeo-- the boy who was "beloved by god", in a situation where Marius was absolutely casting himself as a god. But that fruit went sour somewhere along the way due to circumstances Marius claims time and again that he "could not prevent".
This sentiment perfectly captures how Marius feels about Armand and I have realized that do not hate Marius enough for it. Two words in episode 5 and it perfectly captures the whole dynamic. All the condescension, disrespect, and demeaning utility.
Having finished Blood & Gold last week I am still reeling from the disdain Marius shows for Armand. The show hit the nail right on the head I didn't hate Marius enough; I need to get better at my new job: Hating Marius.
My heart breaks for Armand who spent his (precious few) years in Venice mooning after Marius like the guy was some kind of god. But, nah, Armand was just the purse dog Marius bought to distract him from his midlife crisis because he's a pathetic and lonely divorcee. Once that little dog gets lost he just shrugs and goes to the breeder to get another. Doesn't even put up missing posters or check the shelter.
I am not even joking. As soon as Amadeo gets kidnapped Marius is like "welp, that's a lost cause, I guess it's time to get a new one" and turns Amadeo's best friend Bianca.Â
All of this is an effort to recreate Pandora, of course, and the relationship he had with her. Or to forget Pandora, more aptly. Amadeo, its implied, is nothing like Pandora, her polar opposite-- male, willful, more than a little bit unhinged and ultimately unable to effectively argue with/have equal power to Marius. But when Amadeo is kidnapped as a result of Marius's own failure to act? it's just too much fucking work to get him back because he isn't Pandora and the only person Marius cares about is Pandora. (Unless Pandora is around in which case the only person Marius cares about is himself and maybe Akasha.)
Naturally, he turns Bianca who is a beautiful young woman but obedient and quiet. Or so he claims in his narration, ignoring how Bianca is cleverer than he is and has lived her life beholden to men just like him, finding ways to outlast and outstmart them...
He then has multiple opportunities to drag Armand's ass out of his cult and spend however-long helping him get back to himself. He knows where Armand is the entire time. They've vampires. They live forever. Armand more or less worshipped Marius-- if anyone on the planet could help pull him out of the cult bullshit, Marius could've-- but, no. Nope. He won't even let Bianca go do it. You see, Armand dresses in rags and is smelly and mean, there is no hope for that little barbarian rascal, he was this vicious little savage the whole time clearly, what an oversight, what a shame, what a pity.Â
(The ancient Roman racism toward Europeans is so fucking strong in everything Marius says and does in this book. It's really nasty -- which, kudos to Anne Rice for damn compelling, uncomfortable writing. Kudos to the show for casting Assad Zaman because I feel like the "orientalism" flavor of condescending racism is a really relevant evil to invoke for how all the Western characters relate to Armand.)
There's a disjointed and disconnected feeling scene at the end of the book where Marius decides he wants bloody revenge on Santino and another character kills the guy for Marius-- but, does he really? What a hollow, token gesture that Armand (with no dialogue or further description than his name) is present for. Nothing in the actions or words about the previous 500 years at all indicates that Marius gives a damn about what happened to Armand, what Armand had to become to survive, the betrayal he must have felt upon finding out that Marius never, not for even a breath in the privacy of his own mind, so much as pretended to want to seek Amadeo out and save him.
My poor Armand who has been a bargaining chip his whole life, a pretty thing to own and control, a tool for forces more powerful and incomprehensible to him. Is it any wonder that he turns out the way he does?
I can't wait until we get to the point that the AMC Adaptation fandom realizes that Armand is the whipping boy everyone whales on when they don't like the consequences of their actions.
   I know we like to joke about Armand being akin to a teenage girl, but you can genuinely tell Armand was originally written by a woman. Armand, to me, is an example of a man being forced into a stereotypical âfeminineâ role since he wasnât seen as âmanâ enough or strong enough, which is why I think so many women relate to him.
   A few people have pointed out how similar Armand is to an eldest daughter, and as an eldest daughter I 100% agree. Armand is CONSTANTLY placed into caretaker roles, a role stereotypically given to women(especially daughters). In the books, Armand is often infantilized by older and more powerful men because heâs of the age where he can easily be mistaken for a girl. Heâs young and slender with pretty curls and big brown eyes. He constantly insists that heâs a boy, and Marius doesnât even refer to him as a young man. No, he is always a boy.
