Untitled

[zanguntsu]

characters who Do Not deserve rights:

-yamamoto

-byakuya

-mayuri

-gin

-aizen

-szayel

-nnoitra

-ulquiorra

-isshin and ryuuken

-that homophobe from cfyow

-every quincy except uryu, ichigo, masaki, souken, karin, yuzu

-ginjo

-the entire central 46 and noble houses

-that ichibei bastard

i am not accepting criticism

[groove-charge]

*Breathes in* *Exhales* Here. We. Go.

If this Yamamoto thing if for the whole Save Rukia arc then just behr in mind that Yama has faithfully served the Soul Society for over a 1000 years. He’s not about to tear down his legacy for a single turncoat Shinigami. Keep in mind that he didn’t know her personally so as far as he was concerned, she was just another bad apple.

Byakuya redeemed himself multiple times. The whole Rukia execution thing was brought on by a conflict of oaths. Your hatred it unjustified.

Mayuri is a terrible person. No way around that. His one saving grace is restoring Toshiro, Kenpachi, and the Vizards

Love does crazy things to a man. Gin is no exception. If killing a few nameless Soul Reapers was what it takes to kill a super genius, all powerful, turncoat Soul Reaper then so be it. Gin becoming a traitor to kill Aizen and protect/avenge Rangiku is justified.

Aizen is a pretty bad guy, but he’s pretty much already been stripped of his rights.

Szayelapporo (spelled that right on my first try) is insane. Just put him on medication.

Nnoitora is the way he is because he hates himself. He’s angry because he hates himself. His situation is a complicated one.

Ulquiorra is also complicated. He doesn’t even understand the concept of emotion. The first real emotion he’s ever felt was love, and heartbreak. Love when he realizes his feelings towards Orihime. Then heartbreak when he dies knowing that her power could save him but she doesn’t because she knew he would continue fighting Ichigo. She chose Ichigo over him and he had to die knowing that. Sorry mate, I’m gonna have to give him a free pass.

Isshin is a creepy father but that’s all a cover for his Shinigami side which is his true self. Ryuuken did what he thought was good for Uryu. He didn’t want his son to prance around the city at night in a goofy white outfit fighting monster when he could be cut down by a Soul Reaper any moment. He wanted his son to have a normal, and prosperous life. Nothing wrong with that.

Don’t know what homophobe you’re talking about. I’ve been reading CFYOW and I have no idea who you’re talking about.

The Quincies had it rough. Most of them are guilty of nothing more than being on the losing side of a war. Even some of the worse ones are victims of past trauma. That doesn’t excuse their actions but it does mean that they need help. #YwhachDidNothingWrong

Ginjo maybe an asshole, but he’s guilty of nothing more than wanting justice for his friends deaths.

Central 46 are assholes. Idk why you hate the nobles for, they’re pretty irrelevant (except for Tsunayashiro, Shiba, and Kuchiki).

Literally no idea what Ichibei did.

I know I took this entirely too seriously but eh, whatever.

[zanguntsu]

[evilkitten3]

Being faithful to something doesn’t make you a good person

Byakuya made no effort to fix the system that almost killed his sister, blindly supported her execution, and is incredibly wealthy while people in Rukongai are starving to death

Mayuri is a horrible person whose every action is motivated by his own self-interest, which makes fascinating and generally very fun to watch, but ultimately still an awful person

Gin is my favorite character, but his bs is in no way justified - Matsumoto didn’t ask him to do any of that, and I think she would’ve preferred that he hadn’t. On top of that, he’s done absolutely horrible things for no reason at all, such as causing Rukia to have a breakdown for shits and giggles

Aizen shouldn’t be alive at all; Soul Society should be working on finding a way they can execute him

Szayel being crazy doesn’t justify shit. Most crazy people aren’t dangerous to others, and Szayel doesn’t show signs of real life mental illness so much as he shows signs of being a science-obsessed jackass

Nnoitra’s situation is not complicated. He’s a misogynistic pig and a sexual predator. No amount of “uwu self-hatred” makes that okay.

