No title available

ellievsbear
🪼
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Sweet Seals For You, Always
d e v o n
YOU ARE THE REASON

izzy's playlists!
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
trying on a metaphor
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Today's Document

Discoholic 🪩

shark vs the universe
KIROKAZE
Misplaced Lens Cap
No title available
Stranger Things

#extradirty
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

seen from South Korea

seen from Spain

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye
@drowninginflora
So, what you're saying is, under no circumstances should we be reposting the above image as much as humanly possible?
Well, we should certainly make sure that everyone knows about this image, or how will they know not to post it? It's not like "That image of Musk looking like a Nazi" would narrow it down.
I need to write about We Have Always Lived in the Castle. It’s such an exploration of trauma, agoraphobia, codependency, obsessive compulsive behavior, mob mentality and denial
does constance think merricat set the house on fire deliberately, and did merricat indeed set the house on fire deliberately, and does constance truly blame herself in merricat's place like she did six years before, and does that then imply that constance never wanted their family to die, or does it imply that she too wanted charles gone
I like to think it was a true blue accident. That all of the protection spells that Merricat made worked in its own wicked favor. That all Merricat ever wanted was the house and Constance to herself, and the fire did just that.
And I think Constance, as a young and sad woman, wants nothing more than freedom. Killing her family was a childish way to bring some freedom, but it made her agoraphobic. But I think she wanted what Charles could give her, but not him. I think she wants to be in Merricat's life but not in the way she is now.
Thinking about Constance using food as a method of power within the Blackwood household by using it to nourish, and Merricat using food as a method of control within the Blackwood household by using it to destroy.
More semi-coherent thoughts on a modern adaptation of We Have Always Lived in the Castle (or possibly an adaptation of it set during the COVID-19 lockdown)
Merricat hasn't touched the Internet since the murders. At first, it was out of a desire to avoid social media and not see what people were saying about her and her family, but then it turned into quitting the internet entirely. She wants Constance to stop paying the Internet bill and cut off the entire house's access to the Internet- In the original book, the Blackwoods get rid of their phone and stop receiving mail after the murders occur, so a modern! Merricat wants the Internet to be cut off as well. This further isolates them from the outside world and makes them seem even more disconnected from the passage of time.
But they still pay for some Internet access because of Constance. She's the one member of the family who uses it, mostly for things that help her care for Uncle Julian (such as ordering medical supplies for him, etc.). One day, Merricat finds Constance talking to people online, quietly expressing a desire to leave her home. This freaks Merricat out.
Cousin Charles encourages the other members of the family to start using the Internet again. Modern! Merricat takes this about as well as you'd expect. Maybe this time around, his watch (which she destroys) is not just a standard watch, but an Apple watch/Smart watch?
After the fire, the Blackwood house has lost all access to the Internet.
If this modern adaptation takes place during the days of lockdown, then early in the story, Merricat hears about growing fear about a new, spreading virus. When she feels Constance is expressing a desire to leave the home, Merricat tells her it's not safe out there because there's a virus.
Lockdown and the virus come to the village around the same time Cousin Charles arrives. Merricat tells Constance she's convinced that Charles has brought the virus, despite the fact that he himself doesn't have it. Constance tries to tell "silly Merricat" that the lockdown and spreading of the disease isn't Charles's fault, but Merricat won't hear it.
Because of the lockdown restrictions setting it, Cousin Charles announces that it looks like he'll be quarantining with them for a while. Merricat is enraged. Charles insists she try to get along with him because like it or not, they're all stuck here.
Uncle Julian doesn't always remember there's a pandemic happening, he just assumes that Constance has decided to deep clean the entire house and is proud of her for doing so, praising her for her cleanliness and being so conscious of diseases.
Merricat is accepting of lockdown, she's glad that she no longer has a reason to leave her family's property, and she secretly hopes that the virus kills everyone else in the village so it will finally be just her and Constance. The only things she truly dislikes about COVID are: the fact that it's forcing Charles to live with them, the fact that it's extra distressing to Constance, and the fact that she has to start performing new spells in order to prevent any of them from getting sick.
The villagers get more and more hostile the longer lockdown goes on (I don't think the original book takes place over a very long period of time, but maybe this adaptation can have a timeskip. Or lockdown just happens to hit the village hard and fast. Either option works, tbh).
In a pandemic version, I feel like the villagers would attack the house after feeling like the Blackwoods had brought the pandemic to their village. Obviously, the easiest target for this belief is Charles, because he's a newcomer, but the villagers are supposed to hate the sisters, not Charles. So tbh, I don't know how they'd blame COVID on Merricat or Constance. They'd find a way, though, and then would raid/attack the house.
rhaenyra in house of the dragon • merricat in we have always lived in the castle (s. jackson)
at the function one drink in begging people to read some shirley jackson
saw a 2 week old reddit post of ppl describing their fave books badly. mine is "male cousin and younger sister fight for the incestuous affection of older sister. younger sister wins."
Finished reading We Have Always Lived in the Castle for the first time 🍪
constance i would die for you
why do we always bash girls for poisoning their family with arsenic but never question if the family had bad vibes? or was unpleasant to be around?