   Armand, like women have done since the beginning of time, has constantly cleaned up the messes that other men make. When Armand was a baby vampire, he was punished for Mariusâ actions. He was forced to watch his brothers burn to death, had their ashes dumped on him, then was forced to eat his best friend. He was put under mind breaking torture all because MARIUS turned him. Similar to how women are often victim blamed for the actions of their partner/abuser.
   When Nicki becomes too far gone after Lestat was warned not to turn him, Armand was the one who had to put him out of his misery. When Louis refused to listen to him after Armand gave him several warnings about how dangerous things could get with his coven, he directed the play and then he practically mothered Louis in San Francisco, constantly cleaning up behind him to make sure he wasnât caught. Then for 52 years he made sure Daniel didnât fuck up his career.
   And letâs not forget how Armand had to lead two covens for centuries. He had to make sure they were in bed on time, made sure they ate dinner, and diffuse any fights between them. Lestat was essentially the âfatherâ of the two because he stereotypically did what fathers do. He funded everything, he provided while Armand was placed into the role of a âmother,â ei, a caregiver who makes sure everyoneâs needs are being met. This is what makes Armandâs claim that he was usurped by Santiago even more laughable, I donât think Santiago would be able to hold everything together for a DAY. If he was truly in charge the coven would have destroyed themselves before Louis got the chance.
   Speaking of Armand being in charge, letâs talk about how being a leader doesnât mean you have a leader mindset.
   Lestat and Louis have lied way more than Armand has because Armand really has told the truth in a lot of the âliesâ heâs told.
   âI could not prevent it.â
   Armand was born in 1508, the painting he was revealed to be into was painted in 1520-1525, meaning that instead of 20, Armand would have actually been 12-17 during the time he was a muse for that portrait, meaning Marius ârescuedâ him at the ages of 7-12. So ever since he was a small child, Armand had no agency and was taught to never want any. Now, thereâs a chance the showrunners have made a mistake and they earnestly meant for Armand to truly be 20 in that portrait, my point still stands perfectly well. Armand was forced to be a servant his whole life, so when he was finally a leader he still acted like a servant.
   âI could not prevent it.â
   Armand genuinely felt like he could not prevent it because he has never been in a position to prevent anything. This reminds me of how women are conditioned to be followers, even though they are often placed in positions of leadership such as being mothers and managing a household. This is also why women tear down other women, they have been taught that wanting agency is a bad thing.
   You want to know two people who have always had agency because they fit into the patriarchy? Louis and Lestat.
   Yes, as queer men, Louis and Lestat faced discrimination from a society built upon a patriarchy, but they had so many more chances than Armand because they were still able to be deemed âman enoughâ in certain aspects.
   Yes, Louis faced racism, but Louis also held a position of power. Louis was a pimp who admitted to looking the other way as he listened to his prostitutes getting raped. And for as much as Louis preached about racism and how wrong it was, Louis never used his influence to try and held other African-Americans. Yes, he gave the prostitutes partial share of the business, but Iâve always felt like that was more or so done out of guilt than Louis genuinely wanting to help those less fortunate than him.
   For as much as Louis preached against racism, when he found out Armand, a man of color, was taken from his homeland, placed on a ship, taken to a new foreign country, sold like cattle, and was owned by a white man who continued to exploit him, he suddenly had nothing to say and continued thinking about his dead husband. Armand experienced what countless enslaved African-Americans did and in that moment Louis acted no better than Lestat when he was reading a history book and Louis had to inform him that they used to put the heads of slaves on spikes as a warning. Louis only really cared about racism when it applied to HIM.
   Back to the patriarchy, Louis chose not to visit his family often. Even if Louis could only come at night, he still could have made more of an effort. Society often deems that if the man of the household is a provider, thereâs nothing else he needs to do. Louis had that same mindset, and like so many men, was shocked when he found out that wasnât enough.
   Letâs look at Lestat, who held even more power than Louis did because of the color of his skin. Lestat was always listened to more than Louis in business because he was white. Even before Lestatâs race mattered, he held power over Nicki being a vampire. He abused that power and as I said before, Armand had to clean up the mess.
   Lestat held power over Louis and Claudia, again because he was white, but also because he was far more powerful than either of them. People always say that Louisâ the one who kept escalating the fight in S1E5. But guess what? Lestat was immensely more powerful than him, he could have deescalated the situation and he didnât. There are situations of this in real life where basically self defense is self defense until it isnât. When the other person is no longer a threat, you cannot do something to hurt them and claim self defense. Lestat was fully capable of dragging Louis up to the sky, therefore he was fully capable of ending that fight without going to that extreme.