Whether or not Ulquiorra had feelings for Orihime isn’t relevant. He kidnapped, abused, and traumatized her. He also murdered her close friend/crush twice. He didn’t die knowing she chose someone else because there was never a choice for her to make - Orihime never once interacted with Ulquiorra because she wanted to; she was a prisoner and he was her guard.

“I did it for your own good” is something a lot of abusive parents say or tell themselves. It’s bullshit and it doesn’t justify abuse. If Isshin and Ryūken had wanted Ichigo and Uryū to be safe, they would have told them the truth

Dunno who the homophobe is; I haven’t read CFYOW yet

Attempted genocide isn’t okay no matter what. Regardless of how fucked up Soul Society is, the Quincies were awful too. Also, they’re pretty heavily Nazi-themed, to the point where Quilge Opie looks exactly like Himmler, so…. consider this Jew very uncomfortable

Ginjou had beef with Soul Society, not with Ichigo and his friends. Involving them at all wasn’t justified.

The nobles are all filthy rich. People in Rukongai starve to death on a daily basis. Fuck the nobles.

Ichibei could’ve shown up a helluva lot sooner and saved everyone some trouble, but I guess he was too busy painting or w/e

[groove-charge]

No being faithful isn’t inherently good. But he’s not a bad person either. He just has no tolerance for those who are enemies of the Soul Society, an organization he’s worked for over a 1000 years. He was compassionate to his allies, and hard on his enemies. He’s not good, nor is he bad. He’s a soldier.

Byakuya is based on the classic samurai. Being a samurai he’s all about honor. He made an oath on his parents’ grave which is an oath you strive to honor no matter what. Personally, I think he unconsciously threw the fight with Ichigo so Rukia would be saved and his oath would be kept. I still find it hard to believe that Ichigo during SS could defeat Byakuya.

Mayuri is an interesting character because he’s a bad person. No argument there.

Gin is the classic ‘you hurt my woman so I’m gonna kill your ass’ type character. Let’s be honest though, his encounter with Rukia was just put in to make us believe he was the villain. My guess is that he’s either not fond of the Kuchiki family, or did it to save face knowing that Aizen was probably watching him.

Aizen can’t be killed. He’s like Doomsday with genius intellect. And that chair of his had the adverse effect of making him stronger. Even Ywhach the most powerful being in their universe couldn’t kill him so good luck with that.

Szayal is literally the same thing as Mayuri. He’s just as likely to be good as he is bad. He’s a mad man.

Nnoitra is a very complex situation. When it boils down to it, he needed an ass beating and a therapist.

Ulquiorra was just as likely to be good as he was bad. He was a lonely Vasto Lorde who lacked the ability to talk and was an outcast even among his own kind. Imagine how different his situation would have been if he’d run into Kisuke instead of Aizen. He was abusive, but not intentionally so. If he was then he would’ve beaten Orihime within an inch of her life when she slapped him. He’s like a person who never developed properly as a child and I think he was intentionally written in that way. He was a tragic character, nothing more and nothing less.

Isshin and Ryuuken weren’t abusive. Isshin taught Ichigo martial arts the hard way so that when is powers awakened he could defend himself easier. Ryuuken tried to turn Uryu away from the Quincy lifestyle because of all the pain it brought him. He didn’t want his son being a Quincy because he knew it would be a hard and dangerous life. He wanted what he thought was best. Which is a little unwarranted because according to Ywhach, Uryu is technically the strongest character in Bleach.

I dunno who the homophobe is. If the original poster is talking about Tsunayashiro then yeah fuck him. He’s done a lot worse things than homophobia. Like having his own clan members killed then killing the assassins themselves. Abusing Hikone. And killing his wife, then nearly crippling her best friend Kaname. I wish Kaname had a redemption arc for the Blood War but I really wish he had one now. I would’ve loved to have seen him beat Tsunayashiro’s ass. I don’t know what Tsunayashiro’s zanpaktou does but between bankai, hollowfication, and resureccion (all together a 30x boost) he should be plenty powerful enough to beat Tokinada Tsunayashiro’s ass.

