Toni Morrison and James Baldwin
St. Paul de Vence. Early 1980s
One Nice Bug Per Day
Show & Tell
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
d e v o n
Claire Keane
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
taylor price

Kaledo Art

Andulka
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
occasionally subtle
DEAR READER

#extradirty

pixel skylines

tannertan36
No title available

Product Placement

shark vs the universe
Jules of Nature
h
seen from Italy
seen from Poland
seen from Iraq
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Armenia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@everyoaktree
Toni Morrison and James Baldwin
St. Paul de Vence. Early 1980s
he is getting euthanized. TODAY! sorry to all those who might still find it within themselves to grieve him. he told to leave him out in the sun for a bit and then lend his ashes to his estranged husband but unfortunately there are no means of transportation available to me right now and i have no way to find him so i’m not going to fulfil his dying wish
alejandra bodden: interview with the vampire season 1 ep. 6: a violent cycle begins anew
archita mittra: the brutal allegory of interview with the vampire season one
bishop v. navarro: ‘interview with the vampire’ examines difficult themes with focus and understanding
nadira goffe: interview with the vampire is the best show almost nobody is watching
tavia nyong’o: out of the closet—and into the coffin
five pieces looking at (and praising!) interview's handling of domestic violence and abuse
"Poor orphan child," she said. "Wandering child, oh, such a long road you've traveled to come to us."
And what a wonder it was that all they had done to me should seem but a thing we shared, a common and inevitable catastrophe.
Anne Rice, The Vampire Armand
Okay I just said this on discord but I'm reminded of this passage in terms of everything the TVL show is doing wrong. The context for these lines is in the wake of Armand's extensive torture at the hands of Santino and Allessandra, when he has been so utterly broken down that he accepts them and sees them as fellow victims in suffering, rather than the ones responsible what he's endured (at least partially; they're obv not the only ones who have hurt him.) And the power of the passage lies in the fact that obviously this is not actually the case—Santino and Allessandra are the ones with the power, and they've tortured Armand and killed virtually everyone he knows—and so we see Armand's internal process of reconciling himself to the Children of Darkness (because he has no other choice) but the dissonance here underlines the extent of the pain he's endured.
And TVL the show seems to be attempting to do something similar in its positioning of Lestat as an equal victim, but the dissonance is not present in any real intentional way. Obviously we as viewers are aware of the abuse Lestat has perpetuated towards Louis and Claudia, but the show hardly ever mentions it, beyond Lestat being angry about IWTV the book. I think this is most egregious when the show evokes Claudia. A casual viewer watching only this season could easily conclude that Lestat had absolutely nothing to do with Claudia's murder—his involvement in the trial isn't discussed (or, for that matter, the fact that he's the reason why Louis and Claudia fled to Europe to begin with.) See the Louis/Lestat scene from Episode 5, where discussing Claudia is painful for both of them and their grief is paralleled (Lestat is also emotional seeing Regina.) And theoretically one could write a storyline about Louis grieving Claudia so deeply that he chooses to reconcile with Lestat despite everything Lestat did to them both, but this is not what the show is communicating, because the details of Lestat's relationships with Louis and Claudia hardly ever come up. And again, it's wholly possible to examine Lestat to mourn Claudia despite abusing her, but that's not what the show's doing. It's like the show is setting Louis and Lestat up as two people on equal footing who lost a loved one to a random unspecified blameless tragedy, which is obviously not what happened in the two previous seasons of the show.
Do you think Lestat's outburst against Claudia before the drop, is also informed by his relationship to Gabriella? Doing everything he can to make Gabriella love him- the incest ( even though he doesn't say it, there must be some revulsion subconsciously). The love perverted by Gabriella-> unconditional between Louis and Claudia. In his jealousy he says some crude and unthinkable things about Louclaudia. None of his parents were ever there for Lestat-Gabriella never was his immortal companion. Louis was ready to be so for Claudia.
About 90% of Lestat’s feelings about LouClaudia are related to Gabriella. The last 10% is more about Lestat projecting his grief over Nicki onto Claudia. But that’s a diff convo.
So yes, Lestat’s reaction to the love between LouClaudia is heavily based on the traumatic relationship with his own mother. But imo it’s about more than the unconditional love between them. It’s about their enmeshment and Louis’ dependency on Claudia. LouClaudia had the unhealthy dynamic Lestat wishes he had with Gabriella.
i forgot i was looking into this earlier.... patron saint of parenthood and bridegrooms...............
They hate when you serve biracial couple with no white person
Okay.
The only thing Louis ever had to apologize to Lestat for was not warning him about the book coming out. That's it. Louis was never wrong to tell his story. It's his life. And once again LOUIS NEVER WANTED THE BOOK OUT AT ALL IN THE FIRST PLACE. DANIEL WENT AGAINST HIS WISHES ALONG WITH THE TALAMASCA TO HAVE IT PUBLISHED.
Put your phone down and watch the episodes with subtitles on if you must. Louis is consistently attacked for this by fans because Lestat is angry about it and sorry but it's literally victim-blaming.
ALSO the interview was done before he even knew the full scope of the trial and that Lestat saved him. That's what's frustrating about the hatred and the response to Louis by fans.
A lot of you are missing key moments about why Louis is dealing with it the way he is. Lestat ignored him for like a year and a half after the book came out and left his ass on read. And then toured while dragging him for filth in his music all because Louis had the gall to express his life's story from his perspective in order to make sense of his past.
The writers having Louis portrayed as in the wrong as if he needs to apologize about this is a bizarre choice. I'm hoping somehow in the next two episodes the victim-blaming ends but I'm losing hope.
Lestat is allowed to be hurt by his portrayal in the book but again Louis is not wrong for giving an interview about his own life.
And making things up in the narrative that never occurred in IWTV. Lestat more or less says "I didn't threaten to rape her!" Well Louis never said nor implied Lestat threatened to rape Claudia? Does Rolin Jones remember what he wrote?
And will Rolin ever answer any hard questions about his writing or will he continually push out his BIPOC actors to answer for writing choices that aren't landing well?
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
The moment he spotted him, wiping down the antiquity that was the bakery’s counter, Armand knew he’d like Louis.
The feeling wasn't mutual.
sorry to the three Larry fans
thank god for bridelou.
i have bad things to say about this scene in particular. louis was shot point blank as a fledgling vampire and he was fine, plus lestat didn't come rushing to his aid, nor did he ask if louis was alright in the aftermath. why are we playing it like louis is the bad guy (or singular bad guy i suppose) in their relationship—and just in general—every single time?? louis is a selfish bastard and not lestat? the man with a track record of being incredibly selfish, especially in regards to his treatment of louis? why is he being made to feel like he's selfish for not checking in on lestat "i have the blood of akasha in me" de lioncourt? there is so much to say about this moment and none of it is good.
and of course, once again, louis is treated like shit and expected to swallow his trauma and apologize. during an extremely emotionally distressing moment for him, lestat turns the importance back upon himself. a moment that would arguably not have even happened had he, you know, had the opportunity to grieve properly in the aftermath of claudia's death, instead of living with the man responsible because someone who's supposed to love him wanted to make him miserable....where have i seen this before.....
the biggest weakness of tvl is how much shit happens offscreen and is explained thru narration or clever dialog. I cant see how a person who is not familiar with book!tvl will understand much of anything.
My answer to Lestats question in the car is “Where were you for months after the drop?”
introducing: the cunty glasses club 😎