   In this next example, both Louis and Lestat abused their positions of power. And that is with Claudia. After Louis used his position of power(being a vampire)to accidentally cause a riot, he uses Claudia to cleanse him of his sins. While Louis abused the power he held, Lestat abused it even more because again, he was the older and more powerful one. Lestat had the final say. And Louis was a new vampire and was panicking. Not only that, Louis had never seen a vampire go mad before. Lestat had. Yet he still turned Claudia.
   Louis literally dragged Claudiaâs body like a ragdoll when asking Lestat to turn her, just like how society often views women as dolls. And just like so many women when it comes to the healthcare system, Claudia was treated as an object and not a person who deserved autonomy.
   Men will often find women to replace their mothers if they have mommy issues. Their wives cannot just be their wives, they have to be mothers as well. Claudia could not just be his daughter, she had to be his sister as well. Lestat at least always saw Claudia as a daughter, while Louis continued treating her like a toy in a game of house whose role he could change on the flip of a dime.
   My whole point leading up to this has been to say Louis and Lestat had so many chances to get it together, to do right by themselves and Claudia, and they missed the mark. Every. Single. Time.
   Now time for something thatâs probably going to rile up a lot of Loustat fans:
   Louis and Lestat were more responsible for Claudiaâs death than Armand was.
   Iâve already listed how they failed Claudia, but let me reiterate:
They decided to turn her.
Very often, when women lash out, weâre told weâre being dramatic and emotional and asked if weâre on our period. When Claudia justifiably began acting out because she would forever be stuck in a little girlâs body and Lestat forced her to watch Charlie burn, all the blame was put onto her. These two grown men could not find it in them to admit that they were in the wrong and Claudia had every right to feel how she felt.
Lestat could not better himself, which drove his fledgelings to âkillâ him which drove them to Paris in the first place.
   What did Armand do? Well,
He continuously told Louis he needed to guard his thoughts better, notice how he never had to tell that to Claudia because she had that DOWN PACKED.
He continuously told Louis that the coven would kill him if he either didnât join the coven or get his ass out of Paris.
He ultimately chose his coven because unlike Lestat, Armand wasnât just going to turn anyone willy nilly because he understood the weight of the Dark Gift. Lestat only watched Nicki burn, Armand watched COUNTLESS others burn and probably considered walking into the fire a couple times himself. Not only that, but remember that while Louis certainly was falling in love with him, he was JUST starting to get over Lestat. And letâs be honest, once Louis found out Lestat was alive it would have been game over for Loumand. If Armand eradicated his coven, Claudia would have ran off with Madeline and Louis would have ran off with Lestat and Armand would have fallen into vampire madness. For as batshit crazy as his coven was, they kept him alive and werenât going anywhere. Armand himself said he didnât trust Louisâ love for him lasting, which he was right about. I know itâs a running joke that Louis wanted everyone and everyone wanted Louis, but nothing was ever good enough for him. When he was with Lestat he needed Claudia, when he was with Claudia he needed Lestat, when he was with Armand he needed Lestat, and when he continued to be with Armand he had to sleep around with hundreds of over men. We always infantilize Louis about the fact that Lestat cheated on him, but he stuck with Antoinette. Louis had a arsenal of twinks and everyone wants to joke about it, letâs just not talk about the fact that Louis was a serial killer that targeted gay men during a time where things were already extremely dangerous for queer people.
   I donât understand why other people canât understand that everyone in this show is a shitty person. Not only that, but Iâd argue that Armand is one of the least shitty.
   Yâall, Armand(almost)never lied.
   He didnât lie about him and Lestat fucking in the box, they actually fucked way more and he left that out. He also was considerate of Lestat and left out the fact that he fucked his mom.
   He didnât lie about Lestat loving him.
   And I donât even think he lied about Louis asking him to wipe his memories.
   Armandâs only lie was about the trial, and that was only because he found himself painted into a corner. Iâve already listed the reason why he let the trial play out, he never expected for Lestat to save Louis. So he was forced to scramble.
   Whatâs so funny is that yâall do not listen to the literal actors of this show.
   Assad himself said Armand is not a mustache twirling mastermind villain.
   Jacob has said that Armand is not truly a villain and that heâs deeply traumatized.