War isn’t genocide. And in all honesty you could argue that Ywhach did nothing wrong. They may have resembled Nazis but they obviously weren’t since they allowed colored people, that one dude that Kenpachi killed in like 0.2 seconds who was probably gay (Sternwritter Q the Question I think), and Giselle who is probably transgender according to Yumichika and Charlotte Coollhorne. (Probably butchered that dudes name but oh well.)

Ginjo did have beef with the Soul Society but he needed Ichigo’s powers to take them on because he wasn’t strong enough by himself. A weak motive but there is something else to consider. Ginjo probably resented Ichigo because Ichigo and his friends are accepted and even honored among the Soul Society and by Ukitake while Ginjo, and his friends were betrayed. Doesn’t justify but it makes it easier to understand why he did it.

The nobles are assholes but it really isn’t their job to take care of the Rukon district. It doesn’t matter though, most of Central 46 has been replaced after the Blood War and according to Captain Commander Kyorako, conditions have improved significantly along with relations with Hueco Mundo.

Ichibei isn’t a superhero. It’s not his job to crash down from the Soul Palace into the middle of the battle field and take on Ywhach head on. His job is to protect Soul King Reio. Ironically he failed at that too, but at least he tried. And it’s because of him and Squad 0 that Ichigo got as strong as he did. They also saved Rukia, Renji, and Byakuya. In truth he didn’t even have to do any of that. But again, not really his job.

[evilkitten3]

He committed genocide. That’s inherently bad.

Exactly zero people asked him to make that vow. And in any case, he also made a vow to Hisana (who very much did ask) that he would protect Rukia. Trying to have her executed isn’t really keeping that promise.

I love Gin. I really, really do. But the reality of the situation is that Rangiku doesn’t belong to him, regardless of whether or not they had feelings for one another. He also cut Hiyori in half. The best possible explanation for his actions is that Aizen groomed him, which is very likely, but an explanation isn’t an excuse. He did horrible things and his backstory doesn’t justify that.

Aizen can’t be killed as far as anyone knows. If they figured out how to get the Hogyoku away from him, they might be able to kill him.

Szayel and Mayuri’s entire fight was based around how they had similarities on the surface but were in reality very different. Mayuri wants science for the sake of science. Szayel wants to be perfect. One has done good things (for self-serving reasons) and the other hasn’t even come close to doing anything remotely decent.

Nnoitra is a misogynistic pig and a sexual predator. He deserved what he got. No excuses for that fucker.

He was very much intentionally abusive. He calculated his words in an effort to break Inoue’s spirit and succeeded. Not beating the shit out of someone doesn’t make you a good person. The only tragic thing about Ulquiorra is how far people will go to excuse his shit.

Assaulting your kids is child abuse. There isn’t an excuse for that. Ryūken wanting what he thought was best isn’t an excuse either - lots of abusive parents tell themselves or their kids that to justify their behavior. It’s still abuse.

I assume that’s who the homophobe is as well, and yeah, fuck that guy.

“War isn’t genocide” no but wiping out an entire people because some of them are shitheads very much is. Also, “a couple of them had dark skin so they aren’t racist and therefore they aren’t nazi” yeah dude it’s called a parallel. And neither Giselle nor Charlotte are good representations of trans or gender nonconforming people.

Again, understanding someone’s reasons doesn’t mean their actions are acceptable. Kūgo fucked over a lot of people and no amount of “he was jealous” makes that okay.

Okay, then what the fuck are the nobles for? Decorative flower arrangements?

Aizen was going after the Soul King. Stopping him was absolutely a part of Ichibe’s job.

[groove-charge]

Aight I’m about to school your bitch ass

GeNoCiDe Is BaD… If war is genocide and genocide is inherently bad then the US and Russia are fucking monsters for tearing Nazi Germany and Japan a new one during WWII.

