WHO IS THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD?
SIR PATRICK STEWART
No title available
wallacepolsom

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Mike Driver

⁂

#extradirty
One Nice Bug Per Day

Origami Around
h
Not today Justin
Stranger Things
ojovivo
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Cosmic Funnies
todays bird
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Discoholic 🪩
d e v o n

Janaina Medeiros
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

seen from United States
seen from South Africa

seen from Türkiye

seen from France
seen from Vietnam
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
@expostninja
WHO IS THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD?
SIR PATRICK STEWART
Anti-honesty hour. Ask me anything and I will respond with blatant lies.
This actually sounds hilarious
me when i get my student loan
this is the money cat. reblog in 30 seconds and you will find yourself with more wealth
#this is the only money cat i will reblog because it’s actually doing the manekineko pose151,646 notes (via lolwhutninja)
OMG YOU’RE RIGHT
and it has its right paw up! the correct paw for this. and from the markings on its ears, it looks like it might be a calico cat. which is the luckiest kind!
extremely lucky cat
I don’t even care if it actually works, I’m mostly reblogging because it’s freaking adorable.
cute cat and need money, good post, 10/10
in case anyones interested in the other versions
http://www.namaii.com/manekineko/maneki-neko-types.html
Y’know I reblogged this a bit ago and was saved from financial probation and getting kicked out of school because of it, just mere months from graduation. Got a call from the financial aid advisor telling me that they made a mistake with filing my account (or some other sort of clerical error) and said that, basically, they owe me money. Welp.
Last time I reblogged the money cat, I won two $100 gift cards at work.
Got tagged for a couple of those character writeups yesterday; they’re over on my FFXIV-themed RP blog, @spider-glass, for both Rhio and Micharan.
Decided to update my baby behemoth pattern and try something different.
I wanted to more closely represent what is in game. I found a fabric that I felt gave a great shiny look while still being pleasant to touch.
I hope to use it on future projects, it was a bit troublesome to work with. I ended up having to line the plush to prevent “bearding” (when the stuffing pokes trough the fabric). Worth the extra effort though!
@expostninja
Well, this has unintentionally become my aesthetic now.
I never see masses of whites trying to move into 3rd world nations and demand to be ‘natives’ or the government of that land hint at the same.
my 2016 goals plummeted all the way down to “survive” really quick
Erm.
I hate to be the one to say this, but…
Have I misunderstood something about long-term relationships when I think that couples aren’t necessarily always in love with each other? That it is essentially a deep friendship/companionship with someone you care very much about and can’t imagine not having in your life, and that the “in love” thing is something that comes and goes over time, like the ebb and flow of the tides?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I think it’s more and less complex than that at once.
My love for my wife does not ebb and flow. I love her. I promised to spend the rest of my life with her, and that remains constant. It always has. But that connection is first and foremost based upon having that same deep companionship, that sense that I would happily spend all of my time with her even if there wasn’t any romance there. At the end of the day, she’s my best friend, the person I want to be with for my life, and that’s how it is.
But the intensity does vary. It always does. It’s natural, and it happens to both of us. There are times when the companionship we want is much calmer and more adult, mostly just working together to keep a functional household and care for our cats and all of that; there are times when we just want to cuddle up and be quiet together; there are times when we want to giggle and watch shows together. It’s not just one mode of interaction. After more than a decade together and a whole lot of personal changes for both of us, the feeling is not the same as it was when she and I first got together, nor would I expect it to be.
There’s a real risk of mistaking the first flush of love for being the golden standard by which you judge a relationship. That first flash of connection, that passionate intensity, that sense of nervous energy - that’s how you start forming a connection. But it’s not enough to sustain a relationship over the long term, because so much of it is based upon an idea at that point and not a person. It’s also the sensation that most media loves to sensationalize, that feeling of falling in love rather than being in love.
Falling in love is special, but that has a half-life of about six months. A year if you push it. Being in love is something far more stable, and if you don’t know what you’re looking for it’s far too easy to think “oh, I don’t feel that same early spark, I’m not in love any longer.” You may not be, or you may just have graduated to the point where you no longer need to be impressing one another. You can exist together and be comfortable just sharing space.
Put in metaphorical terms - falling in love is lighting a fire and watching it blaze at full intensity. Being in love is a slow and gentle burn that sustains itself almost indefinitely (with any luck).
It’s one of those things that takes time to learn and really feel, partly because culture tells us that you’re supposed to be head-over-heels on a constant basis or it’s not real love, because films and songs and stories love to celebrate the “falling” part over the “sustaining” part. I don’t claim any special knowledge or exception, I’ve fallen in love, made dumb decisions, and struggled to reach an understanding of how it shakes out just like everyone else.
Still, you aren’t going to always be gaga over your partner. That’s healthy. That’s normal. And it’s a bit contrary to what we think of as normal even though it is.
Santa is on strike due to global warming. All presents this year will be delivered by Sasha the Christmas Tiger. Milk and cookies may not be sufficient.
The cruelest irony
I honestly wouldn’t be enjoying this so much if people weren’t so intensely up in arms about it on the site itself. I don’t think I’d even care. People are getting so mad, though, and maybe I’m a bit of a git for taking so much pleasure in that, but I’d like to think that Sans is laughing at them, with me.
this is the money goat it only appears every goat year reblog and our great goat overlord will bless you with fortune
Or it’s just a cute baby goat, which is also great!
When rockers Disturbed put out their latest album, Immortalized, in August, fans weren’t surprised at all when the news came that the band had notched up yet another accolade: Its fifth No. 1 debut in a row. The release, Disturbed’s first in five years, contained a notable cover of Simon & Garfunkel’
Just listen. <3
Wait, WHAT?!
YESSSS!!! (I love it when Disturbed does covers…)
I haven’t heard this group miss a mark on a cover yet, really.
Imagine undertale and neko atsume…nekotale
Man I hate it when people use the pronoun “you” as a singular pronoun in an informal setting. “You” is plural, unless thou dost speak to an unfamiliar person. The correct singular second person pronoun is “thou” in most cases. Grammar never changes. Pronouns must always stay one way until the end of time. Learn thy proper English. *sigh* Kids these days.
If thou this mistake shouldst make on thine own blog, then know, villain, that thou art a dirty descriptivist, and no friend of mine. Ne'er should language itself alter, it doth remain fixèd as such, untouch’d by change. Wouldst thou, vile descriptivist, that we forget the heritage of our great tongue? Nay, say I. Thou art but a dickhead who sayest so.
stynt ðy clappe! beoð ðo writerris be wetleas knafen. ðy langag o engelond diffoulened be, ille usenid bi sclaundrous novelri.