Satan's Two Cents

28, bodily transfemme. look, someone has to have common sense around here and it's sure as hell not me or any of you. plural system discourse blog. any pronouns. anti-endos fuck off. Terfs fuck off. nazis deserve worse.

[discoursesatan]

Hello! This is a plural system's discourse blog. Let me introduce you to the regular posters- this post will be updated frequently. People will sign and tag their posts with their name.

Anton Slavik:

Source: Command and Conquer Tiberian Sun

Pronouns: he/him

Anton's a dispassionate man. He has an awful lot of bones to pick with most people's understanding of propaganda, imperialism, and socialism, and exactly what is justified in resistance.

Velvette:

Source: Hazbin Hotel

Pronouns: she/her, also do not call her a girl

Velvette is the reason we made this blog. She needs somewhere to grab people by their short and curlies on queer discourse of all kind and intersectionality. Understand she will probably be pretty mocking. She's here to upset people and poke at beliefs.

Posadas:

Source: Equestria At War

Pronouns: She/her

Ah, Posadas. Our local pro-nuclear seapony. She's obsessed with nuclear energy and will be posting about it and it's borderline religious for her. She also takes *massive* issue with cultural protestantism in socialist spaces that insist misery and work are virtue.

Allison Keyes:

Source: Angel Alastor AU

Pronouns: she/her/it/its

Resident schizoreligious angel. Highly Catholic, but actually reads the bible. Will be here to argue and spin theology in different ways and raise questions on all kinds of things- what is God? Does it matter if He exists? What does He want? Spoilers: incredibly pro-queer, gets insanely mad at anyone who only sticks to theology and cherry picked quotes to build their view of the world instead of also engaging with reality. "If queer people are an affront to God, they wouldn't even exist. God isn't a weak force that you can meaningfully oppose- everything, and I do mean everything, is made with divine intent".

Kane:

Source: Command and Conquer in general

Pronouns: he/him/it/its

Kane's entire shtick is being able to talk to anyone on the political spectrum and understand them. He has a lot to say about practical communication. . . And also cults. He's got a lot of thoughts on practical discourse and how to bring people together, not drive them apart.

[discoursesatan]

Yeah sure ideally a system should mostly get along for- you know, the sake of functioning.

But we have peace*makers* for a reason. Because my fucking God I will never stop despising Vi and she exists in here. Some of us live off antagonising others, and some people just exist to be despised in here.

You gotta allow a little bit of internal strife and disagreement and fighting- it's just nature in any large system I think. Definitely in fictive heavy ones.

- Jinx

[thephantomsys]

I love you Problematic Factives and Factkins Problematic Factives and Factkins I love you I love you please never stop existing

[discoursesatan]

We literally have an entire group in Pluralkit called Toxic Gossip Train for fictives with the most *rancid* discourse imaginable. On that list is Charlie Morningstar, Vriska Serket, Jinx, and Sarah Kerrigan/The Queen of Blades. Women who get no peace/get subjected to transmisogyny. - Jinx

[thephantomsys]

I love you Problematic Factives and Factkins Problematic Factives and Factkins I love you I love you please never stop existing

[navelgazed]

I do actually need singlets to understand that joking with a fictive about traumatic events in their canon is something you should ask for permission to do before assuming it will be a Funny fandom joke haha

Let's exercise our imaginations and think about what actually experiencing the events in the show/game/book what have you would be like and then ask ourselves critical questions like "would I appreciate it if someone made a joke about the worst thing that ever happened to me without seeing if I was cool with it first?"

[sarinisanta]

You wouldn't expect saying "kids shouldn't be property" to be such a controversial take but you would be surprised how quickly that gets you called things in this website

[bigriceenthusiast]

something something the disregard of kids' individuality in media of all types in favor of making them some sort of plot device is indicative of a larger problem about how children's personhood is perceived

(this is about isha but also worth discussing in general)

[avisaurea2]

what people think aspd boredom is:

what aspd boredom really is:

[discoursesatan]

I can explain what willogenic means. It’s another term for transplural.

(Some people may try to convince you otherwise. But the term was made to be an alternative to transplural)

Oh huh. So entirely voluntary plurality. Neat! Thanks.

Plurality as an experience is about the compartmentalization, so that makes sense some people do it on purpose.

