Eilikes you!!! @eilikes - Tumblr Blog

I hate being associated with the LGBT group so much, we need to make a new group for the normal people to call themselves. I nominate you as the leader :D

I am not leader material, but thank you anyway. That’s so sweet. ^^

blakebisexualhaircut-deactivate

damnfandomproblems

“I’m gonna pretend that “insert person here” created this media I like because the real authors did/said something shitty” OR you COULD just learn to separate the art from the artist Yknow? Like EVERY functioning adult?

deepblooberc

I don’t care if you disagree with Notch or JK, the work is still playable without the artist

(though personally I don’t think that most of Notch’s opinions were shitty)

champagnepadre

samsung phone: *charges wirelessly, waterproof, screen doesn’t crack* me: ……anyway *buys the iphone 17s plus lavender edition*

ardri-na-bpiteog

Y'all: capitalism is evil

Also y'all: …anyway I’d still buy the iphone even if the ghost of Steve Jobs physically manifested in my house and shot me in the head

cowhandmax

The price of not being an android user can never be too high

mostlyjudson

Bc apple users are simply retards.

logarto

jojo is definitely one of those “so bad its good” things

This show has so much bullshit and misogyny but its fun.

And manage to have interesting characters after part 4.

bizarrolord-deactivated20241123

“Misogyny”

Dude, parts 1-4 were written in the late 1980′s and early-to-mid 1990′s, cut it some slack. That and back then Shounen Jump pretty much didn’t do any female character that wasn’t a sweet, underdeveloped love interest, so Lisa Lisa was quite a change from the mold. Not everything comes from the US in 2020, and, as such, not every piece of media needs to be judged as if it came out, brand-spanking-new, in the US in 2020.

hatsuzuki-deactivated20211122

sirobvious

I’m sorry I’m trying to read the subtitles.

mangonetics

frogmiliar

levia-kun

whatheballs

Holy trinity

sashimikitten

Anime is the gift that keeps on giving

Meet Eos

Goddess of the Dawn, Sister to the Day and Night

Titaness and my bby

the-based-brit

Clearly, she's not the only goddess here 😘

You're so pretty, you make Aphrodite look ugly.

cisnowflake

A baby

atepa09

D’awww what breed is she?

thebuttkingpost-deactivated2021

Ball python!

People will advocate against free speech then turn around and call someone else a bootlicker

“the government should be allowed to decide what is allowed to be said” is the bootlickest thing you can believe

analvelocity

I reblogged this in support and then realized OP probably just wants to say the n word in public

thebuttkingpost-deactivated2021

I feel like your leap from "free speech is good" to "people who want free speech are racist" says more about you than it does me

Fair, but considering that nowadays nazis constantly talk about”free speech” to complain about people getting mad at them, I can understand the apprehension. It’s not right, but I get it.

I don't

"Free speech" as a Nazi """dogwhistle""" is about the dumbest shit ever conceived.

Whatever man, they are still the people I hear say it most. Them and people who say that Nazi in particular shouldn’t be censored but are fine with leftists being censored, so hypocrites.

I don't think anyone should be censored. That's not my way.

bottledfool

Imagine living in a world where you view the words "free speech" as a warning sign.

Right?

Every principle has its limits and that limit is Nazis

No.

I don't care how much you dislike them. They have as much right to talk as you do.

That's how free speech works. That's how precedents work.

So they get to advocate for my death and I’m not allowed to try and stop that? Fuck that, fuck them, fuck this.

peterisspidermanconfirmed

Yes. Just like how you can advocate for their death, their censorship, their imprisonment.

As long as it isn’t a direct threat on a person, a legitimate cause for concern, it should be allowed.

Because the moment you start putting restrictions for someone on something, it applies to everyone, it can and will be abused, and possibly pushed even farther.

Freedom means responsibility for yourself.

teenscoolest

feralsaarebas

Vegans really wildin’ in the notes.

1.) The hunting family DID NOT force the woman to eat meat. They didn’t. She tried to force them into her vegan lifestyle but they didn’t try to force her into theirs. So stop trying to act like they’re the bad guy.

2.) Hunting is 100% more ethical than the meat industry. It’s sustainable, it exists solely on the ‘kill only what you need’ axis. That’s the entire reason these people switched to hunting their own food. They hate the meat industry.