You are not safe from this. You, the person reading this, are not safe from this. No matter how educated or open minded you think you are, you are not safe from this. The moment you think you are safe from it is the moment you become the most susceptible.
Its similar to why you cannot put bad people in a class of their own. The moment you do that you stop being able to see the bad things that the people closest to you do a la "my best friend couldn't have said that racist thing, they're not evil."
The moment you think you are immune from this type of backslide into right wing nonsense is the moment you stop questioning yourself enough to keep yourself from backsliding into right wing nonsense a la "I mean im not antiscience, im vaccinated, I just think that fluoride in our water supply is imparting children's ability to learn as fast as they otherwise could without it."
Remember, being progressive means progressing, its about always moving forward. The moment you rest on your laurels and stop putting in effort to keep the progression is the moment you start becoming left behind.
#I'm a millenial and I have caught myself saying things#it can and will happen to you#the trick is to notice#the trick it to keep being curious#the trick is to resist calcifying your brain#keep thinking and keep moving#nothing made by humans is perfect#we can always improve#that perfect plan you thought would fix it all when you were 20#will age like everything else#and the goalposts do move because there will always be bad actors#reinventing all the old evils so they look new and harmless again
If you will allow a 46 year old a moment. The trick, ime, is to continue to spend time around young people, continue seeking out and experiencing new things.
It's really easy to stop paying attention and suddenly find yourself surprised and confused by new things, new ways of things, what the kids these days are up to. And it's pretty human to react by saying "oh well, that's stupid, I hate these kids, things were fine the way we did them." And that's sorta the first step. That first kneejerk "I don't understand this and therefore feel negative about it."
But spending time around younger people, spending time online with people younger than you, people in different communities, it's a vaccination against that.
(Also I've seen so many people people fall down the crunchy granola to conspiracy theory to antivax pipeline. BEWARE.)
I think another really important thing is to learn to accept being in a degree of discomfort. Often people fall into this stuff for the feeling of predictability and comfort it gives them, which is also why they can be so incredibly difficult to reason out of it. They don't really care about the issue as much as it simply validates their sense of superiority and makes them feel comfortable in general.
The secondary useful thing is to learn to research and assess data, this stuff thrives on kneejerk reactions. Does an article make you angry, is a person listed as being xyz without saying what the actual issue is? Check. Confirm it. Try to understand the u familiar in more detail and ask people who are experts in the subject with lived experience to help you if needed. Be immune to clickbait even if it is designed to affirm your anger. This emotional reaction is often targeted algorithmically to up engagement and polarise arguments.
You can absolutely still be angry and still have beliefs to fight for. That is important and valuable because anger informs justice. But it needs to be backed up by accurate info or you risk fruitlessly expending your energy on simply doing the media's work for them.
I do agree that spending time with younger people is wise. I read as quite childlike myself and I also don't have the supposed bad experience with Gen Z that get constantly thrown about, they are mostly much nicer than the boomers and better informed. I would say this is also important the other way around.
But this is just one example of not getting polarised by groups, people get radicalised and dehumanise others when they get marooned in one demographic. They also are typically happier because being scared and hateful towards others is not typically a pleasant state of mind. This also means if it is safe we might need to occasionally interact with people who make us annoyed or a bit uncomfortable for this reciprocity to happen, but that is much safer as part of a varied community as that will dilute the ability of that person to cause harm.
I think part of the problem is when these varied communities get fragmented as people become alienated...this is in a way better in terms of class now, but much worse in terms of wealth, power and inequity unevenly distributed as it separates people from the reality of other people's lives. If you are a politician or financier with no idea of how your decisions will really impact others you are going to be innately radicalised and siloed in a very harmful way. And with nothing to balance or correct it.
With all of that said, I am going to hazard a guess that at least some portion of the people who have had significant, major personality changes "because of Fox News" are actually in the early stages of frontotemporal dementia and would continue to become more disagreeable and disconnected from reality even if they never took in news from a right wing source again.
It's at its most noticeable right now because the Boomers are the largest generation in history to make it en masse to an age where those predisposed to this condition start to exhibit symptoms. But I would assume this has always been a contributing factor to the lunatic fringe of politics.
doomed
Watching Apothecary Diaries and my only take is that Maomao is a little freak (affectionate)
power couple (platonic) incoming im soooooooo excited
Last night at Paley fest, they asked Rhea if Helen hadn’t died and instead joined everyone else under the virus, would she feel any different about it and she said (summarizing): no, she wouldn’t feel any different about wanting to fix the world and letting herself become the reluctant hero because Carol and Helen’s love reflects a very specific role in Carol’s life, which to be loved BY Helen. No one else can call her on her shit, peel her gum, etc. like her wife would. She’s a very private person who is fully known by Helen, and Carol wants to be loved UNIQUELY, which is so much more important to her than being loved UNIVERSALLY