Let's talk about House of the Dragon
Disclaimer: I am not a professional, and these are just my opinions and criticisms. This is not in any way a form of bashing or hate, nor am I criticising any members of the cast.
Itās been a while, but life has been keeping me busy.
However, I have finally finished the second season of House of the Dragon.
As a dedicated fan of the books, I was really looking forward to this series and was ecstatic when I learned that Fire & Blood was getting an adaptation, especially since House Targaryen is one of my favourite houses.
However, after watching the first two seasons, I have to admit that my enthusiasm has dwindled severely. Here are my reasons why. Once again, this is all my opinion.
1. The physical changes made to several characters
While some character descriptions in the books can be ambiguous, the descriptions of Rhaenys Targaryen and House Velaryon were very clear.
House Velaryon, in particular, threw me off a bit because while I understand this is a fantasy series and, yes, there could absolutely be darker-skinned Valyrians out thereā¦
House Velaryon was not one of them.
(And note: I love the actors and their portrayalsāthey are amazing.)
Velaryons in the books were described with:
pale skin
silver hair
purple eyes
Basically, they had a very similar appearance to the Targaryens.
So yes, that caused some hesitation for me, especially since their Valyrian appearance played a major role in later rumours surrounding Rhaenyraās sons being bastards. When you have two Valyrian parents, people expect Valyrian features.
Then we move on to Rhaenys.
I love this actress so much, so this hurts to say, but book, Rhaenysās mother was not Valyrian, and that is very important because Rhaenys inherited black hair streaked with silver from her Baratheon mother.
I know some people want to say, āMaybe itās old age,ā but respectfully, in the show, her first appearance is during the tourney.
For context, even with the show ageing characters up, book Rhaenys during that period would only have been around 38 years old.
Iāll just let that sink in while I move on to another character, because a lot of people didnāt realise the show version looks almost opposite to her book description.
Helaena Targaryen.
I was so looking forward to my plump, sweet-faced Targaryen princess.
Iāll address Helaenaās changes later in this post.
2. Alicent's character adjustment
The first episode starts, and Iām excited. Iām looking forward to seeing how they bring these characters to life.
(Quick note: I never look at official castings beforehand. I prefer seeing actors in the actual show so I donāt form expectations.)
Then I saw Alicent Hightower, and I felt⦠confused.
As far as I knew, Alicent Hightower was around 18 when she married Viserys I Targaryen.
Rhaenyra was a childāabout 8 years old, if I remember correctly.
They were never best friends.
That was the moment I understood that with this show, I should not expect strict book accuracy.
Book Alicent Hightower was:
highly intelligent
socially polished
politically strategic
ambitious
proud
extremely aware of court dynamics
She understood power.
Very early on, she showed strong political instincts. She is not written as some helpless woman being swept along by events.
Instead, she feels like an active architect of Green power.
She understood:
succession matters
perception matters
alliances matter
bloodlines matter
She was a highly capable woman who had spent enough time at court to understand how to manipulate both the system and the people around her.
Book Alicent was fighting against a child, not a close friend.
And letās be honest here:
Book Alicent wanted Rhaenyra and her children removed as threats.
This woman was not some soft, meek, āmy father told me to do this, so I didā girl.
She was just as ambitious as Otto Hightower.
I was genuinely looking forward to that version of her because I enjoy characters who know how to play the game well.
Book Alicent to Rhaenyra:
āYou are the obstacle between my son and the crown.ā
Show Alicent to Rhaenyra:
āYou were once the person I loved most, and now we stand on opposite sides.ā
TWO VERY DIFFERENT CHARACTERS, GUYS.
That said, both actresses who played Alicent were fantastic, and I genuinely hope to see them in more shows and films.
3. Helaena Targaryen
This one hurts me the most.
I was really looking forward to Helaena because, in the books, she was one of the few characters on the Green side that I truly adored.
Book Helaena was described as:
beautiful
plump
sweet-faced
gentle
cheerful
warm
She was beloved by both the court and the smallfolk.
That part matters.
She wasnāt feared. She wasnāt strange. She wasnāt distant.
People genuinely loved her.
She loved simple joys:
her children
riding Dreamfyre
quiet domestic comforts
She felt⦠human.
Soft.
Kind.
She represented innocence in a family tearing itself apart. And thatās why her later tragedy hits so hard in the books. Because you look at her and think:
āWhy her?ā
Now compare that to show Helaena.
Show Helaena is:
withdrawn
distant
prophetic
dreamlike
socially detached
Her entire personality revolves around dragon dreams and prophecies. And while I understand what the show was trying to doāin tying both prophecies together for both showsāit just doesnāt feel like Helaena to me.
Show Helaena feels like a mystical seer.
Book Helaena feels like a sweet young queen destroyed by war.
Those are not the same characters.
Book Helaena makes me grieve innocence.
Show Helaena makes me grieve inevitability.
Again:
Two very different characters.
4. Daemon Targaryen
I am going to say something controversial here. Some may agree, some may not.
Stop looking at Daemon Targaryen entirely through modern lenses.
A lot of people watched House of the Dragon and judged every relationship by modern standards and modern morality.
This is a fantasy world loosely inspired by medieval political structures, particularly around the 12th century, where power, marriage, succession, and family dynamics functioned very differently from today.
Based on that, I have never personally viewed Daemon as a groomer in the way many people describe him.
Now, before anyone jumps me, let me clarify.
The Targaryens were incestuous. Their family dynamics were weird as hell. I am not denying that.
But I do not believe Daemon was sexually attracted to his eight-year-old niece.
I think people often look at every interaction between young Rhaenyra Targaryen and Daemon and immediately interpret it through a romantic or sexual lens, and I think that is overly simplistic.
I also think people forget how small House Targaryen had become by the time Rhaenyra was a child.
Before Rhaenyraās birth, House Targaryen was full of relatives.
By the time she is eight, if we are strictly counting Targaryens, there are only four left:
Viserys I Targaryen
Daemon
Rhaenyra
Rhaenys Targaryen
(And yes, Aemma Arryn had Targaryen blood, but she was an Arryn.)
So yes, I absolutely think Daemon spoiled his niece.
He gifted her things. He paid attention to her. He indulged her.
But I do not believe every gift or every act of affection came from sexual attraction.
At least not when she was a child.
Did that change later, when Rhaenyra became older and their dynamic evolved?
Yes, clearly.
But that is very different from saying every interaction from childhood was grooming.
I also think it is worth pointing out that the age gap between Daemon and Rhaenyra is actually smaller than the age gap between Corlys Velaryon and Rhaenys Targaryen.
People often ignore that.
And that should not be surprising, because in the historical period this world draws inspiration from, girls were often married under sixteen to men old enough to be their fathersāor even grandfathers.
Was that ideal? No.
Was it normal in that setting? Often, yes.
So while I completely understand why modern viewers are uncomfortable with Daemon and Rhaenyraās relationship, I think calling Daemon a groomer without acknowledging the context of the world, the culture of House Targaryen, and the realities of the time period oversimplifies a far more complicated dynamic.
You do not have to like Daemon.
You do not have to approve of his relationship with Rhaenyra.
But I do think the conversation around him is often stripped of historical and in-universe context.
Thatās all for today.
Iāll definitely be making more posts on this, but I wanted to start putting my thoughts down while they were still fresh, especially the points I knew Iād forget if I didnāt write them down now.


