   Eric has said something similar to Jacob.
   Even Sam has acknowledged this.
   Yâall have to understand, these actors looked  at the books and built these characters from the ground up. They KNOW these characters. They werenât just given a script, they gave this show its soul. When they say something, HEAR THEM OUT.
   Another hot take: Claudia wouldnât have died if she was Armandâs daughter.
   When Armand truly loves someone, they are enough. When Louis told Claudia she was enough, he lied. Claudia was never enough for Lestat either. Armand loves Daniel unconditionally, he loves Sybelle and Benji unconditionally, and he would never keep them in an environment that he knew could harm them just because he wanted some dick.
   Speaking of Claudia and Armand, the two have many parallels because they are both victims of the patriarchy. Claudia because she is a woman, and Armand because he is deemed as invaluable as a woman.
   Claudia bore the brunt of a manâs violence(Louisâ murders)like Armand did(The Children of Satan).Â
   Claudia was taken in as a child, believing she was safe in a world of men because it was better than what she had before, like Armand.
   Both of them were turned at young ages. Claudia was 14, Armand was 17 in the books and in the show he was 27(possibly younger. And even if he wasnât physically younger, Assad has said that many times Armand still has the mind of a teenage boy)because the men in their lives did something that affected them.
   Both were forced into caretaker roles, Armand had to he Mariusâ constant companion and Claudia had to look after Louis.
   I think another parallel is how Claudia and Armandâs introduction to sex was traumatic.    Not enough people are talking about how sad Armandâs sex life genuinely is. And Iâm not just talking about how he was trafficked. Armandâs first âloveâ was Marius, who actually didnât love him and had sex with him on a regular and forced him to have sex with his friends. Â
Cut to the Children of Darkness, where sex was shamed and he was encouraged to not even look at his own genitals. Armand, who is a survivor of sexual assault, probably felt dirtier than he had before. Imagine being repeatedly violated for your entire life, and then you are told that sex is forbidden and disgusting no matter the circumstances. I feel like that would add to any self loathing guilt Armand might have already had.
Cut to Lestat, the first person Armandâs had consensual sex with(no, Iâm not counting Marius). When we see Armandâs version of the story, where heâs shy about having sex with Lestat, I genuinely believe thatâs how Armand felt when sleeping with Lestat for the first time. Either Lestat just didnât realize how nervous he was or didnât want to bring it up in his interview with Daniel. I think part of the reason why Armand is almost like a glass doll in Lestatâs memory is because he hasnât properly comprehended Armandâs feelings towards him.
âI love you, Lestat.â
âChrist.â
I think Armand got really vulnerable with Lestat, and Lestat never realized how vulnerable Armand was being. He saw Armand trying to open up as âdesperationâ because he was projecting his own trauma. And to Armand, the first person he ever willingly had sex with abandoned him, and he probably felt the same way Arun and Amadeo felt. Used for his body and then left.
   As for Louis, I strongly believe the main reason Armand ever joined in on the threesomes in San Francisco was to please Louis the same way he was forced to please Marius. Do I think Armand could ever agree to have a threesome for funsies? Yeah, not out of the questionÂ
   Now, Iâd like for everyone to look at these GIFs:
đŹ 0  đ 1243  â¤ď¸ 3379 ¡ 2x05 | 3x04
  Not only am I an eldest daughter, but I am also a middle child. Why I relate to this scene so much is because I know what itâs like being able to watch everyone else around you being able to have outbursts and youâre just meant to keep your cool all the time. This is not only a common expectation for women, but middle children often fall into this box because they are literally caught in the middle of these things.
   In Armandâs fight with Louis(I highly suggest rewatching that scene)a few people have pointed out how strangely human Armandâs movements are. Thereâs this one scene in particular where Armand wipes his face. I think this is Armand continuously trying to not rip Louisâ head off, I am not kidding. I think Armandâs rage was gradually being expressed through his movements. I think part of why Armand was acting so human in that scene is because he hadnât been that angry since he was a mortal. If they include the scene in the books where he broke down Mariusâ door, Armand might have felt neglected by Louis the same way he felt neglected by Marius. When you take that into consideration, it adds even more validity to his lashing out and torturing Daniel.
