Art by Luo Li Rong

ellievsbear
Xuebing Du

izzy's playlists!

⁂
Stranger Things
hello vonnie

Andulka
No title available

No title available

No title available

pixel skylines
dirt enthusiast
Cosmic Funnies
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available

titsay
Monterey Bay Aquarium
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Game of Thrones Daily
seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Israel

seen from Canada
seen from Romania

seen from Malaysia

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from India
seen from United Kingdom
@everythingissostupid
Art by Luo Li Rong
With severance season 2 around the corner it’s time for me to share the time I accidentally watched 4 minutes of an episode on mute and thought it was a brilliant way to show the sensory deprivation experienced by the innies
Parallels.
men who have a vagina and/or uterus do not systemically benefit from male privilege. its that simple
this isn't a statement that should need qualifiers to clarify intent because its true. yeah someone could use this true thing to be a dick, to bend it to mean a certain thing, especially when the person hasn't unlearned any of the oppositional sexism or transphobia theyve been taught.
but it doesn't inherently imply any of that. and it is a pretty basic feminist observation. this should be transfeminism 101. its insane that this is as controversial as it is. the fact that it isnt transfeminism 101 should tell you something about how much feminism has been held back by its own transphobia & anti-transmasculinity.
if you disagree with this statement i better not ever hear you talking about medical misogyny & the lack of research on "female bodies" or ESPECIALLY reproductive autonomy, abortion, forced pregnancy, etc. etc. because there is NO WAY! to discuss misogyny that targets the body without talking about trans men and nonbinary people and intersex people and, yes trans women, who can also overlap with all of the previous groups!
either you are a transphobe and don't care if we live or we die or you do and you should be making an effort to include us. and that means getting more comfortable with ambiguity and nuance around trans people and their relationships to patriarchy and gender oppression. and that includes trans men and masculinity/manhood in general!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! there is no way around this
transfeminism should be about complicating the feminist framework that was built by & for cis perisex women. it shouldn't be about flattening trans and intersex experiences to fit into that framework. like what are we doing here can we be so for real.
you're laughing. charles dickens had a son named plorn and you're laughing
HE HAD A SON NAMED
WHAT
NICK I LOOKED IT UP AND SAW NOTHING OF THE SORT IS THIS A PRANK
technically his name was edward but everyone called him plorn
Edward “Plorn” Dickens. my god.
I have something worse
imagine getting stuck with the nickname Plorn
imagine getting sent to live in the Australian outback when you were sixteen
WHY WERE THEY SO CRUEL TO MY BOY PLORN
I have an answer to that one too
The face of a man whose father nicknamed him Plorn.
Born without a groove 😔
With each addition to this, I find myself nodding and murmuring, "Mm hm. The Plorn Dickens."
Robby wouldn’t forget to make that damn CT scan btw
As a Greek, in response to the current controversy about Matt Damon being cast as Odysseus, I'd just like to share that one of the moments that changed my brain chemistry as a kid was reading a novelized version of the Odyssey and coming across the following description of Odysseus when Circe sees him for the first time and thinks he's hot: "his hair curled like a clematis and his eyes were very brown".
So may I present my own casting choice for Odysseus:
Excuse me???
you are right and you should say it.
Is this the face of a man who would put his own infant in front of a plow to avoid going to war?
Absolutely not
You know who would try that shit?
Is this the face of a man who would defy the very gods to get home to his wife?
You know who would defy the gods just to show he could get away with it?
The last thing Penelope's suitors ever see:
Always bear in mind that there is absolutely no legitimate evidence that Luigi was actually the one who killed the insurance company guy.
Of course he wasn't. He was at a party with me that day.
No but like literally, actually. All bits aside.
He didn't do it.
The cops very clearly planted evidence on him because they had to make an arrest because all eyes were on them and whoever actually did the deed was making them look stupid.
Why would the real killer hero have kept the weapon on his person and traveled two states over while carrying it and a manifesto in his bag, conveniently turning the crime into a federal matter? The same guy whose bag they found in a park, filled with monopoly money? Why did the police turn off their bodycams, take Luigi's stuff, drive a block away, turn their bodycams back on, go back into the restaurant, and then arrest him?
From the moment of his arrest, even left-of-center media has been presuming his guilt without examining anything (e.g. calling him "the killer" instead of "alleged" or "accused") and then when I say he didn't do it, the nearest person chimes in with some quip that tells me they think he did do it but should go free anyway. Don't get me wrong, I would have the same attitude if he had done it. But he didn't. It makes me feel like the only sane person in the world, even among my staunchly leftist friends.
9x12. White Charcoal.
My Art Instagram
Who's sorry now? Who's sorry now? Whose heart is achin' for breakin' each vow?
My gratitude in the form of an animation, in honor of the people on Twitter who managed to raise over $10,000 in a fundraiser for the medical needs of LGBTQ+ people
i love them
been turning the decision to have this season take place on the 4th of july of all days around in my head. the pitt is not a show that does anything incidentally; it is exacting in its precision. if they wanted summer-specific storylines they could have chosen any other day, but they picked the 4th in particular—and it becomes the lens through which everything else is filtered.
because what is it, exactly, that 4th of july represents as a holiday—what’s really being celebrated?
it’s a celebration of america at its most idealized: freedom, opportunity, the belief that this is a place where you can make something of yourself—where you are given the chance to build and to belong. and that belief matters; it’s one people have taken seriously enough to stake their lives—and their families’ futures—on.
america the brave. america the beautiful. america the free. america the great.
the pitt takes that promise—this myth of america—and holds it up to the light, and refuses to let you look away from all the truths it reveals.
can any one hear me