Shabbat Kodesh
2025
Posca Markers on Mixed Media Paper
9 x 6.75 inches
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Today's Document
sheepfilms
Not today Justin
KIROKAZE
EXPECTATIONS
RMH

PR's Tumblrdome
NASA

Kiana Khansmith

titsay

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
The Stonewall Inn
Noah Kahan

izzy's playlists!
No title available

Andulka
Xuebing Du

oozey mess

Love Begins
seen from South Africa

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Egypt
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@emmarandallartist
Shabbat Kodesh
2025
Posca Markers on Mixed Media Paper
9 x 6.75 inches
I really wish people would understand that there is a vast gulf of cultural difference between “nomadic ethnic groups” and “ethnic groups which are not and have never been nomadic, but which were repeatedly violently expelled”
The Saami people are nomadic. The Buryats are nomadic. Uyghurs are not. Jews are not. Many Native American groups, including the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Creek are not. This distinction may seem small and academic but it is absolutely vital to understanding modern day conflicts involving these groups.
Some cultures are itinerant, with physical movement from place to place as an inherent part of their identity. Some cultures were violently displaced, with a cultural identity that carries the scars of being forced to relocate, against their will. It is victim blaming of the highest order to treat the second type as though it is the first.
I think this is an important distinction especially in light of JVP's incredibly tone-deaf "mikvah in a tea cup, we've always been a people on the move" bullshit. But it's also worth keeping in mind that nomadic peoples have and need homelands too. Nomads need places to roam around in, they can't practice their cultures if all the land has been parceled out among sedentary peoples and this has, in fact, been one of the primary threats to the survival of nomadic cultures.
Yes, absolutely! To clarify because I should have probably stated this in the original post: this conflation absolutely causes damage in both directions. Well-meaning but ignorant non-nomadic people often see a nomadic lifestyle as a sign of desperation – the problem isn’t seen as “the lifestyle of itinerant peoples is being threatened by the sedentary colonization of their homeland”; the problem is seen as “these itinerant peoples are not getting their fair share of the sedentary colonial pie and it’s causing them to live poor, unsettled lives.” This view is wrongheaded and actively harmful! When itinerant communities are systemically disenfranchised, any solution which requires them to adopt a sedentary lifestyle in order to access resources isn’t a reparative measure to combat that disenfranchisement; it’s a continuation of a policy of cultural eradication. Conversely, any solution which requires non-itinerant communities to maintain forced-itinerant lifestyle in order to access resources is, likewise, a continuation of a policy of cultural eradication. These types of lifestyle are simply fundamentally different, and they should not be treated as though they are the same.
Summer Daylight
5in x 7in
2025
Gouache on Watercolor Paper
A professor gave us an extra credit option: take a picture of yourself outside, doing something that you would not usually do. We were told not to take it too seriously. Here is my entry:
I maintain that sticking my head in the mailbox is not something I do on a regular basis.
Love that some of you are reblogging this. You looked at a picture of a guy with his head in a mailbox and went "yeah"
Can't wait to see if everyone did something like this or if they had a normal reaction. I will keep you posted.
[ID: a photo of a pale person wearing a black t-shirt and jeans with his head in a mailbox /END ID]
Hello to everyone asking for an update!
The professor has said that he will put all submitted pictures into a powerpoint to be shown in class tomorrow (Tuesday, March 9th). I am very much looking forward to seeing the reaction from him and from the rest of the class. I promise to keep you informed.
Update: the professor saved my picture for last. I was told that I had "truly embodied the spirit of the assignment" and that I had gone "above and beyond."
Also, to everyone who is worrying about whether or not I got my head out, I was gifted with a very small head, and while I got out just fine I would NOT recommend this if you have a large head or even a normal sized head.
Hey you guys should make this into a meme.
Hows this?
Perfect
2017-2018 Subaru Forester
I love it here.
It wasn't there 😔
I'm not sure if "defect" is the right word. It is living it's life as a pillow. That's like, the dream.
Edit: After a little digging I believe that this species of starfish has a mutation that sometimes occurs, here's a different photo and "biscuit starfish" individual:
It's funny how averse nature is to squares though. These squares get by just fine but still aren't meant to exist.
this terrible distant blurry shot of two pigeons is one of my favourite photos out of any pic I’ve ever taken I think
you understand me
A general tip for students who are sending those dreaded Religious Absence Emails to your professors: Rather than asking permission to take the day(s) off, politely let them know that you will be taking the day(s) off.
In other words, consider not saying this:
"May I miss class on [date] so I can observe [holiday]?"
It's not that there's anything wrong with the above, per se. But because it's phrased as a request, it risks coming across as optional — a favor you hope to be granted. Problem is, favors are not owed, and so unfortunately asking permission opens the door for the professor to respond "Thanks for asking. No, you may not. :)"