Byakuya is a samurai. He is honor bound to serve his family. His promise on his parents’ graves was the honorable thing to do. I you don’t understand that then I can’t help you. And your whole argument gets completely negged by the fact Byakuya managed to retain both his vows.

You know most of the Soul Reapers Gin killed were corrupt right? And the ones that weren’t pledged their lives to protect the Soul Society, which is what they did by being killed by Gin. Gin is every bit as justified as Itachi.

I hope Nnoitora comes back to life in the upcoming canon Espada light novel for that sole reason lmao. And I hope he comes back a 100x stronger Lmao.

Quincies aren’t nazis just because they look like them lmao. Kubo drew them like that to make them look like a bigger threat.

Oh yeah, and Kugo wasn’t jealous. That was a side dish compared to what really happened. Kugo’s squad was slaughtered by Soul Reapers because Tokinada wanted to. Kugo just wanted Ichigo’s powers to get revenge on the real bitch ass responsible for murdering his friends.

The nobles run the Soul Society.

[zanguntsu]

imagine being so dull and unaccomplished in life that you have to come back to a months old thread to argue. shut up you racist misogynistic bastard lmao im blocking you now

[dolphspace-blog]

I've got an alternate account, suck it. I left Tumblr in the first place because of the toxicity of this site's anime community. A friend from the Insta anime community, which is FAR less toxic than this whiny ass community, convinced me to defend Bleach as its rep. So here I am to ask you who the hell you think you are shitting on Bleach's characters? Where do you get off insulting them and, in turn, Kubo's work? This time try to give a coherent argument instead of defaulting to your favorite insults - which made absolutely no sense in this argument's context - and hiding behind the block button. (Which won't work because I've got another alt account after this one lmao.)

[dolphspace-blog]

[dolphspace-blog]

Take a seat Gillete. In the meantime, I’m in need of a new watch.

[motherbychoice]

This cracked me the fuck up.

Like. Okay. And still… be fucking decent to people and teach your kids to do the same.

The goddamn male tears over being asked to be accountable for their behavior and take responsibility for themselves is fucking hilarious.

And also really fucking sad.

Gillette: Hey guys, we really need to make some changes in how we treat each other.

This bullshit: But… but… but… bad things happen to men sometimes!!!

Cry me a goddamn river and then grow the fuck up.

[sinner-speaks-deactivated201903]

This ad doesn’t demonize men. It does not promote imagery of men that implies most men are bad. If you don’t realize what real issues people have in the ad you might be the sexist one

[motherbychoice]

Of course the issues in this ad are real issues. And they’re issues that actually need to be addressed. But they ONLY ever seem to come into play from the MRA crowd when they’re needed to silence women and/or the ways toxic masculinity impacts us all.

Lets stop using men like this, yeah? Lets hold men accountable for their actions AND also look at why some of these things happen and what we can do to fix them. Because we can do BOTH.

Men dont get a free pass for their action/inaction just because there are some issues which impact men that need to be addressed. I’m certainly not going to forget all the times I have been harrassed/assaulted/intimidated by men just because they are more often victims of homicide (should we also discuss who most often commits homicide?).

The issues men face are many and varied. But they are 1) operating in a system established by and maintained by men and 2) the direct result of all of the things the Gillette ad pointed out.

If we want to fix most of the things above, it starts with the suggestions from the Gillette ad.

[sinner-speaks-deactivated201903]

Do you realize feminists silence MRA’s constantly, and thats why they invade your talks?

Also you are still missing the point of the problem. Holding men accountable isnt what the ad does wrong.

Demonizing men is what the ad does wrong

[motherbychoice]

If MRAs weren’t a fucking joke it might be different. As is, MRAs exist solely to undermine feminism. That is literally all they do.

I saw nothing demonizing about the ad. Chances are, if you’re offended by it, there’s a damn good reason. You’re probably part of the problem.

[nerdymouse]

This ad also completely misses the point of what the Gillette ad was talking about. The Gillette ad doesn’t imply that all men are bad. It just says hey, if you see another man harassing women or being overly aggressive and bullying others then stop that. Be better.

