artist: felicia chiao
KIROKAZE

if i look back, i am lost
The Bright Sessions
🪼
Today's Document

shark vs the universe
hello vonnie

oozey mess

titsay
almost home

Love Begins

Origami Around
RMH
No title available

pixel skylines
★
Cosimo Galluzzi
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
EXPECTATIONS

Product Placement

seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany

seen from Russia
seen from Singapore
seen from Venezuela
seen from Colombia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Vietnam

seen from United States
seen from India

seen from Peru
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Iraq

seen from Singapore
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan

seen from Belgium
@dreaming-byzantium
artist: felicia chiao
Why I Stopped Watching "House of the Dragon"
First of all: this is not about the actors.
The cast is incredibly talented, and they deserve love, respect, and appreciation for the work they put into these characters. My issue is not with the performances. My issue is with the writing, the adaptation choices, and the direction the show has taken.
As someone who has read "Fire & Blood" and is Team Green, I stopped watching because the show no longer feels like an adaptation of the Dance of the Dragons. It feels like a version of the story that constantly softens Team Black, weakens Team Green, and strips away the complexity that made the original conflict interesting.
And let me tell you, I am Team Green, but I loved the way Rhaenyra was written and how she didn't need to be soft and a "strong female character" to have supporters and to play the game. So this really is not about teams, but about how the characters and the story were written in the show.
In the book, neither side is good. That is the point. The Dance is not a story about saints and villains. It is a tragedy about ambition, inheritance, pride, violence, family, and political failure. Everyone is compromised. Everyone is hypocritical. Everyone loses. But the show keeps pushing the audience toward one side.
Rhaenyra, especially, is framed far too often as a hesitant, noble, passive, almost saintly figure who simply wants peace and justice. But book Rhaenyra is not that. She is proud, ambitious, entitled, politically reckless, capable of cruelty, and deeply hypocritical. That is what makes her interesting.
Rhaenyra does not want a new world. She wants Rhaenyra to be queen.
She lives in a patriarchal society, yet makes no meaningful effort to improve the condition of women generally. She has three sons widely believed to be bastards, yet does nothing to improve the status of bastards as a class. She does not challenge the system for everyone. She expects exceptions for herself and her children while leaving the same oppressive structures intact for everyone else. And that matters politically. In Westeros, succession is everything. Putting disputed heirs in line for the Iron Throne and Driftmark is not a minor scandal; it is a recipe for future rebellion. It gives rival branches of the family and ambitious lords grounds to challenge the succession. It also creates a dangerous precedent in a society built around legitimacy, inheritance, and bloodlines.
And yet the show surrounds Rhaenyra with prophecy, white stag symbolism, and “chosen one” imagery that never existed in the book. The prophecy was not part of the Dance. The white stag did not choose her. The universe was not endorsing her. "Fire & Blood" is far more cynical and far more interesting than that.
Another thing is that the show also keeps taking strengths from Team Green and either removing them or giving emotional weight to Team Black instead.
Book Alicent is not a helpless victim drifting through events. She is politically savvy, intelligent, ambitious, strategic, and deeply involved in the Green cause. She knows how to play the game. She rules effectively alongside the Green Council while Viserys declines and while Rhaenyra is away on Dragonstone.
The show, however, strips her of agency again and again. Her choices are softened, excused, or blamed on misunderstandings. The deathbed “Aegon” confusion was never in the book, and it weakens her political motivation. In "Fire & Blood", the Greens crown Aegon because they believe he has the stronger claim, because they have prepared for it, and because Alicent is protecting her children. It is deliberate. Even Aegon only accepts the crown to protect his siblings.
Even worse, the show makes Alicent look like she does not love her sons. That is one of the most unforgivable changes to me. Book Alicent’s defining motivation is her children. She fights for them. She defends them and their rights as children of the king. She is not perfect, but she is a mother whose political world is built around their safety and their claim.
Turning her into someone who betrays her sons for the sake of reconciliation with Rhaenyra is not tragic to me. It is character assassination.
And how they keep punishing Alicent by taking her agency and with assault situations - the whole feet thing with Larys, her marriage, Aemond kissing her - it only makes it clear to me that it was never about feminism for the show runners, but about Rhaenyra being the "strong female character" that will destroy the "evil side".
Helaena is another example. In the book, Helaena is Team Green. She is queen, Aegon is her husband, and they have children together. Their marriage may not be romantic in the modern sense, but it is not nothing. Aegon is said to share her bed until the death of their son. She is beloved by the smallfolk. She is a dragonrider bonded to Dreamfyre, one of the most important dragons alive.
