Three Goblin Art
Show & Tell
Origami Around
oozey mess
styofa doing anything
Jules of Nature
Peter Solarz
izzy's playlists!
taylor price
Game of Thrones Daily
Sade Olutola
blake kathryn
i don't do bad sauce passes
cherry valley forever
Andulka
will byers stan first human second
tannertan36
Discoholic 🪩
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
NASA
seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia
seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia
seen from New Zealand
seen from Brazil
seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from United States
@dykeapostate
Anyways since gofundme is evil and willing to harm vulnerable women to appease misogynist liberals, here is a link to donate to the Vancouver Rape Relief center directly
https://rapereliefshelter.bc.ca/donate/
Thank you for supporting our work to end violence against women. Vancouver Rape Relief and Women’s Shelter is a not for profit organization,
please boost this!
YES, men can be rape victims, but let’s get one thing clear as glass:
1. Women are overwhelmingly more likely to experience a rape or sexual assault. 82% of all juvenile victims are female. 90% of adult rape victims are female. Females ages 16-19 are 4 times more likely than the general population to be victims of rape, attempted rape, or sexual assault. One in five women and one in 71 men will be raped at some point in their lives. In fact, bisexual women are the most likely out of ANYONE to experience sexual violence.
The rape of males is real, absolutely, but it is not on the same scale as the rape of females. Don’t discuss the two as if they’re on the same widespread scale.
one thing about this study is that the statistic on sexual violence by sexuality are highly experimental (it’s even noted that they may not be accurate due to multiple limitations of the study) meaning that it’s not certain that they are true. as well as the statistics based on race. according to this study, biracial women are far more likely to experience sexual violence than black and indigenous women and that is just blatantly false.
only noting this because i have seen bisexual women use this statistic to perpetuate lesbophobia or the idea that bisexual women are the most oppressed of SSA women. i have also seen this study used to discount the experiences of black and indigenous women and sexual violence towards them. stay mindful!
Trans activism is men’s rights activism.
Funny how trans rights activists and men’s rights activists have exactly the same goal: destroy female safe spaces and opportunity for women.
They are both ultra-conservative in many of the same ways: categorizing the sexes via gender stereotypes, hatred of women and gay people, wanting to destroy female spaces and female class consciousness, the list goes on. The only real difference is conservatives see trans women are lower tier/failed men while transactivists see them as gods.
I’ve literally never been in a situation outside of middle school where a man crying has been mocked/ hasn’t been taken seriously. Like most adults are pretty empathetic towards men displaying emotion and I’ve heard many women express the sentiment that seeing a man cry immediately moves them to tears because “men only cry when it’s really serious” like the idea that women all point and laugh at a man weeping is such an absurd fiction lmfao
No, other guys will definitely call you a pussy when you leave the room
Yes. Other men. Thanks for helping to prove my point dumbass
Why are you such a rude cunt
"men make fun of other men for crying"
"yea that's my point, men are perpetuating this narrative. not women"
"why are you a cunt"
LMFAO 💀💀
it’s not your job to entertain him by sending him nudes
it’s not your job to satisfy him sexually because he’s horny
you are not required to do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable or that you don’t want to do
don’t be scared of “losing him”
he most likely wasn’t anything worth keeping
They’re also demanding social reforms in housing & child/elder care: requesting an increase in public housing units & for the state to hire workers in order to ensure proper & free care of the elderly and children for all families.