This ad goes “men are strong and all of these other things. Men are good. Look at all the struggles we go through.” Meanwhile the reason why men are more likely to commit suicide is due to the behaviors that the Gillette ad points out. The divorce rates? I guarantee are not because the man was a great person. You don’t leave your partner if they treat you well. You just don’t. No one is denying that men deal with issues, but you men always like to bring that up when we ask y'all to be held accountable for your actions.

[dolphspace-blog]

That’s the problem. The ad only calls out men. Women are more than capable of doing the things shown in the gillete add. If anything, women are more prone to bully. At least in my experience. (I wasn’t bullied but a friend of mine was.) Women can also sexually harass. Women can stalk men too. Yet this ad portrays it as a man only issue while repeating phrases like ‘boys will be boys’ which feminists continue to falsely claim is used as an excuse to horrendous actions committed by Males. We know bullying is an issue, but do teachers do anything about it? Nope. And which gender makes up the majority of teachers? Females. Sexual assault/harassment and rape is an issue but nothing productive can be done about it until 1) women quit lying about it and 2) they report it so that men can hold the sub human filth accountable. Gillete missed the mark, big time.

[nerdymouse]

Are you done whining? The ad was focused on the phrase “boys will be boys” that allow them to get away with shit they shouldn’t.

Women also don’t lie about rape and sexual assault. You are part of the problem if you think that.

Look… I have been sexually assaulted or raped many times. Have you? Do you know the shame that comes along with that? I was 13 when I was first raped in the basement of my mom’s house as she was making dinner for everyone. She thought he was a good Catholic boy. I wanted to play video games. He wanted me to give him head. He grabbed me by my hair and forced me. 13 year old me was horrified and ashamed. I had made a vow of celibacy. I shoved it down and lied to myself that it wasn’t “really rape”. He’s now married.

The one time that I reported sexual assault, he was friends with the police chief and his wife was a judge. That went no where beyond making it harder for my now ex fiancee who forced me to report it then left me.

Perhaps instead of blaming women for not reporting you should blame the people who committed the act.

[dolphspace-blog]

The phrase 'boys will be boyd' had never been used to excuse such behaviors. It's used to defend behavior such as kids rough housing on the playground. Or when they get a new dirt bike and ride it around all day.

Unfortunately, women do sometimes lie about rape, and sexual assault. I've seen it first hand. I used to sit with a couple of slatterns at lunch and one of them talked about the possibility that she might be pregnant and was wondering what she should tell her parents. One of her friends said that she should tell them that she was raped. And her friend was serious. And what happens when you say you've been raped? They ask who committed the crime. It would be so easy for her to pick out somebody she doesn't like and say that they did it. Worst of all, the poor guy can't even prove his innocence until the baby comes and they can run a DNA test. It's even worse if the guy actually is the father.

I'm sorry you were raped. I truly am. If I had the chance, I'd lop off the heads of the sub human beasts without a second thought. But nobody is blaming the victim. You can't wait over an extended period of time to report it. As gruesome as it is, you need evidence. If not then justice can't be served and those sub human filth are still free to do it again. The world was made for man and woman to work hand and hand. Men can't hold other men accountable if the women don't do their part as well.

[dolphspace-blog]

Fake News

[dolphspace-blog]

We need another Crusade...

[dolphspace-blog]

Take a seat Gillete. In the meantime, I’m in need of a new watch.

[motherbychoice]

This cracked me the fuck up.

Like. Okay. And still… be fucking decent to people and teach your kids to do the same.

The goddamn male tears over being asked to be accountable for their behavior and take responsibility for themselves is fucking hilarious.

And also really fucking sad.

Gillette: Hey guys, we really need to make some changes in how we treat each other.

This bullshit: But… but… but… bad things happen to men sometimes!!!

Cry me a goddamn river and then grow the fuck up.