They’re not ‘killing animals for fun’, ‘killing for luxury’, they’re fucking eating it. This isn’t trophy hunting this is the most cruelty free, sustainable way to eat meat.

nikipuppeteer

Also, a friendly reminder, they didn’t try to force the vegan woman to eat their diet, she did. Like, The hunting family where literally more respectful

sk8rbi

but they literally did kill an animal “for fun”…it’s not like a vegan diet is literally inedible ffs, y’all want so badly to make vegans look like horrible people but the philosophy behin it is literally just not wanting to kill and eat animals. you sound psychotic defending these people.

all the animals they killed they are, sometimes they kept the skin and stuffed them but they ate all the meat from all the animals. the “meal” she tried to make them eat was completely raw/uncooked because she refused to use heat. it wasn’t that they wouldn’t eat a vegan meal it’s that the meal was disgusting and almost completely inedible. no ones trying to attack vegans as a whole, just this one insane woman

moonybyte

I looked that episode up (it’s a ten-part video on Youtube) and the only pretty bad thing about the hunters that I could find was that they had a bunch of confederate flags around the house (the episode never shows or explains what kind of political view they might have beyond the meat-vegan thing so no clue how deep that one goes).

Both moms are stay-at-home moms while the dads do the work. The children of both don’t really do any chores past small stuff. So IN THEORY the families are pretty similar.

Hunter mom tried her best to create a vegan diet despite lack of knowledge. She went with the daughter to all the protests that vegan mom usually goes and while she found the stuff really weird, she kept that mainly from the child. She did all the chores in the house and pampered the dad a bit when he came back from his 15-hour job. She never belittled them for their lifestyle, only was honest about finding it confusing (like that the humans don’t cook, but they cook for the cat [WHO HAS TO LIVE VEGAN. THEY ARE ONE OF THOSE NUTJOBS THAT KEEP A CARNIVOROUS ANIMAL AND FORCE IT TO BE VEGAN]).

Vegan mom did chores on like the first 1 or 2 days as asked and then tried to skip them or ditch them on the son (she doesn’t do any chores in her own family, the dad has to do everything on top of his job). She tries to trick them multiple times into not eating meat out of pure selfishness and arrogance, she wastes food too (she threw away perfectly good food like chilli con carne and then claimed it was cause it looked bad). She stands outside in the garden x minutes/hours a day cause she believes that the sun will fill her with vitamins (you are so close yet so far from understanding sunlight and vitamin production) and says she hopes to one day be able to live on a sun diet. Even though hunter family never forces or even encourages her to eat any meat, she cries every time they do. Hunter family seemed willing to reduce their meat consumption initially, but dad gets very quickly pissed off about vegan mom’s wastefulness, lazyness and her general attitude.

Also, the vegan family has leather furniture but seem to not realize that animals die for that, so I am not fully certain they understand what kills animals and what doesn’t in regards to animal products…

So at the people here that are upset for the vegans: As someone that has friends who are vegetarian and vegan, I beg the vegan people here to literally watch the episode and check out the vegan family. You can’t tell me that you think the stuff they are doing is fine and will help your cause/ideals and such. Like, I only eat meat like 20% of the time (health reasons), I try to be as cruelty-free as possible and felt like getting an aneurysm from listening to that mom and daughter. The cat thing alone already makes me go “fuck those vegans” and it can’t be the goal of vegans to make their life style look like insanity, suffering and animal abuse…right?

celtic-pyro-deactivated20230725

Every INFP descriptor is like “Pure bby cinnamon roll uwu protecc them” I assure you I’m not pure or a baby Im full of rage but my main outlet is crying.

celtic-pyro-deactivated20230725

Also I realize that MBTI isn’t an exact science but sometimes it sounds like a lot of INFP traits tend to overlap with anxiety and depression. Like, “Are you really just assuming everyone hates you because of your Ne or Fi or whatever or is that a genuine mental illness?”

artofthecatt

Klonk! [x]

nocontextveggies

baokki-deactivated20201222

you know why

fanburgers

It’s literally about Moses. They’re portraying Israelites.

baokki-deactivated20201222

yes? and one of them is saying he enjoyed slavery? and in particular is coded as Jewish throughout the show which gives this even more tremendously antisemitic implications as if it isn't already on its own? don't be a weirdo.

also this literally isn't the Moses episode ("Moe and the Big Exit!"), it's from "Josh and The Big Wall" as if that matters

trutown-the-bard

Read your Old Testament. The Israelites wanted to give up and go back to Egypt on multiple occasions.

nocontextveggies

I don't know if you noticed but a kids show about talking/singing fruits and vegetables with pop culture references is far from biblically accurate and if they really wanted to include that part of the story they could have at least had a character other than the one who is jewish coded

Bud if it’s about the Egyptian slavery bit, then they’re ALL JEWISH.