#SouthKorea
“A long-term study of children raised by lesbians found that these children were less likely to suffer from physical and sexual abuse than were their peers who were raised by heterosexuals. This is thought to be due to the absence of adult heterosexual men in the households (Gartrell, Bos, & Goldberg, 2010). Girls raised by lesbians tend to have higher self-esteem, show more maturity and tolerance than their peers, and are older when they have their first heterosexual contact (Gartrell et al., 2005, 2010). Children raised by same-sex parents seem to be less constrained by traditional gender roles; boys are less aggressive, and girls are more inclined to consider nontraditional careers, such as doctor, lawyer, or engineer (Gartrell et al., 2005; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001). Over the course of more than 20 years, scientists studied the psychological adjustment of 78 teenagers who were raised by lesbian mothers. Compared to age-matched counterparts raised by heterosexual parents, these adolescents were rated higher in social, academic, and total competence, and lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggression, and externalizing problem behavior (Gartrell & Bos, 2010). There are fewer studies of children raised by two men, but gay fathers are more likely than straight fathers to put their children before their career, to make big changes in their lives to accommodate a child, and to strengthen bonds with their extended families after becoming fathers (Bergman, Rubio, Green, & Padrone, 2010).” ~ Martha Rosenthal, Human Sexuality: From Cells to Society, p.247.
“having gay parents will harm children”
I love that this is cited and sourced ahhhh. Actual researched support! So good.
Some MOC are strange because they view sex with white women as somehow “getting back” at white men/white supremacy. It’s weird how a lot men view sex not as an intimate act but as a tool of power and humiliation
It’s true and you should say more
“Women are framed as property, as collateral damage in the war between black men and white men, each trying to assert their masculinity. Men of both races speak of women in terms of ownership. White men talk of protecting “our women” and how “their women” have no virtue. Black men use similar language; they talk about how white men have defiled “our women”, and in return, they are going to lay waste to “their women”. This language perpetuates the universal subordinate status of women; black men acknowledge that white men own their women and white men acknowledge that black men own their women as well. Women are robbed of their personhood and simply become tools to be paternalistically protected from harm and vandalized for revenge.” — Routledge International Handbook of Race, Class, and Gender (2014).Shirley A. Jackson.
source
Quote from Eldridge Cleaver, Black Panther Party leader
“It is for Black men to speak up and tell us why and how their manhood is so threatened that Black women should be the prime targets of their justifiable rage. What correct analysis of this capitalist dragon within which we live can legitimize the rape of Black women by Black men?
At least Black feminists and other Black women have begun this much-needed dialogue, however bitter our words. At least we are not mowing down our brothers in the street, or bludgeoning them to death with hammers.
[Robert] Staples pleads his cause by saying capitalism has left the Black man with only his penis for fulfillment, and a ‘curious rage.’ Is this rage any more legitimate than the rage of Black women? And why are Black women supposed to absorb that male rage in silence?”
- Audre Lorde
i think i’m going to be sick. that eldridge cleaver man actually raped women as “revenge” to white men. and he said he did it because white men have been violating Black women, but HE RAPED BLACK WOMEN TOO, AS “PRACTICE”, KNOWING FEW PEOPLE WOULD CARE.
he didn’t do it to avenge the Black women hurt at the hands of white men, he did it because he sees women as property and he was angry that white men “soiled” Black men’s property, and as revenge, he would do the same to white men’s property. men don’t see us as our own people, but only as an extension of them.
dworkin has said pretty crazy things but she did not support abuse.
those quotes were taken out of context to make radical feminism look bad. i know what article that is - its written by a conservative christian.
1) andrea prefaced that entire thing by saying she redefines erotic as a non-sexual thing. 2) she is arguing that closeness with a child, an animal, family members turns into something sexual by abusers because our society puts sexual love above all else hence why she brings up the nuclear family. in the mind of an abuser, something sexual brought into the relationship means its true love. this is what she is analysing.
i dont necessarily agree with what she's saying but she isn't by any means supporting abuse.
she specifically mentions “fucking between humans and animals” and “the incest taboo” i do not find the idea that she’s defending bestiality and incest to be far-fetched or that her words were taken out of context. and it doesn’t really matter to me who the article was written by because most of my screenshots were her own writing. not just an out of context sentence here and there, but full paragraphs of her opinions about incest and bestiality. as well as her blatant homophobia. what really makes radfems look bad is refusing to acknowledge the faults of the people we uphold to be outstanding feminists.