[sinner-speaks-deactivated201903]

This ad doesn’t demonize men. It does not promote imagery of men that implies most men are bad. If you don’t realize what real issues people have in the ad you might be the sexist one

[motherbychoice]

Of course the issues in this ad are real issues. And they’re issues that actually need to be addressed. But they ONLY ever seem to come into play from the MRA crowd when they’re needed to silence women and/or the ways toxic masculinity impacts us all.

Lets stop using men like this, yeah? Lets hold men accountable for their actions AND also look at why some of these things happen and what we can do to fix them. Because we can do BOTH.

Men dont get a free pass for their action/inaction just because there are some issues which impact men that need to be addressed. I’m certainly not going to forget all the times I have been harrassed/assaulted/intimidated by men just because they are more often victims of homicide (should we also discuss who most often commits homicide?).

The issues men face are many and varied. But they are 1) operating in a system established by and maintained by men and 2) the direct result of all of the things the Gillette ad pointed out.

If we want to fix most of the things above, it starts with the suggestions from the Gillette ad.

[sinner-speaks-deactivated201903]

Do you realize feminists silence MRA’s constantly, and thats why they invade your talks?

Also you are still missing the point of the problem. Holding men accountable isnt what the ad does wrong.

Demonizing men is what the ad does wrong

[motherbychoice]

If MRAs weren’t a fucking joke it might be different. As is, MRAs exist solely to undermine feminism. That is literally all they do.

I saw nothing demonizing about the ad. Chances are, if you’re offended by it, there’s a damn good reason. You’re probably part of the problem.

[nerdymouse]

This ad also completely misses the point of what the Gillette ad was talking about. The Gillette ad doesn’t imply that all men are bad. It just says hey, if you see another man harassing women or being overly aggressive and bullying others then stop that. Be better.

This ad goes “men are strong and all of these other things. Men are good. Look at all the struggles we go through.” Meanwhile the reason why men are more likely to commit suicide is due to the behaviors that the Gillette ad points out. The divorce rates? I guarantee are not because the man was a great person. You don’t leave your partner if they treat you well. You just don’t. No one is denying that men deal with issues, but you men always like to bring that up when we ask y'all to be held accountable for your actions.

[dolphspace-blog]

That's the problem. The ad only calls out men. Women are more than capable of doing the things shown in the gillete add. If anything, women are more prone to bully. At least in my experience. (I wasn't bullied but a friend of mine was.) Women can also sexually harass. Women can stalk men too. Yet this ad portrays it as a man only issue while repeating phrases like 'boys will be boys' which feminists continue to falsely claim is used as an excuse to horrendous actions committed by Males. We know bullying is an issue, but do teachers do anything about it? Nope. And which gender makes up the majority of teachers? Females. Sexual assault/harassment and rape is an issue but nothing productive can be done about it until 1) women quit lying about it and 2) they report it so that men can hold the sub human filth accountable. Gillete missed the mark, big time.

[dolphspace-blog]

Take a seat Gillete. In the meantime, I’m in need of a new watch.

[motherbychoice]

This cracked me the fuck up.

Like. Okay. And still… be fucking decent to people and teach your kids to do the same.

The goddamn male tears over being asked to be accountable for their behavior and take responsibility for themselves is fucking hilarious.

And also really fucking sad.

Gillette: Hey guys, we really need to make some changes in how we treat each other.

This bullshit: But… but… but… bad things happen to men sometimes!!!

Cry me a goddamn river and then grow the fuck up.

[sinner-speaks-deactivated201903]

This ad doesn’t demonize men. It does not promote imagery of men that implies most men are bad. If you don’t realize what real issues people have in the ad you might be the sexist one

[motherbychoice]

Of course the issues in this ad are real issues. And they’re issues that actually need to be addressed. But they ONLY ever seem to come into play from the MRA crowd when they’re needed to silence women and/or the ways toxic masculinity impacts us all.

Lets stop using men like this, yeah? Lets hold men accountable for their actions AND also look at why some of these things happen and what we can do to fix them. Because we can do BOTH.

Men dont get a free pass for their action/inaction just because there are some issues which impact men that need to be addressed. I’m certainly not going to forget all the times I have been harrassed/assaulted/intimidated by men just because they are more often victims of homicide (should we also discuss who most often commits homicide?).