Instead, try something along the lines of:
"I will need to miss class on [date] because I will be observing [holiday]. I wanted to let you know of this conflict now, and to ask your assistance in making arrangements for making up whatever material I may miss as a result of this absence."
This is pretty formal language (naturally, you can and should tweak it to sound more like your voice). But the important piece is that, while still being respectful, it shifts the focus of the discussion so that the question becomes not "Is it okay for me to observe my religion?", but rather, "How can we best accommodate my observance?"
Because the first question should not be up for debate: freedom of religion is a right, not a favor. And the second question is the subject you need to discuss.
(Ideally, do this after you've looked up your school's policy on religious absences, so you know what you're working within and that religious discrimination is illegal. Just in case your professor forgot.)
Also you do not have to be religious in order to take these days off. You do not have to spend all day at synagogue on Yom Kippur or fast in order to be "justified" in taking the day off. You can take the day off and observe any way you wish. Even if that means just being at home with your family. You do not have to go into detail when stating why you taking the day off. You just have to say that you're taking the day off to observe XYZ holiday.
"if you're not part of a congregation, you're not really jewish"
that's not for you to decide.
"if you don't celebrate at minimum [selection of holidays] you're not really jewish"
that's not for you to decide.
"if you haven't had a bat/bar mitzvah, you're not really jewish"
that's not for you to decide.
"if you study [thing], you're less jewish."
that's not for you to decide.
"if you don't keep kosher, or you eat non-kosher food, you're not really jewish."
that's not for you to decide.
"if you're atheist-"
that's not for you to decide.
opinions are like assholes; everyone has one. it costs $0 to keep your judgy crap under wraps.
Chuckling to myself remembering the time I completely broke a scammer's brain by telling them I use Linux.
Scammer: do you have an apple or a windows computer please?
Me: neither, I use Linux.
Scammer: no no no, I asked if you use a apple or a windows
Me: neither
Scammer: what is the sticker? Is it a four boxes or is it an apple with a bite?
Me: ... I don't use EITHER of them. There's a third operating system called Linux. It isn't a PC or a mac. Please tell me you understand
Scammer: do -- do you know what I mean about apple or windows sir?
Me: yes. I'm a software developer. I understand completely. I'm telling you that YOU don't understand. Its called Linux, spelled L-I-N-U-X, type it into google
Scammer:
Scammer: but is it an apple or a windows computer sir
#this is what talking to transphobes is like
@alabastermask ASDFSHBKGJLNDFASKBDHSJG
umm don’t look at my dirty digging hands just look at my beautiful bottle and my 1937 shilling and my sherds…
I've been reading an interesting book I found about German antisemitsm leading up to the holocaust and there are tropes I'm seeing repeated in the modern day. Someone remind me when I'm feeling better and not tired from whatever infection I have and I will properly go through it
This is a super important topic. Interested to hear what your book says. A common misconception about the Holocaust that I’ve seen is the idea that it came out of the blue and started because Hitler just woke up one day and was like “let’s kill all the Jews” and for some reason the German people just randomly went “ok sounds good.”
That’s not what happened. Antisemitism was already deeply embedded in German society - and indeed in European society as a whole. The Nazis were inspired by the writings of antisemites in many other countries - notably France and Russia - and disseminated these bigoted works along with their own domestically produced propaganda.
And it didn’t happen suddenly either. There was a period of a few decades during which the antisemitism in Germany - already latently present for centuries - became more pronounced and accepted in mainstream society. People began sharing many of the same bigoted propaganda and “jokes” about Jews that I see going around online today. And inciting violence against them just as I see today. And those words turned into actions - first isolated attacks that were celebrated by Jew haters - that slowly increased in frequency. I’m seeing that too in many countries. As this happened in Germany most people turned a blind eye and refused to admit there was a problem - or worse still supported the violence.
Antisemitic behavior was normalized in society. It became something that you could get away with without losing friends or social standing. And so it spread and grew more virulent. It became an acceptable political position. Politicians who openly espoused Jew hatred got into positions of power - first a few of them and then more and more. The Nazi Party was founded in 1920. Hitler became leader of Germany in 1933. By 1941 Jews were being gassed en masse in death camps as the world stood by.
Don’t imagine that the Nazis were alien monsters. They were regular people just like you and me. And remember the bulk of Germans didn’t actually work in concentration camps, but they knew what was going on and allowed it to happen and often actively supported it. (As did many people in other countries who were only too glad to hand over their Jews to the Nazis).
When we don’t speak out against Jew hatred, when we normalize it, when we allow it unchallenged into discourse online or in real life, when we share racist jokes or conspiracy theories or biased headlines, we are following the same evil path that the Nazis and many other Jew haters before them followed.