But in vegetales, they were actually all Christian and it’s just a kids shoooow.

There are no implications, and most CHILDREN aren’t going to point and go JEW VOICE JEW VOICE! JEWS MUST LOVE SLAVERY! like you are.

Jewish Coded my ass.

iwatchforher

bold of male reviewers to assume we care about their opinion on Captain Marvel

iwatchforher

bold of male reviewers to assume we care about their opinion on Charlie’s Angels (2019)

iwatchforher

bold of male reviewers to assume we care about their opinion on Birds of Prey (2020)

adobsonartworks

Whenever I look for reviews of new movies, I try my best to seek out women and POC because I’m so god-damn tired of seeing HUNDREDS of channels of white men all espousing the exact same response to every film. Especially to films that aren’t aimed EXCLUSIVELY at them.

Give me VARIETY. Give me different points of view! Give me unique perspectives I would never have considered on my own AS a straight white man.

Okay, but fuck that if the “unique variety” sucks ass and is the same sock puppet over and over

Demand some quality, have some pride.

They aren’t wrong just cause they’re dudes

adobsonartworks

They absolutely aren’t wrong just because they’re dudes. I never said anything of the sort. All I said is that I want variety in voices, even if that variety results in the same criticisms and critiques. Because the alternative is to just keep getting your criticisms from the same small group of white men for everything… and that’s not healthy.

Also, you know, sometimes people other than your average cis-straight white dude can offer some insights that the cis-straight white dudes don’t understand or see. For example, the movie Little Women came out recently and while the universal consensus was that the film was great, a lot of the men didn’t understand some of the underlying themes and as such gave the film a lower rating. Watching women criticizing the film and offering their perspectives helps bridge that gap of misunderstanding and can help elevate your appreciation of the film.

The point is to make sure you’re getting criticism from all over, and not from just one source. Art is subjective, and as such, it’s open to a lot of varying interpretations. It’s only right to want to seek out those different viewpoints if you can so you an be a more well rounded individual.

See, I understand what you’re saying, and I agree! Except on the opinion of WHAT groups.

Straight white men make up a pretty large portion of populations in the majority of English speaking places. That being said, a Spaniard will not have the same perspective as a German. A liberal man will not have the same perspective as a conservative. A male feminist will not have the same opinion as a non feminist. While men may not have some perspective into some movies (like your example) it does not render their opinion useless or invalid or wrong, just a different view and perspective.

You’re viewing white men as a similar to same opinions group, which is racist and an issue in itself. In fact your views seem to be in a misguided, somewhat racist/sexist/phobic place, because you explicitly stated you don’t even care if it’s the same opinion, as long as it isn’t from a white man. As long as you aren’t hearing it from (race) (sex) because you’re tired of them, there’s too many! Get them out of here!

You forget critics and reviews, especially more popular modes of consuming it (like YouTube!) aren’t restricted by race or sex. Anyone can make a review, they simply have to choose to do so. But, you may have noticed, on YouTube’s in countries with majority White people, you’re going to have majority white content creators, because when you have a bag full of blue skittles with a few yellow here and there, when you pull out a handful, probs gonna get 99% blue.

Getting a variety of critisicms and reviews on content is fantastic! But it’s important to remember that race/sex/orientation, unless it specifically applies to that film, isn’t variety, backgrounds and life experiences are. Can that be influenced by race/sex/orientation? Absolutely! But that just isn’t all there is.

My point is, variety is important for a comprehensive view on a point, but variety is much more than race/sex/orientation. Limiting people to their skin, sex, and love is, well, bigoted. So we DO care about the opinions of the male reviews on the movies above. Thanks!

adobsonartworks

Sorry, I come at things from a comics/gaming perspective because that’s the field I’m in and, sadly, cis-white men in the comics/gaming world are DEEPLY homogeneous in their views. Views between cis-white men in comics/gaming RARELY differ in general opinion, so as a short-hand while talking about large issues like this it’s easier to just lump them all together into one group. My apologies for the over-simplification.

Fair enough, my perspective comes from the STEM field. I suppose I’m lucky I was taught to never assume and never lump based on a trait that isn’t conducive to the objective.

No need to apologize, just to learn and grow and see beyond skin and sex

eilikes

???? The fuck??