The issues men face are many and varied. But they are 1) operating in a system established by and maintained by men and 2) the direct result of all of the things the Gillette ad pointed out.

If we want to fix most of the things above, it starts with the suggestions from the Gillette ad.

[sinner-speaks-deactivated201903]

Do you realize feminists silence MRA’s constantly, and thats why they invade your talks?

Also you are still missing the point of the problem. Holding men accountable isnt what the ad does wrong.

Demonizing men is what the ad does wrong

[motherbychoice]

If MRAs weren’t a fucking joke it might be different. As is, MRAs exist solely to undermine feminism. That is literally all they do.

I saw nothing demonizing about the ad. Chances are, if you’re offended by it, there’s a damn good reason. You’re probably part of the problem.

[crazygalaxykit]

Do they know that MRA’s make fun of male victims, also seen MRA’s support toxic masculinity.

[dolphspace-blog]

MRA's aren't a joke. They were created not to undermine feminism, but to undermine radical feminism which is solely anti man. And I've never seen MRA's make fun of Male victims. I've seen MRA's support manly behavior that is often, and wrongly, labeled as toxic masculinity. Pretty sure that's how this all got started.

[dolphspace-blog]

Take a seat Gillete. In the meantime, I'm in need of a new watch.

[comicbookuniversity]

[dolphspace-blog]

Two out of those three are brave warriors who don’t back down from a fight. Those are traits considered to be toxic. Side note: toxic masculinity doesn’t exist.

[i-am-an-actual-cancer-cell-deac]

Those traits shouldn’t be considered toxic but toxic masculinity is real. An example would be when a man is told that he’s a pussy or that he is weak for crying or showing emotion, as well as the idea that men cannot be victims of abuse (1 in 10 are I believe).

[dolphspace-blog]

I’m not saying that doesn’t happen. I just have a different term for people like that; dickheads. I agree that men can be victims of abuse; I also think it’s a shame that a lot of the time they don’t get the same help, or support their female counterparts get. I’m more referring to traits like heroism, bravery etc. Unfortunately traits like those are often referred to as toxic masculinity.

[badman-w]

No they’re not, you self victimizing dumbass, heroism and bravery aren’t referred to as toxic masculinity. I literally cannot think of anyone who has ever said that except for you cause you heard toxic masculinity, pissed yourself and then believed it referred to everything often attributed to men (without reading what it actually meant cause you don’t need some dumb feminist to tell you what anything means, you’re so much smarter than that)

Masculinity itself isn’t seen as bad, but then again I think masculinity is working out and Wise Spartans while you probably may think it’s acting like a frat boy and locker room talk. You may believe asking a chick out despite her telling you to quit it is probably bravery so like, I guess seeing people shit on what you equal to True Masculinity would be seen as a threat to you and a war on Masculinity.

That or you watch conservative news “the only true source of news” and they’ve told you Feminists want to kill masculinity and no matter how many times they prove you otherwise the Conservative commentators on your head have already set your ideology just like all the other sheep.

[dolphspace-blog]

You must not be paying attention then. I've seen, more often than not, feminists use Male characters who defend their female companions from danger as examples of toxic masculinity. Pretty sure that falls under heroism and bravery.

[comicbookuniversity]

[dolphspace-blog]

Two out of those three are brave warriors who don’t back down from a fight. Those are traits considered to be toxic. Side note: toxic masculinity doesn’t exist.

[i-am-an-actual-cancer-cell-deac]

Those traits shouldn’t be considered toxic but toxic masculinity is real. An example would be when a man is told that he’s a pussy or that he is weak for crying or showing emotion, as well as the idea that men cannot be victims of abuse (1 in 10 are I believe).

[dolphspace-blog]

I'm not saying that doesn't happen. I just have a different term for people like that; dickheads. I agree that men can be victims of abuse; I also think it's a shame that a lot of the time they don't get the same help, or support their female counterparts get. I'm more referring to traits like heroism, bravery etc. Unfortunately traits like those are often referred to as toxic masculinity.