The show reduces her almost entirely to prophecy and fragility. Her relationship with Dreamfyre is barely explored. Her role as queen is diminished. Her bond with her family is weakened. Her strength is removed.
Aegon II also suffers from this treatment. In the book, he is deeply flawed, but he is not an idiot. He is not meant to be a cartoon villain. He has one of the most extraordinary dragon bonds in the entire Dance with Sunfyre, the most beautiful dragon in the world. So why does the show make him seem incompetent even in basic Targaryen identity? Why is Sunfyre visually diminished, being rarely shown?
Daeron is another issue. In the book, Daeron is one of the Greens’ best assets: courteous, capable, brave, beloved, and an effective military presence. He was effectively the greatest threat to Rhaenyra, militarily speaking. He was fostered in Oldtown, which is normal in Westeros. That does not mean Alicent did not raise him or that he is only good because he was away from her. The show’s handling of him has been strange, delayed, and dismissive. He was in Oldtown for a few years only, not his whole life.
The Greens in the book are also much more united and politically competent. They are loyal to each other. They are strategic. They understand governance. In the show, they are constantly turned against each other, made weaker, more fractured, more foolish, and more cruel. Aemond turns against Aegon and bruns him. Aegon and Helaena barely look at each other. And Aemond is cruel towards Helaena. It never happened in the book.
Meanwhile, Team Black gets softened.
Daemon is one of the clearest examples. In the book, Daemon is dangerous, violent, predatory, and morally horrifying. He is not a romantic ideal. He is not simply a devoted husband who loves Rhaenyra. The show repeatedly leans into his charisma and his romantic appeal while transferring or emphasizing many of his worst traits elsewhere, especially onto Aegon. Daemon groomed his niece. He killed his first wife in the show. He is involved in horrific violence. Yet the fandom often treats him as “morally grey” while Aegon is treated as uniquely monstrous.
Then there is Nettles.
Removing Nettles is one of the worst adaptation choices. She is one of the most unique characters in the Dance. She is lowborn. She is not another polished Targaryen princess. She challenges ideas about blood purity and dragonriding. She is also the only confirmed Black character in the original Dance narrative, and her relationship with Daemon is one of the most ambiguous and interesting parts of his story.
Erasing her and handing parts of her role to Rhaena changes the story completely. It removes a lowborn outsider and replaces her with another Targaryen noble. It also removes one of the few characters who truly disrupts the aristocratic world of the Dance. It also makes Rhaenyra look like a saint, instead of the racist she truly was in the book.
And yes, the show’s racial choices frustrate me too. Making the Velaryons Black could have been interesting if the writing had meaningfully explored it. But instead, they erased Nettles, the one character whose presence actually challenged the Targaryen worldview from outside noble bloodlines. Criston Cole being a brown man could also have been interesting if the show developed him with care. Instead, he is often reduced to sexual scandal, humiliation, and villain framing.
Rhaenys also infuriates me. The show gives her speeches about Alicent serving men, as though Rhaenys herself spent her life fighting patriarchy. But what did she actually do? She toiled for Corlys’ ambitions. She allowed her very young daughter to be offered as a bride to Viserys. She accepted Lucerys as heir to Driftmark despite knowing the obvious questions around his parentage, instead of fighting for Baela and Rhaena. She later accepts political marriages between her granddaughters and Rhaenyra’s sons instead of truly advocating for them. So what was that speech supposed to be?
Again, this is the problem. The show gives certain characters modern-sounding lines about power, gender, and freedom, but their actions do not match.
And Maelor. The erasure of Maelor is something I cannot get over. That is not a small change. It affects Blood and Cheese, Helaena, Aegon, Alicent, and the entire emotional structure of the Green tragedy. Even George R. R. Martin publicly criticized the removal of Maelor and warned about the butterfly effect of simplifying the story.
At some point, it stops feeling like adaptation and starts feeling like distortion. That is why I stopped watching.
Not because I think Team Green are saints. They are not. Otto is manipulative. Aegon is deeply flawed. Aemond is dangerous. Criston is bitter and violent. Alicent is ambitious. I know exactly what side I support, and I do not need to pretend they are morally pure.
But that is precisely the difference. Many Team Green fans can admit our side is full of terrible people. What becomes exhausting is watching Team Black characters get romanticized, softened, excused, or turned into symbols of righteousness while the Greens are stripped of their intelligence, loyalty, complexity, and love for each other.
The Dance is supposed to be a tragedy where everyone is flawed. It is not supposed to be “Rhaenyra the chosen queen of feminism versus the evil misogynistic Greens.” Book Rhaenyra is not a saint. Book Alicent is not a helpless victim. Book Helaena is not just a fragile dreamer. Book Aegon is not an imbecile. Book Daemon is not husband goals. Book Nettles matters. Book Daeron matters. Maelor matters. The Green family matters.