Even in the comic/gaming sphere, cis white men still tend to have vastly different opinions and tend to form their opinions based on different considerations and factors.

Look at any 2 game reviews of the same games - you might have overarching opinions such as "this aspect was poorly done" or "this was an excellent aspect" but the way they interpret and experience the games are vastly different and they explain why it is so.

Hell, as an example: the reviews for the game YIIK (pronounced Y2K) are all mostly of the same general opinion that it's a shit game, but every review will have insight into different aspects of the game and will expand on why they think those aspects contribute to the overall shittiness of the game. Some reviews even had vastly different opinions on the exact same scenes or mechanics.

Same rule applies to comic reviews. Same thing applies to movie reviews.

And this is just in the casual sphere of the fans where we find this variety.

I'm positive people in the industry also have different opinions, but that others are unwilling to hear them out or to understand the reasoning behind these opinions due to stereotyping them as having "worthless opinions bc cis white male".

Different perspectives are important, but acting like all the members of one group for any industry will have the exact same opinions?? Fucking whack.

Anyway, those movies were still shit 🤷

sizvideos

This campaign defies censorship in social media to raise awareness for early detection of breast cancer

iamanemotionaltimebomb

this is actually super fucking smartass of them

snake-lady

Reblogging as this is so important everyone! My mum had breast cancer and that shit is not nice so please check yourself ladies and gents! 💕💕💕

angelickall

Thank you Henry 💗

theminingengineer

Grandma passed a month after I was born from breast cancer. Share this to educate and support.

ask-whitespear

Thanks henry.

zucca101

Sister in law has it… thank you, Henry!

bi-kisses

telling people to die isn’t classy, cute, or quirky. It’s shitty and legit illegal, even if you don’t really mean it. Just don’t say that shit.

You got told to die because you was pushing rape apologist rhetoric by implying some reasons for not consenting to sex are invalid.

To reiterate with everyone else, go play in traffic rape apologist scum.

You do realize I reblogged this in general, right? It wasn’t specifically about any one instance and it wasn’t reblogged because I got suicidebaited. On top of that, suicidebaiting people is worse than you guys either being ignorant enough to not understand what’s being said or being obtuse enough not to care.

Anyway, that’s not what I said. Please develop some reading comprehension even though I acknowledge people like you hate understanding basic things. Instead of jumping onto different posts, go read some psychology sources, specifically about the abuse tactic of “withholding intimacy and affection”.

“withholding sex” can’t be abuse because you would firstly be infringing on the non-consentees bodily autonomy. A partner refusing to have sex with you isn’t abuse because you can literally accept that the relationship isn’t what you want and leave.

In fact trying to emotionally manipulate a partner to have sex with you when they clearly don’t want to IS abuse. It’s called coercion.

Yet again you deserve the vitriol you have sowed because you are literally making excuses and sharing rape rhetoric.

Nobody deserves to be suicidebaited or told to die just because they stated a psychological fact and you think you know more than psychology does. Not to mention you people putting words into my mouth. I never said anyone’s entitled to sex or that the person withholding sex from their partner has to have sex with their partner no matter the reason why. I literally never said that.

I said that withholding intimacy and affection as a punishment is a psychologically recognized form of abuse - same as coercion is. You guys are not only putting words into my mouth, but you’re also ignoring the context and the sources I gave because for some reason you think you know more than the field of psychology which by the way you do not.

Someone going “you talked to another man when you know you’re not allowed to do that so I’m giving you the cold shoulder and not giving you any attention or showing you any affection” is indeed an abuse tactic used as a punishment, as a way to further control their victim, et cetera.

Does that mean the person withholding sex from their partner needs to have sex with their partner? No, of course not. It’s just recognized as a form of emotional abuse if it happens repeatedly as a punishment.

I’m sorry you guys think you’re the expert of human relationships and psychology, but you’re really not so you might want to stop clowning around just because you don’t have that much world experience or academic knowledge of psychology. It’s obvious the group of you are ignoring what the sources are saying, putting words in my mouth, and running wild. It’s a bad look, fam.

Muh psychological fact.

Until the 1980’s it was SCIENTIFICALLY ACCEPTED that women had smaller and inferior brains. We now know that was false and fueled by institutionalised misogyny. Which is happening here.

As for psychology, I fucking studied it twice at college, along with sociology. You don’t get to run around and act like an authority on it when you clearly don’t understand scientific history and how it axis with misogyny.