[vannajamma]

[dolphspace-blog]

Literally no man feels like their identity is being threatened. They’re calling bullshit because they’re calling out men for being just that. Men. They’re saying that normal boyish behavior is now bad because it’s not politically correct.

[uknownada]

Advertisement: “don’t rape people”

Intelligence incarnate: “This is just what men do.” *throws useful $20 tool in the toilet*

[dolphspace-blog]

At not point in the ad did they say "don't rape people" because it doesn't need to be said. Men know rape is bad. Some still choose to do it because they're bad men. Women can do it too. At no point did I say what you're implying.

[comicbookuniversity]

[dolphspace-blog]

Two out of those three are brave warriors who don’t back down from a fight. Those are traits considered to be toxic. Side note: toxic masculinity doesn’t exist.

[badman-w]

Reason #394874 Why I wish men would just keep their stupid opinions to themselves

Men are really fucking hurting cause they think we’re calling all masculinity toxic except that’s the difference dumbass, not all forms of masculinity are toxic but the dominant type you asshats use that makes men having vulnerabilities a completely horrible sin is what we call toxic masculinity.

I know this hurt your feelings and triggered you so bad you had to fill your blog with comments on how toxic masculinity is imposible and made up. But maybe if you had actually thought about what people mean as toxic instead of acting like some form of reacting like a man-ape and going all “masculinity is being called toxic by… hmm… evil feminazis” you wouldn’t sound like such a dumbass.

I guess men not being able to have vulnerabilities or being called pussies for not wanting to act like predatory fuckboys isn’t a masculinity problem, whatever

[dolphspace-blog]

Reason #394874 Why I wish feminists would just keep their stupid opinions to themselves

[vannajamma]

[dolphspace-blog]

Literally no man feels like their identity is being threatened. They're calling bullshit because they're calling out men for being just that. Men. They're saying that normal boyish behavior is now bad because it's not politically correct.

[silver-tangent]

I’m just gonna say it. If you think a razor company saying “Rape and misogyny aren’t manly traits” is an attack on all men, or some sort of leftist feminist propaganda; then you are fucked up. The fact that a video standing up to bigotry has 90% dislikes makes me feel absolutely disgusting.

If you’re not terrified that 90% of people felt personally attacked by an ANTI-RAPE, ANTI-MISOGYNIST message, then you’re not paying attention.

And if you think the ad is anti-male; you can stay the fuck away from me because I don’t wanna be a man like that, and I don’t wanna not be a man around people like you…

[dolphspace-blog]

Except that it isn't anti-rape/anti-misogny. It literally doesn't even broach those topics. It shows a few jackasses and claims that it's toxic masculinity when in fact it's just small group of assholes. And that's what made up like 2% of the video. The rest was just boyish behavior that's been considered normal for decades but is now considered bad because a small group of blue haired feminists and beta males made up the term toxic masculinity.

[arandomthot]

Have to wonder if his co-workers were pretending as well

[dolphspace-blog]

First of all, ever seen Sosuke Aizen? The disguise works.

Second, the 'fragile male ego' is a fake term made by blue haired feminists who went lesbian because no man was ever attracted to them.

Thirdly, there is nothing fragile about Superman. The dude sneezes entire solar systems away.

[politicalsci]

[dolphspace-blog]

Not asking for tens of millions of people to die.

He's talking about how some guys actually take the idea of toxic masculinity seriously. Also the fact that they need safe spaces. Especially since a lot of the guys back then were hard workers and many were willing to enlist voluntarily.

[liberalsarecool]

Mental illness is global.

America has a very unique problem with guns, violence, and toxic white men.

[dolphspace-blog]

False on many counts. America doesn't have a problem with guns. America doesn't have problematic issues with violence. White men isn't the problem either. (And saying they are is racist.) America has a problem with fatherless homes. As you'd find out if you did your research, quite a few shooters came from fatherless homes. America needs more masculinity, not less.