The Holocaust was a cancer that grew slowly over a period of decades (based on hatreds centuries old). What happened before does not have to happen again - and will not and cannot be allowed to happen again. But the parallels are real. Don’t think what’s happening now is less serious. This is how it started. Not with the madness of a dictator but with the hate filled murmurings of regular people who allowed their prejudices to go unexamined and unchecked and with the complicit silence of others.
The racist hatred of Jews was old. The Nazis just harnessed and updated it. For example, because persecuting Jews for failing to convert to Christianity was going out of fashion the Nazis focused more on portraying Jews as an inferior race rather than followers of an inferior religion. Other than a slight cosmetic change though a lot of the propaganda and “justifications” for violence remained the same - i.e. false propaganda blaming Jews for economic problems and depicting then as manipulators and predators who preyed on children and portraying them as the “oppressors” who the world had to be “liberated” from by any means etc.
Jews who are pointing this out today are not being paranoid - and if you think otherwise, you have in fact fallen for a classic piece of antisemitic propaganda spread by the Nazis, but not invented by then, portraying Jews as unreliable sources about their own oppression, when in reality, the Jewish community tends to have one of the best understandings of antisemitism since their lives have literally depended on it for millennia. Jews have faced extreme violence and oppression and even genocide many times in their long history (even as far back as the conquest and destruction of historic Israel and Judea by the Babylonians over 2,500 years ago) and those that didn’t recognize the signs often were murdered. So naturally Jews have learned to pay attention to and recognize these deadly trends.
Listen to them. And listen to the historians telling you the same thing. And examine your own behavior and biases. Speak out against hatred and racism and make sure you are not being part of the problem by spreading words or taking part in actions that inflame tensions and spread hatred and violence. Say no to hate. Be on the right side of history.
people writing historical romance seem to love having a guy with a bad leg who walks with a cane but I’d like to see this energy in contemporary romance as well. there are handsome guys among us today who use canes
Portrait of Aggie Cat
5in x 7in
2025
Gouache on Watercolor Paper
i love it when people say "those european white jews changed their names to sound more indigenous when they moved to israel 🤬🤬🤬"
like babe those are hebrew names. i'm glad we agree that hebrew, the language of the jewish people, is the indigenous to the levant.
Hilarious how they’re insinuating that they’re using those names to try to sound “Arab” when those aren’t even Arab names. Because apparently the self appointed Tik Tok Middle East experts don’t know the difference between Arabic and Hebrew, and also don’t seem to know that Arabic is not the only language in the Middle East.
a) there’s not mainstream criticism of the Talmud like there is with the Christian Bible or Quran because the Talmud isn’t mainstream like those books are.
Christians are 32% of the world population, Muslims are 26%, and Jews are only 0.2%—not all of whom are even religious, and even fewer who have actually read the Talmud in its entirety.
“how many white people follow that religion” my ass. ain’t even that many of us period.
b) bro the talmud is like 2.5 million words long and looks like this
who tf is going out of their way to put themselves through reading a super niche, dense, 2.5 million wordcount legal text that’s formatted like the ancient precursor to House of Leaves just to criticize a teeny tiny little religious minority??
anybody who hates Jews that much isn’t going to take that much time out of their schedule to read what actual Jews have to say about Judaism when they could just make up some salacious shit & repost Nazi memes instead
External criticism of the Talmud is actually very much a thing that did happen. A lot.
Here's a whole book about it:
and a Wikipedia article about one instance of it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputation_of_Paris
and as a result, "Twenty-four carriage loads of Jewish religious manuscripts were set on fire in the streets of Paris"
In 1242, these were painstakingly handwritten volumes that were lost.
It didn't start there, though. The content of some of the Talmud itself was created under Roman occupation, and as such the Sages self-revised.
Here's a more extensive powerpoint by David Levy about the history of censorship in/of Jewish texts: https://jewishlibraries.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/LevySlides2023.pdf
Here's more on censorship of Jewish books https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4170-censorship-of-hebrew-books
This is just a brief overview.
As such, fear/criticism of the Talmud is actually a common antisemitic canard. This is not an original thought or statement. It's one steeped in a bloody history.
"Your brow adorned with black gold"
Papercut artwork,
9 x 12 inches
2025
title and writing based on a song/poem by Avraham Halfi
עטור מצחך זהב שחור
אברהם חלפי
Arik Einstein, Yehudit Ravitz and Korin Al'al did an amazing cover for the poem, melody by Yoni Rechter - HERE.
"Your brow adorned with black gold"
Papercut artwork,
9 x 12 inches
2025
title and writing based on a song/poem by Avraham Halfi
עטור מצחך זהב שחור
אברהם חלפי