Also I find it incredibly fucking rich I’m clearly being talked down to about my lack of life experience when I’m fucking 22 and I’m judging you’re no older than 15. You’re just a know it all jumped up teenager trying to get a reaction by sharing your edgy opinions.

How about you actually gain some life experience instead of lecturing adults about their supposed lack of theirs.

Then I guess we just have to throw out the entirety of science because you claimed such a thing despite not giving a source for it. Oh wait, no. That’s dumb. Science isn’t invalidated just because it was wrong once. Grow up.

I can see why you needed to study it twice since you missed a shit ton and clearly even twice isn’t enough to get it to stick. Ouch. Also, you do realize that withholding sex as punishment isn’t just done by women to men? I think you’re getting this confused with actual forms of misogyny and spousal rape. There’s a different between what I’m talking about and that. In fact, this form of emotional abuse can be done to any one - a man to a woman, a woman to a man, a man to a man, a woman to a woman. Same as any other abuse tactic.

I’m not fifteen. I am in fact an adult and older than you are. I can see you’ve honed your ability to assume based on nothing along with your inability to read context and not resort to putting words in other peoples’ mouth. Nice try though.

“I’m actually an adult” clearly not mentally, weeb.

Amazing counterpoint, but I guess resorting to lame insults is all you can do when you’re objectively wrong and you have nothing to back yourself up with.

Idk bro, I don’t masturbate to japanese cartoons and then bend over backwards to excuse rape. This some incel bullshit.

limelines-deactivated20210530

I don’t masturbate to Japanese cartoons or bend over backwards to excuse rape either, so I don’t know what you’re talking about.

I won’t play your game, although I certainly could. Instead maybe if I quote my friend who put this in different words than I did, maybe you’ll finally understand what’s being talked about here because whatever you’re hearing isn’t it.

Ignoring the fact that withholding sex can be a manipulation tactic sends off huge red flags to me, especially since it’s just a different version of withholding desires/necessities, and are used to alter behavior

Refusing to fuck your partner because you didn’t like something they do/think, until they “correct” that behavior to fit your own views? Very much an abuse tactic. Like I can understand not wanting to have sex, but there is a huge difference between that, and “you get sex when you learn to behave"

Dog behave - dog get treat. Dog don’t behave - dog get no treat. It’s very similar to me at the most base lever at least.

I have no issue with using reward and withhold tactics to train dogs and to teach children good behavior. I implement it in as many of my pracs lessons as I can. But there’s a difference between wanting to improve good behavior /discourage bad behavior, and forcing your own views onto someone through abuse tactics. They’re also overlooking that this tactic never goes alone. It’s usually part of an already toxic relationship

Not wanting sex isn’t the same as deliberately withholding it from someone with the goal to have them reform their behavior to suit your own abusive views/needs

No one owes anyone sex for any reason, but it’s also healthy to look into the motives behind certain behaviors. Someone in an abusive relationship might not be able to recognize this as an abuse tactic, which is extremely bad

And I mean, as example - someone can give someone candy or a gift, and you can argue that it’s ‘good’ or kind or whatever of them, but if no one knows that their motives behind it are sinister (luring a child for example, attempting to gain trust from someone in order to manipulate them and such), there’s a huge danger in viewing actions as separate from the person and their intentions.

Does that help or are you gonna be deliberately obtuse here too?

if they studied psychology twice that means they failed it at least once. I wonder why 🤔

anyway, i also study psychology, and uh. yeah. withholding affection is abuse. we went over this in developmental psychology in the context of parent-child bonding. this can, logically, also be applied to relationships, as similar mechanisms of bonding are used, albeit on a less instinctual basis.

if that’s not enough, have this:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/traversing-the-inner-terrain/201609/when-is-it-emotional-abuse

Point number 5 of emotional abuse is, guess what…

Going beyond that, we also covered operant conditioning/behaviorism (Skinner, 1938) several times, and the ethical ramifications of it. Conditioning an adult human like you would a rat or dog is just strange and bad, is what we decided in discussion. Withholding something IS A MECHANISM of operant conditioning.

It’s in German because I study in Germany, but hey, here’s a source from one of my professor’s lectures. C+ is a positive consequence, C- is a negative one. Positive reinforcement is giving positive stimulus, negative reinforcement is taking away a negative stimulus (think: torture, you get tortured and if you talk they stop), you can give a negative consequence, or withhold a positive one.

this is literally first semester stuff.