never thought love had a rainbow on it! @flowers4therapture - Tumblr Blog

hiii everyone… i think im gonna have to e-beg…. cuz my abusive parents are now threatening to kick me out and formally evict me after i had to go to the hospital. i’ve wanted to get out for so long but now i’m at risk of homelessness as i have no transportation, nowhere to go, and no money to my name as they don’t allow me to work despite me being 21. im really scared and feel so helpless and i just want to get out of this situation. if you donate or even just share i’ll be so grateful.

I’m trying to get out of my abusive household, and it’s even more dire now, as they… stratus C needs your support for Help Stratus Escape an

#stratusposting

balaclava-trismegistus

It's that time of year again. Happy Pride, Mr. Rollins.

ducks-unlimited

sudanese

bobdylanyaoi

“Subverting” Catholic art? Oh, okay. I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You log onto the internet and you post about how “Wound of Christ” from Psalter and Prayer Book of Bonne de Luxembourg, attributed to Jean le Noir, c.1349, for instance, looks like a vulva because you're trying to tell the world that you enjoy Catholic art and imagery in an alternative, queer, risqué way that challenges Christian beliefs. But what you don't know is that that stigma isn’t just a vulva. It's not just a mandorla. It's not just yonic. It's actually intentionally erotic. And you're also blithely unaware of the fact that around 1297, Saint Angela of Foligno experienced a vision of Christ himself, who called her to put her mouth to the wound in his side and lick the freshly flowing blood. And then I think it was Saint Catherine of Siena who drank blood and a clear liquid from the wound before receiving a ring made from Christ’s foreskin? And then graphically erotic encounters with the side wound of Christ quickly showed up in the writings of eight different mystics. And then the yonic interpretation of the stigmata filtered down through the illuminated manuscripts and then trickled on down into some pseudo-intellectual corner of the internet…where you, no doubt, fished it out of some Pinterest board. However, that interpretation represents hundreds of years and countless visions of religious ecstasy. And it's sort of comical how you think that you've come up with an idea that exempts you from Christian theology when, in fact…you're posting an image that was sexualized for you by the very Medieval saints you think you’re so different than…from “subverted” Catholic art.