   Another way I and so many other women can relate to Armand? Weâve all been sexualized. I remember being around 8 or 9 and being told I had to wear a long shirt with leggings, I was 15 when my mother called me a prostitute for wearing a tank top and a skirt that was past my fingertips, I was also 15 when my mother accused me of trying to dress sexually(again, for not wearing a long shirt with the leggings I had on)and she told me I could only wear an outfit like that when I was with my dad because he needed to protect me from âcertain attentionâ I wouldnât draw to myself. Cut to me being 16-17 and my mother was confused as to why I refused to wear a crop top. Not only confused, but angry because I refused to show off my slim waist, as if she hadnât slut shamed me a year prior. Even of adults donât realize it, they very often sexualize children from a young age, especially girls. I had not even(or just barely)reached double digits when I first encountered this. When you are a woman, your body and beauty will be praised as much as it will be used against you.
   In the books, while Armand is praised for his outward appearance, he is claimed to be deceiving whenever he does something âwickedâ. The first thing that comes to mind is Lord Harlech talking about how vile he was while having the face of an angel/choir boy around the time they began sword fighting.
   The main reason Armand suffers so much is because he is placed in the same box as women by the patriarchy. Armand is a victim of misogyny when you boil it down to the bare bones of it all.
   Assad Zaman never lied.
   Armand has always been good.
   Let me repeat myself.
   Armand has ALWAYS been good considering the circumstances he was CONSTANTLY forced to survive in. Armand is mentally still a child in the body of a man being treated like a child but expected to act like a man but donât forget that by societyâs standards youâll never ACTUALLY be a man because youâre too womanly and women are weak. And even though youâre as weak as a woman you will still be handed things that are too heavy for you to carry because even though youâre totally weaker than men youâll actually be expected to carry more than they ever will.
   If you went through what Armand has, you would be no better. And I think so many of us women know that, we know that because Armand represents the deepest, darkest, most hurt, most vulnerable parts of ourselves. In truth, we know we would be no better than Armand because we ARE no better than Armand. Even if you havenât gone through Armandâs abuse, you understand the role heâs been given and when you look at him itâs almost frightening how similar it is to looking in a mirror.
   Weâve all been Aruns.
   Weâve all been Amadeos.
   And weâve all become Armands just to survive, just to navigate a world that will always be against us because even though our hands are empty we have to carry ourselves like we were born with silver spoons clasped in our palms so that we can rise above the hardships bestowed upon us by men.
daniel is going to be like âhey armand do you know anything about sofia? canât get a read on herâ and armand will say âoh thatâs gabriella. lestatâs mom.â and the grin that will spread across danielâs face will look like this:
Get @reshare_app ⢠@imdb Any vampire truthers out there? đ Here's an exclusive look at the next episode of #TheVampireLestat, premiering Sunday on AMC and AMC+.
Whatâs funny about the whole âLestat denying that he and Armand used to fuckâ thing is that he actually didnât deny it at all; he just didnât give it any weight. Yes, he corrected all the things Armand left out, and he did deny that he had professed his love to Armand.
But he never made a big deal out of the fact that he and Armand had a sexual relationship. It was just a detail in the background of his telling, not something worth amplifying or denouncing, unlike the center stage spot it had for Armand. If youâre looking for proof that it happened, youâre going to find it: other characters make references to it in his telling, even Armand himself. If youâre not looking for it, youâre probably not going to notice it. It was never important to him in the way it was to Armand.
The conversation he has with Armand in the box, the âWhat is us?â, is very reminiscent of Armand asking Louis what they were, if not companions, when they themselves used to have a sexual/romantic relationship. Let us remember Dreamstat making fun of Armand for questioning Louis, just as the real Lestat showed disdain when Armand asked him.
Louis also described his relationship with Armand at that moment without putting much weight on it, even though we know they had something and understand why Armand would think so: âitâs whatever you want to call it, Iâm fine with companionship, itâs not the word Iâd choose.â At the same time, Armand was convinced enough of the opposite to claim loudly before his coven that they were, in fact, companions.
A testament to how a story can be the exact same or quite similar in a lot of ways, and still be perceived to be so different based on who's telling it and what their priorities were.
itâs so important to me that lestat makes it explicitly clear that this is *his version* of events (whether daniel and louis actually met in a nice bar or not). because, yes, it stops the dumbass debate on who was telling the truth (surprise! theyâre ALL lying!). but MOSTLY because that implies that lestat wanted us to know as listeners that daniel is so horny for armand at all times that even louis du âhallucinates lestatâ lac was freaked out. and i think thatâs beautiful