- Jinx

[discoursesatan]

Why the fuck are we getting anti-endo shit on our dash?

Seriously, why? We're as traumagenic as they come- I mean fuck, we have an Angel Dust in here who used to be the part who'd grovel and beg for our parents to accept us again, I was the part that always wanted to get things right and be loved and accepted for once- but what the fuck does gatekeeping solve? Plurality is barely understood medically. I don't get why the idea of some people just being plural for different reasons and in different ways pisses people off so bad.

Defining your identity around suffering is some dumb weak bitch shit. You gonna be a victim or you gonna make sure people respect you? And hell, we might be traumagenic but we love our plurality and being all our selves. It makes the world make sense. It makes us make sense with all the internal arguments and the fifty different ideas and wants that pop into our head when we get put on the spot.

I don't even understand some of the origin terms- not a clue what willogenic means- but people end up compartmentalised for a million reasons and it's up to them if it counts as traumatic or not.

We're traumagenic and not suffering with plurality. It's the medicine for our shattered mind that makes it work and makes it make sense. Anti endos fuck off, anti willos fuck off, stop being little pussies who are offended by someone experiencing something differently to you.

- Jinx

[lesvegas]

you can only reblog this if you're not racist

[discoursesatan]

Thank you for actually talking about how, "kill all men," and phrases like that actually purpetuate the same bio-essentialism that the patriarchy runs on. I'm tired of seeing arguments that seem to mostly be, "well it hurts my feelings :(" instead of pointing out the more important issues with it, along with the fact that similar phrases are also used as dogwistles for hate groups. A phrase calling for the extermination of any entire group will never be productive for those reasons.

Exactly! No problem. It needs to be said, and it needs pushed back on even if it's a "joke".

"It's just a joke! Based on things I believe! That I'm reinforcing!"

- Velvette

[narcopthy]

the 'narc abuse' community needs a wake-up call

take it from someone diagnosed with NPD and who developed the disorder from abuse: if you were abused, you were abused and that's awful. but the answer is to not to abuse someone back.

you do not get to purposely try to make them angry, make them lash out, make them spiral or have a narcissistic collapse because you endured pain. that is also abuse.

maybe this person didn't manage their symptoms. push them to get help, do not push them to get worse. purposely causing a collapse repeatedly is insane all for your petty enjoyment. it IS possible to get better with this disorder and even go into remission. stop looking at ego as a bad thing and start looking at lashing out as cries for help --- or leave them alone if you (rightfully) resent them for the abuse, but do not taunt them and push them to suffer more under their own illness.

remember, narcissist is not a synonym for abuser or bad person.

so called empaths have no empathy when it comes to someone struggling in a different way, or in a way that hurts others.

if youd like a detailed description of how NPD feels and what ways we suffer i will be glad to provide that insight and closure for you.

[professionalmachinefucker]

youll see a lot of trans (plus nonbinary) and intersex discourse topics are often boiled down to a lot of people still thinking “men bad women good”.

[moss-the-art-guy]

Gooooood morning everyone! And happy clown week!

[nullandsuch]

A little tired of having to make my own representation for everything lol

[discoursesatan]

Plurality is always going to be seen as weird until the weirdest of us are accepted and can't be used as a wedge.

Same goes for queerness, FYI.

And we're a traumagenic system with headmates of every gender and sexuality, and the *vast majority* are not human. We have bioweapons, formerly human weapons, vampires, angels, ghosts, ponies, and people that don't exist. How plurality personifies your feelings and experiences and perspectives into different people is different for every plural system!

- Posadas

[discoursesatan]

Gender sure is weird. Now, obviously, everyone in here has their own relationship to it- we have transfemme people, transmasc, cis women, and cis men and multigender people- but collectively, we usually narrow it down to "bigender transfemme".

We *used* to be just a normal binary trans woman, then- we started reading about how trans men related to masculinity. How they constructed their own idea of manhood for themselves, and we realised we could do that for ourselves. We went full circle on masculinity- leaving it behind when it was socially imposed, coming back when we could decide what it meant for ourselves.

We can't meaningfully seperate ourselves from how trans men and transmascs experience gender. It's part of us now. We're here until the end.

We love y'all. Part of our community.