My first-ever project, finally finished! Pattern by Shitpost Sampler by __hobiis
Om3lette aka Julia (Australian, based Melbourne, Australia) - 2x2, 2021, Paintings: Digital Arts
Maybe I'm too American but this Sarah Everard thing is blowing my mind.
"Sarah Everard should not have submitted to arrest. Women should run from a cop who tries to arrest her and call an emergency hotline."
Uh, where I'm from, that just means you die faster? Are UK cops just gonna be totally cool with woman refusing to be arrested and running away from them? I know they don't carry guns but cops are cops everywhere. That just seems like "choose how you'd like to be assaulted today."
I thought the same thing, being from another country with militarized police. And imagine how that would play out for a black woman.
The thing is, that actually happened in the US. Pretty recently. A traffic cop tried to pull a woman over on the highway for speeding. She slowed down, moved to the right lane, and put her flashers on, but she kept driving because she was looking for a safe place to pull over. It was dark, and the shoulder was narrow.
The cop FLIPPED HER CAR. He could have killed her.
This was horrifying for several reasons - not least among them, that this is what women are supposed to do when they get pulled over alone at night. They're supposed to put their flashers on, slow down, and find a safe, brightly-lit, public place (like a gas station or parking lot) to pull over. And even call our emergency number to confirm that an actual officer is pulling you over, because it's common for serial killers and rapists to use fake cop lights and pretend to be police officers to attract their victims.
So hearing UK media tell women to just resist arrest? That's... that's a thing? You can do that?
i love dogs that hate men and i think it's funny
every time someone says “andrea dworkin was right about everything” i cringe inside. consider:
dworkin’s arguments against the reality of sex
dworkin’s homophobia (for as much as y’all talk about “woke homophobia” from TRAs, did you know dworkin shared these same beliefs?)
dworkin, pro bestiality
dworkin, pro incest
dworkin, pro pedophilia
so every time i hear “dworkin was right about everything” i know one of two things immediately. one, you haven’t actually read much dworkin. which is okay! two, you’re pro incest, bestiality, pedophilia, and homophobia. but i usually give people the benefit of the doubt and assume it’s the first.
** and a disclaimer before i get angry reblogs… where in this post have i criticized dworkin’s writing on pornography and prostitution? thank you.
IT’S FAT COOCHIE FRIDAY™️
No words, just this.
or how about protect your daughters and kill your sons.
Good job guys!
we need to get back to this: feminism as ACTION, not as an identity.
stop being like "so-and-so isn't a feminist!", how about no one's "a feminist", but all kinds of women can do feminist actions? actions that benefit women as a class. how about that?
so, people can be marxists, conservatives, communists, socialists, nationalists, liberals, libertarians, gay rights activists, civil rights activists, humanists, environmentalists, nihilists, post modernists, materialists, existentialists, and a million other nouns that denote ideological groups, but not feminists? interesting that this is the one thing where we're not allowed to BE it. think about the opposite of this, "red pill/incel/anti feminist men aren't anti feminists, they're just PEOPLE doing anti feminist things, no one's anti feminist :)"
this argument has never made sense to me. people can do anti racist things, but not be a civil rights activist, actions existing outside of the ideology doesn't render that ideology redundant. someone can be pro socialist healthcare and not be a socialist, that doesn't make the political group of socialism redundant. why does some women doing feminist things but not being radfems mean that radical feminism can't also exist as a political identity if the required beliefs are believed? it's an ideology, if you fit the ideology, you are that thing. no other group has these arguments. why are women not allowed to have their own exclusively female political ideology that they ARE, not just do?
THIS THIS THIS. this argument is so fucking annoying to me. if you were to say “i’m a marxist but i believe in the free market” people would laugh in your fucking face. aren’t y’all the same people who love to say that words mean things? words mean things even when you don’t like it. why are people so obsessed with adopting labels that don’t describe them and watering down radical political ideologies just to fit themselves in them?