Now, I repeat - The actors deserve every bit of praise. They are doing their jobs beautifully, even if the script is deeply flawed.
But the writing has lost me. This is not the Dance I wanted to watch.
There are a lot more stuff that I could point out and criticise, but theses are the ones on top of my head. In the end, I wanted to watch Fire & Blood. Instead, I got someone's fanfiction loosely inspired by it.
But hey, at least we got the whole prophecy thing linking to Jone Snow, right?
Anyway, if any Team Black stans want to yell at me, I'll be over here rereading "Fire & Blood", where nobody is the chosen one, everyone is awful, and somehow that's exactly what makes the story so brilliant.
So damn true.
Before the show came out, I was sure that given one of the main appeals of Game of Thrones was that you have an entire world full of complex characters who don‘t fit the villain/hero dichotomy because everyone is just working for their own goals that the Dance of Dragons would be no problem. It‘s the same, albeit even more morally ambiguous because there are no Stark main characters anymore who get the benefit of doubt.
But I started watching it and am suddenly thrown into this terribly cringe self-proclaimed feminist take on an inheritance issue? Where one side gets all bad traits and characteristics and relationships the writers can come up with and the other is completely unrecognisable and handed a chosen one narrative?
At first, I excused it with commercial interest because obviously, they wanted guaranteed success and wanted to appeal to Daenerys fans by giving Rhaenyra matching vibes. That already felt wrong because a princess who lived at a court where her family had stabilised their position as ruling monarchs of a wealthy kingdom does not have much in common with an orphaned daughter of a deposed dynasty running from assassins.
And it just became worse and worse since that. Like you said, this is not an adaption anymore. This is fanfiction loosely inspired by “Fire & Blood“. Maybe they should have chosen another time period to do a prequel about, like the Conquest or Robert‘s Rebellion or the Blackfyre Rebellions or something. Where there‘s not enough book material to KNOW that there are no heroes or villains in this story.
I agree, maybe the Blackfyre Rebellion would’ve been good.
Sleeping Muse
By Misha Frid
#i literally crack up everytime #at least ten of the notes are from me
This will reach a million posts before I stop reblogging EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
AND IT’S BACK ON MY DASH. LOVELY.
A HANDY CHART FOR THOSE OF YOU WONDERING WHAT THE FUCK IS UP WITH THESE. NOTE THAT THESE ARE ALL THE INFORMAL AND YOU IS THE FORMAL SO LIKE YOU WOULD ALWAYS ADDRESS YOUR SUPERIOR/ OLDER PERSON/ SOCIAL BETTER WITH YOU BUT WITH YOUR BUDS YOU CAN USE THESE.
As a Greek, in response to the current controversy about Matt Damon being cast as Odysseus, I'd just like to share that one of the moments that changed my brain chemistry as a kid was reading a novelized version of the Odyssey and coming across the following description of Odysseus when Circe sees him for the first time and thinks he's hot: "his hair curled like a clematis and his eyes were very brown".
So may I present my own casting choice for Odysseus:
Excuse me???
you are right and you should say it.
Is this the face of a man who would put his own infant in front of a plow to avoid going to war?
Absolutely not
You know who would try that shit?
Is this the face of a man who would defy the very gods to get home to his wife?
You know who would defy the gods just to show he could get away with it?
The last thing Penelope's suitors ever see:
I love this guy.
Well done Bulgaria, I will listen to your song soon
Free Ornamentation IV. This work is dedicated to the public domain 🐌
I turned them into individual transparent pngs if anyone wants those premade!
(Op lmk if you want me to take this down, I'd totally understand—on the other hand, I'd love to do it for the other public domain pieces you've done if that's ok!)
“don’t take it personally” how would you like me to take it then? professionally? romantically? academically?
they want you to make fried rice
who is "they"
the wok left
how am I supposed to make fried rice if the wok left
skillet issue
And all of this at once.
'26.2.8 宝山寺奥の院にて
雪降る朝。写真展の搬入があるのでいつもの奈良公園には行かずに近所の古刹へ。本堂を越えて奥の院に着くと、時折強風が吹いてぶわっと雪が打ち付けるように降ります。
寺猫さんも寒そうに「にゃあ~」と鳴いてややしかめっ面・・それでも近くでじっとしていると寄ってきて僕の足元をスリスリ。「寒いやんなぁ⛄」などと撫でつつ久しぶりの雪中撮影。
・・ということで、2/10から合同写真展です(PR😉)もう数回お知らせしましたが、しつこく告知😆
★G2.8写真展”断片集” No.31★
日程:2026.2.10(火)~2.15(日)12:00~19:00(2.15のみ17:00まで)
場所:同時代ギャラリー(京都三条 1928ビル2F)
私は2.11(水祝)・2.13(金)・2.15(日)各日12:00~17:00で在廊の予定です。
every moment hit below the waterline a tear in the design the band’s still playing but the captain resigns and as we’re all going down she tries in vain not to drown
Residents view the first iceberg of the season as it passes the South Shore, near Ferryland Newfoundland, Canada by Jody Martin
it…did not occur to me that icebergs just…pass by people’s houses
i used to live in st. john’s, nl, and, in late spring to early summer, it was not uncommon for a giant iceberg to float slowly by just outside the harbor. they would mention it on the news and radio. they took hours or, sometimes, days to go by. and, when it happened, it would make the whole town colder.. like ice in a glass of water. and, sometimes,… they would groan. as they passed.
there is gold in the sky
getting used to digital....again